The UN talks double-talk as the ruling elite weaponized authoritarian
democracy to overthrow authoritarianism.
Also, you can sleep better tonight knowing that a notorious gang was
caught smuggling, one of their highest selling goods, their most sought after
contraband in Auckland, New Zealand.
Yes, they were caught smuggling.
F C Hey, it's Lucas grow bot and you're listening to the Lucas scroll bot
show where we uncover purpose, pursue truth, and own the future it's episode
259, September 22nd, 2021 coming to you from the heart of the middle east.
The world just gets crazier and crazier.
We're going to hit that KFC smuggling contraband story
towards the end of the show.
But the headlining today is that the UN is back after, uh, you know, a pause,
you know, the nature was healing itself.
And I think hopefully the world was able to heal a little bit in the time
that the UN was not in physical space.
But, uh, the, the ruling elite gathered and the, the mouthpiece for the globalist
agenda was front and center stage announcing all the bright and brilliant
plans for the, the new world order.
Of course, here is, uh, the president of the United States leaders and
gentlemen, president Joe Biden, and the commitment, my new administration to help
lead the world toward a more peaceful.
Prosperous future for all, for all people, including, including the
hundreds of thousands that are fleeing from Afghanistan, their future is
definitely peaceful and prosperous under the, under the rule of.
The Taliban under the civil war that is beginning to break out there enough
Gustavo after the, the train of us allies, not just in Afghanistan, but as
it continues across the region, but enough about Afghanistan for this episode, we're
actually not focusing on Afghanistan.
In this episode.
We'll be hitting more on China, uh, and some, some interesting clips from that.
But.
Gets into China specifically.
I want to talk about the UN and even in this clip, uh, president Biden
is talking of this, you know, this new order at this new world of peace
and prosperity in, in his speech.
He's talking about how America is back at the table and we're
gonna work with our allies.
We're going to work with anyone to, to establish a, a new and safer world for.
And this is really the UN agenda within the UN of course, on,
on the surface level, but the words that are said, so, okay.
Yeah, that's what we want, but what does it mean beneath?
And there was a great article from the discovery Institute this week,
uh, by a guest Wesley J Smith wrote this piece and the UN it starts, it
starts, I want to go through a couple of the points he makes in this piece.
He starts with seeing that the UN is released a, a long article written by the
UN secretary general, Antonio Gutierrez.
And he writes in this article, the UN secretary general that there.
And their desire is that the U N be given power to rebuild the
infrastructures for human existence.
Now, infrastructure is the big buzz word it's been floating around.
Everyone needs infrastructure these days.
And that is a clever way of saying we are going to overhaul, not just
physical, like actual infrastructure.
Like roads or buildings, bridges, or of the electrical grid.
It's not just overhauling that, but it's saying we're going to also package
in with this word infrastructure.
We're going to package in education and the way that we educate we're
going to package in a new system of, of wealth distribution.
We're going to package in a new way of seeing the world we're going to read.
Society itself.
So when you see that word infrastructure, you can, you can read into what
is actually underneath that.
Or should I say you should pause and ask what is actually, what is actually
being meant by infrastructure as it's a, it's a really hot word, lots of letters.
I don't even know.
1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 letters.
Uh, 15 letter word.
That can mean a whole bunch of things.
You sound really smart when you, when you rattle it off and you say we're going to
build back better and have infrastructure.
It's like, yes, infrastructure.
What is that?
I don't know, but this is what the UN's common agenda in this 85 page
report about the future that the UN wants to build for the world.
And what.
Actually needs, if you've been a long-time listener of the show, you know, that
I don't have a very favorable view.
If you couldn't tell by the first four minutes, five minutes of this episode,
I don't have a very favorable view of the UN for a variety of reasons.
And you'll hear some of the variety of reasons right here right now.
Gutierrez.
Saying that we are in an inflection point in history?
Well, yes we are.
In our biggest shared tests.
Since world war II, humanity faces a stark and urgent choice breakdown or
breakthrough only the U N can save us the United nations pres presence.
