{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Hypertrophy Past and Present","title":"061 Does training hard help or hinder hypertrophy?","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/75e674b6\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":5393,"description":"In this episode of Hypertrophy Past & Present, Jake and Chris begin with a 1972 routine from Bradley J. Steiner and discuss what makes it one of the more sensible \"golden era\" bodybuilding programs they've reviewed so far and whether splitting exercises across consecutive days is likely to be more or less effective than performing all exercises in a single workout. \nThe conversation then shifts towards the concept of \"training hard.\" Jake and Chris unpack what hard training actually means, why RPE is often a poor proxy for hypertrophy, and how chasing \"hard training\" can unintentionally encourage fatigue instead of productive training.\nKey topics include: Bradley J. Steiner's minimalist 1972 bodybuilding routine  Whether splitting workouts across consecutive days improves stimulus to fatigue ratio Why RPE and reps in reserve are not interchangeable  How cardiovascular fatigue, burning sensations, and instability can increase effort while reducing stimulus  The concept of \"quality over quantity\" as a better way to think about muscle growth  Why telling people to \"train harder\" may actually make their programs less effective","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/CJhjWFKhcK0h4C11sAyS9S4btLA7VgbHkoTw7LPZHTk/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS8wNDVi/MjE1YzM4ZmVlYzZj/OWEwMTA1Y2QwOGY2/ZDU0ZS5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}