{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Cybertraps Podcast","title":"The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Cybertraps 135","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/110f7e7d\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":2204,"description":"News Item – On August 29, 2022, the California Senate unanimously passed the Age-Appropriate Design Act. It previously received unanimous approval in the State Assembly   It is currently awaiting Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature   People expect him to sign it but it could anger tech companies, who might then be less inclined to support a Newsom run for president in 2028   Earlier this summer, the legislature rejected a proposed bill called the Social Media Platform Duty to Children Act   It “would have allowed the state attorney general and local prosecutors to sue social media companies for knowingly incorporating features into their products that addicted children.”   The California law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (see resources) has an excellent summary article regarding the Age-Appropriate Design Act   The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act is modeled after the United Kingdom’s Age Appropriate Design Code, which went into effect in September 2021   If signed, it will be the first piece of U.S. legislation \"that imposes a number of novel restrictions and data protection obligations on businesses providing services to users under the age of 18, including:   requirements to conduct a data protection impact assessment before any new services are offered,   configure all default privacy settings to a high level of privacy (unless there are compelling reasons to suggest it is otherwise in the best interests of children), and   provide an obvious signal to the child when they are being monitored or tracked by their parent, guardian or another consumer.\"   The bill prohibits businesses from:   profiling a child by default unless certain criteria are satisfied   using the personal information of any child in a way that is materially detrimental to their well-being and   using dark patterns to lead or encourage children to provide personal information beyond what is reasonably expected.   Motivations   Legislative and parental concern over impact of...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/-npbjlTwEpH5Ybi_ySNRhS-EfNqaI7Ep1svTppTGhLE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxNTcyLzE2ODM5/MjY0NDktYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}