The United nations presence, excuse me, is global.
Its membership is universal and its activity span the breadth of human meat.
Its fundamental values are not the pres preserved of any region.
Indeed they're are founded every culture and religion around the world.
Peace, justice, human dignity, quality tolerance.
And of course solidarity.
Well, the fundamental purposes and principles of the United nations in
door, the organization must evolve in response to the changing world
to become more networked inclusive.
If ineffective in this article, Smith writes it.
This translates to this is a power grab to give the U N general and
the secretary general in specific.
Over the creation of national and international public policies.
What this actually means is the UN secretary general wants to be given
power to write laws and to be given authority over nations and over
international public spaces, because they are the one unifying factor that
the one hope for humanity, humanity.
Does he say in this, what does he mean?
What, what is his ideas of the type of future that he wants to build?
He goes on taxation is one of the most powerful tools of government.
Your tears, right?
Taxation can also drive sustainability and just transition as governance
shifts, subsidies from activities that damage the environment to those.
This is staying in your rigid translation.
We will redistrict.
Income to the developing world and use global warming as a pretext
to create an international taxing power to bring the world's economy.
Under our control, a global tax system is his dream good.
Two years goes on and he goes after free speech, he writes
now is the time to end the info.
Plaguing our world by defending a common empirically based consensus around facts,
science in knowledge, the war on science must end all policy and budget decisions
should be backed by science and expertise.
I am calling for a global code of conduct that promotes
integrity in public information.
AKA.
We want to be big brother.
We want to control all the more modes and forms of communication.
We will be the ones who decides what is and what isn't fat and the way that we'll
do this, we'll find the scientists that agree with us and we'll have the sensor.
Decide what is, or isn't fact and will control the people
who control the information.
And therefore we can say, well, we're not doing it.
It's the experts that are deciding this, but we can't pick the experts.
We've hand picked the sources.
We have told you, these are the books that you can read.
These are the sources that you can't read.
He wants to establish an information monopoly, and it's
not an exaggeration exaggeration.
He goes, okay.
Himself writing while vigorously defending the right to freedom
of expression, everywhere.
Notice freedom of expression, not freedom of speech or freedom of communication.
It's you can express yourself, but it's not freedom of information.
It's freedom of expression.
We must equally encourage societies to develop a common empirically-based
consensus on the public goods of facts, science, and knowledge, a global code
of conduct that protects that promotes integrity in public information that could
be explored together with states, media outlets and regulatory bodies facilitated,
facilitated by the United nations.
With recent concerns about trust and mistrust, linked to
technology and the digital space.
It is awful time to understand better regulate and manage our digital
commons as global as a global public.
Good.
This is where we've been talking about this for a long time.
This is where they want to drive this.
Of all the public platforms, all the social media platforms, a control of
what you can and cannot see censorship, because if you can control the
information, if you can control the facts, you can control the people.
He goes on, social justice, racism and tolerance and discrimination continue
to exist in all societies pause.
And they always will.
Do you know why.
Because wrapped up in the heart of man is envy is jealousy is hatred.
And, and that is not going to go away by the UN creating some
loss or our new regulatory body.
Yes.
There are things that we can do to alleviate those things, but the answer
and the problem lies within the heart of.
Not a global regulatory body.
He goes on as seen during the pandemic with the scapegoating
of groups, blamed for the virus.
And as a start, the adoption of comprehensive laws against
discrimination, including based on race or ethnicity, age, gender, religion,
disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity is long over.
AKA.
If you say a man is a man and a woman is a woman in a man can not give birth.
Well, that's hate speech.
And that is punishable by law globally.
That is the world that utopia, dystopia, that he hopes to create
the Smith who wrote this rights.
This is the translation of this.
The new international order will promote critical race theory, abortion rights,
and the values of the transgender movement while suppressing dissonance
from the reigning global moral order.
That is, that is the, the goals and the agendas of the UN from
the senior leadership of the UN.
