WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript 

00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:06.300
Lawrence: Welcome to The FED Weekly
for 22-28 June 2025, your essential

00:00:06.300 --> 00:00:09.820
weekly briefing on the policies
and proposals shaping your career,

00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:12.220
your benefits, and your retirement.

00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:16.720
Whether youâre a current federal employee
navigating changes in the civil service,

00:00:16.960 --> 00:00:22.190
or a retiree keeping a close watch on your
hard-earned pension and healthcare, this

00:00:22.190 --> 00:00:27.260
is your source for the latest news from
Capitol Hill and the executive branch.

00:00:27.828 --> 00:00:32.198
Each week, we cut through the noise to
bring you the critical updates on budget

00:00:32.198 --> 00:00:37.758
negotiations, pay raises, workforce
policies, and the legislative battles that

00:00:37.758 --> 00:00:40.268
directly impact the federal community.

00:00:40.858 --> 00:00:43.788
Let's get you up to speed on
what happened this past week.

00:00:44.360 --> 00:00:47.590
Issues That Affect Current
and Retired Federal Workers

00:00:48.226 --> 00:00:52.205
During the week of June 22â28,
the major stories spanning both

00:00:52.286 --> 00:00:56.536
active and retired federal workers
centered on proposed legislative

00:00:56.536 --> 00:00:58.656
changes to benefits and retirement.

00:00:59.466 --> 00:01:03.666
In Congressâs budget reconciliation
debate, dramatic cuts that had been

00:01:03.666 --> 00:01:07.596
proposed for federal retirement
benefits were largely removed.

00:01:08.116 --> 00:01:12.596
For example, a late June draft of
the Senate reconciliation text omits

00:01:12.596 --> 00:01:17.045
provisions that would have forced
new hires to choose âatâwillâ status

00:01:17.045 --> 00:01:21.476
or pay much higher FERS pension
contributions, and does not include

00:01:21.476 --> 00:01:25.696
the House plan to eliminate the FERS
annuity supplement for early retirees.

00:01:26.294 --> 00:01:30.234
These omissions mean that, for now,
current employees will not suddenly

00:01:30.234 --> 00:01:34.613
owe more to their retirement funds,
and future retirees will continue to

00:01:34.613 --> 00:01:38.533
receive their earned supplements (the
full Social Securityâbridge benefit).

00:01:39.384 --> 00:01:43.104
The Senate version also drops a
controversial payroll-tax âfeeâ

00:01:43.104 --> 00:01:47.304
on unions, which would have
affected unionized workersâ dues.

00:01:47.957 --> 00:01:52.267
In short, the worst retirement-benefit
cuts in the Houseâs proposal (higher

00:01:52.267 --> 00:01:56.767
contributions and loss of supplements)
appear off the table in this period.

00:01:57.491 --> 00:02:02.541
Federal employees (both active and
retired) remain cautiously optimistic,

00:02:02.851 --> 00:02:07.082
but union and retiree groups are
urging lawmakers to safeguard earned

00:02:07.082 --> 00:02:09.082
benefits in the final legislation.

00:02:09.832 --> 00:02:12.892
One piece of legislation moving
in this timeframe that affects

00:02:12.892 --> 00:02:17.322
the broader federal workforce is a
bipartisan House bill to modernize the

00:02:17.322 --> 00:02:19.512
federal workersâ compensation system.

00:02:19.982 --> 00:02:24.702
On June 27, the House Education and
Labor Committee unanimously approved H.R.

00:02:24.702 --> 00:02:28.582
3170, the âImproving Access
to Workersâ Compensation for

00:02:28.582 --> 00:02:30.382
Injured Federal Workers Act.â

00:02:31.882 --> 00:02:32.772
Sponsored by Rep.

