WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.400
Music.

00:00:08.399 --> 00:00:19.769
I'm Pastor Luke and I'm Pastor Cameron. And this is the Uncut Podcast, where we have uncut and honest conversations about faith,

00:00:20.102 --> 00:00:21.821
life and ministry.

00:00:22.849 --> 00:00:28.897
This week, if you're joining us, this week's going to be a kind of part two, picking up

00:00:29.059 --> 00:00:34.649
where we left off the conversation from last week.

00:00:34.649 --> 00:00:44.912
Last week, we dove in and talked about a dialogue that was happening between Andy Stanley and Robert...

00:00:46.028 --> 00:00:51.925
Albert Mueller. Andy Stanley hosted a... And others, too.

00:00:52.329 --> 00:00:55.549
And others. Lots of other people have been talking about it.

00:00:55.549 --> 00:01:04.349
And Andy Stanley, influential pastor, hosted a conference aimed at supporting and caring

00:01:04.349 --> 00:01:16.649
for parents of LGBTQ kids, and some of his decisions were kind of tossed into the question

00:01:16.649 --> 00:01:23.749
of like, is he crossing the line into becoming affirming in some of the decisions that he's

00:01:23.749 --> 00:01:24.749
made?

00:01:24.749 --> 00:01:32.249
And so we kind of talked about that from a pastoral perspective, tried to kind of read

00:01:32.249 --> 00:01:40.009
both sides of the story well and with some charity and we kind of gave some of our thoughts there.

00:01:41.986 --> 00:01:48.089
And so, and a lot of you watched, cause I think that's our biggest episode thus far, last I looked. Yep.

00:01:49.689 --> 00:01:58.569
So yeah, is there anything we feel like we need to, before we kind of, at least in my mind,

00:01:58.569 --> 00:02:07.369
I think I had that we were going to talk about kind of homosexuality in the church more generally.

00:02:09.065 --> 00:02:14.809
Before we did that, was there anything in your mind about the conversation still sitting with,

00:02:16.438 --> 00:02:19.609
Andy and that whole conversation, like, specifically?

00:02:20.435 --> 00:02:26.249
Well, I mean, I don't know that it... Yeah, probably not specifically to that situation.

00:02:26.249 --> 00:02:27.583
Yeah. It's kind of been.

00:02:28.906 --> 00:02:34.784
You know, for at least social media accounts that I follow and stuff like that, there's not.

00:02:36.594 --> 00:02:44.516
It's kind of died down, you know, thanks to what's going on in the world at this time.

00:02:44.516 --> 00:02:49.396
You know, I don't know when you're watching this, but there's issues in Israel, between Israel and,

00:02:50.088 --> 00:02:54.676
Palestinians and Gaza right now. And so, that's kind of, even in Christian circles,

00:02:54.676 --> 00:02:57.281
overshadowed what was last week's news, apparently.

00:02:58.116 --> 00:03:08.116
But there are, I think, still implications for, I mean, life and ministry that we can

00:03:08.116 --> 00:03:10.676
talk about as it pertained here.

00:03:10.676 --> 00:03:21.156
I don't remember totally where we left off, but I do still have a lot of questions about.

00:03:25.125 --> 00:03:29.636
About how, because I think like,

00:03:32.093 --> 00:03:34.676
on reflection about what we talked about last week, I think,

00:03:34.676 --> 00:03:43.196
I think it's, I hope it was clear that we see points of both arguments. Yeah.

00:03:43.544 --> 00:03:48.225
We see the point of Andy's desire to offer a conference like that.

00:03:49.236 --> 00:03:59.516
Right. I see the point of Albert Mueller's comments, particularly around the type of speakers that

00:03:59.516 --> 00:04:04.240
that are allowed to present at a conference like that.

00:04:04.436 --> 00:04:07.454
And probably another like.

00:04:08.651 --> 00:04:19.340
Aspect of his criticism to Andy really is that his, when asked point blank his position on essentially

00:04:19.340 --> 00:04:26.962
like affirming homosexual practice or marriage or however you wanna phrase it,

00:04:27.070 --> 00:04:33.110
that he believed, like he thought that Andy skirted the issue and that he didn't offer any clarity

00:04:33.380 --> 00:04:35.739
and he said things without saying things.

00:04:36.459 --> 00:04:43.660
Um, and which I think is, I don't know if it's totally fair, but, um,

00:04:43.660 --> 00:04:49.872
yeah, I mean, like I would characterize Andy's answers to some of that stuff as like, he

00:04:50.020 --> 00:04:54.740
kind of says things shorthand a little bit.

00:04:54.740 --> 00:05:04.321
So by like what he said is like, what did he say? He said something around like the five new Testament passages that talk about homosexuality.

00:05:04.660 --> 00:05:11.220
We believe, or something like that. He said something to that effect, which affirms conservative

00:05:11.388 --> 00:05:16.540
Christian views on sexuality, but that is probably, like, the most roundabout way to

00:05:16.540 --> 00:05:28.123
have said that. And so, you know, it is kind of a, like, are we, you know, are you being.

00:05:29.014 --> 00:05:33.074
Obtuse intentionally, you know, like, you know, so.

00:05:33.786 --> 00:05:37.060
Pete Yeah. And how clear does he need to be? Jared Yeah.

00:05:37.060 --> 00:05:46.587
Pete Part of, I think, what one of the questions that I have is like, what is the

00:05:46.900 --> 00:05:51.754
the big C church, the church in the world.

00:05:54.380 --> 00:06:01.423
What is its role or responsibility in calling out what they believe to be

00:06:01.846 --> 00:06:05.546
as false teaching or non-biblical teaching,

00:06:06.740 --> 00:06:08.560
in individual churches?

00:06:11.064 --> 00:06:20.540
It seems like most people who I've seen commenting commenting on this or like offering their opinions or videos and responses or whatever,

00:06:21.260 --> 00:06:29.660
see it as their job to confront false teaching or an anti-biblical or a non-biblical stance here.

00:06:29.660 --> 00:06:38.660
And my question is whether or not that is like, is that the role of a local church?

00:06:40.321 --> 00:06:44.571
Should that be a responsibility of the local church to call out another local church?

00:06:44.571 --> 00:06:55.611
Right. You know, I think I know where my... I am not predisposed to... I don't look particularly

00:06:55.611 --> 00:07:03.451
favorably... I don't look favorably on... What do you call those? Watchdog ministries?

00:07:04.411 --> 00:07:08.011
I think there's another word for those, like... I don't know.

00:07:08.011 --> 00:07:11.931
I know what you're talking about. Yeah. They're like theological ombudsmen, right?

00:07:11.931 --> 00:07:17.996
Right. Or they're just like internal affairs for the church that run around and find heresy.

00:07:18.331 --> 00:07:25.211
Yeah. And I can think of a couple blogs, websites. Sometimes these websites or blogs are dedicated to,

00:07:25.810 --> 00:07:33.048
particular churches. Sometimes they're dedicated to like the church at large. And they can...

00:07:33.111 --> 00:07:41.371
And those individual theological watchdog ministry things can have their own slant. They don't have

00:07:41.371 --> 00:07:43.691
to be conservative watchdogs. You can... No.

00:07:43.691 --> 00:07:53.051
There are ones that are very much in a more liberal kind of leaning. And so I personally

00:07:53.051 --> 00:07:55.131
don't love those. No, I don't either.

