{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon","title":"I Tested REA, GitHub’s Viral Reverse Engineering Tool, on a Real Electron App","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/254af2d4\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":697,"description":"\n        This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/i-tested-rea-githubs-viral-reverse-engineering-tool-on-a-real-electron-app.\nI tested REA, GitHub's viral reverse engineering tool, on a 100 MB Electron app. Here's where its static analysis impressed and where it failed.\nCheck more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming.\n            You can also check exclusive content about #reverse-engineering, #mcp, #ai-agents, #electron, #developer-tools, #rea-agents, #rea-review, #github-trending-tools,  and more.\nThis story was written by: @ishankdev. Learn more about this writer by checking @ishankdev's about page,\n            and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.\nI tested REA, GitHub's viral reverse engineering tool, on a 100 MB Electron app. Here's where its static analysis impressed and where it failed.","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/KhCapPSRkLGL2Xw8888yuChkNRWthaKapLYTvNdu4W4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxMTY2LzE2ODM1/ODIzMzAtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}