{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Born To Watch - A Movie Podcast","title":"Wild Things (1998)","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/603bbd5c\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":6798,"description":"Wild Things 1998 Review takes Born to Watch into the steamy, suspicious world of Blue Bay, Florida. Whitey, Gow and Damo revisit the film that sold a generation on its trailer, its cast and a certain swimming pool scene. Nearly three decades later, does the thriller itself hold up once everyone has stopped pausing the VHS?\nMatt Dillon plays Sam Lombardo, a high school guidance counsellor accused of assault by wealthy student Kelly Van Ryan, played by Denise Richards. Neve Campbell’s Suzie Toller adds another allegation, Kevin Bacon’s detective Ray Duquette investigates, and Bill Murray arrives as the lawyer who seems to be having considerably more fun than anyone else. That is the setup. What follows is a pile-up of schemes, betrayals and reveals that sends the boys back through the plot to work out who knew what, and when.\nFor Whitey and Damo, this is a trip back to seeing Wild Things at the cinema in 1998. The trailer did its job, but their memories of the film are rather more selective. Gow has watched it more often and remembers enjoying the twists. On this rewatch, the three compare the movie they thought they knew with the one actually playing in front of them. Just how much of its provocative reputation comes from a handful of scenes?\nThe discussion turns to the performances. Is Dillon playing Sam as brooding and mysterious, or is something missing? Does Campbell's character give away more than the film intends? And why does Murray, with relatively little screen time, feel like the only cast member who understands the sort of movie he is in? Richards, Bacon and Theresa Russell all get their moment under the Born to Watch microscope too.\nThen there are the clues, the convenient decisions and the increasingly crowded list of double-crosses. The boys pick apart the film's red herrings and ask whether another twist makes a thriller clever or simply harder to care about. A book Suzie is reading, a line from Duquette and a set of muddy footprints all get a...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/UW701-GqukZr-1D14eBt8sR44lYKfmwl9ME2kRN8CZI/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzI5NzkzLzE2NTQ0/ODExODMtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}