{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"AI News Today | Julian Goldie Podcast","title":"China’s Qwen 3.8 VS Fable 5!","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/264ddeca\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":976,"description":"Qwen 3.8 vs GPT-5.6 Soul vs Fable 5 vs Kimi K3: 23 Game Builds Tested (GoldyBench Results)\nThe video compares Qwen 3.8, GPT-5.6 Soul, Fable 5, and Kimi K3 across 23 side-by-side builds on GoldyBench, focusing on game and interactive demo quality such as Outrun, Skyrim-like RPGs, a flight simulator, GTA-style gameplay, Doom-style shooters, physics tests, and landing-page design. The host notes Qwen 3.8 is a massive 2.4T-parameter model and, in these tests, often produces smooth, fun, highly detailed outputs, sometimes with weaker UI, lighting, or buggy controls, while Kimi K3 frequently excels in front-end feel and physics interactions. Fable 5 remains the host’s favorite overall, with Kimi K3 generally second, and GPT-5.6 Soul often competitive but inconsistent. The takeaway is results are a mixed bag, so viewers should test models themselves, with links to GoldyBench and the AI Profit Ballroom community and trainings.","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/Tp0JSUlyiAe2ran44b13cjk4ImQYS1QEMKCAa9Q7go0/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lNTYz/NGQxMTU2ZTM1MzU5/MDNiYjcwZjJmYTY5/ODJmOS5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}