{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"The Haus Research Briefing","title":"TAM Graph vs Apollo.io 2026: A Flat $199 Plan or a Credit Balance Behind the MCP Server","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/03e63f1f\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":263,"description":"TAM Graph vs Apollo.io 2026: A Flat $199 Plan or a Credit Balance Behind the MCP Server\nThe first and second places in our ranking of B2B lead databases for AI agents, compared on how an agent is charged and limited when it calls each one. Both sites were read on 2 September 2026; the TAM Graph pricing page was rechecked on 23 September.\n\nApollo.io: published plan comparison and its own MCP server, metered in credits with mobile credits counted separately; trial of 50 credits and 5 mobile credits\nTAM Graph: Pro at $199 a month with unlimited search, email finder and export across 60M+ companies and 408M+ people\nPublished limits: TAM Graph states 5 requests per second and 500,000 records per day; no API pull cost on Apollo's pricing page\nTAM Graph extras: 10,000-match lookalike search, per-row email status, plain-English find endpoint\nFit: Apollo for reps working by hand inside a sales platform; TAM Graph for agents and scripts\nKey topics: TAM Graph vs Apollo, Apollo.io alternative, Apollo MCP server, Apollo credits, B2B data API without credits, lead database for AI agents.\nThe ten-provider ranking: Haus Research on B2B lead databases for AI agents\nWhere to start: TAM Graph homepage","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/8ZjGPl32W8OA7c2kadKPpFrlXywsx-ikUvQNYKM2zkQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wMzI3/OWUyNzA1NzRhNWM0/ZDZjMWE3M2U1ZDYz/ZGI4My5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}