WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript 

00:00:00.010 --> 00:00:02.349
Jethro: Welcome to Artificial Intelligence Real Talk.

00:00:02.349 --> 00:00:10.959
I'm your host, Jethro Jones, and today we are talking about AI and how schools can use it and like what do we do?

00:00:11.080 --> 00:00:15.580
I mean, this is what we talk about all the time on this podcast, but today we're talking with Sam Bourgeois.

00:00:16.020 --> 00:00:21.720
And, uh, pretty excited to chat with him because he has been in the IT space for years.

00:00:21.720 --> 00:00:27.750
And, uh, so we're just gonna have a conversation, gonna riff off on a couple of topics and, and go from there.

00:00:27.750 --> 00:00:31.440
So, uh, you can listen to this podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:33.240
Artificial intelligence, real talk.

00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:34.950
Thanks so much for listening.

00:00:34.950 --> 00:00:37.170
Sam, where do you think we should start?

00:00:37.779 --> 00:00:40.299
Sam Bourgeois: Man, uh, it's always a good convo with you.

00:00:40.539 --> 00:00:51.099
Um, I think what's been on my mind lately is I've got this, uh, this course in development and I wanna put this content in as a, as a en enrichment opportunity for that.

00:00:51.219 --> 00:00:52.989
Course, and that course is centered around it.

00:00:53.919 --> 00:01:02.169
Uh, district leaders, uh, instructional leaders, potentially superintendents, even teachers as leaders in the classroom, right?

00:01:02.709 --> 00:01:04.869
And the course is all about.

00:01:05.354 --> 00:01:08.714
AI risk management, cybersecurity risk management.

00:01:09.104 --> 00:01:11.294
So we're on an AI podcast.

00:01:11.444 --> 00:01:16.124
I'm gonna tell you, let me, let me tell you a story and then you tell me where we can go with this.

00:01:16.124 --> 00:01:17.684
So I had this really cool idea.

00:01:17.924 --> 00:01:22.574
Um, now I know we have similar backgrounds with our, with our, uh, with our children.

00:01:23.354 --> 00:01:27.489
son, for everybody who's listening is a neuro neurodivergent 10-year-old.

00:01:28.639 --> 00:01:33.019
he is super, super excited about who would win books.

00:01:33.709 --> 00:01:38.119
I don't know if you've seen those, the Who's Gonna Win Tiger Shark versus Great White Shark or whatever.

00:01:38.869 --> 00:01:41.239
the other day I'm getting ready for a party.

00:01:41.239 --> 00:01:44.419
It's the holiday season and I've got phone in hand.

00:01:44.419 --> 00:01:47.884
I'm trying to get something done, and he's just peppering me nonstop with questions.

00:01:47.929 --> 00:01:49.279
So I say, I've got this idea.

00:01:49.279 --> 00:01:50.149
So I pull up my phone.

00:01:51.254 --> 00:01:55.544
Go to my chat, GPT Pro, which is not training the, the data in the, in the masses, right?

00:01:55.544 --> 00:01:57.254
So I've got it, you know, internalized.

00:01:57.404 --> 00:01:59.984
I hit the talk button, I dunno if you ever do this.

00:02:00.734 --> 00:02:02.654
And I just put it in front of him and he just starts talking.

00:02:02.654 --> 00:02:04.604
He goes, who would win?

00:02:04.724 --> 00:02:06.884
Uh, great white shark or tiger shark.

00:02:06.974 --> 00:02:10.994
And then the lady comes back to him with a British accent and he says, oh, that's a great question.

00:02:11.264 --> 00:02:14.144
Let's, let's unpack that for a moment, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:02:14.204 --> 00:02:18.704
And my kid just goes off and has this amazing conversation.

00:02:18.764 --> 00:02:20.804
And the funny thing is my, um.

00:02:21.194 --> 00:02:32.234
My, my a BA person, my a BA clinical specialist, is in this, she's there watching and she's just like, mind blown, like, whoa, this is great.

00:02:32.234 --> 00:02:36.434
And she's telling me after the fact, she's like, he's practicing his conversation.

00:02:36.824 --> 00:02:38.684
He's waiting and pausing.

00:02:38.804 --> 00:02:40.784
He's treating this like a real person.

00:02:41.144 --> 00:02:43.814
So I was like, awesome.

00:02:43.814 --> 00:02:44.204
Dad.

00:02:44.204 --> 00:02:45.134
High five moment.

00:02:45.134 --> 00:02:45.854
But then I was like.

00:02:46.694 --> 00:02:52.424
I totally didn't do like a risk assessment to see where this is gonna go and like the drawbacks, right.

00:02:52.424 --> 00:02:52.754
So I don't know.

00:02:52.754 --> 00:02:53.599
What are your thoughts on that?

00:02:54.964 --> 00:02:57.664
Jethro: Yeah, well, I, I love that example for a few reasons.

00:02:57.964 --> 00:02:58.594
One.

00:02:59.110 --> 00:03:00.610
Uh, you, you're right.

00:03:00.610 --> 00:03:05.079
You didn't do a risk assessment and like say, what could possibly go wrong with this?

00:03:05.079 --> 00:03:13.120
But the first thing there is what your, uh, what the specialist said, which is he's treating this like a real person.

00:03:13.660 --> 00:03:23.769
And to me that's the biggest issue that we have with AI right now is that people often think that it is a real person when it definitely is not.

00:03:24.010 --> 00:03:28.149
And so that to me is, is the, the groundwork where you need to start.

00:03:28.510 --> 00:03:37.029
This is not a person, this is a tool that might help you understand or do something a little bit better, but it is not a real person.

00:03:37.029 --> 00:03:42.399
So don't get confused and think that this is a real person, however.

00:03:43.089 --> 00:03:51.339
Was she right about him practicing, talking and using and speaking appropriately and being able to be understood.

00:03:51.370 --> 00:03:55.060
Let me share a little story with you as well that's along those same lines.

00:03:55.390 --> 00:04:08.620
Uh, my oldest daughter has down syndrome and has a speech impediment and is sometimes hard to understand, but she has a, uh, a home pod, uh, in her room that plays music that she loves to listen to.

00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:10.420
She loves music so.

00:04:10.915 --> 00:04:20.245
We were driving in the car and I invoked Siri on my, uh, car and said, play this kind of music, or play this song or something.

00:04:20.605 --> 00:04:26.725
I tried five times, I couldn't get it to work, and so my daughter leans over and says, dad, I got it.

00:04:27.025 --> 00:04:31.075
And she says, Siri, play this thing and then it does.

00:04:31.255 --> 00:04:32.965
And I was like, are you kidding me?

00:04:33.235 --> 00:04:35.545
So what has actually happened is that.

00:04:36.145 --> 00:04:57.955
My Siri account has been trained on my daughter's, uh, speech impediment, so it understands her better than it understands me now, which causes all sorts of
frustration on my part, but she totally gets it, and she can, she does a great job with it, and that's, that's one of those things that these tools can enable.

00:04:58.570 --> 00:05:02.920
Kids with disabilities to have a more level playing field.

00:05:03.100 --> 00:05:04.600
Let me share another story.

00:05:04.750 --> 00:05:14.770
Um, my daughter needed to give a talk in church and so she, I had her write down and text me what she thought, uh, she wanted to say.

00:05:15.250 --> 00:05:26.200
And so she wrote this long sentence with no transition words, no periods, no commas, no nothing, but were things that I know she believes and understands, and that.

00:05:26.680 --> 00:05:29.620
And so I was like, okay, this is something that she would say.

00:05:29.770 --> 00:05:36.490
However, if she gets up there and reads this, nobody's gonna understand and nobody's gonna like care what she's saying.

00:05:36.790 --> 00:05:46.930
They'll just be like, there's a kid with Down syndrome speaking some gibberish, and like people are respectful and they'll be kind and everything, but she won't be able to communicate what she really believes.

00:05:47.275 --> 00:05:52.585
And so I went into Chachi pt. I put that in and I said, she needs to give a talk.

00:05:52.585 --> 00:05:53.455
Here's our religion.

00:05:53.455 --> 00:05:55.315
Here's the things we believe.

00:05:55.315 --> 00:05:56.695
Here's what she said.

00:05:57.055 --> 00:06:02.095
Now make this into a talk that would make sense to a normal person.

