{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"In That Case","title":"Algorithmic Serendipity","html":"<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"180\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" seamless src=\"https://share.transistor.fm/e/dd9c8358\"></iframe>","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":672,"description":"Shook Orange County lawyers take a brief look into recent AI developments including the differences between traditional and generative AI. Shook Associate, Polly Tran, highlights a case where an appellant's use of fictitious AI-generated legal citations led to dismissal and sanctions by the Missouri Court of Appeals. The attorneys discuss the importance of adhering to court rules and the duty of candor, even when people represent themselves.\n\nCase: Kruse v. Karlen, No. ED111172, Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District (Mo. App. E.D. Feb. 13, 2024).\n\nClick here to learn more about Shook attorney Polly Tran\nClick here to learn more about Shook's Orange County office.\n\nPlease follow us on social media at:\nLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/\nYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ\nInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/\n\nwww.shb.com","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/b1Tubs_gdI44KAq4FhDtuDgE6pOhywXhjlfVdK58pOw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS82OWM5/ZGU5MTk4NWRkNzc1/MDk0YjJhMDc5MjBj/YjhlMy5wbmc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}