{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Transistor","provider_url":"https://transistor.fm","author_name":"High Octane Leadership","title":"Will Gen-AI Destroy Thought Leadership?","html":"","width":"100%","height":180,"duration":2231,"description":"Eight out of ten buyers say thought leadership shapes the decisions they make. Only six out of ten companies think thought leadership is critical to winning that business. That twenty-point gap is the starting point for Bob Buday’s conversation with Donald Thompson on this episode of High Octane Leadership — and it’s also the reason Bob thinks the rise of generative AI is such high stakes for the profession he helped invent.\nBob isn’t a recent arrival to this conversation. In 1987, he was on the marketing team at CSC Index that turned business reengineering into a five billion dollar consulting category, before “thought leadership” was even a phrase people used. He co-founded The Bloom Group, one of the first thought leadership agencies, in 1998, and launched Buday Thought Leadership Partners in 2020. His book, Competing on Thought Leadership, has won 13 publishing awards.\nBob’s read on that twenty-point gap: most firms treat thought leadership as a marketing checkbox, when the real value sits upstream, in the primary research that produces a genuinely new idea, and downstream, in whether the firm can actually deliver the expertise it’s promoting at scale. He uses the rise and fall of CSC Index’s grip on business reengineering to make the point — the idea traveled faster than the firm that invented it could capitalize on it.\nThat’s where generative AI enters the picture, and where the episode title comes from. If a firm can now generate a passable white paper with a few prompts, does it still need five editors and two researchers? Bob’s answer cuts against the doom narrative: generative AI raises the floor on writing quality, which means the old advantage of just sounding smart disappears — and the bar moves entirely to original insight. He walks through his own experiment asking ChatGPT to compare The New York Times’ and the LA Times’ digital strategies, and what it revealed about scaling primary research with AI instead of replacing it.\nBy the end, Bob makes...","thumbnail_url":"https://img.transistorcdn.com/lgmj79F6u_aksHXmYERU-fwjthI5JqnlRVWJ-A5NESw/rs:fill:0:0:1/w:400/h:400/q:60/mb:500000/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS80MGQ0/YjZiYWJmNDlkMWNh/N2Q1YjEzNTgwMzA3/ZDEzYS5qcGc.webp","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300}