{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Traffic School","title":"August 28th, 2026 - Grave Robbing, Guillotines And Inflatable Anime Women","html":"","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":2394,"description":"This episode of Traffic School begins with what sounds less like a legitimate radio program and more like two men standing outside a post office trying to resurrect the concept of 19th-century bounty hunting. Wanted posters come up almost immediately, along with the horrifying realization that Speaker 1 apparently considers himself an “outstanding young man,” despite the conversation rapidly turning toward suspicious behavior, mysterious electricity usage, heat sensors, and a house glowing so brightly that the government apparently needs to be informed. The conversation then takes a hard left into neighborhood fire trucks, elderly neighbors, Arizona vacations, and an absolutely bizarre story that is teased but never fully revealed because apparently even Traffic School has standards somewhere deep beneath the basement floor. Then, suddenly, it is time for actual law questions.\nThe first major legal crisis involves a supposed dine-and-dash, except the alleged criminal mastermind insists he actually paid. During a birthday dinner for Peaches, the restaurant payment system apparently displayed multiple tickets, the correct bill was selected, the payment was processed, the waitress confirmed everything was fine, and everyone left. Later, however, the crew discovered that another group had apparently departed without paying, while a friend had paid the original bill. The payment itself initially showed as pending, creating a spectacular bureaucratic nightmare in which one person had apparently paid, another person had apparently paid, and everyone was now wondering who had technically stolen dinner from whom. The discussion spirals into whether dine-and-dash can become theft, whether intentionally entering a business with the plan to steal food could constitute burglary, and whether eating more than $1,000 worth of food would transform the situation into grand theft. The answer, delivered with the confidence of a man who has already been accused of crimes he didn't...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/qIAJ-BjOF3B3aRT7fyXuTuFEPN_4vxl4nFzS_NqVGPc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8xZjkx/OTEzMjMyYzA0YjE5/ZDRmOTkxZDk2NjE1/MTc2OS5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}