{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"The Experimentation Edge","title":"Squarespace killed its blank template and built something better","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/3d779878\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":1359,"description":"SummaryWhat do you do when your big launch increases engagement and tanks conversion? On this episode of The Experimentation Edge, host Ashley Stirrup talks with Lina Blackman, Director of Product Analytics at Squarespace, about the blank template launch that flopped — and how its learnings became Blueprint, Squarespace's AI-guided website builder. Lina explains how her embedded analyst team runs 150–200 experiments a year for 3 million customers, the two questions she asks every time a test loses, why teams only need one or two big wins a quarter, how Squarespace calibrates statistical certainty to business stakes, and where AI belongs (and doesn't) in the A/B testing workflow. For product managers, data scientists, and experimentation leaders who want to extract more learning from every test.Chapters 00:00 Introduction: Lina Blackman, Director of Product Analytics at Squarespace 01:45 Squarespace's business and 3 million website customers 02:30 Decentralized analysts, centralized experimentation program 04:15 150–200 experiments a year: onboarding, mobile, checkout, pricing 04:55 The blank template disaster that became Blueprint AI 07:45 Two questions for every losing test 09:30 Moving ship-first teams up the experimentation maturity curve 12:30 A/B test logs and insights rituals 13:30 North Star metrics and the KPI tree 16:35 AI in the A/B testing workflow — and what stays manual.TakeawaysStated preference lies: users asked for a blank canvas, but behavior demanded guided design — and only the experiment could referee.Close every losing test with two questions: did it work for a granular segment, and is the idea worth further investment?One or two big wins a quarter is a healthy hit rate when you run 150–200 experiments a year.Calibrate certainty to stakes — tight bounds on revenue and pricing tests, wider bounds on engagement tests so teams don't spin on noise.Hand AI the mundane parts of the workflow (tracking, assignment setup), but if AI runs the brief and...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/D9kLs0HSsqR4ttk_5ESEdC1jX-wmD76GK-OHmb3a9B8/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80YTFk/MGU1MjJlODhlNjJh/MTdlZTZkN2Q1ODY5/OTdjYy5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}