00:07:55.131 --> 00:08:02.891
I'm like, I came to the conviction a long time ago that, like, if I'd never wanted to be involved

00:08:02.891 --> 00:08:10.891
in a ministry that was primarily defined by what we are against. I just, that's, it's not the way

00:08:10.891 --> 00:08:17.672
I'm built. I don't think it's a healthy way to be or to operate. And that's not to say that you

00:08:17.931 --> 00:08:26.811
never, you know, I probably, my personality and bent is to just kind of avoid the whole conversation of what we're

00:08:26.811 --> 00:08:31.491
against, sometimes. And sometimes that's really a good strength because.

00:08:32.697 --> 00:08:38.147
I don't think we always need to be like, I think if we're very clear about what we're for and championing that and

00:08:38.512 --> 00:08:44.147
showing the beauty and the truth of that, we don't always have to like engage in this kind of like,

00:08:45.336 --> 00:08:48.267
anti-attack what we're against behavior. Yeah.

00:08:48.595 --> 00:08:59.307
But there is a space for that, you know? Um, but more directly to your question, I guess, like where,

00:08:59.307 --> 00:09:06.267
Isn't that the role of, and I say this as we're both pastors of a non-denominational

00:09:06.635 --> 00:09:08.976
church, isn't that the role of the domination?

00:09:10.056 --> 00:09:16.147
Right? Isn't that the role of, like, church hierarchy, you know, at least historically, right?

00:09:16.147 --> 00:09:24.467
Each church has got people who are supposed to be overseers of the church and guarding

00:09:24.467 --> 00:09:29.027
the, you know, like, doesn't that provide a space for that?

00:09:29.027 --> 00:09:30.644
As you know.

00:09:30.707 --> 00:09:34.227
Guarding like the, yeah, as like the, the bishop would be the one that is charged

00:09:34.290 --> 00:09:35.974
with guarding the faith. Right.

00:09:37.727 --> 00:09:41.927
I mean, do you think, do you agree with that? Or do you think that was just kind of like always in word,

00:09:41.927 --> 00:09:44.004
but never in deed or?

00:09:44.447 --> 00:09:53.127
Well, yeah, I mean, like from its most, I think from its most pure example and motive in scripture,

00:09:53.127 --> 00:09:55.076
it is what it should be or.

00:09:55.687 --> 00:10:09.669
So I mean, that's how Paul operates. It is how Paul operates, but Paul's relationship with his churches is a little unique.

00:10:09.767 --> 00:10:14.727
Yeah, I don't think we should duplicate. I don't love the justification of, well,

00:10:14.727 --> 00:10:16.487
Paul did it. I'm like, well, you're not Paul.

00:10:16.574 --> 00:10:21.127
Right, you're not Paul, and you're not an apostle. You haven't seen the resurrected Jesus,

00:10:22.011 --> 00:10:25.729
and you are, not all of us are church planters.

00:10:26.607 --> 00:10:34.695
And so Paul was speaking from a place of pastoral authority over those churches and congregations,

00:10:34.987 --> 00:10:37.647
and you would expect that the pastor would speak with authority over them.

00:10:37.647 --> 00:10:45.138
I think maybe one of the examples that I would maybe reference that would support the idea,

00:10:45.607 --> 00:10:50.607
that other churches can hold other churches accountable,

00:10:51.638 --> 00:10:53.834
which is also a sticky idea because we're like.

00:10:55.437 --> 00:11:00.887
It's the New Testament idea of church is pretty different than what we're experiencing in church

00:11:00.887 --> 00:11:07.927
now. But like Paul going to Jerusalem to confront the apostles about the inclusion of the Gentiles,

00:11:08.859 --> 00:11:14.407
or the necessity of the Gentiles to be circumcised or whatever in order to be partakers in the

00:11:14.407 --> 00:11:24.487
gospel. And Paul says, I went there to confront them to their faces. But we weren't talking about

00:11:24.487 --> 00:11:29.249
an established church at that point. We weren't talking about established pastors at that point.

00:11:29.527 --> 00:11:29.942
No.

00:11:31.077 --> 00:11:37.414
We weren't talking about... There was no ecclesiological structure at that point.

00:11:37.549 --> 00:11:46.487
Yeah. And trying to find a direct correlation in the Bible to your modern ecclesiological structure is impossible. Right.

00:11:47.605 --> 00:11:53.847
Titus is probably the closest I can think of, because the instruction Paul gives there is

00:11:53.847 --> 00:11:57.894
set overseers in each town or each church.

00:11:58.065 --> 00:12:03.413
And so he kind of like, you know, there is some sort of structure given there.

00:12:03.647 --> 00:12:06.924
Right, and so like, I don't know, when I.

00:12:11.247 --> 00:12:19.267
I'm trying to do like a quick survey in my head and I could be wrong here.

00:12:20.567 --> 00:12:23.527
You know, someone could reference something that could show me that, oh yeah,

00:12:23.527 --> 00:12:30.131
I guess you're right, is that like, I get the sense that the, especially the New Testament.

00:12:35.487 --> 00:12:39.917
Asks communities of faith to guard themselves,

00:12:44.047 --> 00:12:45.210
against false teaching.

00:12:48.649 --> 00:12:57.174
You know, like false teaching is springing up. That needs to be opposed because there's only one gospel, right?

00:12:58.047 --> 00:13:02.522
So that false teaching that's springing up from that group of people from among you,

00:13:03.527 --> 00:13:09.727
so there's maybe like a faction of teachings springing up, that needs to be quashed.

00:13:10.543 --> 00:13:14.807
And if it's not, they need to be kicked out because a little yeast makes its way through

00:13:14.807 --> 00:13:21.381
the whole batch of dough type of thing. necessarily from,

00:13:23.551 --> 00:13:31.725
Someone else on the outside Seeing what's going on internally? Mm-hmm and coming and saying hey you guys are not doing this, right? Yeah.

00:13:33.823 --> 00:13:42.726
Now again The reason that maybe that wouldn't happen, maybe Paul would be fine with that idea. Yeah, but but,

00:13:43.590 --> 00:13:49.081
We don't have an example in the scripture of whether or not that would be okay because we don't have an example in scripture whether

00:13:49.081 --> 00:13:54.041
not that would be okay. And part of the reason that I asked the question is because I think,

00:13:54.834 --> 00:13:59.721
there is a difference between, okay, let's say that Cameron Leinhart at Conduit Ministries in

00:13:59.721 --> 00:14:04.592
Jamestown, New York held an unconditional conference. Would it get the response that

00:14:04.637 --> 00:14:10.507
others... Would it get the same response? Well, no, because we're in Jamestown, New York.

00:14:10.678 --> 00:14:18.681
Right, but... We're not... Yeah. So why is that, though? Because if everything else being the same

00:14:18.681 --> 00:14:22.841
Is that like, okay, it's the responsibility of outside churches to come in and hold accountable,

00:14:23.488 --> 00:14:27.641
churches or pastors who are teaching what they believe is to be non-biblical.

00:14:28.691 --> 00:14:32.201
Would I expect that there would be other pastors in the city here that would have something to

00:14:32.201 --> 00:14:40.601
say about it? Probably. Yeah, probably. But would I expect the type of response? I don't know. And

00:14:40.601 --> 00:14:48.921
And so I think a little bit of this, a little bit of the issue here is who sponsored the

00:14:48.921 --> 00:14:56.921
conference, what type of voice that they have and influence that they have, and the magnitude

00:14:56.921 --> 00:15:01.921
of the message.