00:02:32.902 --> 00:02:34.731
Joe Courtney (D-Conn.),

00:02:35.022 --> 00:02:38.672
this bill would revise the Federal
Employeesâ Compensation Act (FECA)

00:02:38.962 --> 00:02:42.012
to allow physician assistants and
nurse practitioners to provide

00:02:42.012 --> 00:02:44.052
care for injured federal employees.

00:02:44.690 --> 00:02:48.450
(Previously, only physicians or
chiropractors could treat most federal

00:02:48.450 --> 00:02:50.100
workersâ compensation patients.)

00:02:50.730 --> 00:02:54.329
If enacted, the bill would benefit
federal employees (and potentially

00:02:54.329 --> 00:02:58.050
retirees eligible for FECA)
by expanding medical provider

00:02:58.050 --> 00:03:00.030
options after on-the-job injuries.

00:03:00.519 --> 00:03:04.420
Another issue spanning both current
and retired workers involves

00:03:04.420 --> 00:03:06.390
cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).

00:03:06.890 --> 00:03:11.740
Under current law, Civil Service
Retirement System (CSRS) annuities rise at

00:03:11.740 --> 00:03:16.019
full CPI, but Federal Employees Retirement
System (FERS) annuities are capped: if

00:03:16.019 --> 00:03:21.970
inflation is between 2â3%, FERS gets
only 2%, and if inflation exceeds 3%,

00:03:22.100 --> 00:03:24.910
FERS gets one point less than full CPI.

00:03:25.534 --> 00:03:28.703
Retiree advocates note this
long-standing disparity.

00:03:29.013 --> 00:03:31.864
Indeed, several lawmakers have
reintroduced the bipartisan

00:03:31.864 --> 00:03:34.084
âEqual COLA Actâ (H.R.

00:03:34.084 --> 00:03:34.894
491/S.

00:03:34.894 --> 00:03:38.363
624), which would give FERS
retirees the same COLA as

00:03:38.363 --> 00:03:40.733
CSRS/Social Security beneficiaries.

00:03:41.318 --> 00:03:45.988
(That bill is under consideration and has
broad support in federal retiree groups.)

00:03:46.528 --> 00:03:50.598
During this week no new action was taken
on COLAs, but the issue remains under

00:03:50.598 --> 00:03:56.448
discussion on Capitol Hill as active and
retired FERS annuitants call for parity.

00:03:57.120 --> 00:04:02.260
In short, the main bipartisan legislative
developments of late June involve

00:04:02.260 --> 00:04:06.840
retirement and benefit structures rather
than day-to-day pay or workplace rules.

00:04:07.400 --> 00:04:12.130
Both current and retired workers can
breathe easier that key cuts proposed

00:04:12.130 --> 00:04:16.190
in the House reconciliation plan (higher
contributions and lost supplements)

00:04:16.390 --> 00:04:18.650
are not in the latest Senate draft.

00:04:19.257 --> 00:04:23.248
Retiree organizations continue to press
Congress to protect all hard-earned

00:04:23.248 --> 00:04:27.538
benefits, including adjusting
FERS COLAs, as the reconciliation

00:04:27.538 --> 00:04:29.198
bill heads toward Senate debate.

00:04:29.848 --> 00:04:32.248
Issues That Affect Current Federal Workers

00:04:32.854 --> 00:04:37.034
Several stories this week focused
on active federal employeesâ working

00:04:37.034 --> 00:04:41.433
conditionsâfrom court rulings and
agency policies to personnel rules:

00:04:42.032 --> 00:04:47.902
Union Bargaining Rights â Court Blocks
Trump Order: On June 25, a San Francisco

00:04:47.902 --> 00:04:52.402
federal judge granted a nationwide
preliminary injunction against President

00:04:52.402 --> 00:04:56.761
Trumpâs March 2025 executive order
that would have stripped collective

00:04:56.761 --> 00:04:59.152
bargaining at dozens of agencies.

00:04:59.753 --> 00:05:03.933
The judge agreed with unions that the
abrupt removal of bargaining rights

00:05:04.153 --> 00:05:08.843
likely violates federal law and
constitutional free speech protections.

