What does it really mean to pursue a true collaborative divorce? In this episode, Melinda sits down with fellow collaborative law attorney, Lisa Marquis, to break down the difference between simply having an “agreeable divorce” and engaging in Big C Collaborative Law—a structured process that puts families, not the courthouse, at the center of resolution.
We cover:
- Why collaborative law is different from litigation (and why it’s not just “amicable divorce”).
- The benefits: more control over timing, privacy, creativity in solutions, and often lower financial and emotional costs.
- The role of neutral professionals—financial and mental health experts who guide families without taking sides.
- Common myths, including how collaboration can still work when challenges like substance abuse or mental health issues are present (with treatment in place).
- When collaboration is not appropriate, including situations involving domestic violence or active protective orders.
At its core, collaborative divorce is about helping people who don’t agree—but want to. It’s a path toward peace of mind, healthier dynamics, and solutions tailored to your family’s unique needs.
Quotes:
“Collaborative is a process for people who do not agree but want to” - Melinda Eitzen
“It is a process for people who do not agree and have a desire to do what is best for their family and need a little help” - Lisa Marquis
"The power of the neutral voice" - Melinda Eitzen
"People who cannot collaborate, are if they are crazy, actually crazy; not divorce crazy because we all feel a little crazy when divorcing." - Melinda Eitzen