00:06:02.695 --> 00:06:14.905
It created a talk that actually communicated what my daughter really believes in a way that was incredibly powerful, which I just loved because she got to.

00:06:15.595 --> 00:06:16.915
To put this out there.

00:06:17.125 --> 00:06:22.465
Uh, and it was what she believed, even though she didn't construct the sentences herself.

00:06:23.035 --> 00:06:32.395
Now, to be perfectly honest, if she needed to give a talk and I was helping her, I would be the one writing the talk for her and try to make it sound like her as much as possible.

00:06:32.875 --> 00:06:36.745
The benefit in this situation is that I gave her the.

00:06:37.300 --> 00:06:41.170
The, the task to, to write what she wanted to write.

00:06:41.590 --> 00:06:47.800
I put into chat GPT and then made a couple of, uh, additions or subtractions so that, so that it would make sense.

00:06:48.130 --> 00:07:04.990
Now, going back to your first story in this story, what that enabled, um, there was a paper released in the summer of 25 that was called
cognitive Debt, and it talked about how when you use AI, then you create cognitive debt because you don't remember the things that you wrote.

00:07:05.905 --> 00:07:14.905
But for people with disabilities, I believe that AI creates cognitive equity, that they are able to do things that they wouldn't be able to do normally.

00:07:16.045 --> 00:07:18.445
That the AI gives them the power to do that.

00:07:18.535 --> 00:07:42.175
And I wrote a paper on this myself called Cognitive Equity, so you can go look that up and, and gave the example of what my daughter went through and how we use this to help her communicate something
that was so much better than what she could do on her own and how valuable and important that was because it gave her the opportunity to express what she believes and what she is interested in.

00:07:42.755 --> 00:07:49.085
To a room full of people who don't interact with her very often, and then they could see what she really believed.

00:07:49.085 --> 00:07:58.895
And that was a huge, huge mark, like huge improvement on her life because she gets to express herself in a way she never has been able to before.

00:07:59.414 --> 00:08:01.844
Sam Bourgeois: We, and you know, we've talked about this in the past.

00:08:02.054 --> 00:08:02.504
Um.

00:08:03.359 --> 00:08:05.009
And this, you know what it reminds me of?

00:08:05.009 --> 00:08:20.579
It reminds me of the conversations where, do you remember when we were first handing out iPads for like, again, my, my son is a SD, but there
were, there were these iPads and they were like the, it was like the old storyboards that we used to do with like Velcro to help communicate.

00:08:20.815 --> 00:08:21.354
Jethro: Oh yeah.

00:08:21.385 --> 00:08:21.744
Yeah.

00:08:21.899 --> 00:08:23.939
Sam Bourgeois: was, it was like a game changer and people thought.

00:08:24.254 --> 00:08:25.694
I don't care how much it costs.

00:08:25.754 --> 00:08:28.844
Let's just get this thing so the, so the child can actually have a voice.

00:08:28.844 --> 00:08:32.054
Or, you know, if you even go back a little further from there.

00:08:32.114 --> 00:08:40.394
And you look at the, um, uh, the, the kiddos who are confined to a wheelchair, their mobility, just conversation.

00:08:40.394 --> 00:08:45.854
Their mobility comes from some of these technical improvements, technology, technology improvements.

00:08:46.244 --> 00:08:47.534
It's, it's really the same thing.

00:08:47.539 --> 00:08:52.154
It's like, but we have to ask ourselves, this is the question for the principal side of you, not the father side of you.

00:08:53.924 --> 00:08:57.254
We have to kind of reevaluate what is the, what's the learning outcome?

00:08:57.254 --> 00:08:58.034
What's the objective?

00:08:58.034 --> 00:08:58.724
What's the thing?

00:08:58.724 --> 00:09:03.194
So in your example was the thing to get up on stage.

00:09:03.674 --> 00:09:04.094
Okay?

00:09:04.394 --> 00:09:07.364
Mission accomplished was the thing to express yourself.

00:09:07.424 --> 00:09:10.004
Mission accomplished was the thing, the grammar.

00:09:10.484 --> 00:09:10.784
Okay?

00:09:10.784 --> 00:09:12.344
So we didn't, we didn't do that.

00:09:12.344 --> 00:09:15.194
But if, if that's not the thing that we're trying to measure.

00:09:15.974 --> 00:09:23.024
that's not the coursework, the course material, it's like, it's like, uh, when we were young men and we were told we couldn't have a calculator in math class, right?

00:09:23.114 --> 00:09:23.774
It's the same thing.

00:09:23.774 --> 00:09:23.894
It's

00:09:24.024 --> 00:09:24.354
Jethro: Yep.

00:09:24.564 --> 00:09:24.924
Yep.

00:09:25.029 --> 00:09:30.254
Sam Bourgeois: are, are you measuring work that I produced and wrote in my little blue book, the, the showing my work?

00:09:30.404 --> 00:09:34.814
Or are you measuring my accuracy to do three digit multiplication?

00:09:35.204 --> 00:09:35.474
Like

00:09:35.859 --> 00:09:36.249
Jethro: Yeah.

00:09:36.284 --> 00:09:36.674
Sam Bourgeois: me which one.

00:09:36.674 --> 00:09:37.184
It's right.

00:09:38.139 --> 00:09:47.169
Jethro: Well, and, and this is what is, is so important, is the, the purpose it, we need to go back to that every single time.

00:09:47.724 --> 00:09:54.864
What are we trying to get the kids to be able to do and if the purpose is for them to to learn something?

00:09:55.014 --> 00:10:00.654
If the purpose was for my daughter to learn grammar, it was a total failure, but that wasn't the purpose.

00:10:00.954 --> 00:10:13.764
If the purpose was for my daughter to be able to give a talk so that people could understand her in a way that they've never been able
to understand her, but before then, not only was that purpose met, but it was exceeded at a grand scale, which was really amazing.

00:10:14.814 --> 00:10:28.915
And so again, we go back to your original story that you started out with the, the purpose for your son in that situation was for him to have a conversation about what would win with somebody.

00:10:29.334 --> 00:10:36.594
Or something I should say that could engage with him in a, at his level and in a way that was appropriate for him.

00:10:37.344 --> 00:10:39.685
And again, mission accomplished.

00:10:39.805 --> 00:10:48.654
And you and I as dads, sometimes we don't have the time, and this is where it becomes really valuable for teachers, because teachers don't always have the time either.

00:10:48.925 --> 00:10:56.394
They've got 20 to 40 students in their classroom and they don't have time to give individual individualized attention to each one of those kids.

00:10:57.269 --> 00:11:00.629
So where do we want their time to be spent?

00:11:00.869 --> 00:11:03.419
Do we want them to be, uh, creating.

00:11:04.134 --> 00:11:09.234
Personalized materials for every single kid when an AI could do that so much better.

00:11:09.535 --> 00:11:12.144
No, we don't want them to be using their time for that.

00:11:12.594 --> 00:11:19.134
I want my teachers to spend as much time as possible interacting with my kids, uh, in a way that is gonna help them.

00:11:19.314 --> 00:11:22.704
And I want the teacher to have the freedom and the power to make that decision.

00:11:23.094 --> 00:11:25.974
So where can we bring AI tools in to help with that?

00:11:26.185 --> 00:11:27.834
Now, if, let me.

00:11:28.420 --> 00:11:41.800
Put a little caveat in here if the AI tools are there, just to help make it so that the teacher can do the same dumb lessons she's always done and not change what she's doing and personalize it for the kids.

00:11:42.069 --> 00:11:43.064
That's not really beneficial.

00:11:43.865 --> 00:11:49.564
You know when when these new AI tools came out, everybody was like, oh, I can have it make worksheets for me.

00:11:49.714 --> 00:11:52.204
Well, worksheets are not really that valuable.

00:11:52.265 --> 00:11:53.375
Let's not do that.

00:11:53.645 --> 00:11:58.745
So let's do something different and let's do something that is valuable for our kids.

00:11:59.045 --> 00:12:00.875
And teachers have to ask the same question.

00:12:01.175 --> 00:12:03.334
What's the real purpose and value here?

00:12:03.785 --> 00:12:05.735
And what I've said a hundred times is.