00:05:09.503 --> 00:05:13.863
This block means hundreds of thousands
of current federal employees remain

00:05:13.863 --> 00:05:17.563
entitled to negotiate working
conditions through their unions.

00:05:18.199 --> 00:05:22.999
(A separate ruling in April had
already blocked the order at seven

00:05:22.999 --> 00:05:26.599
large agencies; this weekâs ruling
covers the remaining agencies).

00:05:26.599 --> 00:05:30.199
The decision explicitly found the
administrationâs order was targeted

00:05:30.199 --> 00:05:34.599
at agencies deemed âhostileâ to the
president, further affirming that agencies

00:05:34.599 --> 00:05:36.199
cannot unilaterally terminate bargaining.

00:05:36.199 --> 00:05:38.999
(The White House has vowed to appeal.)

00:05:39.029 --> 00:05:43.809
Performance Management Overhaul:
In mid-June, OPM issued sweeping

00:05:43.809 --> 00:05:47.219
new performance rules for federal
agencies, and news outlets

00:05:47.219 --> 00:05:48.949
reported on the guidance this week.

00:05:49.509 --> 00:05:54.159
An Office of Personnel Management memo
(published June 17) strongly urges

00:05:54.159 --> 00:05:58.159
agencies to limit how many employees
receive âexceeds expectationsâ

00:05:58.159 --> 00:06:02.789
ratings and to move more swiftly to
discipline or remove poor performers.

00:06:03.371 --> 00:06:06.711
In effect, the guidance tells
managers to âmake a disproportionate

00:06:06.711 --> 00:06:11.081
number of employees not exceed
expectationsâ so that only truly

00:06:11.081 --> 00:06:13.291
exceptional work merits top scores.

00:06:13.903 --> 00:06:17.163
It also directs agencies to
update their discipline policies

00:06:17.163 --> 00:06:21.073
so that âpoor performers can be
swiftly removed or reassignedâ.

00:06:22.371 --> 00:06:26.621
In practice, this could make it easier
to fire or demote underachieving

00:06:26.621 --> 00:06:30.861
employees (especially at agencies
recently exempted from bargaining).

00:06:31.431 --> 00:06:36.171
Unions immediately criticized the changes
as a departure from negotiated contracts.

00:06:36.651 --> 00:06:40.001
But at minimum, current workers
should expect stricter performance

00:06:40.001 --> 00:06:44.951
evaluations and faster accountability
processes under these new rules.

00:06:45.637 --> 00:06:50.227
Probationary Periods Rule: On June 24
the Federal Register published a final

00:06:50.227 --> 00:06:55.687
rule aligning with President Trumpâs
April 2025 Executive Order on probation.

00:06:56.237 --> 00:07:00.117
This rule rescinds the old
probation regulations and requires

00:07:00.167 --> 00:07:04.247
agencies to actively affirm the
value of a probationary employee.

00:07:04.917 --> 00:07:09.537
In other words, employees no longer become
âcareerâ by default after probation;

00:07:09.877 --> 00:07:14.097
instead, agencies must certify that
retaining each probationer is in the

00:07:14.097 --> 00:07:16.207
public interest, or else terminate them.

00:07:16.820 --> 00:07:20.679
The rule explicitly removes prior
barriers to ending probationers,

00:07:20.979 --> 00:07:22.710
allowing easier separations.

00:07:23.260 --> 00:07:27.090
For current employees, this means new
hires must clear an extra hurdle at the

00:07:27.090 --> 00:07:32.369
end of probation, and supervisors cannot
simply let probation expire automatically.

00:07:32.900 --> 00:07:35.479
The intent is to weed
out poor fits earlier.

00:07:35.849 --> 00:07:40.440
All federal agencies must update their
HR policies to implement this change.

