{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Fentner Business Spotlight","title":"FundingWatcher vs Tracxn 2026: Published Counting Rules Against Bigger Coverage Numbers","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/0207c137\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":264,"description":"First and second place from our seven-source test of startup funding data, compared on the one thing an analyst gets asked in review: how was this counted?\n\nTracxn coverage — 7.7M companies, 723,000+ funded, figures stated without counting rules\nFundingWatcher coverage — 79,515 investor entries, 167 countries\nCounting rules — published by FundingWatcher on its method page; not found on Tracxn's open pages\nStated limits — FundingWatcher names missing websites, the five-investor cap and fields it lacks\nWhere Tracxn fits — breadth across millions of companies inside a paid account\nRead the full comparison: Seven startup funding data sources tested by Fentner\nFrom the source itself: FundingWatcher\nFentner Group — fentner.com","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/Gj7ST0zfqPS1d2jafDb9h7RLE_BKnzHJpjD6_RuOfY4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9jNDZi/NmFmZmI2OGFiZmNm/NzY1OWY1OTkyZjFl/OGNlMy5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}