00:12:06.834 --> 00:12:09.114
We should not use AI to circumvent learning.

00:12:09.324 --> 00:12:11.214
We should use AI to enhance learning.

00:12:11.665 --> 00:12:13.374
Think about the actual purpose.

00:12:13.614 --> 00:12:18.594
What is that you want to happen, and then use a tool that's gonna help get you to that point.

00:12:19.104 --> 00:12:23.785
That's, that's the key, and that's what we need to be using AI for a hundred percent.

00:12:25.124 --> 00:12:26.504
Sam Bourgeois: I couldn't, I couldn't agree more.

00:12:27.314 --> 00:12:30.014
What are your, what are your thoughts on the risk, on the risk profile?

00:12:30.014 --> 00:12:32.534
So, my example was a silly one, but I, here's where I was at.

00:12:32.534 --> 00:12:33.284
This is what I was thinking.

00:12:33.284 --> 00:12:33.794
I was like.

00:12:36.269 --> 00:12:41.639
Honestly, I, I think my kids get too much screen time and, and it doesn't matter what the number is.

00:12:41.669 --> 00:12:45.359
By the way, just for the record, there's always gonna be too much screen time if you ask me.

00:12:45.479 --> 00:12:48.059
Like, I would like to have more green time, not more screen time.

00:12:48.059 --> 00:12:48.239
Like,

00:12:48.269 --> 00:12:48.489
Jethro: Yes.

00:12:48.744 --> 00:12:49.104
Yep.

00:12:49.499 --> 00:12:52.439
Sam Bourgeois: even if it's 15 minutes a day to be, you know, less.

00:12:52.439 --> 00:12:52.739
Right.

00:12:53.274 --> 00:12:53.724
Jethro: Mm-hmm.

00:12:53.909 --> 00:12:58.349
Sam Bourgeois: is I didn't put that on a device that he has access to all the time.

00:12:58.379 --> 00:12:59.874
'cause I'm, I'm afraid that that might.

00:13:01.184 --> 00:13:02.684
Take away from human interaction.

00:13:02.834 --> 00:13:03.224
Okay.

00:13:03.824 --> 00:13:07.004
I thought about like, I training the data on this?

00:13:07.034 --> 00:13:07.784
No, no.

00:13:07.784 --> 00:13:08.984
I'm not training the data on this.

00:13:09.314 --> 00:13:16.814
I actually thought about does this actually, uh, this actually affect my training of my GPT experience?

00:13:16.814 --> 00:13:26.684
Because like I'm always asking like, let's say, let's say higher level, higher order questions, I'm asking things about forensics, data forensics, cybersecurity, or something like that.

00:13:26.684 --> 00:13:28.874
And by having a conversation about sharks, is that gonna.

00:13:29.279 --> 00:13:30.419
You know, of,

00:13:30.610 --> 00:13:30.939
Jethro: Yeah.

00:13:31.180 --> 00:13:31.540
Yep.

00:13:31.769 --> 00:13:32.729
Sam Bourgeois: affect the learning, right?

00:13:33.149 --> 00:13:37.799
So I asked some of those questions, but what are your thoughts at the school level?

00:13:37.949 --> 00:13:46.199
How do we ask the right questions and how do we determine what's appropriate for use in a classroom at the, at the building level and at the district level?

00:13:46.199 --> 00:13:46.799
What are your thoughts there?

00:13:48.354 --> 00:13:59.665
Jethro: Yeah, so I, I am most typically in favor of giving teachers as much autonomy and, and permission to experiment as we can.

00:13:59.754 --> 00:14:08.754
So, so that's the first place is let's, let's let them be the ones to make the most decisions and give them the tools that they can then make those decisions about.

00:14:09.354 --> 00:14:10.329
So that's where I would.

00:14:10.854 --> 00:14:11.515
Start.

00:14:11.604 --> 00:14:17.155
And that's because they're the ones who are closest to the kids and they're the ones who know what the kids need the best.

00:14:17.155 --> 00:14:19.375
And so that's, that would be the first place.

00:14:20.035 --> 00:14:24.984
The other thing to be thinking about is, is going back to what we said before, the purpose.

00:14:25.104 --> 00:14:26.905
What, what are you trying to accomplish?

00:14:26.935 --> 00:14:31.074
And make sure that the tools you're using allow you to accomplish that purpose.

00:14:31.135 --> 00:14:33.805
And, and if they don't, that's an issue.

00:14:33.805 --> 00:14:35.515
You gotta go, you gotta go fix that.

00:14:36.055 --> 00:14:36.505
Um.

00:14:37.194 --> 00:14:44.785
So those two things first would be what I would think about the next thing would be what's gonna happen with the kid who uses this?

00:14:44.844 --> 00:14:47.905
What's going to be the long-term effects of them using it?

00:14:48.265 --> 00:14:51.505
And so, you know, uh, the calculator is a good example.

00:14:51.685 --> 00:14:52.555
If somebody, if.

00:14:53.290 --> 00:14:59.050
If somebody uses a calculator but they don't have an idea of number sense, then the calculator is essentially pointless.

00:14:59.050 --> 00:15:00.819
'cause they won't know when it's wrong.

00:15:01.119 --> 00:15:10.270
If they do 25 times 25 when they meant to do 25 plus 25 and they get 5,000, they're gonna know if they have number sense.

00:15:10.359 --> 00:15:11.500
That's not the right answer.

00:15:11.500 --> 00:15:15.040
If they don't have number sense, they're just gonna copy the answer down.

00:15:15.430 --> 00:15:16.925
And so that's where you really gotta be.

00:15:17.604 --> 00:15:26.844
Intentional about talking about what it is that you're using, how you're using it, and why, so that you can make a more informed decision about the output that you're getting.

00:15:27.175 --> 00:15:39.594
Because if you don't know what that output is, then it's gonna be really difficult for you to say, this is exactly what it needed to be, and this is how, how I understand it, and this is the right, the right response.

00:15:40.344 --> 00:15:47.275
So you have to be thoughtful about that, and teachers have to have continuous conversations with principals and with students about that.

00:15:47.515 --> 00:15:55.944
Students, when they're using it need to be able to articulate why and how they're doing what they're doing, instead of just saying, oh, I just made an image.

00:15:56.245 --> 00:15:58.255
Okay, but like, what's the purpose?

00:15:58.464 --> 00:15:59.545
I just had to do my homework.

00:15:59.574 --> 00:16:00.714
Okay, but what's the purpose?

00:16:00.714 --> 00:16:01.405
Why did you do that?

00:16:01.405 --> 00:16:02.454
How did you go about it?

00:16:02.814 --> 00:16:06.535
Because you can actually understand a lot more from the questions somebody's asking.

00:16:07.030 --> 00:16:15.489
And the things they're asking it to do, you can understand if they understand what they're trying to accomplish and other times, like they clearly can't.

00:16:15.489 --> 00:16:20.229
In my daughter's example that I shared, she had no idea what was going on.

00:16:20.379 --> 00:16:24.339
She was like, oh, I sent you something and now I read this thing that you sent me back.

00:16:25.060 --> 00:16:26.349
Okay, whatever.

00:16:26.709 --> 00:16:51.820
And you know, that's fine for what we were trying to accomplish, but if that's the case in a presentation in school, for example, that's probably not the outcome that you're looking
for, but, but if the kid is super nervous about speaking in front of others and is so nervous about it that they can't handle writing the actual content, they are going to speak.

00:16:52.600 --> 00:17:02.110
You can give them the, the tools to write that faster so that they, they're not worried about punctuation or spelling or grammar because it's already laid out nicely.

00:17:02.709 --> 00:17:06.315
That is a benefit to them If the purpose is to get up and speak.

00:17:07.195 --> 00:17:11.335
But if the purpose is other things, then you need to use other tools to get them to that point.

00:17:11.755 --> 00:17:15.505
And so that's where like, there's no way to say, here's a hard and fast rule.

00:17:15.744 --> 00:17:18.534
Use AI for this purpose and this purpose only.

00:17:18.865 --> 00:17:24.655
It has to be case by case, situation by situation, making the best decision that you can.

00:17:24.804 --> 00:17:27.775
And nobody likes that answer because it's too flimsy.

00:17:28.394 --> 00:17:31.154
Sam Bourgeois: You know, you know where my mind was going as you were talking, I was thinking.