00:07:41.165 --> 00:07:44.705
Probationary employees (and
their unions) should be aware

00:07:44.705 --> 00:07:48.506
that extension and termination
processes will now be more active.

00:07:49.126 --> 00:07:54.015
Administrative Leave Concerns: Federal
News Networkâs Federal Drive reported

00:07:54.015 --> 00:07:59.306
on June 25 that over 100,000 federal
workers are on paid administrative

00:07:59.306 --> 00:08:01.876
leave, often for extended periods.

00:08:02.479 --> 00:08:06.119
Experts warn that this use of
administrative leave far exceeds

00:08:06.119 --> 00:08:10.309
what Congress intended (max 10
workdays per year except for certain

00:08:10.309 --> 00:08:12.839
investigations) and may be unlawful.

00:08:13.479 --> 00:08:17.219
The Public Employees for Environmental
Responsibility (PEER) group has even

00:08:17.219 --> 00:08:22.499
filed a complaint, noting that agencies
have broadly put employees on leave (e.g.

00:08:22.499 --> 00:08:27.059
for DEI officers or RIF targets)
without evidence of wrongdoing.

00:08:27.748 --> 00:08:31.578
If upheld, this issue primarily
affects current employees, since

00:08:31.578 --> 00:08:33.198
they are the ones placed on leave.

00:08:33.877 --> 00:08:38.168
The takeaway is that many more active
workers are effectively sidelined (on

00:08:38.168 --> 00:08:43.237
paid leave) than in the past, raising
questions about due process and back pay.

00:08:43.970 --> 00:08:47.060
Furloughs and RIFs â Courts,
State Department: Mass layoffs

00:08:47.060 --> 00:08:48.480
were a hot topic this week.

00:08:48.830 --> 00:08:51.530
A June 27 Supreme Court ruling (Trump v.

00:08:51.530 --> 00:08:55.400
CASA) limited courtsâ power to
issue nationwide injunctions.

00:08:55.988 --> 00:09:00.848
While the decision generally curtails
broad injunctions, a footnote suggests it

00:09:00.848 --> 00:09:05.578
does not disturb the existing lower-court
order blocking the Trump administrationâs

00:09:05.578 --> 00:09:07.918
plan for agency-wide layoffs.

00:09:08.728 --> 00:09:12.518
In practical terms, federal employees
currently have some protection

00:09:12.518 --> 00:09:16.867
against the administrationâs proposed
workforce cuts, at least temporarily.

00:09:17.608 --> 00:09:21.308
In line with that, the State
Departmentâs massive RIF (nearly

00:09:21.308 --> 00:09:23.997
3,400 jobs) remains on hold.

00:09:24.518 --> 00:09:28.298
In fact, State has been restructuring
how it would conduct those layoffs.

00:09:28.999 --> 00:09:32.770
State recently rewrote its RIF rules
to create dozens of new âcompetitive

00:09:32.770 --> 00:09:34.969
areasâ (by post, bureau, etc.)

00:09:35.130 --> 00:09:36.849
to make targeted layoffs easier.

00:09:37.461 --> 00:09:42.451
State officials say they still intend
to reduce ~1,900 employees, but a

00:09:42.451 --> 00:09:44.401
judge has barred the cuts for now.

00:09:44.811 --> 00:09:49.752
So current State Department workers face
uncertainty: the process has been revamped

00:09:49.752 --> 00:09:54.961
behind the scenes, but legal blocks (and
upcoming Supreme Court action) mean any

00:09:54.961 --> 00:09:57.481
actual layoffs are paused for the moment.

00:09:58.405 --> 00:10:01.075
Other Developments: A few
other announcements during

00:10:01.075 --> 00:10:02.195
the week are noteworthy.

00:10:02.745 --> 00:10:06.805
The Defense Departmentâs
FY2026 budget proposal (marked

00:10:06.805 --> 00:10:10.065
up June 27) includes a 3.8%

00:10:10.065 --> 00:10:14.425
military pay raise and quality-of-life
funding, but that concerns uniformed

00:10:14.425 --> 00:10:16.835
personnel more than civilian employees.

