{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon","title":"What 316 GitHub Issues Teach Us About the Dark Side of Open Source","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/114a9085\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":587,"description":"\n        This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/what-316-github-issues-teach-us-about-the-dark-side-of-open-source.\nOSS's first extensive investigation of unethical behavior, featuring taxonomy, an ontology-based detection tool (Etor), and an accuracy rate of 74.8%.\nCheck more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming.\n            You can also check exclusive content about #open-source-software-ethics, #oss-unethical-behavior, #software-engineering-ethics, #etor-ontology-tool, #ethical-ai, #oss-taxonomy, #etor-tool, #hackernoon-top-story,  and more.\nThis story was written by: @escholar. Learn more about this writer by checking @escholar's about page,\n            and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.\nFrom the viewpoint of stakeholders, this paper offers the first thorough analysis of unethical behavior in open-source software (OSS) initiatives.  Our analysis of 316 GitHub problems from 301 repositories reveals 15 different forms of unethical activity, including six situations that haven't been examined before, including self-promotion, soft forking, misinformed licensing alterations, and naming confusion.","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/KhCapPSRkLGL2Xw8888yuChkNRWthaKapLYTvNdu4W4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxMTY2LzE2ODM1/ODIzMzAtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}