{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon","title":"Choosing the Right RPC Framework for .NET","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/739f366b\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":1936,"description":"\n        This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/choosing-the-right-rpc-framework-for-net.\nWitRPC vs SignalR vs gRPC vs CoreWCF: measured benchmarks, transports, serialization and Blazor support, with an open-source benchmark suite.\nCheck more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming.\n            You can also check exclusive content about #dotnet, #rpc, #grpc, #signalr, #benchmarking, #csharp, #distributed-systems, #inter-process-communication,  and more.\nThis story was written by: @dmitrat. Learn more about this writer by checking @dmitrat's about page,\n            and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.\nI benchmarked four RPC options for .NET on the same hardware and the same intercontinental network path, then compared them on developer experience, transports, serialization, discovery, and Blazor/AOT support. WitRPC led both benchmark sets; gRPC was four times slower on large unary payloads; SignalR stayed strong for browser fan-out; CoreWCF is a migration path rather than a new-project choice. The benchmark suite is open source, so every number can be reproduced or refuted.","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/KhCapPSRkLGL2Xw8888yuChkNRWthaKapLYTvNdu4W4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxMTY2LzE2ODM1/ODIzMzAtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}