00:15:02.306 --> 00:15:11.081
And so it, it does make me wonder sometimes what the role there then of the church is

00:15:11.081 --> 00:15:15.681
because okay, if it was a small church, no one presumably would really care too much.

00:15:16.052 --> 00:15:27.782
Right. And so is it, is it about overpowering a message or is it about calling a leader to repentance?

00:15:28.801 --> 00:15:35.601
Like is it, is it ideologies fighting? Yeah, I just need to be louder now. Yeah. Andy Stanley's been really loud about this. I need to

00:15:35.601 --> 00:15:38.360
to come over top of you louder about the truth?

00:15:38.561 --> 00:15:38.972
Yeah.

00:15:40.041 --> 00:15:43.086
Or is it like the...

00:15:44.445 --> 00:15:52.214
You know, like, Andy, I'm worried about this. Here's where I think it's wrong.

00:15:52.935 --> 00:15:54.240
Here's where I think you're in sin.

00:15:55.255 --> 00:15:59.375
Here's where I think you're wandering from the Word of God.

00:16:00.811 --> 00:16:09.295
And the Lord is calling you to repent of this. Well, you know, I had a, I wondered, right?

00:16:09.985 --> 00:16:16.529
And from our vantage point, there's a whole bunch of things that we don't see, can't know, won't know.

00:16:17.895 --> 00:16:28.403
And I wondered if there was at any point during this, there was any attempt by Moller or Andy

00:16:28.583 --> 00:16:37.095
to exchange personal correspondence or conversation.

00:16:37.095 --> 00:16:42.024
Does Moeller address that in his podcast? Doesn't he say, we have not talked other than these back and forths?

00:16:42.335 --> 00:16:44.335
I think so. Yeah.

00:16:45.094 --> 00:16:49.010
Or as you're saying, you wonder if there would have been, could something have been avoided?

00:16:49.982 --> 00:16:57.815
Yeah. Okay. Well, or like, you know, because it's, man, I read so many things.

00:16:57.815 --> 00:16:58.855
I listen to so many things.

00:16:58.939 --> 00:17:05.907
I don't remember if Moeller mentioned, um, the, like, calling, like, Matthew...

00:17:07.374 --> 00:17:13.784
Uh, 18, like calling someone to account or something, maybe he didn't, but like,

00:17:14.504 --> 00:17:23.184
you know, the whole, like putting someone on public blast as being the first thing

00:17:23.184 --> 00:17:30.424
that you do is different than having said, Hey man, like, you know, maybe we

00:17:30.424 --> 00:17:39.384
We don't really have any relationship or anything like that, but I watch this kind of stuff,

00:17:39.384 --> 00:17:42.184
and I see you from afar making this decision.

00:17:42.321 --> 00:17:44.338
I think this is really troublesome.

00:17:44.624 --> 00:17:49.584
Could we have a conversation? Could we maybe have a dialogue about this?

00:17:49.584 --> 00:17:55.864
I want to present to you some of my concerns, not just because I'm concerned about necessarily

00:17:55.864 --> 00:18:00.929
your implicate, like, what you're... I'm concerned about what you're doing for your church, but.

00:18:01.304 --> 00:18:08.392
Then, you know, I think Moeller's justification for one of the reasons that he does take so

00:18:08.744 --> 00:18:15.824
seriously what Andy's doing is Andy's influence for the church at large, which becomes a,

00:18:15.824 --> 00:18:24.464
you know, a justification for why the conversation, I guess, is being had. But, so yeah, part

00:18:24.464 --> 00:18:29.304
of me wonders is if, and again, like, I don't really know that

00:18:29.304 --> 00:18:36.424
there's a way of knowing if they've had any personal correspondence, but I think that that would be, that at least to

00:18:36.424 --> 00:18:48.092
me, communicates a different tone, different set of intentions than, because I'll be, because I'll be honest, like

00:18:48.389 --> 00:18:58.966
Moller's first article, while I think he ended up raising good points, doesn't look great.

00:19:00.434 --> 00:19:07.184
At first glance, because it's a preemptive, Like, read the website.

00:19:08.581 --> 00:19:12.749
Pluck out and assume and make assumptions about what it's going to be without,

00:19:13.883 --> 00:19:19.631
Having gone to the conference conference hadn't happened yet. There's a lot of assumption there and then,

00:19:20.591 --> 00:19:23.791
there were several things in andy's response that kind of,

00:19:25.118 --> 00:19:32.431
Told a bigger and more complex story than moeller's original kind of call-out really was telling

00:19:32.761 --> 00:19:39.243
Um, and then molar kind of doubled down on the points that weren't necessarily resolved.

00:19:40.071 --> 00:19:43.852
Yeah. Um, and kind of abandoned some of the other points that would have been like that

00:19:44.111 --> 00:19:48.111
were a little bit less more minor now that the whole story was out.

00:19:48.722 --> 00:19:54.731
And you know, so that tells a story that's not of like connection conversation,

00:19:56.077 --> 00:19:59.391
like, um, you know, personal calling of account.

00:19:59.391 --> 00:20:08.511
It's more of a public platforms going against one another and having an ideological bout of sorts.

00:20:09.231 --> 00:20:10.511
I don't know, what do you think?

00:20:11.551 --> 00:20:16.751
I think that's basically what I was trying to say is that, you know,

00:20:16.890 --> 00:20:20.320
Albert Mueller wouldn't be responding to anything he thought was non-biblical from me.

00:20:21.832 --> 00:20:26.297
No. I don't think he would see his role. Right.

00:20:26.828 --> 00:20:32.626
As like, I need to correct Cameron for this unbiblical teaching.

00:20:32.951 --> 00:20:39.171
I think it is pretty clear that it was because of who it was and whether he sees it as,

00:20:39.471 --> 00:20:44.284
oh, well, because he has such a big audience, I need to protect his audience from him.

00:20:45.471 --> 00:20:52.359
Or it's like a opportunistic, I'm gonna need to jump in on this because I know it's gonna be,

00:20:53.751 --> 00:20:55.555
it's gonna get lots of traction.

00:20:55.911 --> 00:21:01.811
I don't know, I don't wanna be too overly pessimistic about his motives there, and I don't know them,

00:21:01.811 --> 00:21:04.503
but it seems to me that like.

00:21:07.591 --> 00:21:13.406
It does seem to me that we, I think we sometimes overestimate our responsibility,

00:21:14.671 --> 00:21:21.471
in the, like I just don't, for me to,

00:21:23.795 --> 00:21:31.405
I mean this with the best of intentions, for me to care significantly, it would take a lot for me

00:21:31.405 --> 00:21:37.725
to care significantly about what another pastor is doing in their ministry to the point of this

00:21:37.725 --> 00:21:46.445
type of response. Like, it would have to be extraordinary for me. It would have to be

00:21:46.445 --> 00:21:49.919
be unavoidable for me.

00:21:50.766 --> 00:21:54.421
Because, like, I got, the amount of things,

00:22:00.285 --> 00:22:07.485
I have to respond to for my own congregation is like longer than I can reasonably do

00:22:07.485 --> 00:22:10.553
in any given amount of, given period of time.