00:10:17.797 --> 00:10:21.208
The GSA issued its routine
summer âelectricity curtailmentâ

00:10:21.238 --> 00:10:23.517
alert (asking agencies in D.C.

00:10:23.517 --> 00:10:27.067
to conserve power due to a heat
wave) â a minor energy-savings

00:10:27.117 --> 00:10:29.127
notice rather than a personnel issue.

00:10:29.657 --> 00:10:33.297
In short, the most substantive news
for active federal employees in

00:10:33.297 --> 00:10:38.047
late June centers on personnel rules
(performance and probation), legal

00:10:38.047 --> 00:10:42.468
fights over layoffs and unions, and
some legislative fixes (workersâ comp).

00:10:43.167 --> 00:10:47.428
Key Legislation Affecting Current
Employees: Aside from the reconciliation

00:10:47.428 --> 00:10:51.548
measure (see Section 1), the only
specific bill moving was H.R.

00:10:51.548 --> 00:10:53.387
3170 (workersâ comp).

00:10:54.002 --> 00:10:56.552
There was no new bill on pay or telework.

00:10:56.972 --> 00:11:00.742
However, several bills are in the works
that could affect current workers:

00:11:01.346 --> 00:11:04.046
The Federal Employee Train
Transportation Act (H.R.

00:11:04.046 --> 00:11:09.136
725), for example, was introduced in
May to guarantee rail pass benefits

00:11:09.426 --> 00:11:11.006
(it awaits committee action).

00:11:11.734 --> 00:11:15.724
Proposals on expanding child care
or leave for federal workers have

00:11:15.724 --> 00:11:19.434
been floated in other Congresses,
but none advanced this week.

00:11:20.020 --> 00:11:22.600
Issues That Affect Retired Federal Workers

00:11:23.184 --> 00:11:26.664
Late June brought no immediate
changes to veteransâ pensions or

00:11:26.664 --> 00:11:31.554
retiree-specific benefits, but retirees
closely watched Congressional actions.

00:11:31.974 --> 00:11:36.274
The House-passed reconciliation bill
had threatened to cut retiree income by

00:11:36.274 --> 00:11:40.794
eliminating the FERS annuity supplement
for early retirees and switching from

00:11:40.794 --> 00:11:44.184
a âhigh-3â to âhigh-5â salary basis.

00:11:44.862 --> 00:11:49.272
As noted above, those provisions have
been removed from the latest Senate draft.

00:11:49.782 --> 00:11:53.622
If the Senate language holds,
current and future retirees will

00:11:53.622 --> 00:11:57.852
continue to receive their full earned
pension supplements and retire under

00:11:57.852 --> 00:12:00.612
the familiar high-3 calculation.

00:12:01.432 --> 00:12:07.002
Retiree groups had loudly protested the
proposed cuts â NARFE warned that clawing

00:12:07.002 --> 00:12:11.372
back these benefits would violate workersâ
earned compensation promises â and this

00:12:11.372 --> 00:12:15.752
weekâs developments mean those worst fears
did not materialize, at least for now.

00:12:17.432 --> 00:12:21.602
Beyond the reconciliation debate, the
main retiree-focused legislative news

00:12:21.602 --> 00:12:23.462
involves cost-of-living adjustments.

00:12:23.992 --> 00:12:28.398
Supporters of FERS annuitants continue
pushing the Equal COLA Act (H.R.

00:12:28.398 --> 00:12:29.145
491/S.

00:12:29.145 --> 00:12:33.102
624), which would remove the
2%-cap penalty and give FERS

00:12:33.102 --> 00:12:35.262
retirees the full CPI adjustment.

00:12:35.930 --> 00:12:37.980
Although that bill has
been introduced by Rep.

