In this episode, Shook attorney Edward Danielyan reports on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Stein et al. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan et al., a False Claims Act lawsuit involving allegations of Medicare fraud through upcoding tactics. The analysis sheds light on whistleblower incentives, procedural nuances, and the implications for future qui tam actions.

Case: Marcia Stein, et al v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., et al, No. 22-15862 (9th Cir. 2024)  

Click here to learn more about Shook attorney Edward Danielyan.

Click here to learn more about Shook's Orange County office.

Please follow us on social media at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/