00:22:10.706 --> 00:22:18.725
And so now I'm going to like see it as my responsibility, as my calling, as my biblical responsibility now,

00:22:19.456 --> 00:22:25.645
to walk around making sure other pastors are doing the thing, both theologically and methodologically

00:22:25.645 --> 00:22:27.125
that I think they should.

00:22:27.125 --> 00:22:31.325
And when I see them not doing it, then I'm gonna call them out because I'm afraid for their people.

00:22:36.011 --> 00:22:41.070
I don't buy it. I don't buy that. I think it's opportunistic.

00:22:41.701 --> 00:22:49.730
I think it's an overstep, maybe, especially like you said, when Mueller's piece,

00:22:49.885 --> 00:22:53.285
his original piece came out pre the conference.

00:22:54.565 --> 00:23:00.485
And maybe without any context as to why the conference was started,

00:23:00.485 --> 00:23:04.085
which I think Andy did a great job of telling that story.

00:23:05.805 --> 00:23:10.845
Essentially, hey, look, world, we have been in this space of ministering to families

00:23:10.845 --> 00:23:14.154
of LGBTQ kids for over a decade.

00:23:15.685 --> 00:23:18.457
And none of y'all cared then.

00:23:20.032 --> 00:23:24.025
Right. None of y'all cared to get involved. None of y'all cared to serve.

00:23:24.025 --> 00:23:28.611
None of y'all cared to like be in this space, But you care now?

00:23:30.646 --> 00:23:37.216
Um, so while I don't necessarily agree with the way that Andy went about it in terms of like,

00:23:38.991 --> 00:23:46.096
at least the advertised content and speakers, some of the methodology, some of the methodology

00:23:46.096 --> 00:23:53.776
of the conference, like I don't think that I think that Mueller's response was a little

00:23:53.776 --> 00:23:58.776
little opportunistic and I don't necessarily believe,

00:24:00.336 --> 00:24:04.976
that it's the responsibility of every local church or every pastor to be holding other local churches

00:24:04.976 --> 00:24:07.136
or other pastors accountable.

00:24:07.136 --> 00:24:09.608
One, because I don't think that's how accountability works in the scripture.

00:24:11.456 --> 00:24:15.027
We don't get to just hold somebody accountable because we wanna hold them accountable.

00:24:15.416 --> 00:24:22.256
Right, well, and even to use the Matthew 18 example, which is always thrown out as like, well, Matthew 18,

00:24:22.256 --> 00:24:25.896
you gotta go to them first and then you're gonna take your brother with you.

00:24:25.896 --> 00:24:33.590
And Jesus is like, hey, if they sin against you, he's not talking about like, if there's any conflict,

00:24:34.616 --> 00:24:40.576
anywhere in the world, the right thing to do is to go and hold that person accountable.

00:24:40.576 --> 00:24:47.498
Like, no, it's like, you sin against me, I sin against you, okay, I'm gonna go to you and say,

00:24:47.856 --> 00:24:52.736
you've sinned against me, this is what you've done, like, let's try to work together,

00:24:52.736 --> 00:24:55.616
don't listen, okay, I'm going to bring a brother with me. You don't listen again,

00:24:55.616 --> 00:24:57.136
oh, I'm going to bring it to the whole church.

00:24:57.914 --> 00:24:58.238
Yeah.

00:24:59.894 --> 00:25:06.115
It's not about like, Andy said something we don't like, let's go hold him accountable. Right, right.

00:25:07.294 --> 00:25:13.616
You don't get to do, like, there's not really a biblical example of that. You don't stand on

00:25:13.616 --> 00:25:22.016
super strong biblical ground, I don't think. I don't… Yeah, well not, I wouldn't, yeah, like, particularly not from a.

00:25:24.317 --> 00:25:32.487
Proof texting place. You can't find the Scripture, verse, and passage that gives us the prescription,

00:25:33.302 --> 00:25:41.367
that to go forth and act like this. But I'm curious then how you would define then the

00:25:41.367 --> 00:25:45.767
conversation we've had the last two weeks, this conversation, last week's conversation.

00:25:46.472 --> 00:25:51.648
Like, I've got reasons why I think we're talking about this, but I'm curious, you know,

00:25:52.468 --> 00:25:55.690
You know, why then are we talking about this?

00:25:56.047 --> 00:25:59.624
Well, I mean, I can tell you the reason I want to talk about it is because other people are talking about it.

00:26:00.506 --> 00:26:07.627
Yeah. You know, I do have thoughts on it. And I do think that like, there is,

00:26:09.687 --> 00:26:14.207
one of the reasons I want to talk about, not just this issue, but issues like it,

00:26:14.361 --> 00:26:16.378
is because I do know that there are people,

00:26:17.407 --> 00:26:24.750
that look to me, look to us, or some sort of way to unravel the ball of yarn,

00:26:27.807 --> 00:26:33.104
that is things like this. And they don't necessarily know even how to begin the conversation.

00:26:37.207 --> 00:26:45.827
And even outside of, like I said, even outside of the specific situation,

00:26:46.527 --> 00:26:49.767
that we're talking about here, there are principles of ministry

00:26:50.082 --> 00:26:53.207
that I think are almost universally applied to churches

00:26:53.207 --> 00:26:55.247
or can be universally applied to churches,

00:26:56.015 --> 00:26:57.725
like the difference between drawing lines and drawing circles,

00:26:59.462 --> 00:27:06.241
the responsibility of one pastor or church to hold another pastor or church accountable.

00:27:09.727 --> 00:27:14.658
I think last week we talked a little bit about the ministry and theology of preaching. Yeah, we did.

00:27:15.207 --> 00:27:22.274
And who we bring on our stages who we allow to preach to our people and what it's like.

00:27:26.064 --> 00:27:30.475
I wouldn't expect that we would be adding significant,

00:27:33.056 --> 00:27:42.496
significant insight into this situation in particular, but I would expect that the principles of the topics

00:27:42.496 --> 00:27:47.480
or the ideas that are rooted in this situation

00:27:47.816 --> 00:27:51.016
are applicable to our context of ministry.

00:27:51.016 --> 00:27:51.558
So that's what we're talking about.

00:27:52.096 --> 00:28:21.896
Yeah, and I, that's essentially what I, you know, what I think about when we talk about these topics is that in a world that's shrunk because of digital media, people are now, you know, you know, everybody's aware of everything else, and everybody else, you know, like, the fact that, you know, the fact that anybody's aware of what some local churches are doing on a large

00:28:21.896 --> 00:28:29.296
scale platform like that is, I think, unique to our age,

00:28:29.296 --> 00:28:29.665
right?

00:28:29.971 --> 00:28:31.856
You know, if you were to go to this generation.

00:28:32.258 --> 00:28:38.802
Yeah. If you were to go decades back and, you know.

00:28:39.964 --> 00:28:46.854
You were to, like, this would have happened, and it wouldn't have been, it would not have,

00:28:47.040 --> 00:28:53.414
not everybody would have known about it as quickly or at all as they do now. And then

00:28:53.521 --> 00:28:59.334
there's that question of like, well, our congregation is being exposed, people we know

00:28:59.334 --> 00:29:06.854
are being exposed to this topic, and they're now having to find a way to sort through with it.

00:29:07.088 --> 00:29:17.809
And, and so it's not that like, like, I don't think either you or I have any illusions that Andy or Moller are listening to our conversation.

