Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Click here to watch a video of this episode.
In seventy-two hours the AI industry asked to slow down, OpenAI shelved a trillion-dollar listing, and the President called the whole thing a hoax on speakerphone. Everyone called it the week AI flip-flopped; nobody did, and one supplier gets paid either way.
On Saturday 12 September, Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei published We Must Pace the Frontier, a call for an AI slowdown in how fast frontier models gain capability. Within hours Elon Musk replied "Dario is right" and Sam Altman told Fortune there would be no OpenAI IPO this year. By Monday, President Trump had called AI fears a hoax and phoned Jensen Huang live at the All-In Summit. The twist: the call for an AI slowdown came in the same quarter Anthropic booked $11.5 billion of revenue and positive adjusted operating profit.
Aman Narain, solo this week while Zubin Vandrevala is in London, breaks down who actually wants an AI slowdown, who only says so, and who gets paid whichever way it goes.
Key takeaways:
1. Almost nobody changed position this week. What changed is which kind of doom each player chose to say out loud.
2. Read the capex, the PAC cheques and the IPO calendar: what AI leaders say moves weekly, what they spend does not.
3. The call for an AI slowdown arrived in the quarter Anthropic proved the frontier pays.
4. Pacing is not stopping. In a boom Nvidia sells the training, in a slowdown it sells the testing, and inference carries on regardless.
5. The doom that decides the US midterms is not extinction. It is the electricity bill of a voter who lives near a data centre.
Topics covered:
- Five things in fourteen days: escaped agents, a resignation, Nvidia buying Hugging Face, the essay, the speakerphone
- A four-box map: AGI believers and sceptics, accelerators and restrainers, and the two people who move
- Three dooms and two booms: extinction, displacement and deflation against capability and capital
- Say versus pay: Sam Altman's four positions in eleven years
- David Sacks's cartel charge, Jensen Huang's inspectors, and 100 gigawatts of physics
- The circular trade: Nvidia's equity in its customers, and the Lucent precedent
- Why an AI slowdown does not shrink Nvidia's order book
- Data centres, power bills and the midterms
- China: invoked everywhere, included nowhere
- Four calls for 2026, including where Anthropic's IPO prices
- Closing wagers: prophet or cynic?
Chapters:
Referenced in this episode: Dario Amodei, We Must Pace the Frontier; Dario Amodei, Machines of Loving Grace; Jacob Coxon's resignation and Evan Hubinger's reply; Nvidia's $12.93bn agreement to acquire Hugging Face; Sam Altman's Fortune interview; the All-In Summit call between President Trump and Jensen Huang; Anthropic and OpenAI Q2 2026 results as reported by the FT, CNBC and WSJ; Aswath Damodaran on Anthropic's valuation; Annenberg Public Policy Center polling on data centres; Lucent and Nortel vendor financing; Søren Kierkegaard, The Concept of Anxiety.
Related episodes: SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI: The $2tn IPO Boom; Google I/O 2026: Sundar Pichai's 25-Year AI Long Game; S2E24 on Google's AI leadership reshuffle.
Hosted by:
Aman Narain writes at amanwhoblogs.substack.com. Zubin Vandrevala, your payments provocateur, sat this one out in London.
Enjoying A2Z Fintech? Leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts. It is the single biggest signal to the Apple algorithm and how new listeners in our world find us.
For information and entertainment only. Not financial advice.
Transcript:
In seventy-two hours the AI industry asked to slow down, OpenAI shelved a trillion-dollar listing, and the President called the whole thing a hoax on speakerphone. Everyone called it the week AI flip-flopped; nobody did, and one supplier gets paid either way.
On Saturday 12 September, Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei published We Must Pace the Frontier, a call for an AI slowdown in how fast frontier models gain capability. Within hours Elon Musk replied "Dario is right" and Sam Altman told Fortune there would be no OpenAI IPO this year. By Monday, President Trump had called AI fears a hoax and phoned Jensen Huang live at the All-In Summit. The twist: the call for an AI slowdown came in the same quarter Anthropic booked $11.5 billion of revenue and positive adjusted operating profit.
Aman Narain, solo this week while Zubin Vandrevala is in London, breaks down who actually wants an AI slowdown, who only says so, and who gets paid whichever way it goes.
