{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Lawfully Good","title":"AI and Attorney-Client Privilege: What you share with AI is probably NOT protected","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/7aebe56b\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":598,"description":"Are your prompts protected? Tons of people are using AI for legal advice. Plenty of attorneys are using it too — to draft documents, summaries, and more. \n\nAt some point, courts were going to have to deal with the role of AI in legal matters. A recent federal case, United States v. Heppner, offers an early glimpse into how courts may view AI communications and what that could mean for attorneys, businesses, and anyone relying on AI for legal guidance. \n\nTL;DR -- don't just start chatting with AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude about your case before you talk to your attorney because that \"conversation\" may not be private. Let me tell you why.\n\nThis episode was recorded on July 21, 2026.\n\n+++++++++\nTHIS CONTENT IS MEANT TO ASSIST IN A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE CURRENT LAW AND PRACTICE RELATING TO THE TOPICS DISCUSSED. IT IS NOT TO BE REGARDED AS LEGAL ADVICE. COMPANIES OR INDIVIDUALS WITH PARTICULAR QUESTIONS SHOULD SEEK THE ADVICE OF COUNSEL.","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/CVV9QhoLE3Hr3isndq-WoGxrORm9uvu4YWSn5tUmFwU/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS85ODA0/ZTBhZjY3Nzg2ZDZj/NDBmOGZjZmFkZTlj/NjBiYS5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}