{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Zero Click Marketing","title":"[Replay] The LinkedIn Algorithm Is Basically a Party","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/a0465f49\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":674,"description":"LinkedIn’s feed has changed since I first published this episode — but the core idea holds up: the platform is trying to understand what you talk about, who should care, and what deserves distribution. In this refreshed Field Note, I revisit LinkedIn’s retrieval-and-ranking system, clarify what topical consistency actually means, touch on the new “Seems like AI slop” reporting feature, and explain why the best LinkedIn strategy still looks a lot like behaving normally at a party.\nTimestamps\n00:00 — What’s changed since the original episode01:05 — Retrieval vs. ranking: the “two algorithms” caveat01:28 — Why topical consistency still matters02:20 — LinkedIn’s new “Seems like AI slop” reporting feature03:20 — Stop chasing algorithm hacks; become understandable05:02 — How LinkedIn’s retrieval and ranking stages work06:20 — Why LinkedIn is like a party10:03 — The real LinkedIn strategy: predictable relevance\nLearn more: zeroclickmarketing.co\nConnect with Amanda Natividad (@amandanat): LinkedIn | Substack | Instagram | Threads\nThis episode was produced in partnership with Share Your Genius\nwww.shareyourgenius.com ","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/IthCXTjgV3K8leLwx_hDMGaZ1JtN3o6wJwDqsYx223g/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9lMDlm/NDRhOGIzZTBjNDc2/ZGU1NWE3MTIzYjg2/ZDNmMy5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}