00:29:17.863 --> 00:29:31.854
And we're not trying to talk to them. We're trying to talk to those in our context and offer perhaps a way to, to detangle it a little bit and think through it in a critical lens.

00:29:31.854 --> 00:29:35.854
And to be honest with Andy, I think that's what he was trying to do with the conference.

00:29:36.174 --> 00:29:37.854
In fact, he states that.

00:29:38.235 --> 00:29:41.224
Yeah. It wasn't for... It wasn't for everyone else. Right.

00:29:41.962 --> 00:29:51.802
It was for the context that they were ministering in, the people that they had, and the, you know, 300 families or 300 people or whatever who were sitting in this ministry already.

00:29:52.576 --> 00:30:01.254
Yep. So, um, so yeah, I mean, like, I don't know, maybe, you know, we could probably

00:30:01.254 --> 00:30:03.214
beat, beat the horse to death here.

00:30:03.774 --> 00:30:11.014
Um, but, or beat the horse that's already dead, you know, whatever.

00:30:12.814 --> 00:30:16.414
We, we do not support the abuse of animals, just to be clear.

00:30:16.414 --> 00:30:26.713
Be clear. But I guess then, you know, what then does this mean in.

00:30:29.836 --> 00:30:35.013
One of the questions that I think you were beginning to pose, and I think is worth us

00:30:35.278 --> 00:30:48.238
talking about, was that progression of sanctification of like, at what point, right, have you got

00:30:48.238 --> 00:30:51.398
yourself cleaned up enough that you can be at church?

00:30:51.398 --> 00:30:52.171
Part of the community.

00:30:53.152 --> 00:30:57.464
Yeah. Yeah. I have written down here, it's progressive discipleship versus immediate sanctification.

00:30:57.718 --> 00:31:03.028
Which one of those do we expect out of the people that attend our churches?

00:31:03.478 --> 00:31:07.038
Do we expect that they will go through a long-term process of progressive discipleship?

00:31:07.038 --> 00:31:12.358
I think I said last night in Bible study that you could take one step closer to Jesus every

00:31:12.358 --> 00:31:17.035
single day for the rest of your life and still not be close enough to him.

00:31:17.118 --> 00:31:22.678
We don't arrive at a place of being like, I don't necessarily agree with John Wesley

00:31:22.678 --> 00:31:28.498
on that. Like I am fully sanctified in this life.

00:31:30.118 --> 00:31:39.820
So the question there is, or therein, is if we know that there are people.

00:31:43.058 --> 00:31:46.678
Within our congregation whom we are spiritually responsible for,

00:31:46.678 --> 00:31:49.263
whom we are in a pastoral relationship with,

00:31:50.596 --> 00:32:12.538
What level of sanctification, perfection of character and conduct, uniformity of belief,

00:32:12.538 --> 00:32:24.338
uniformity of lifestyle, what do we actually require of them?

00:32:24.543 --> 00:32:30.908
And what do we do with those who never move from the place?

00:32:32.378 --> 00:32:36.768
Who just never move? And we know we have them in our churches.

00:32:37.058 --> 00:32:43.238
We have people in our churches who are no more sanctified in their walk with Jesus than

00:32:43.238 --> 00:32:45.618
they were when they started coming to church 40 years ago.

00:32:46.185 --> 00:32:54.215
Yeah. And a lot of times we're comfortable with it because their starting point was at a nominal place. Right.

00:32:55.238 --> 00:33:01.618
So, do we say to them, hey, look, man, you've got to experience transformation through life

00:33:01.618 --> 00:33:07.340
Christ or we're gonna kick you out mm-hmm like.

00:33:09.258 --> 00:33:19.748
That seems ridiculous to me. It just does, you know? And so, like, but the thing is that, like,

00:33:19.748 --> 00:33:26.388
we get this sense of, like, well, there are sins that we will allow people to sit in.

00:33:28.333 --> 00:33:34.948
Without really calling their non-sanctified behavior to account. We'll let people be

00:33:34.948 --> 00:33:36.548
be prideful all the day, all day.

00:33:37.588 --> 00:33:44.321
Yeah. You know, we'll let people be greedy, gossips all day. Yeah.

00:33:46.068 --> 00:33:51.640
But heaven forbid, if a homosexual couple comes and attends your church.

00:33:52.685 --> 00:33:56.249
Yeah. Heaven forbid it. Well, you gotta call that out immediately.

00:33:56.762 --> 00:33:58.194
Yeah. You gotta hold them accountable.

00:33:58.788 --> 00:34:02.868
You gotta show them the error of their ways and they have to repent of their sin.

00:34:02.868 --> 00:34:05.288
Otherwise expel the immoral brother.

00:34:08.078 --> 00:34:08.699
Yeah. I don't.

00:34:13.468 --> 00:34:18.944
I have like two voices in my head. Well, I do as well. Yeah. but I.

00:34:23.922 --> 00:34:37.552
But yeah, tell me what your voices are saying. Well, one voice is saying something that I see a lot, and that is that.

00:34:42.412 --> 00:35:02.372
The Church, like Church I interact with, like my experience, is that we We are willing to extend so much grace to the non-believer, but the moment you become

00:35:02.372 --> 00:35:06.503
a believer, that grace disappears.

00:35:07.172 --> 00:35:18.332
Okay. Like I see us much more willing to say, like, I can find people who are much more will,

00:35:18.332 --> 00:35:25.012
I think your average person will be much more forgiving of the person who does not profess

00:35:25.012 --> 00:35:33.123
the name of Christ and their sanctification level, where their life is at.

00:35:33.412 --> 00:35:40.772
And then once they become a Christian, it's zero to nothing.

00:35:40.772 --> 00:35:42.692
Not zero to nothing, but zero to a hundred.

00:35:42.972 --> 00:35:46.257
It's like, okay, well, God saved you.

00:35:47.292 --> 00:35:56.394
Now you need to get it together. And we lose, excuse me, we lose any sense of, like, willingness to extend the gospel

00:35:56.826 --> 00:35:58.842
to those who have accepted the gospel.

00:35:59.212 --> 00:36:10.772
I was reading in 2 Timothy, and Paul's verbiage there is so strong, because he says, like,

00:36:10.772 --> 00:36:13.452
if we deny Christ, like, he will also deny us.

00:36:13.452 --> 00:36:17.972
So, if we renounce faith, we have renounced it.

00:36:18.372 --> 00:36:23.012
But if we're faithless, He remains faithful to us.

00:36:24.490 --> 00:36:32.500
Because he cannot deny himself. We have been saved. Even if we fall in, we are faithless,

00:36:32.500 --> 00:36:39.047
we are not faithful to the call that we've been called to as Christians, Christ will not

00:36:39.443 --> 00:36:44.100
be faithless to us. He will be faithful to us because he can do no other because it's in his

00:36:44.100 --> 00:36:53.940
character. And so, that's a, like, those two phrases, right, side by side, are massive,

00:36:54.521 --> 00:36:59.140
like, almost feel contradictory, right? Because one says, like, if we deny him,

00:37:00.067 --> 00:37:09.220
and he will deny us, but if we're faithless, he will remain faithful. And I don't know,

00:37:09.384 --> 00:37:15.460
But the way I understand that is to be is like, if you, as long as you profess Christ, as long as you,

00:37:16.136 --> 00:37:21.140
do not ultimately deny Him, you know, we could talk about what that means,

00:37:21.906 --> 00:37:28.100
but like, even, like, how do we take what Paul says there, we're faithless, He remains faithful to us.

