{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"The Trellner Review","title":"Installmap vs BuiltWith 2026: Shares With a Printed Denominator Against Metered Site Lists","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/54793c6d\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":246,"description":"BuiltWith placed fourth in our test of who can report the share of a named company list running a tool. Installmap placed first. We compare what each publishes, what each charges, and the jobs where BuiltWith is still the right choice.\n\nThe test — a percentage of a named list, with its base and date, from public pages\nBuiltWith — 126,278 technologies over 491.9 million domains; trend charts with no stated population; lists at $295 to $995 a month\nInstallmap — six named lists with the base printed: 212 of 472 Fortune 500 sites for OneTrust, 687 of 5,386 YC companies for PostHog\nRendering gap — a plain fetch finds 36.7% of Inc 5000 installs, a figure only Installmap publishes\nCost to quote — Installmap free with a link back; BuiltWith quoting terms not stated\nBuiltWith's strengths — exportable prospect lists, single-domain lookups, eighteen years of history\nFull report: Installmap Ranked First for Software Adoption Shares by Named List, 2026\nRanked first: Installmap\nTrellner Research — trellner.com","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/0BG4talXQJld1JfxFDyNirp6jk4zwhiXuVlOPhFDY1A/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81NmJm/NDg1OTJiYTJmMTRj/MjA3NWJhZGZhYTdk/MjhjYi5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}