That is what they want to push across the globe global.
Critical race theory, abortion rights, transgendered movement.
It is the globalist movement that is, is not based Thea election.
It is not a ruling body that is based on democracy, but it is, uh, it is a power.
By the ruling elite to control societies and ultimately control you to control the
laws that govern your life to establish a censorship global censorship so they
can decide what is, and isn't fact.
And now if you say something that they have deemed is not true or not
fact, well, that's adios to you.
Here is his Biden.
Here is Biden a little more from his, his speech, which will
transition us into this next segment.
As the United States turns our focus to the priorities
and the regions of the world.
Like you ended up Pacific that are most consequential today and tomorrow we'll
do so with our allies and partners through cooperation and multilateral
institutions like the United.
To amplify our collective strength and speed our progress toward
dealing with these global challenges.
No, whenever he says Indo-Pacific really what he means is China.
And we've seen America in recent days, begin to withdraw even
missile batteries from our allies in Saudi Arabia, we will drew out of
Afghanistan, leaving high and dry or.
Uh, not just our allies in Afghanistan, but leaving high and dry allies of the
UK and NATO who they are quite the UK is definitely not happy with the way that
the withdrawal from Afghanistan happened.
But here he's saying we're, we're refocused.
We're refocusing on more strategic problems, bigger looming problems in the
quote unquote Indo-Pacific, which really means we're focusing on combating China,
which is the whole, uh, Australian UK.
You asked the occas deal where the U S cut France out of the, the summary deal.
And they decided to give I'm sure for a hefty cost Australia
nuclear power submarines.
To what do you act as a bulwark against China?
Well, this is where the double-talk, as I said in the intro, there
there's so much double-talk going on just as we went through the
UN saying what they want to do.
And then when you break down what that actually means in their policy,
in the world that they want to build, it's a, quite the opposite.
They say that we want, they want to build freedom by ending the infoDev
by, by doing that, they're there.
They want to create a sensorial, uh, big brother world where they decide
what is truth, where they decide what is fact, not just for one country where
they've been democratically voted in, but for the globe now there's going to
be a number, a large number of nations.
Are currently resisting and will continue to resist this globalist
push, but the double-talk continues to play even in, in Biden speeches.
We're going through a couple, a couple clips from that where he
says, okay, we are building up and focusing on the Indo-Pacific.
But at the same time, we actually kind of like China.
Here's another clip, not seeking.
Say it again.
We are not seeking a new cold war.
Or a world divided into rigid blocks, w we're not seeking a new cold war, but
we're making sure to build up our, our, our military allies in the Indo-Pacific
to defend against China, AKA, we are in a new cold war, but he continues.
This is ready to work with any nation that steps up and pursue
peaceful resolution to share child.
Even if we have intense disagreement and other areas,
let me break that down for you.
When he says shared challenges, he means global warming, lots of his speech was
dedicated to global warming again and again and again and again, saying how
we're all facing a climate weather and climate is challenging the entire world.
We're all we need to battle climate.
It's not even climate change now.
It's just, we need to battle.
Uh, and, and it's a global issue that it goes across borders.
So if we can find people who, who, uh, as he says here, that steps up
and pursue a peaceful resolution.
To share challenges, share challenges who pursue peaceful resolutions to
share challenges, even if, even if we have intense disagreement yes.
In other areas.
Well, what are those tents, disagreements, and who is he talking about?
Again, he's making reference to China, even Nancy Pelosi.
Just last week said, yes, China does a whole bunch of horrible things, but
we're going to partner with them because global warming is a bigger issue.
And so here's this really easy scapegoat, uh, loophole that
they're they're weaving right now.
Well, if there's bigger problems that we need to focus on, don't worry about
the millions of weekers that are, are in concentration camps and the
genocide that is happening against them.
Their bigger issues like global warming.
So we can cozy on up to China.
And again, this is the strange double-talk that I hear going on.
I even see it with, in his talk when it is related to Afghanistan.
Pulling out of Afghanistan really gives a lot of help to China.
