{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Tech Stories Tech Brief By HackerNoon","title":"A New Platform Going Live Is Not the Same as Completing a Migration","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/24051923\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":459,"description":"\n        This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/a-new-platform-going-live-is-not-the-same-as-completing-a-migration.\nWhy migrations should be measured by systems retired, legacy traffic eliminated, and old infrastructure switched off.\nCheck more stories related to tech-stories at: https://hackernoon.com/c/tech-stories.\n            You can also check exclusive content about #legacy-system-migration, #enterprise-modernization, #system-decommissioning, #double-run-costs, #event-driven-architecture, #legacy-code-analysis, #infrastructure-modernization, #cutover-strategy,  and more.\nThis story was written by: @vrs0401. Learn more about this writer by checking @vrs0401's about page,\n            and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.\nThis article argues that migration programs are measured backwards. Moving workloads to a new platform does not create value if the legacy estate remains fully operational, leaving the organization to pay a double-run tax across infrastructure, staffing, licensing, audits, and synchronization.\n        \n        ","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/IuqXIpaNNuezY7jNfIDnL5gqB1iL_SEndwUUzLGdljY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxNDI5LzE2ODM1/ODM0NjQtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}