{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"Programming Tech Brief By HackerNoon","title":"Why We Stopped Using Single-Activity Architecture Everywhere","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/ac222dc7\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":740,"description":"\n        This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/why-we-stopped-using-single-activity-architecture-everywhere.\n             Why a large production Android app moved away from single-activity architecture—and how a hybrid approach improved stability, memory, and velocity. \n            Check more stories related to programming at: https://hackernoon.com/c/programming.\n            You can also check exclusive content about #android-architecture, #single-activity-architecture, #android-app-scalability, #android-navigation-component, #jetpack-compose, #modular-android-apps, #android-deep-linking, #enterprise-android-development,  and more.\n            \n            \n            This story was written by: @lovegarg. Learn more about this writer by checking @lovegarg's about page,\n            and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.\n            \n                \n                \n                Single-activity architecture simplified our Android app early on, but at scale it caused deep-linking, memory, and modularity issues; a hybrid, multi-activity approach proved more resilient.\n        \n        ","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/KhCapPSRkLGL2Xw8888yuChkNRWthaKapLYTvNdu4W4/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9zaG93/LzQxMTY2LzE2ODM1/ODIzMzAtYXJ0d29y/ay5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}