00:37:30.020 --> 00:37:37.700
So, like, I hear that, and I see, you know, that the grace that makes the gospel possible

00:37:37.700 --> 00:37:43.220
Paul remains true for the believer.

00:37:43.295 --> 00:37:55.380
It's Paul's argument in Romans, right? But Paul also, right, he switches his argument and says, should we continue to sin so that

00:37:55.380 --> 00:38:01.780
sin may abound by no means, right?

00:38:01.780 --> 00:38:07.836
And so I also have in my head this idea of cheap grace.

00:38:09.015 --> 00:38:17.105
Right? That's Bonhoeffer, right? And this idea of just, like, of taking what Paul said about grace

00:38:17.105 --> 00:38:24.865
and then not reading forward and saying, well, yeah, you're just free to sin, not free from sin.

00:38:26.020 --> 00:38:34.305
And so I hear both of those voices in my head, and I've seen both in play, where we become so

00:38:34.305 --> 00:38:40.865
rigid that we're unable to extend the same grace of the gospel to those who are already,

00:38:41.450 --> 00:38:50.305
in faith in Christ, but then also I see a significant danger where we get to a place and we,

00:38:50.945 --> 00:38:56.785
are just saying, like, well, you don't have to be holy because he's holy.

00:38:58.438 --> 00:39:06.145
We ignore that passage. We ignore the fact that, like, no, Paul does seem to indicate we should strive to sin no

00:39:06.145 --> 00:39:09.132
more because we're free from sin, right?

00:39:09.825 --> 00:39:15.425
Or in 1 John, say these things to you, not so that you won't sin, but so that when you

00:39:15.425 --> 00:39:20.285
do sin, you repentance and you will be cleansed from all unrighteousness.

00:39:20.285 --> 00:39:29.085
That passage remains true too. So I see this huge dichotomy of like the extent of the gospel and grace to both believers

00:39:29.085 --> 00:39:33.006
and unbelievers, and God's faithfulness to it.

00:39:33.525 --> 00:39:37.913
And I also see the upward call of Christianity to become more like Christ.

00:39:38.645 --> 00:39:41.595
And how dare we not do that?

00:39:42.431 --> 00:39:44.655
Right. And I couldn't agree more.

00:39:46.645 --> 00:39:53.805
I think the, like the, the hinging point though is where's the hinge?

00:39:53.805 --> 00:39:59.653
Tell me, like, no, like what does the church do in response to those that will not be transformed?

00:40:02.865 --> 00:40:12.058
What do we do? Do we allow them to remain in community? Do we tell them that they have to leave?

00:40:13.085 --> 00:40:22.600
Do we do a, do we take the, do we take, do we take Jesus' teaching on the wheat and the weeds?

00:40:22.753 --> 00:40:25.805
Right. Like, hey, the angels will sort it out at the end.

00:40:26.147 --> 00:40:26.805
Right.

00:40:28.136 --> 00:40:32.007
Or do we take Paul's teaching on, do not associate with them and treat them as an unbeliever?

00:40:34.032 --> 00:40:41.405
I don't know. Cameron, you're supposed to know. I don't know.

00:40:41.405 --> 00:40:48.625
I mean, I think that, like, you have the teaching of Jesus, okay, it's like, there's always these things

00:40:48.625 --> 00:40:54.936
where you have, like, you have the teaching of Jesus, the things that he, like, flat out taught. Yeah.

00:40:56.079 --> 00:41:00.505
Then you have the practice of Jesus, which is not always, there's not really,

00:41:00.505 --> 00:41:02.714
There's not really a distinction there.

00:41:04.991 --> 00:41:12.281
You're the teaching of Paul. Yeah. Well, you don't have a whole lot of Like the teaching of Paul ends up being the practice of Paul for us

00:41:12.697 --> 00:41:18.027
Yeah, because he's giving instructions a lot of times and then we're gaining principles from that. Yeah, right,

00:41:19.440 --> 00:41:22.186
so The question is do we want?

00:41:23.081 --> 00:41:30.681
One is do we believe that there is a I mean I guess you could call it a contradiction. Not really but like,

00:41:31.674 --> 00:41:33.240
Is there a difference between?

00:41:34.078 --> 00:41:41.829
Paul's perspective on the manor and his experience in it, then Jesus' teaching on the manor

00:41:42.041 --> 00:41:48.716
and his interaction with those who are like either followers or not followers of him. Yeah.

00:41:50.281 --> 00:41:54.630
You know, he was, Jesus was not afraid to send people away either.

00:41:54.881 --> 00:41:57.601
No. He said, you don't have any idea what it takes to follow me.

00:41:59.806 --> 00:42:05.081
Right. No, and so. The rich young ruler who went away sad because he had much money. Right.

00:42:06.846 --> 00:42:11.824
Yeah, or even disciples like, hey, foxes have holes, birds of air,

00:42:11.921 --> 00:42:15.884
they've got a nest. I don't even have a place to lay down my head.

00:42:16.061 --> 00:42:22.281
So if you're gonna follow me, it's gonna be like picking up an instrument of execution and coming.

00:42:22.281 --> 00:42:26.201
And like many turned away. Right, you came to me. Who can accept this teaching?

00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:29.505
Right, you came to me because you had your fill of bread and fish.

00:42:30.681 --> 00:42:37.237
So Jesus turned people away Or at least made the cost of discipleship so much that they couldn't accept.

00:42:37.940 --> 00:42:39.110
They couldn't follow.

00:42:40.109 --> 00:42:47.481
And so maybe it becomes a communication of the cost of discipleship.

00:42:47.644 --> 00:42:53.451
This is what it requires to follow Jesus. Will you follow him or not?

00:42:53.613 --> 00:43:00.418
And then they self-select whether or not it's something that they will do or not do.

00:43:02.084 --> 00:43:08.862
Still, it feels like, at least experientially for me, that it always, you know, that there

00:43:09.250 --> 00:43:19.161
are some who will desire to be a part of community, but not live a life of repentance.

00:43:19.841 --> 00:43:36.599
So they want to be around the people, but their hearts are stubborn, stubborn hearts. So what do we do?

00:43:36.921 --> 00:43:37.859
Do we allow...

00:43:39.506 --> 00:43:46.492
You know, like from Romans chapter 1, do we show contempt for the kindness, patience,

00:43:46.596 --> 00:43:51.036
tolerance of God that leads them unto repentance?

00:43:51.036 --> 00:43:54.836
By becoming judges? By becoming judgmental of them? Yeah.

00:43:54.836 --> 00:44:00.139
Or do we say, well, it's our responsibility to hold them accountable?

00:44:00.476 --> 00:44:07.756
You know, I wonder, so like, one of the passages, there's more passages to talk about, but one

00:44:07.756 --> 00:44:15.596
of the key passages, I think, is that's in one of the Corinthians, right? Where Paul.

00:44:17.436 --> 00:44:27.196
Tells them to cast the brother out. And that particular circumstance, he was sleeping with his,

00:44:27.836 --> 00:44:30.531
mother... Mother or mother-in-law.