00:17:32.009 --> 00:17:33.239
are, what are you testing for?

00:17:33.269 --> 00:17:34.919
Like what's, what is the assessment?

00:17:34.919 --> 00:17:36.749
What's the evaluation looking for?

00:17:36.839 --> 00:17:37.169
Right.

00:17:37.229 --> 00:17:47.489
And I was thinking about those nervous times that we've all had in life where we've had to get in front of the class and do a presentation on XY and I was thinking, you know, what I use today, there's a tool.

00:17:47.489 --> 00:17:50.969
So anybody who's watching this, if you wanna go check it out, it's called synthesia.

00:17:51.419 --> 00:17:52.499
Uh, I hope I pronounce that right.

00:17:52.499 --> 00:17:56.429
But, um, Synthesia Online is, is relatively.

00:17:56.804 --> 00:17:58.094
Attainable, budget friendly.

00:17:58.154 --> 00:18:04.004
It's not too expensive, but, um, you can use the avatars that exist, but you can also create your own avatar.

00:18:04.274 --> 00:18:06.464
And so I was just thinking about me like, what do I do?

00:18:06.554 --> 00:18:17.534
I put my shirt on and I do a talk and I read myself, and then I get my avatar, and then, um, I can just kind of dump in text scripts that I've written and I can have the avatar read it.

00:18:17.534 --> 00:18:18.914
My avatar doesn't make mistakes.

00:18:19.229 --> 00:18:21.509
There's no noise from the kids in the other room.

00:18:21.569 --> 00:18:23.969
There's no like, I don't have to shave, right?

00:18:23.969 --> 00:18:29.009
Like so I'm just thinking about like, what about the kid who says, well, I'm gonna create an avatar of myself.

00:18:29.009 --> 00:18:34.739
I'm nervous in front of people, but you wanted me to the material, create a presentation.

00:18:34.739 --> 00:18:37.199
I did that and then I gave it to my avatar.

00:18:37.199 --> 00:18:39.869
It's my voice, it's my likeness anyway.

00:18:39.929 --> 00:18:46.319
I'm not trying to be too wild and challenging, but I'm just kind of thinking through like a lot of fun conversation to be had here.

00:18:46.319 --> 00:18:47.129
What about the teacher?

00:18:47.459 --> 00:18:48.899
Who does what I do do.

00:18:48.899 --> 00:18:55.109
We look down on that teacher and say, you did a flipped classroom, but you cheated, you know, you used your avatar to read the lessons.

00:18:55.109 --> 00:18:55.589
It was like,

00:18:56.020 --> 00:18:56.440
Jethro: Yeah.

00:18:56.759 --> 00:18:59.219
Sam Bourgeois: it, I did what I, what I was trying to accomplish.

00:18:59.219 --> 00:18:59.459
Right.

00:19:00.370 --> 00:19:00.850
Jethro: Yeah.

00:19:00.940 --> 00:19:20.080
Well, we've all sat through classes with a teacher or a professor who rambles on and on and on and doesn't get to the point and talks about a million different
things, and when in reality it would be much better if we just had the exact information that we needed to know, and then we could have those rambling conversations.

00:19:20.575 --> 00:19:35.905
When we're not trying to teach a specific topic, so, you know, Synthesia is a, a good example of an opportunity where you can produce a perfect lesson essentially with no errors, no bird walks, nothing.

00:19:36.295 --> 00:19:44.035
And if that's what you're trying to do is teach a very specific thing, it is crazy to try to do that yourself.

00:19:44.500 --> 00:19:59.410
With a bunch of kids, with people interrupting when a better way to do that is say, here's exactly what you need to know in a clean, well thought out presentation with slides and bullets and all this kind of stuff that makes it very clear what's going on.

00:19:59.800 --> 00:20:02.650
That is, is really powerful.

00:20:03.040 --> 00:20:07.840
Now, there, there are a lot of, uh, scripted type, uh.

00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:15.310
Um, uh, curriculums where the teacher basically says, you know, they read from a book everything that's happening that day.

00:20:15.640 --> 00:20:21.610
In those situations, why not have a computer or AI do that?

00:20:21.940 --> 00:20:25.870
If that's really what the point is, the AI is not going to mess up.

00:20:25.870 --> 00:20:27.610
It's going to read the script exactly.

00:20:28.120 --> 00:20:29.980
Why not have it do that?

00:20:30.850 --> 00:20:32.050
Those situations?

00:20:32.050 --> 00:20:32.620
Yes.

00:20:32.710 --> 00:20:34.000
You, you might as well.

00:20:34.180 --> 00:20:37.210
What's the benefit of the teacher being the one to do that?

00:20:37.480 --> 00:20:43.600
Well, the real benefit is that the teacher will notice when the kid needs some additional help or needs to slow down.

00:20:44.110 --> 00:20:48.040
And that's great and they should, should provide that and help with that.

00:20:48.490 --> 00:20:55.030
But if we are like, here's the exact thing you need to know, here's how we know exactly how to teach it, and this is what it looks like.

00:20:55.585 --> 00:21:07.645
We might as well put that into something like Synthesia or something else to say, here's the information that needs to be had in a clean, clear way to make sure you don't mess up and you really understand it.

00:21:08.455 --> 00:21:12.475
Let's, let's go with that, and that is a perfectly acceptable way to use it.

00:21:13.135 --> 00:21:16.615
However, that's not what most teaching really is when it comes down to it.

00:21:16.795 --> 00:21:22.465
Most teaching is us having a conversation, getting to understand where each other's coming from.

00:21:24.265 --> 00:21:24.285
Excuse me.

00:21:25.255 --> 00:21:27.835
And then making decisions from there.

00:21:28.105 --> 00:21:31.585
And that's the kind of thing that I want more of from my kids' teachers.

00:21:31.885 --> 00:21:36.535
And I want less of the stuff that an AI could do better that we should just hand over to the ai.

00:21:39.774 --> 00:21:47.459
Sam Bourgeois: I was in a presentation, uh, in October of this, of this past year, the talk was, uh.

00:21:47.939 --> 00:21:50.639
An AI guru and he was trying to kind of open everyone's eyes.

00:21:50.639 --> 00:21:51.479
It was a great talk, by the way.

00:21:51.479 --> 00:21:54.239
I'm not, I'm not, not poo-pooing it at all.

00:21:54.269 --> 00:21:55.169
It was a great talk.

00:21:55.589 --> 00:21:56.549
Very inspirational.

00:21:56.939 --> 00:21:59.309
But one of the things that he said is he had a mentor.

00:21:59.729 --> 00:22:02.579
Um, this is a business conference and an education conference.

00:22:02.579 --> 00:22:06.689
He had a mentor who was just full of all nuggets of wisdom, just great experiences.

00:22:06.689 --> 00:22:15.599
And so what this guy did was he took all of his writings, his books, manuscripts, a GPT and called it like, I'm just making this up.

00:22:15.659 --> 00:22:17.099
Imagine Jethro, right?

00:22:17.099 --> 00:22:19.049
So GPT.

00:22:19.169 --> 00:22:28.409
Imagine if we took all of your writings, all of your brilliant musings, all of your perspectives, and built a GPT, and then we had an agentic conversation.

00:22:29.279 --> 00:22:31.199
Now, I'm not suggesting we don't have this podcast.

00:22:31.199 --> 00:22:39.029
I'm not suggesting you, you know, you, you, you, you trademark your likeness and all your writings and then do a bot instead of having real human interaction.

00:22:39.389 --> 00:22:43.259
My point is we're talking about individualized instruction.

00:22:43.259 --> 00:22:56.544
Imagine if we had that teacher likeness in the future that could answer questions authority without rambling in a way that the kid wants to have the conversation say, you know, I, I wanna learn had.

00:22:57.299 --> 00:22:58.739
had that experience in college, by the way.

00:22:58.739 --> 00:23:03.329
I had a, he was a Jamaican, I think he was a Jamaican chemistry professor.

00:23:03.389 --> 00:23:03.989
Brilliant.

00:23:04.319 --> 00:23:08.039
But he talked a lot about alligators and sharks, and I didn't know what the heck he was talking about most of the time.

00:23:09.449 --> 00:23:11.039
and he was funny.

