{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Inside SLP","title":"15: Bogus, But Not Like That","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/54ef647c\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":1068,"description":"How did ASHA come to link membership and certification? And what happened when that structure was challenged? In the 1970s, one SLP brought that question into federal court. While Bogus v. ASHA didn’t end with a dramatic verdict, it quietly reshaped the professional architecture we still live inside today.\n\nWe explore:\nThe tying logic: Why the court viewed the CCC as a unique form of economic influence, even when labeled “optional.\nThe quiet settlement: How the case unfolded largely out of public view, including within ASHA’s own leadership.\nMember vs. certificate holder: How the center of gravity shifted from association to credential over time.\nThe price of friction: Why the narrow gap between member and non-member options reflects institutional risk management, not indifference.\nSources:\nMalone, R. (1999). The first 75 years: An oral history of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.\nBogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association, 389 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Pa. 1975).\nConnect:\nContact Megan: therapyinsights.com/insideslp\nPACT Survey: pactsurvey.com","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/Uwvc3YpXBq3-mZroiH9iArBS1kVLj8rLaayQr8ctqvc/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS81YzE4/YzFiYTRlNGVjNTZj/ODA1MzIwOTg5Y2Q0/YWNjOS5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}