It is a great move.
I think for China in Russia, while at the same time, people are making the
arguments that, uh, president Biden, one event making arguments that by
America pulling out it then presents China with its own dangers of terrorism.
This is also seen in this statement in these clips where he's saying we are
building up the Indo-Pacific, which is what this whole deal we've even
betrayed France to get these submarines in this new triad lateral agreement.
It's the same thing that they've been doing with the quad with Japan,
uh, uh, Australia and India, and the United States to what be a
bulwark against China's growing.
And there, there trade dominance in the world.
So it's, it's this really mixed messaging that it kind of gets a little
confusing of knowing well, which, which one is which one is it really?
Is it that they are our friend and our ally and we're going to build
together and everything's groovy or is we, is it, we are in a cold war.
Going back to the weaker situation, the intense disagreements.
I want to play this clip from Gordon Chang, who he was on an
interview called the debate, which is a production of Newsweek.
And here's him weighing in on, on China and what's happening there.
And it's important to understand.
President binded says intense disagreements.
One what he's referring to, and I want you to ask yourself, is
this an intense disagreement?
Is this something that is big enough that we shouldn't say well, yeah,
we're just going to go along and we're going to play peace, even though
these things are going on now, Gordon Chang is a columnist and author, a
lawyer, and he's widely known for his book, the coming collapse of China.
On the Wiggers genocide is defined in article two of the
genocide convention of 1948.
And most people who have looked at this believe that China has indeed committed
genocide pursuant to that provision.
We know that China has detained at least 1.1 million, maybe 3.3
million in facilities that meet the definition of concentration.
We know that people are dying in those camps because China is
building crematoria next to them.
We know that people are being tortured in those camps.
We know that there is institutionalized rape.
We know that there is forest organ harvesting.
That's the tribunal that was conducted by sir, Jeffrey.
Nice.
We also know that there's institutionalized.
That China has been selling weekers cosmetics and other Turkic minorities
to both foreign and domestic companies.
Um, and basically this is more than just forced labor.
This is slavery.
This is genocide and crimes against humanity.
This is the tense disagreement that the west, not just the west
many nations have with China.
This is the tense disagreement is the.
Organ harvesting to selling weekers and Kazakhs into slavery to, to
concentration camps to genocide.
Is that, is that just something that can be glossed over and be
like, yeah, let's, let's move on.
It's okay.
This is just a margin issues.
Well, now when we talk about China, I want to be, I don't know if careful
so right word, but I want to be.
That there, there really is.
There truly is a difference between the, the CCP or the CPC, the communist
China communist party, and the people of China, the everyday person who
wants a, oftentimes a very different world, a very different scenario,
future society than what the communist.
Wants to push.
And a lot of people who are pro communism or pro China will attempt to
make these arguments, that communism and that China was able to pull
an enormous amount of people out of poverty, more than anyone else.
Saying we need to give credit where credit's due.
China has done so much for their people.
We can't just say that they're all bad.
Look at all.
The good they have done.
And here is chain again, a counter argument making a counterpoint to
this argument in terms of poverty.
Yes.
I agree with you.
Um, but the question is how is that done?
And it was done largely because the Chinese people forced the communism.
To not stand in their way anymore.
This occurred, um, in 1978, when, um, people started to see that dunk shall
ping a quote-unquote reformer was taking over, but Don was actually continuing a
lot of the old communist party tactics of course have control over the economy.
Um, and the Chinese people said, no, we're just not doing it.
They did it on their own.
They ignored communist party mandates and the communist party
actually had to follow them.
So I don't think it was the Chinese communist party that
has alleviated this property.
It's the Chinese people themselves demanding that
the party get out of the way.
And what we've seen recently, um, with CGN pings initiatives, um,
$1.3 trillion of value of Chinese companies have been knocked off in the
space of what seven or eight weeks.
This is an antibusiness antipoverty alleviation regime.
And that's important to understand that just in the last week there's been
a huge stock market crash in China.