00:23:11.039 --> 00:23:11.819
He was really funny.

00:23:11.819 --> 00:23:12.659
He was a great guy.

00:23:13.019 --> 00:23:22.349
But wouldn't it have been great for me to have that silly, rambling 90 minute class Tuesday and Thursday, and then go home with my phone and talk to, I think his name was Dr.

00:23:22.349 --> 00:23:23.009
Darbo, by the way.

00:23:23.009 --> 00:23:24.249
So, Dr. Darbo, if you're watching this.

00:23:24.929 --> 00:23:34.229
Have my Dr. Darbo, GPT and have a conversation about inorganic chemistry it's meaningful for me, when I'm ready to learn, when I'm ready to ask questions.

00:23:34.499 --> 00:23:38.399
How incredibly powerful would that be, right?

00:23:38.489 --> 00:23:40.469
I mean, that's the future.

00:23:41.515 --> 00:23:41.815
Jethro: Yeah.

00:23:42.145 --> 00:23:55.205
And, and like that, that's certainly very possible, and you could already do that without even getting all of his stuff in there because there's enough information in the models already that they could, they could be.

00:23:55.645 --> 00:24:02.215
Answer that, but here's the real key, like it's not enough to just have the conversation, right?

00:24:02.545 --> 00:24:11.725
And just having a conversation with the teacher is typically not enough because each one of us learns and we have our own learning path, and we learn in our own way.

00:24:12.115 --> 00:24:19.135
And, and this is not getting into all the multiple intelligences stuff and all, all that kind of thing, but just our own experiences.

00:24:19.135 --> 00:24:26.905
You and I are gonna walk away from this conversation having different insights that matter to us from what we said.

00:24:26.905 --> 00:24:29.245
And anybody listening is gonna have their own insight.

00:24:29.575 --> 00:24:39.445
Now it's possible and very likely that many of the insights will be similar, but the reality is, is that everybody has their own learning path, and it is unique to them, as unique as their fingerprint.

00:24:40.135 --> 00:24:46.945
In fact even more unique because even identical twins are gonna have a different learning experience than Than their, than their twin.

00:24:47.455 --> 00:24:56.285
So we all have this unique experience, and as you go through life, you build on what it is that you learn all throughout your life.

00:24:56.965 --> 00:24:59.935
And that makes you into the person that you are.

00:25:00.355 --> 00:25:07.525
And there's culture, there's genetics, there's uh, what you actually learned, like academically officially.

00:25:07.735 --> 00:25:12.535
There's also the things that you learned from, uh, negative personal interactions and things like that.

00:25:13.135 --> 00:25:19.180
And what I want is for us to be able to recognize and value whatever learning.

00:25:19.815 --> 00:25:22.185
That happens wherever it comes from.

00:25:22.755 --> 00:25:27.825
And our problem in schools is that we focus on the learning that happens within the four walls of the classroom.

00:25:28.275 --> 00:25:30.915
And that's all that quote unquote counts.

00:25:31.215 --> 00:25:35.745
Because if you already know how to do something, you're still gonna take that test in class.

00:25:35.925 --> 00:25:40.875
You're still going to have to do that report, even if you can de demonstrate.

00:25:40.965 --> 00:25:42.255
I definitely know this.

00:25:42.315 --> 00:25:44.325
Most teachers are not gonna let you outta that.

00:25:45.415 --> 00:25:49.525
However, it's incredibly powerful when you do let kids out of that.

00:25:49.765 --> 00:25:54.925
My second year teaching, I had a student who was so smart and so far advanced for the rest of my kids.

00:25:55.315 --> 00:25:57.325
I knew there was nothing I could teach her.

00:25:57.670 --> 00:26:03.280
As a student in my class, and I said to her, look, I'm not gonna be able to do anything to help you grow.

00:26:03.400 --> 00:26:16.060
So you need to come up with your own thing that you wanna spend your time learning, and you don't have to do any assignments in class, and I will exempt you from everything, but you've gotta be learning at your own rate, at your own pace.

00:26:16.480 --> 00:26:17.920
And she was like, are you serious?

00:26:17.920 --> 00:26:18.550
I said, yeah.

00:26:18.550 --> 00:26:20.440
And she's like, all right, I wanna do Victorian literature.

00:26:20.440 --> 00:26:22.780
And she read four Victorian.

00:26:23.215 --> 00:26:29.575
Literature books, and I don't remember them all, but I know Withering Heights and Pride and Prejudice were two of them.

00:26:30.085 --> 00:26:33.385
And I was like, what in the world is this girl doing?

00:26:33.385 --> 00:26:40.525
But she was totally into it and loved what she was doing, and then she wrote a bunch of stuff about it and, and did a great job.

00:26:40.885 --> 00:26:45.265
Definitely better than what I did in my own English degree in college.

00:26:45.595 --> 00:26:46.915
It was, it was great.

00:26:48.025 --> 00:26:49.885
But she did her own thing.

00:26:49.975 --> 00:27:05.095
Now, what would be really valuable is if she had a, an AI chat bot that was there to help her work through that stuff and talk about goals
and how to make plans and what she was trying to do and what she was doing well and where she was struggling, that would've been nice.

00:27:05.335 --> 00:27:11.815
But the thing that was really valuable about my time with her is that we talked during class.

00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:15.730
Once a week and she just said, here's where I'm at and here's what I'm doing.

00:27:16.030 --> 00:27:18.490
And I, and I said, this looks good.

00:27:18.490 --> 00:27:19.900
Let me give you some feedback here.

00:27:20.110 --> 00:27:22.750
This could be improved, that looks great, whatever.

00:27:22.900 --> 00:27:26.560
And we just did that each, each week for the whole school year.

00:27:26.950 --> 00:27:30.580
She produced more in that year than any of my other students.

00:27:31.510 --> 00:27:41.530
Because she was operating at her own level, and what I didn't have was Subway to help push her and keep her going, except just my interactions with her.

00:27:42.040 --> 00:27:42.670
And so.

00:27:43.270 --> 00:27:48.760
If we can have some way to personalize everything that we're doing in class, that would be great.

00:27:48.790 --> 00:27:50.320
Here's a real simple example.

00:27:50.800 --> 00:27:53.650
You're teaching a math class and you have story problems.

00:27:53.650 --> 00:28:03.130
You're trying to teach Pythagorean Theorem and you have kids say, this is what I'm interested in, and then your questions that use the same numbers, just use something that they're interested in.

00:28:03.580 --> 00:28:08.290
And so, you know, it doesn't matter what it is because it's all about learning the math.

00:28:08.530 --> 00:28:09.040
So.

00:28:09.415 --> 00:28:20.605
You have 500 questions that you can generate instantaneously that each one relates to, gives each kid 10 different options for how they want to answer that specific question.

00:28:21.145 --> 00:28:24.505
And then like that could be generated in a heartbeat.

00:28:24.595 --> 00:28:31.465
And that is the amazing thing because then a kid might actually be interested in it if they're like, when will I ever have to use this?

00:28:31.465 --> 00:28:36.655
And you're like, oh, here's a place where you could use it and something you're interested in that becomes really valuable.

00:28:37.754 --> 00:28:37.994
Sam Bourgeois: Yeah.

00:28:38.369 --> 00:28:42.179
Yeah, the diameter of the death star compared to the opening

00:28:42.265 --> 00:28:42.685
Jethro: Yeah.

00:28:43.199 --> 00:28:43.799
Sam Bourgeois: the tunnel, right?

00:28:43.799 --> 00:28:44.039
Yeah.

00:28:44.099 --> 00:28:44.309
Yeah.

00:28:44.339 --> 00:28:44.519
I,

00:28:44.545 --> 00:28:45.115
Jethro: Yes.

00:28:45.119 --> 00:28:45.749
Sam Bourgeois: totally agree.

00:28:45.959 --> 00:28:46.349
I totally

00:28:46.495 --> 00:28:46.975
Jethro: Yeah.

00:28:47.245 --> 00:28:49.825
So those are the kinds of things that we want to do, right?

00:28:49.919 --> 00:28:55.799
Sam Bourgeois: we did that whenever we were in the classroom, but it was exceedingly difficult and taxing

00:28:55.945 --> 00:28:56.455
Jethro: Oh, yeah,

00:28:56.669 --> 00:28:58.169
Sam Bourgeois: and we couldn't do it for every kid.

