The Crying Game, written and directed by Neil Jordan, was released in 1992 to critical acclaim and a fair share of controversy. The film, set against the backdrop of the Troubles in Northern Ireland, follows the story of Fergus, an IRA member who develops an unexpected bond with a British soldier named Jody. When Jody is killed, Fergus seeks out his girlfriend, Dil, leading to a complex and boundary-pushing relationship. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the member bonus 1993 Academy Awards Best Film Editing Nominees series with a conversation about The Crying Game.

In our discussion of The Crying Game, we delve into the film's exploration of identity on multiple levels – personal, sociopolitical, cultural, and economic. The film's structure, with its shifting narratives and surprising revelations, keeps the audience engaged and constantly questioning their assumptions. We examine how the film pushes boundaries through its depiction of interracial and transgender relationships, particularly in the context of the early 1990s.

While we acknowledge the film's groundbreaking nature, we also discuss some of its shortcomings. We debate whether the IRA subplot is given too much screen time and if it paints a one-dimensional picture of the organization. Despite these critiques, we recognize the film's power in challenging viewers' preconceptions and fostering empathy for its characters.

The Crying Game remains a thought-provoking and conversation-starting film nearly three decades after its release. Its themes of love, loyalty, and the complexities of human nature continue to resonate with audiences. While not without its flaws, the film's ability to challenge viewers' assumptions and evoke strong emotional responses is a testament to its enduring power. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!