{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast","title":"Was there no case to answer? Strachan v Albany Resort (Bahamas) in the Privy Council. ","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/67d4dfdb\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":3079,"description":"A podcast exploring the Privy Council’s decision touching on no case to answer submissions in civil claims, in Tyson Strachan (Appellant) v Albany Resort Operators Ltd (Respondent) (The Bahamas) [2026] UKPC 5, as well as effective teamwork in Privy Council appeals.\nThe judgment is interesting as it is an unusual analysis at Privy Council level of:\nthe necessary ingredients legally and evidentially for a viable tort claim for damages (here by an employee for personal injury);\nthe pleading and particularisation requirements for a viable employment claim; as well as\nthe appropriate procedure and threshold associated with a submission of no case to answer in a civil claim.\nSpeakers: the advocates who acted for the successful Respondent in the Privy Council- Charles Bagot KC and Sara Ibrahim of Gatehouse Chambers, London and their Instructing Attorney, Giahna-Soles Hunt from Glinton Sweeting O’Brien in the Bahamas.\n ","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/YBz-lpTlXC6gLmQNLivnFuahJwOW_hI3TkNvVVK2gmw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzM2NTAvMTYyNjQy/NjYwMi1hcnR3b3Jr/LmpwZw.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}