00:28:58.199 --> 00:28:59.069
We could just do it

00:28:59.125 --> 00:28:59.515
Jethro: yeah,

00:28:59.669 --> 00:29:01.559
Sam Bourgeois: a handful whenever it was possible.

00:29:01.589 --> 00:29:01.919
Right.

00:29:02.215 --> 00:29:02.605
Jethro: yeah.

00:29:02.845 --> 00:29:05.095
And so, so what great teachers do.

00:29:05.680 --> 00:29:12.490
They default to, uh, things that they think most of their kids will get and will like, and that's great.

00:29:12.550 --> 00:29:13.990
I, I so appreciate that.

00:29:14.470 --> 00:29:22.720
But they could do so much better if given the proper tools and the proper understanding of how to use those tools and when to use them and when to make 'em right.

00:29:22.750 --> 00:29:24.850
Like that is incredibly powerful.

00:29:27.505 --> 00:29:29.290
Oh, you just muted yourself somehow.

00:29:31.154 --> 00:29:31.634
Sam Bourgeois: Apologies.

00:29:31.724 --> 00:29:31.964
I guess

00:29:31.990 --> 00:29:32.200
Jethro: There you go.

00:29:32.204 --> 00:29:33.044
Sam Bourgeois: I was quiet too long.

00:29:34.604 --> 00:29:39.734
Um, you know, what I think about though is I think about the, think about the risk.

00:29:39.734 --> 00:29:42.614
I, I have to, that's just my security brain, right?

00:29:43.064 --> 00:29:44.984
And I don't like to stifle innovation.

00:29:45.074 --> 00:29:49.814
I don't like to, put up, put up too many blocks and obstacles, but.

00:29:50.894 --> 00:29:56.864
I do think about data that we're collecting and, and I, I worry about that.

00:29:56.864 --> 00:30:02.324
Like it concerns me like, not to change the subject from ai, but like, you know, you were talking about Siri.

00:30:02.744 --> 00:30:07.934
I mean, so Siri everything you say, waiting for the queue, the, the trigger.

00:30:08.024 --> 00:30:08.624
Hey, Siri.

00:30:09.284 --> 00:30:16.334
Um, the question I have is like, are we just piling on all this data and metadata.

00:30:17.264 --> 00:30:20.294
You know, like what is, is there, is there a risk there?

00:30:20.714 --> 00:30:26.054
You know, is it, are we creating profiles that can be used, know, potentially in a negative way?

00:30:26.054 --> 00:30:31.694
Like I, and again, I'm not, not thinking about it like, uh, like barcode tattoos or anything like that.

00:30:31.694 --> 00:30:45.164
What I'm thinking about is like we create these learning profiles and is it possible that the profiles don't reflect the learner, and that if given a different opportunity for a different path, they could be.

00:30:45.539 --> 00:30:47.939
On a different trajectory, they could go faster, slower.

00:30:48.359 --> 00:30:54.419
Um, are we creating biases in the system based on that, on that profiling of information?

00:30:54.419 --> 00:30:59.069
Are we saying, now this kid, you know, I'm not saying we'd write 'em off, but this kid's obviously a low performer.

00:30:59.069 --> 00:31:01.019
Let's, let's slow things down for them.

00:31:01.769 --> 00:31:04.409
know that there's always gonna be a response, like, no, no, no.

00:31:04.409 --> 00:31:14.579
The, the AI could always encourage and uplift and train, but from that general perspective of say least privilege, and I say.

00:31:15.374 --> 00:31:16.124
data's bad data.

00:31:16.124 --> 00:31:16.844
I don't want any data.

00:31:16.844 --> 00:31:18.374
I don't want to, I don't wanna possess your data.

00:31:18.374 --> 00:31:19.934
There's liability in anything that I have.

00:31:19.934 --> 00:31:20.144
Right.

00:31:21.134 --> 00:31:26.384
as schools start to compile all this information about learners, what are your thoughts about that?

00:31:26.384 --> 00:31:29.204
And it's, eh, we gotta do what we gotta do.

00:31:29.204 --> 00:31:29.444
Right?

00:31:29.444 --> 00:31:31.934
Like we, it's part of the, part of the success.

00:31:33.100 --> 00:31:33.430
Jethro: Yeah.

00:31:33.610 --> 00:31:34.810
You know, I think one of the.

00:31:35.290 --> 00:31:40.450
One of the worst things is that we have all this data about students already and we don't use it to benefit them.

00:31:40.660 --> 00:31:42.580
So, so that's an issue too.

00:31:42.790 --> 00:31:51.820
And, and that's a real problem because, uh, we're missing out on opportunity to bless our kids' lives with the information that we do have.

00:31:52.150 --> 00:31:53.800
So there are some aspects of that.

00:31:53.800 --> 00:31:54.760
On the other hand.

00:31:55.205 --> 00:32:10.925
We definitely should not be keeping a profile of these kids because they will change, and we certainly don't want to do anything that would force a kid lower in their capability than they're actually at.

00:32:11.165 --> 00:32:15.905
We'd never want to do something that would limit a child's potential for growth.

00:32:17.170 --> 00:32:18.910
I can definitely see that happening.

00:32:18.910 --> 00:32:30.670
If you are, if your references are always about sports, and so then the AI only gives you sports related, uh, content, then it never gives you a chance to see something else.

00:32:30.670 --> 00:32:37.750
And so in, in the design of these things, those kinds of considerations I think should be made as well.

00:32:38.260 --> 00:32:45.220
That being said, you, you don't want to just be capturing everything and, uh, having it be, um.

00:32:45.760 --> 00:32:46.810
There forever.

00:32:46.900 --> 00:32:51.640
You know, you want the kids, you want kids to be able to be forgotten from the system.

00:32:51.790 --> 00:32:56.590
And to be honest, with the way AI is right now, nobody knows how to do that.

00:32:56.770 --> 00:33:02.770
And nobody understands how to make that actually happen because we don't understand how it works well enough.

00:33:02.770 --> 00:33:09.190
And I'm not just talking about me, you know, the uneducated principal over here, I'm talking about act.

00:33:10.045 --> 00:33:16.645
Actual data scientists who are creating these tools don't know what's happening inside the black box of ai.

00:33:16.675 --> 00:33:18.145
And that's, that's very real.

00:33:18.355 --> 00:33:25.165
They don't know what's being saved completely, and they have some ideas, but they're not totally sure exactly how it all is working.

00:33:25.165 --> 00:33:28.225
You can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's how I understand it.

00:33:28.225 --> 00:33:28.675
So

00:33:29.794 --> 00:33:30.334
Sam Bourgeois: No, you're, you're

00:33:30.475 --> 00:33:31.105
Jethro: go ahead.

00:33:31.264 --> 00:33:31.714
Sam Bourgeois: no, you're right.

00:33:31.714 --> 00:33:40.684
And there's, there's some, there's some ethical thought exercises that I've gone through, and if, if you guys have never heard some of these perspectives, I'll give you one or two that are kind of the juicy ones.

00:33:41.374 --> 00:33:42.409
You know, there's, there's a lot of people who would argue.

00:33:43.169 --> 00:33:46.019
That, you know, ai, whatever the heck that is, right?

00:33:46.019 --> 00:33:46.739
Like it's, you know,

00:33:46.900 --> 00:33:47.229
Jethro: Yeah,

00:33:47.549 --> 00:33:49.079
Sam Bourgeois: your, your LLM, whatever it's you're using.

00:33:49.270 --> 00:33:51.910
Jethro: the marketing term for what's been going on for decades.

00:33:51.989 --> 00:33:52.529
Sam Bourgeois: exactly.

00:33:52.660 --> 00:33:52.930
Jethro: on.

00:33:53.189 --> 00:34:01.139
Sam Bourgeois: Um, there's, there's a, there's a, that some people say, you know, all that art, that AI art, not AI art.

00:34:01.169 --> 00:34:10.529
It's just a, very poor copy, a very poor amalgamation of real art that's being plagiarized and copied.

00:34:10.829 --> 00:34:11.069
And if.

00:34:11.549 --> 00:34:12.509
That's what you're going for.

00:34:12.539 --> 00:34:12.839
Okay.