Key takeaways:
1. Almost nobody changed position this week. What changed is which kind of doom each player chose to say out loud.
2. Read the capex, the PAC cheques and the IPO calendar: what AI leaders say moves weekly, what they spend does not.
3. The call for an AI slowdown arrived in the quarter Anthropic proved the frontier pays.
4. Pacing is not stopping. In a boom Nvidia sells the training, in a slowdown it sells the testing, and inference carries on regardless.
5. The doom that decides the US midterms is not extinction. It is the electricity bill of a voter who lives near a data centre.
Topics covered:
- Five things in fourteen days: escaped agents, a resignation, Nvidia buying Hugging Face, the essay, the speakerphone
- A four-box map: AGI believers and sceptics, accelerators and restrainers, and the two people who move
- Three dooms and two booms: extinction, displacement and deflation against capability and capital
- Say versus pay: Sam Altman's four positions in eleven years
- David Sacks's cartel charge, Jensen Huang's inspectors, and 100 gigawatts of physics
- The circular trade: Nvidia's equity in its customers, and the Lucent precedent
- Why an AI slowdown does not shrink Nvidia's order book
- Data centres, power bills and the midterms
- China: invoked everywhere, included nowhere
- Four calls for 2026, including where Anthropic's IPO prices
- Closing wagers: prophet or cynic?
Chapters:
- (00:00) - Cold open: $2 trillion changes its mind
- (01:06) - Disclaimer
- (01:21) - Five things, fourteen days: agents slip the harness
- (01:48) - 150 million views and "Jacob is correct"
- (02:58) - Nvidia buys the platform that got attacked
- (03:15) - From Machines of Loving Grace to Pace the Frontier
- (04:22) - "Dario is right": Musk, Altman and a shelved IPO
- (04:46) - Whoever wins AI wins: the President on speakerphone
- (05:20) - The map: three dooms, two booms
- (06:29) - Who sits where, and the two who move
- (07:33) - Say versus pay: Altman's four positions
- (08:37) - $11.5 billion: pacing arrives the day it pays
- (09:52) - Going around the table: Sacks calls it a cartel
- (10:45) - Inspectors with staff badges
- (11:29) - 100 gigawatts: why the frontier was slowing anyway
- (12:01) - The circular trade: Nvidia's $50 billion loop
- (12:38) - We've seen this film: Lucent, Nortel, $8.1 billion
- (13:12) - Same machine, quieter number: the capex clock
- (13:44) - Two invoices from the same supplier
- (14:26) - The doom that votes: a retired teacher in Ohio
- (16:17) - China: invoked everywhere, included nowhere
- (18:21) - Four calls: Anthropic lists, OpenAI waits
- (18:58) - Damodaran's $1.2 trillion hurdle
- (19:34) - Concorde versus the 747
- (19:57) - The midterms: her bill is the ballot paper
- (21:16) - Closing wagers: prophet or cynic?
- (23:01) - Doom is a language, capex is a fact
- (23:45) - Kierkegaard and the dizziness of freedom
Referenced in this episode: Dario Amodei, We Must Pace the Frontier; Dario Amodei, Machines of Loving Grace; Jacob Coxon's resignation and Evan Hubinger's reply; Nvidia's $12.93bn agreement to acquire Hugging Face; Sam Altman's Fortune interview; the All-In Summit call between President Trump and Jensen Huang; Anthropic and OpenAI Q2 2026 results as reported by the FT, CNBC and WSJ; Aswath Damodaran on Anthropic's valuation; Annenberg Public Policy Center polling on data centres; Lucent and Nortel vendor financing; Søren Kierkegaard, The Concept of Anxiety.
Related episodes: SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI: The $2tn IPO Boom; Google I/O 2026: Sundar Pichai's 25-Year AI Long Game; S2E24 on Google's AI leadership reshuffle.
Hosted by:
Aman Narain writes at amanwhoblogs.substack.com. Zubin Vandrevala, your payments provocateur, sat this one out in London.
Enjoying A2Z Fintech? Leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts. It is the single biggest signal to the Apple algorithm and how new listeners in our world find us.
For information and entertainment only. Not financial advice.
Transcript:
Creators and Guests
What is A2Z Fintech?
Aman Narain and Zubin Vandrevala have spent over 25 years in fintech across Banks, BigTech, and Startups. This is a podcast of them riffing on payments, fintech and everything in between.