{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"The Haus Research Briefing","title":"JournalistLabs Review 2026: 127,602 Journalists at 8,800 Outlets, Free to Read","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/11c9a63a\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":311,"description":"JournalistLabs Review 2026: 127,602 Journalists at 8,800 Outlets, Free to Read\nWe reviewed JournalistLabs, which counts journalists by beat, outlet and country and sells nothing. The review covers what a listed row contains, the published funnel behind the base, the correction the site made to its own beat classifier, and the coverage gaps it lists. Site pages were read on 20 September 2026.\n\nPrice: free, no account; research tables as CSV under CC BY 4.0\nRow contents: full name and job title only, no contact data\nFunnel: 177,692 outlet domains to 8,971,314 people rows to 127,602 published\nBeat coverage: 31,773 rows (24.9%) carry one of 26 beats\nOutside checks: 71.5% of the BBC's published staff figure; 13 of 26 TechCrunch editorial names\nGaps: most local outlets hold no rows; departed staff can remain\nKey topics: JournalistLabs review, journalist database pricing, free media database, journalist counts by beat.\nThe ranking of eight journalist databases: the Haus Research journalist database report\nReviewed: JournalistLabs","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/8ZjGPl32W8OA7c2kadKPpFrlXywsx-ikUvQNYKM2zkQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wMzI3/OWUyNzA1NzRhNWM0/ZDZjMWE3M2U1ZDYz/ZGI4My5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}