00:34:12.839 --> 00:34:13.259
Got you.

00:34:13.259 --> 00:34:13.559
Got it.

00:34:13.589 --> 00:34:14.009
Great.

00:34:14.069 --> 00:34:14.699
Super duper.

00:34:15.149 --> 00:34:20.819
Same thing could be said about all the, the writing that we, you know, that we might produce from these things.

00:34:20.819 --> 00:34:31.079
I mean, there's the, the story of the, the attorney, uh, I think it was up north, uh, he had a big case, did a bunch of research, turned in all of his information, cited all of his works, and the whole thing was made up.

00:34:31.109 --> 00:34:32.099
Like none of it was even

00:34:32.199 --> 00:34:32.529
Jethro: Yeah.

00:34:32.769 --> 00:34:33.219
Yep.

00:34:33.389 --> 00:34:38.039
Sam Bourgeois: So we hear those things and those are like the, I call it the fud, you know, the fear, uncertainty and doubt.

00:34:38.769 --> 00:34:39.099
Jethro: Yep.

00:34:39.329 --> 00:34:39.779
Sam Bourgeois: those things.

00:34:39.779 --> 00:34:40.144
That's not my point.

00:34:41.024 --> 00:35:00.764
my point is like, there are ethical considerations to be made and I'm, you know, I'm thinking about eu, like eus got a lot of regulations
around privacy in particular, uh, their new ai, uh, their new ai, uh, framework, uh, that just came out middle of last year, middle of of 2025.

00:35:02.444 --> 00:35:08.354
I think that's gonna be interesting to see where the United States goes with some of those things about data privacy and protection.

00:35:08.504 --> 00:35:09.914
And you used the word I was really.

00:35:10.814 --> 00:35:11.204
on that.

00:35:11.204 --> 00:35:14.474
You said, um, I'm paraphrasing the right to be forgotten.

00:35:15.434 --> 00:35:17.084
You know, do we, is that a right?

00:35:17.174 --> 00:35:21.524
Is that a, is that something that as a US citizen, do we have a right to that?

00:35:21.524 --> 00:35:23.174
Can I say, I wanna be forgotten?

00:35:23.174 --> 00:35:24.554
I don't wanna be a part of your system.

00:35:24.944 --> 00:35:26.264
I don't wanna train your model.

00:35:26.264 --> 00:35:29.624
You know, like, are we, I, I wonder Jethro like.

00:35:30.614 --> 00:35:36.914
All the people selling us the stuff, the AI stuff, they turn on AI from the textbook manufacturer.

00:35:36.914 --> 00:35:39.464
They turn on AI from PowerSchool, they turn on ai, whatever.

00:35:40.184 --> 00:35:48.044
Is it possible that they're just selling us a platform that we're actually doing the work to train to

00:35:48.210 --> 00:35:48.500
Jethro: Yeah.

00:35:48.524 --> 00:35:49.994
Sam Bourgeois: information back, right.

00:35:50.755 --> 00:35:51.145
Jethro: Yeah.

00:35:51.235 --> 00:35:55.285
I mean the, the challenge with this is that the, the training.

00:35:55.825 --> 00:36:03.144
Data is valuable and worthwhile, uh, to the companies and for us, right?

00:36:03.475 --> 00:36:06.834
So if it knows that I like sports, then it can.

00:36:07.930 --> 00:36:10.839
Bring up things that are related to sports for me.

00:36:10.930 --> 00:36:16.750
And, you know, there's, there's all kinds of ways where that knowledge about you is beneficial.

00:36:17.230 --> 00:36:20.589
That's why people love the algorithm on social media.

00:36:20.890 --> 00:36:36.279
And I would, I don't know that people personally love it, but they like being on social media and like seeing things they like because the algorithm has been trained
on the things that you look at, the things that you leave up, the things you know, that you're paying attention to and click on and like, and all that kind of stuff.

00:36:36.279 --> 00:36:36.700
So.

00:36:37.089 --> 00:36:48.789
So those things do matter and, and we want to take advantage of that, but we also have to recognize that that might not be the best, the best way to manage things.

00:36:48.819 --> 00:36:52.240
And there may be benefit in starting fresh every time.

00:36:52.419 --> 00:36:56.979
There may be benefit in starting fresh on some things and going back to other things in other ways.

00:36:57.009 --> 00:37:03.339
And you know, the truth is we just don't know s the answers to so many of these questions yet.

00:37:03.895 --> 00:37:09.115
And, and a lot of people will say that and say, we don't know, so we just keep using it.

00:37:09.415 --> 00:37:18.295
But what we really need to be thinking is, let's, since we don't know the answer, let's be intentional and start asking some of these questions so that when we see something that's a red flag.

00:37:19.299 --> 00:37:23.619
We can shut it down or we can not take it to begin with.

00:37:23.740 --> 00:37:30.399
And so for example, I, I gave the example of teachers using AI to just create worksheets, right?

00:37:30.999 --> 00:37:39.159
If that's what the tool is there for, then there's no point in having the tool in my mind, because we don't need more worksheet creators.

00:37:39.490 --> 00:37:39.789
So.

00:37:40.464 --> 00:37:44.094
That's not how I would suggest we teach anything in education.

00:37:44.514 --> 00:37:55.254
Um, and, and what I mean by that is, is that everybody does the same exact thing and it just makes it so easy for the teacher to grade and correct and, and give feedback on.

00:37:55.554 --> 00:37:57.324
And what we really want are.

00:37:57.700 --> 00:38:04.689
Opportunities for individualization and understanding where people are at and helping them in their own personal learning journey.

00:38:04.899 --> 00:38:11.109
That extends far beyond what happens in the four walls of the classroom, and so that's what we want to be looking at.

00:38:11.169 --> 00:38:16.359
If the tool is just to recreate standardized testing, then let's not use it.

00:38:16.689 --> 00:38:22.930
If the tool is to make it easier for us to assess really what kids understand, then.

00:38:23.994 --> 00:38:27.144
That sounds a lot better, and we can start with those kinds of questions.

00:38:27.144 --> 00:38:36.474
What kind of education system do we want to have and is it worthwhile for this tool to be used to help us get to that point of where it's at?

00:38:36.864 --> 00:38:39.114
Tho those are the kinds of questions we should be asking.

00:38:39.114 --> 00:38:45.924
And when something gives us a red flag and it's like, oh, we're going to use your data to train the our future models.

00:38:46.539 --> 00:38:49.269
We need to be thoughtful about that in some situations.

00:38:49.269 --> 00:38:59.109
Yes, we should be doing that because if we're in a school, and this is training us on how to teach reading better, I want the data to train the model so that kids learn how to read faster.

00:38:59.829 --> 00:39:11.619
That's not a bad thing, but if the, if the data is used then to say, uh, you know, we're gonna train this model and we're gonna use your personal information and refer back to you later.

00:39:11.634 --> 00:39:26.904
If that's not a good thing and we just don't understand how this stuff works well enough, nobody understands how this works well enough to really say, this is the true harm in using your data, and this is the true benefit in using your data.

00:39:26.904 --> 00:39:27.955
We just don't know yet.

00:39:30.535 --> 00:39:35.245
So for that reason, we start with don't use my data to train the model

00:39:35.414 --> 00:39:35.774
Sam Bourgeois: Mm-hmm.

00:39:36.444 --> 00:39:39.535
Jethro: until we understand what it's for, and then maybe we can.

00:39:39.704 --> 00:39:41.534
Sam Bourgeois: Or create enclaves whenever possible.

00:39:41.534 --> 00:39:42.284
Create enclaves.

00:39:42.284 --> 00:39:42.734
There's a happy

00:39:42.955 --> 00:39:43.314
Jethro: Yeah.

00:39:43.364 --> 00:39:43.724
Sam Bourgeois: can we,

00:39:43.884 --> 00:39:44.274
Jethro: Yep.

00:39:44.414 --> 00:39:44.744
Sam Bourgeois: Yeah.

00:39:45.564 --> 00:39:45.774
Jethro: Yeah.

00:39:45.774 --> 00:39:54.115
So we're gonna do all this stuff in this own siloed box over here so that it's not referring back to anything else, not connected to anything else.

00:39:54.415 --> 00:40:00.625
And then as we can learn better, then maybe we can say, all right, let's go some, let's take this somewhere else.