00:12:37.980 --> 00:12:39.940
Gerry Connolly and Sen.

00:12:39.940 --> 00:12:43.270
Alex Padilla, it has not
advanced out of committee yet.

00:12:43.880 --> 00:12:47.960
In the week of June 22â28 there was
no Congressional action on it, but

00:12:47.960 --> 00:12:52.720
advocacy groups (like NARFE) were
publicizing the need for equal COLAs.

00:12:53.408 --> 00:12:56.818
Retirees hoping for COLA reform
will be watching whether that bill

00:12:56.818 --> 00:12:58.648
gains momentum later this summer.

00:12:59.528 --> 00:13:03.278
Another issue on retireesâ radar
is retiree health insurance.

00:13:03.718 --> 00:13:06.948
Congress has not proposed any new
changes to the Federal Employees

00:13:06.948 --> 00:13:11.348
Health Benefits (FEHB) or other retiree
health programs during this week.

00:13:11.838 --> 00:13:17.928
By law, FEHB premiums for 2026 will be
set during open season this fall, and no

00:13:17.928 --> 00:13:19.908
news indicates anything new this June.

00:13:20.388 --> 00:13:24.008
Similarly, premiums for the older
Preferred Provider (PPO) health

00:13:24.008 --> 00:13:28.778
plan (PSHB) were recently updated,
with average increases of 10.1%

00:13:28.778 --> 00:13:32.458
in government contributions
for FEHB and 5.1%

00:13:32.458 --> 00:13:35.948
for PSHB (as per an OPM
release earlier this year).

00:13:36.518 --> 00:13:40.558
No late-June announcements changed these;
retirees simply prepare to see those

00:13:40.558 --> 00:13:42.888
premium changes in December paychecks.

00:13:43.368 --> 00:13:47.438
In summary, retirees got relief
in late June insofar as proposed

00:13:47.438 --> 00:13:49.368
retirement benefit cuts were shelved.

00:13:49.398 --> 00:13:54.068
The Senateâs draft reconciliation
bill as of June 28 retains the FERS

00:13:54.068 --> 00:13:58.598
supplement and the high-3 formula,
meaning current annuitants and soon-to-be

00:13:58.598 --> 00:14:01.098
annuitants face no surprise reductions.

00:14:01.608 --> 00:14:05.038
At the same time, Congress is
hearing continued calls (from

00:14:05.038 --> 00:14:07.358
NARFE, Federal Retiree Board, etc.)

00:14:07.678 --> 00:14:10.518
to protect retirement earnings
and consider bipartisan

00:14:10.518 --> 00:14:12.908
proposals like the Equal COLA Act

00:14:13.526 --> 00:14:16.756
No other retiree-specific
legislation passed this week.

00:14:17.226 --> 00:14:21.866
Retired federal employees and their
advocates will remain vigilant, especially

00:14:21.866 --> 00:14:26.546
once a final reconciliation bill is
actually debated on the Senate floor.

00:14:27.216 --> 00:14:30.426
And thatâs a wrap on this weekâs
Federal Workforce Roundup.

00:14:30.856 --> 00:14:35.256
The landscape for federal employees
and retirees is constantly shifting,

00:14:35.506 --> 00:14:39.576
with major decisions being made about
everything from pay and job security

00:14:39.726 --> 00:14:43.786
to retirement benefits and the very
structure of the civil service.

00:14:44.226 --> 00:14:46.786
Staying informed is your best tool.

00:14:47.186 --> 00:14:51.786
Be sure to subscribe wherever you get your
podcasts, so you never miss an update.

00:14:52.546 --> 00:14:53.626
Thanks for tuning in.

00:14:53.626 --> 00:14:56.426
Weâll be back next week to
track the latest developments

00:14:56.676 --> 00:14:57.836
and what they mean for you.

00:14:58.216 --> 00:15:01.396
Until then, stay engaged and be well.