{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Stewart Squared","title":"Episode #93: Too Big to Question: SpaceX, Wall Street, and the End of Accountability","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/63080fc7\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":3188,"description":"In this episode of the Stewart Squared podcast, host Stewart Alsop and guest Stewart Alsop II tackle the explosive SpaceX IPO, conflict of interest in politics and finance, and whether we're heading toward economic collapse or the singularity. The conversation kicks off with them acknowledging they had to restart recording after getting into a heated argument about whether Trump's stock trading and Nancy Pelosi's husband's trades fall into the same category of insider dealing—though neither technically qualifies as illegal insider trading. From there, they dig into the mechanics of the SpaceX IPO, questioning how Elon Musk convinced major banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to support a staggering $1.75 trillion valuation despite the company reporting nearly $5 billion in losses against $18.7 billion in revenue. Stewart II, who actually read the 300-page S-1 prospectus (unlike most people), explains how this IPO could fail and compares it to the infamous WeWork collapse. They explore the manual process still involved in IPOs, the role of stock exchanges from the Dow to NASDAQ to the new Texas Stock Exchange, and how Trump has concentrated executive power in ways that echo—and pervert—Teddy Roosevelt's use of executive orders. The discussion touches on reserve currencies, Argentina's economic history, cryptocurrency's death as a decentralized ideal, and whether the singularity is real or just conspiracy fantasy embraced by wealthy tech elites.\nTimestamps\n00:00 Stewart Squared podcast begins with revealing an argument about Trump and Nancy Pelosi both doing insider trading though it's not technically illegal insider trading\n05:00 Discussion shifts to insider trading history from the Great Depression era and how current rules no longer work effectively with both politicians stretching ethical boundaries thin\n10:00 SpaceX IPO prospectus analysis begins with focus on Elon Musk's control and conflicts of interest as banks go along with questionable trillion...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/QlC48R1fevmul8S_Y7L1P2WUMnEKqwNUR7TBsNqFHaE/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS84NDMx/NWQ0MWQ1Y2NkNjhk/ZDI1NWE0MTUyN2Q5/Zjg0NS53ZWJw.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}