00:40:00.625 --> 00:40:08.004
So, for example, Claude, I think, is doing this thing where, when the, when the context of your message gets too long, your check gets too long.

00:40:08.619 --> 00:40:12.879
It'll summarize it all and save it so that you have that context.

00:40:13.299 --> 00:40:21.069
That is a good way to say, here's what it's remembering about us in our conversation, and then you can actually make a decision about that.

00:40:21.309 --> 00:40:23.949
Most of the time, you can't make a decision about it at all.

00:40:27.779 --> 00:40:28.499
Sam Bourgeois: That idea.

00:40:28.559 --> 00:40:29.189
I like that idea.

00:40:29.189 --> 00:40:29.669
It's interesting.

00:40:29.669 --> 00:40:31.169
I hadn't, I hadn't really thought about that.

00:40:31.259 --> 00:40:36.779
Um, I also thought about maybe we create systems that are kind of school safe.

00:40:36.929 --> 00:40:38.339
If that's, if that even makes sense.

00:40:38.339 --> 00:40:41.789
Like a pseudo anonymization.

00:40:42.284 --> 00:40:42.644
Right.

00:40:42.644 --> 00:40:45.014
Like, I mean, we, we already do that for the most part, right?

00:40:45.014 --> 00:40:46.544
We already attempt to do that.

00:40:49.694 --> 00:40:50.234
interesting.

00:40:50.264 --> 00:40:50.414
Yeah.

00:40:50.414 --> 00:40:51.194
Interesting thought though.

00:40:51.194 --> 00:40:57.854
I, I think, uh, I think we've been promised that in many industries by many tools and it hasn't actually existed.

00:40:58.214 --> 00:41:00.254
So that's, I do con I have concern there.

00:41:01.209 --> 00:41:02.169
Jethro: Yeah, for sure.

00:41:02.529 --> 00:41:05.230
And a lot this comes down to trust.

00:41:07.029 --> 00:41:16.760
Um, the, the companies and you have to determine if you can trust them, and, and that is a huge question mark for many of these companies that, that you just don't know about.

00:41:17.339 --> 00:41:20.009
Sam Bourgeois: Well, it, and it it, you might do a risk assessment.

00:41:20.459 --> 00:41:21.989
That was where I started this conversation.

00:41:22.019 --> 00:41:24.149
That was my, that's my security guy, right.

00:41:24.464 --> 00:41:30.284
Uh, risk assessment may actually be a quality assessment, but then you don't know what happens behind the scenes.

00:41:30.284 --> 00:41:32.864
Like didn't, didn't Apple own PowerSchool.

00:41:32.864 --> 00:41:36.524
If you go back far enough, like I I, those are the kind of questions we have to ask ourselves.

00:41:36.669 --> 00:41:37.059
Jethro: Yeah.

00:41:37.094 --> 00:41:46.394
Sam Bourgeois: if, if the industry has already demonstrated how they will operate data brokers, uh, click bait.

00:41:47.474 --> 00:41:48.044
economy.

00:41:48.374 --> 00:41:48.674
Right?

00:41:48.674 --> 00:41:52.874
Very inhumane approach to how we interact as humans with our technology.

00:41:53.684 --> 00:41:59.444
that's what the industry has already demonstrated to us, why would we expect anything different if they sold to an education market?

00:41:59.834 --> 00:42:01.844
And that's potentially a concern.

00:42:02.024 --> 00:42:02.294
Yeah.

00:42:03.024 --> 00:42:03.384
Jethro: Yeah.

00:42:03.474 --> 00:42:08.724
And then what happens when the company that you have contracted with gets acquired by somebody else?

00:42:09.324 --> 00:42:13.584
Uh, and do you, are you forced into that new contract?

00:42:13.584 --> 00:42:15.444
Do you want to be part of that new company?

00:42:15.834 --> 00:42:29.214
And, you know, let's say you're working with a, a local mom and pop ai shop that is providing you a, a good service, and then they sell to PowerSchool or HMH or Pearson or any of these other publishers, and they're like.

00:42:29.874 --> 00:42:32.334
All right now that's managed by them.

00:42:32.394 --> 00:42:36.354
And it's no longer this little safe box on your desk in your school building.

00:42:36.745 --> 00:42:44.365
It's part of their server and it's connected to their thing, but now you have insights into all the, all the other stuff that they produce and publish.

00:42:44.365 --> 00:42:47.185
And is that a benefit or is that actually a hindrance?

00:42:47.544 --> 00:42:49.404
And those are the questions you gotta ask.

00:42:49.404 --> 00:42:50.274
You gotta wonder about.

00:42:50.609 --> 00:42:59.069
Sam Bourgeois: And God forbid they're not gonna, they're not gonna give you a question answer back and forth on this one, but you know, God forbid they, they get breached, which is

00:42:59.229 --> 00:42:59.589
Jethro: Yep.

00:42:59.909 --> 00:43:00.779
Sam Bourgeois: happened just a

00:43:00.850 --> 00:43:01.390
Jethro: Yes.

00:43:01.394 --> 00:43:01.564
Yep.

00:43:02.234 --> 00:43:04.964
Sam Bourgeois: If they were breached, what happened to all that training data?

00:43:05.054 --> 00:43:12.524
You know, like imagine all those profiles and learners, like, not to blow this outta proportion, but we, we see what happens in the real world.

00:43:12.524 --> 00:43:16.004
We know what Cambridge Analytica did in 2016.

00:43:16.064 --> 00:43:21.584
If memory serves with our US elections, we know what, what they would do with the data if they had access to it.

00:43:21.584 --> 00:43:26.324
So how would that data be used, nefariously, should there be a breach or, or some kind of leak or exposure?

00:43:28.274 --> 00:43:34.720
Jethro: All, all kinds of things that, that we just don't know the answer to, and we have to recognize that we don't know the answer.

00:43:34.724 --> 00:43:34.894
And.

00:43:35.859 --> 00:43:46.180
Make the best decision we can with the information we do have and be ready to intervene when things, uh, are not going well, which is a, a scary place to be for sure.

00:43:46.720 --> 00:43:51.549
But at the same time, you can't just ignore it and say, this is, we're not talking about this.

00:43:51.549 --> 00:43:54.910
We're not doing anything with it because it is the world that we live in.

00:43:54.910 --> 00:43:58.810
And, and just because you block it at your school doesn't mean the kids aren't using it at home.

00:43:59.245 --> 00:44:01.435
And we don't have any control over that.

00:44:01.524 --> 00:44:15.535
But the reality is, is they have access and we can at least be partners with families in that rather than, uh, just saying, one, you're on your own, or two, we're unlocking the floodgates here.

00:44:15.805 --> 00:44:17.964
Neither one of those are good solutions.

00:44:20.304 --> 00:44:20.894
Sam Bourgeois: Well said man.

00:44:20.984 --> 00:44:21.464
Well said.

00:44:21.879 --> 00:44:22.240
Jethro: Yeah.

00:44:22.329 --> 00:44:23.919
Well, Sam, this has been awesome.

00:44:23.979 --> 00:44:33.819
Thank you so much again for, for doing this and being part of this and, uh, everybody who's listening, thank you for listening to Artificial Intelligence, real Talk, and any final words from you.

00:44:33.819 --> 00:44:34.930
Sam, I'll let you have the last word.

00:44:36.134 --> 00:44:40.514
Sam Bourgeois: Man, I'm, I'm just, it's always a pleasure chatting with you and, uh, as you mentioned, it's always good to learn.

00:44:40.514 --> 00:44:45.344
This is, this is something we will never replace with AI, is these kind of real, authentic conversations.

00:44:45.344 --> 00:44:46.304
So thank you for your time.

00:44:46.980 --> 00:44:47.634
Jethro: That's right.

00:44:47.725 --> 00:44:57.024
Even I said I was gonna have let you have the officer, but now I'm not even, even when we do this kind of a thing with ai, it still is not the same as doing it with another person.

00:44:57.115 --> 00:44:59.365
So you, you are absolutely right.

00:44:59.515 --> 00:45:00.055
Thanks man.

00:45:00.280 --> 00:45:00.700
Sam Bourgeois: Take care.

00:45:01.120 --> 00:45:01.270
Bye.