{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Letters of Intent","title":"50-50 Partnerships Part 2","html":"","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":787,"description":"In this episode breakdown, Pankaj Raval and Sahil Chaudry return to the 50/50 partner dispute from Part 1 and follow it into its most dangerous week. Working through the Texas Business Organizations Code and the California Corporations Code, they unpack what a bank lockout actually means, what records a locked-out owner can demand, and what really happens when a co-owner asks a court to end the company.\nThrough this practical analysis, Pankaj and Sahil extract critical lessons on control, records access, and exit strategy, that apply directly to founders and leaders of growing private enterprises sharing ownership with a partner.\nThis podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.\n\nTakeaways\nThe Gap Between Ownership and Signature Authority: A bank signature card is a contract between the company and the bank about who can move money, not a record of who owns the business. Ownership lives in the governing documents and the books. When the two drift apart, the person on the card controls payroll while the ownership question waits for a court. \nThe Leverage of Single Points of Control: Bank logins, domain registrars, payroll platforms, accounting admin rights, and a sole signature on the lease all become leverage in a dispute. None of it usually starts as wrongdoing; it is how two people naturally divide the work. Pankaj and Sahil's point is that the answer belongs in writing on a good day. \nThe Contrast in Member Records Access: Texas gives LLC members a right to inspect records on written demand with a proper purpose, but a 2023 amendment lets the company agreement narrow it and carves out emails and texts. California grants access regardless of ownership percentage, allows fee shifting for unjustified refusals, and generally keeps the operating agreement from removing the right. \nThe Price of Court-Ordered Dissolution: Winning a court-ordered wind-up ends the business, liquidates the assets, and splits what is left. California's...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/nODHY0YK7swr_eu_9CBnHlaREdt4O-QJxCNv3UFQkmY/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8yMWY4/ZjJkZjk4OTE4ZTg4/N2E2ODhhNjNjZTUz/YjM1Yy5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}