{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Angry Alan Podcast","title":"Episode 27 FOLLOW UP EPISODE Guest Reasa Selph Southlake Hospital Nightmare Continues","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/577be38f\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":1412,"description":"FOLLOW UP EPISODE: The Angry Alan Show, revisits one of the most disturbing medical negligence stories he has ever covered—this time with new evidence. Guest Reasa Selph returns to share her hospital billing records with a medical expert, who flags serious red flags and potential fraud tied to her son’s care.At the center is Reasa’s 11-year-old son, Nicholas, whose near-death experience exposes what happens when America’s medical-industrial complex fails—and then profits anyway.Reasa walks through the timeline again, now with documentation in hand. In December 2023, Nicholas came down with the flu and was taken to Methodist Southlake. He was given fluids and sent home. After a brief improvement, he rapidly deteriorated—confused, lethargic, unable to walk or even provide a urine sample. The family returned to the same ER. Despite abnormal labs and a concerning EKG, they were told it was just a virus and sent home again. No antibiotics. No sepsis protocol. No urgency.By Christmas morning, Nicholas was jaundiced, gray, and barely responsive. Their pediatrician immediately sent them to Cook Children’s, where doctors recognized the crisis within minutes. The diagnosis Methodist missed: septic shock. Nicholas was intubated, vomited a pint of blood, underwent multiple surgeries, and told his mother he had seen Jesus and was ready to die.As Nicholas fought for his life—and continues to live with long-term complications—Reasa began fighting the system. She obtained records showing Methodist’s own labs indicated Nicholas was not stable during that second visit. Federal regulators later cited the hospital for failures in care. Yet the doctor remains in practice. The hospital continues billing. And now, as Reasa walks through the itemized charges with an expert, troubling discrepancies raise the question: were they billed for care that was never properly delivered?Alan and Reasa pull back the curtain on a system where malpractice is treated as a cost of doing business,...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/YnMLD5dY8NNQT4qUutdN4XfUqcAb8-GeeSWlkBXfPRQ/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9mZWZj/Mjg5ODc3OTFkMmY0/YjEyMzZmYzhlYzlj/ZDUwNC5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}