00:44:30.612 --> 00:44:41.996
Mother-in-law potentially. He was doing something wonky. The way it's phrased in the text is with

00:44:41.996 --> 00:44:50.396
his father's wife. And so it's, you know, I don't know, I've studied that passage enough to be able

00:44:50.396 --> 00:44:56.076
to determine exactly what Paul was trying to... If he was trying to be obtuse, like trying to

00:44:56.076 --> 00:45:04.569
obscure the scandalousness of what he was communicating or what, but there's a thing in which Paul indicates, he says,

00:45:05.397 --> 00:45:16.676
the, like you were tolerating something that even the world does not tolerate. Do you think that that is a,

00:45:17.811 --> 00:45:23.240
Interpretive sliding scale?

00:45:25.832 --> 00:45:34.436
Like issue, but like, okay, what's the issue that this guy is like, because I'm not sure what you mean.

00:45:34.436 --> 00:45:40.796
I guess what I mean is like, so that's the passage that's often quoted to talk about church discipline.

00:45:40.796 --> 00:45:46.776
And you know, I did a little bit of listening, podcast listening, trying to find churches

00:45:46.776 --> 00:45:51.216
that practice church discipline and found like, you know, I think I mentioned late last

00:45:51.216 --> 00:45:56.440
episode like the one that like has a list of people who are not allowed to take communion,

00:45:56.616 --> 00:46:01.936
and before communion they read out that list, naming each person and what sin they've done

00:46:01.936 --> 00:46:08.404
and why they can't take communion, which, wow.

00:46:09.043 --> 00:46:13.936
But you've got churches that are doing that, and this is one of the passages they were

00:46:13.936 --> 00:46:19.837
talking about. And I'm sitting there and I'm thinking, I'm like, okay, well, like.

00:46:23.132 --> 00:46:31.504
Does, you know, this is one of the few places where Paul says, like, cast them out, treat

00:46:31.781 --> 00:46:36.599
them as an unbeliever, particularly there's that out language.

00:46:37.541 --> 00:46:45.511
And I'm wondering, like, does the list of things that merit the casting out change?

00:46:46.261 --> 00:46:47.661
Or is that list stagnant?

00:46:48.257 --> 00:46:53.829
Well, if you take Paul at his word, he lists the things, you know.

00:46:53.981 --> 00:46:58.357
So it's the, I mean, like the reference is 1 Corinthians 5.

00:46:58.781 --> 00:47:05.301
And he goes through the, yeah, he uses this example of, you know, a man, you, it's actually

00:47:05.301 --> 00:47:11.564
reported that there is sexual immorality among you and of a kind that does not even occur among the pagans.

00:47:11.906 --> 00:47:19.621
A man has his father's wife. And you are proud.

00:47:19.621 --> 00:47:24.581
Shouldn't you have been filled with grief and put out of your fellowship the man who

00:47:24.581 --> 00:47:27.624
did this?" Okay? And he keeps going.

00:47:28.587 --> 00:47:32.781
He says, I'm not physically present, but I've already passed judgment on the one who did

00:47:32.781 --> 00:47:34.294
this just as if I were present.

00:47:35.661 --> 00:47:41.101
Verse 4, 1 Corinthians 5, when you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus, and I am with

00:47:41.101 --> 00:47:47.222
you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan, so.

00:47:48.741 --> 00:47:52.497
That the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord.

00:47:54.082 --> 00:48:02.589
Then he talks a little bit about, you know, a little yeast works through the whole batch of dough.

00:48:02.811 --> 00:48:10.411
Get rid of that yeast that a new batch without yeast may exist for you, for Christ, our Passover

00:48:10.411 --> 00:48:11.906
lamb has been sacrificed.

00:48:12.691 --> 00:48:21.646
Seems to be an allusion to like, hey, how can we dishonor the sacrifice of Jesus as a Passover lamb?

00:48:21.931 --> 00:48:26.616
I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people.

00:48:27.731 --> 00:48:31.231
Not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral or the greedy and the swindlers

00:48:31.231 --> 00:48:34.271
or idolaters. In that case, you'd have to leave the world.

00:48:35.114 --> 00:48:40.110
So don't worry about the world. I'm talking about the people within your fellowship, within the church.

00:48:40.991 --> 00:48:46.471
But now I'm writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a

00:48:46.471 --> 00:48:49.680
a brother, but is sexually immoral or greedy,

00:48:51.911 --> 00:48:58.241
an idolater, a slanderer, a drunkard, or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.

00:49:01.351 --> 00:49:07.909
Okay. God will judge those outside of the church, but you are to expel the wicked man from among you,

00:49:10.142 --> 00:49:11.573
which is a reference to Deuteronomy.

00:49:14.031 --> 00:49:25.711
So you could take it super literally. Yep. And say, well, Paul gives us a list of those sins that would be the disqualifying sins

00:49:25.711 --> 00:49:26.711
from community.

00:49:26.913 --> 00:49:35.258
Sexual immorality, greed, idolatry, slander, drunkenness, or swindling.

00:49:37.791 --> 00:49:39.579
I like that word, swindling. Swindling.

00:49:39.791 --> 00:49:42.793
And then we would have to talk about what it means to be a swindler.

00:49:43.243 --> 00:49:44.431
Does that include MLMs?

00:49:44.631 --> 00:50:01.725
Yeah, hopefully. Or do you think that that, do you think that there's, you know, you said either literally,

00:50:02.220 --> 00:50:12.471
or like, you know, that that communicates a type of kind of a, maybe a category, but

00:50:12.471 --> 00:50:13.471
not specifics.

00:50:13.471 --> 00:50:17.991
Is that where you were going or you're just not even sure? Yeah, I'm not even sure.

00:50:17.991 --> 00:50:25.191
I think like, I think there, you know, if you take it like just for at face value and say,

00:50:25.191 --> 00:50:28.993
okay, this is what Paul did and what he instructed the Corinthians to do.

00:50:31.551 --> 00:50:35.177
He instructed the Corinthians to do so, would he instruct Conduit to do it?

00:50:38.058 --> 00:50:48.948
Um, is it a purely contextual to this situation type of, um, situation?

00:50:50.517 --> 00:50:56.628
Is it a universal or is it a universal command or mandate of the church?

00:50:59.987 --> 00:51:15.788
And whose responsibility is it to do that? to take that person and expel them. The collective body, the leader, the... I think

00:51:15.788 --> 00:51:20.188
honestly, I mean, I think probably, I think one of Paul's major issues in this

00:51:20.188 --> 00:51:25.211
situation is not that there is someone among them that is sexually immoral, but,

00:51:26.028 --> 00:51:33.428
is that they are boasting about it. That they have, that they are even so debased

00:51:33.428 --> 00:51:36.438
in their understanding of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ,

00:51:36.848 --> 00:51:41.488
that they're boasting about something that is obviously obvious immorality.

00:51:41.848 --> 00:51:42.118
Yeah.

00:51:42.928 --> 00:51:46.772
Something that he talks to the Romans about the same thing.

00:51:47.688 --> 00:51:51.444
He was like, you know, God has given you over to shameful lusts.

00:51:52.888 --> 00:51:56.728
And you are actually proving and applauding

00:51:56.728 --> 00:51:58.208
of those who do such things.

00:51:58.772 --> 00:52:08.688
Yeah. And so, while I don't necessarily, I wouldn't necessarily go so far as to say, well, Paul's

00:52:08.688 --> 00:52:12.402
not actually worried about the sexually immoral person as much as he's worried about the boastful,

00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:15.208
attitude of the Corinthians in the face of sin.

00:52:15.208 --> 00:52:17.749
I don't know that I could go that far.

00:52:18.172 --> 00:52:23.848
Right. But there does seem to be, like, a correlation in the passage of, like, it's not just that

00:52:23.848 --> 00:52:31.368
sexually immoral. It's that he's sexually immoral and considers it to have zero effect on his

00:52:31.368 --> 00:52:36.328
standing as a brother. Yeah, it's that he's sexually immoral and no one cares.

00:52:39.264 --> 00:52:49.617
He doesn't care. And not only is he sexually immoral, he's more sexually immoral than even the world is. Pagans don't do this, Paul says.

00:52:49.688 --> 00:52:50.085
Right.

00:52:51.579 --> 00:52:55.513
So.

00:53:01.356 --> 00:53:06.745
So, do you feel like that fits a different... and like, and I do think, you know, I can't

00:53:06.745 --> 00:53:10.825
make a justification from that, directly from that passage, necessarily, but I do think

00:53:10.825 --> 00:53:20.545
that there is a... we have to, I do think there's a cultural bridge that we have to

00:53:20.891 --> 00:53:29.865
bridge, or gap that we have to bridge, when it comes to, we live in a world where sexual

00:53:29.865 --> 00:53:37.113
Moral immorality is the norm for both heterosexual and homosexual people.

00:53:39.245 --> 00:53:49.095
It is so normalized across the board in so many ways. It's normalized, it's rationalized, it's, yeah.

00:53:49.385 --> 00:53:57.692
And when that is the default position for someone who comes into the church, you know,

00:53:58.805 --> 00:54:03.724
does that context change the way that we have to apply this?

00:54:05.585 --> 00:54:14.745
And, you know, and then this also gets into matters of like church membership versus church attendance

00:54:14.745 --> 00:54:17.074
and who belongs to the flock.

00:54:18.545 --> 00:54:25.785
Yeah, and like, yeah, I mean, Paul, yeah, here Paul includes kind of a rationale

00:54:25.785 --> 00:54:27.498
for why they should be expelled. Right.

00:54:28.905 --> 00:54:33.242
Which is a little yeast works its way through the whole batch of dough. Mm-hmm.

00:54:34.145 --> 00:54:45.359
So does the church leader put others in the fellowship in danger by not pulling out the bad yeast?

00:54:47.745 --> 00:54:48.177
Mm-hmm.

00:54:50.625 --> 00:54:55.585
I think it's hard to argue anything, any other. Any other. Direction. Direction. Yeah.

00:55:04.065 --> 00:55:10.016
But I don't know if there's really any buts about it. I just don't know.

00:55:15.465 --> 00:55:20.981
I don't know how to do that. And if I'm being honest, I don't know if I'm prepared to do that.

00:55:21.225 --> 00:55:23.952
Because at what point do I stop?

00:55:26.445 --> 00:55:30.271
At what point does my own sin disqualify me from being in fellowship?

00:55:33.185 --> 00:55:37.445
Is it like a heart and spirit of repentance? Is that what the issue with Paul here is?

00:55:37.445 --> 00:55:41.405
Is that there's no heart and spirit of repentance. There's no recognition that this is immoral.

00:55:41.405 --> 00:55:46.592
There's no recognition that there is sin here.

00:55:49.525 --> 00:55:56.873
So are their hearts already fully darkened, fully hardened? They're here and they're like, it's not a...

00:55:57.485 --> 00:55:59.250
Unrepentant in it. Yeah.

00:56:02.527 --> 00:56:07.739
So, yeah, maybe that is, you know, hey, I'm, you know, this person is obviously living in sin.

00:56:08.017 --> 00:56:19.361
It's patently obvious to everyone in the community. They're being, they're being, they're allowed to live in sin without any sense of like consequence,

00:56:20.126 --> 00:56:25.923
up until the point where it appears as though there's an affirmation of the lifestyle that's being lived.

00:56:26.297 --> 00:56:34.497
I could run this back into the conversation about the conference, like, right.

00:56:35.988 --> 00:56:49.937
And the apparent affirmation by way of inclusion in community puts others in danger. Yeah.

00:56:50.320 --> 00:56:55.199
Of saying, well, that's okay. Celebrate it. Applaud it.

00:56:55.377 --> 00:57:00.877
I think the way you just formulated that, I think that really gets to the key of that passage.

00:57:01.857 --> 00:57:09.395
That the public open and affirming nature of the unrepentant sin.

00:57:09.857 --> 00:57:10.116
Yeah.

00:57:11.377 --> 00:57:17.092
And I think when you formulate it that way, I think that creates some different boundaries. Sure.

00:57:17.617 --> 00:57:22.476
Than just kind of like, you know, sin hunting.

00:57:23.137 --> 00:57:23.403
Right.

00:57:26.905 --> 00:57:39.297
Right. Yeah, I agree. That wasn't like, that's not a pre panned. No, the plan methodology in my head, but it, it just, it

00:57:39.297 --> 00:57:51.817
feels like it's faithful to the passage, however uncomfortable that is. Without, without understanding it as like you

00:57:51.817 --> 00:57:54.479
said, it's just, we're gonna go run around and sin hunt and get,

00:57:55.317 --> 00:58:00.465
everyone out of the church. That's not, that's immoral, or impure in any way.

00:58:00.582 --> 00:58:03.277
Yeah. Because we wouldn't have a church.

00:58:04.426 --> 00:58:06.956
Right. It was like, no one is righteous, not even one.

00:58:09.233 --> 00:58:16.102
So, right. Because we have people who, like Paul, do what they do not want to do.

00:58:18.551 --> 00:58:33.437
Yeah. Yeah. I don't know if there's anything else that I have about this, I've got pages of notes here.

00:58:38.770 --> 00:58:51.751
Yeah, I don't know if I have anything else here. Yeah. I mean, I think that as hard as it, you know, this is, it is not an uncomplicated pastoral

00:58:51.751 --> 00:58:52.876
issue.

00:58:54.751 --> 00:59:00.751
It's a complicated pastoral issue. I like nine double negatives.

00:59:00.751 --> 00:59:05.309
It makes me sound smart.

00:59:05.511 --> 00:59:13.431
It's a complicated pastoral issue. a complicated church issue, it's a complicated family issue, right? Like, it impacts families,

00:59:13.431 --> 00:59:18.471
and like that percentage of families impacted by conversations like this will only increase,

00:59:18.569 --> 00:59:23.351
and churches that it impacts will increase, and, you know, we do have to,

00:59:25.431 --> 00:59:30.631
find a way to be faithful to the whole counsel of God, and that's hard work.

00:59:32.802 --> 00:59:41.309
Well, we thank you for listening with us here on this topic the last two weeks.

00:59:42.991 --> 00:59:47.871
As always, drop us a question or a comment wherever you're listening.

00:59:48.511 --> 00:59:56.892
716-201-0507 is a text line where you can text us any questions that you might have or comments.

00:59:57.151 --> 00:59:59.916
Like share and subscribe this wherever you're listening to it and we'll catch,

01:00:00.412 --> 01:00:01.834
And we'll see you next time.

01:00:01.840 --> 01:00:11.212
Music.