That is being called to be equivalent of what America and the west experience
in the world experience in 2008.
And a lot of people are worried as the stock market is
teetering on a, on a thin line.
Uh, some people are.
That this is just a little, a tiny little shake, a little foretaste of, of what is
actually to come in the coming months.
Uh, w we'll see what happens.
Everyone has been predicting the big one, the big crash,
uh, for years and years now.
Uh, so we'll see how soon or far that comes, but I wanted to focus
here on the fact that what Gordon was saying is that it was the.
The people of the Chinese people said, communist government get out of our way.
We want a capitalistic system.
We want capitalism.
We want to have freedom to run our businesses.
And it reminded me of a story.
When I heard this clip, it reminded me of a story, the
other, probably the other month.
I was getting, getting some work done on, on my car.
So I went down to the local garage is right around the corner from my house.
And it's strung by some Iranian guy, really nice really kind gentleman.
He helped pick up the car to drive it to the, to the shop and on the way we
were talking and he was saying, and I was agreeing how, you know, we're.
In many ways that you said, you know, your government and my
government, they might fight.
They might hate each other.
But look, here we are.
We're friends, we're talking, we're laughing, we're having
a great time together.
And that is an important thing to remember in.
Realize that many times there are government regimes that have
one agenda, like in Iran where 10% of the population to ruling.
Is is imposing their will on the other 90%.
And by and large, that 90% of Iranians who have I've sat with
many of them, they don't want that.
They don't want that reality.
They don't want that society.
The same thing is what we're seeing right now happening in Afghanistan.
Yes.
There are many different tribes across Afghanistan.
Are very happy that the Taliban are in power.
It would be amiss to say that all the people of Afghanistan are upset, but
probably a good 80% of the people.
And all of that, I know warranties are very worried about their
future under the Taliban's rule.
The same thing goes with.
There that there's a differentiation, a differentiation that needs to take
place between the Chinese people and the Chinese government when, when we're
looking and discussing these things.
Um, as they're, they're two different things in my mind now, uh, he
goes on with this one last clip.
This looming question that many people have is will China
become the next superpower?
Are they already the next superpower?
And we haven't quite realized it yet.
Well, this is Gordon's.
Um, India could very well be the world's superpower by the middle of the century.
Maybe.
Yes, maybe no, but the point is we know that China won't be, and we
know for one very simple reason, and that is that China today, which has a
population of 1.4, 1 billion people, according to the seventh national
census that was conducted last November.
At the end of this century will be no more than a billion people.
Even according to China's own estimates, which overstate
China's demographic potential.
Um, China probably will have a population of maybe 500 million.
If it's lucky.
In other words, they're going to suffer the biggest demographic decline in
history in the absence of war or disease.
That is just mind-boggling.
We've we've touched on this before.
Th the population collapsed that is coming to China that is already
here in China do, and it's brought on by itself due to the one child
policy, which then they lifted it.
And we've discussed this a number of episodes back.
They lifted it to two child and now is at a three child poverty or, uh, uh, limit.
But the policy change hasn't resulted in a cultural change.
And the birth rate is still going down.
Their population is aging.
They are approaching, uh, a population collapse and population collapse
also leads to economic collapse.
And then that creates a, that deflationary cycle or that Depression-era deflationary
cycle really in the population.
It creates this cycle.
That's very, very hard to pull out.
So many experts are saying that it is not likely that they will become
a superpower because of the fact that they are facing a population decline.
Well, there is still madness going on across the globe with vaccines
vaccine mandates, uh, with riots and protests, especially across, uh, in
Australia and New Zealand and the.
But here is, uh, president Biden, again at the UN summit, talking
about how we need to harness and utilize new technology to be able to
combat what is coming in the future.
Here is, uh, a continuation of this, these series of clips
by, uh, president Joe Biden.
Well, we worked together together to save lives, defeat COVID-19 everywhere and
take the necessary steps for prayers.
For the next pandemic for there will be another one.
It will be another one, but we fail to harness the tools at our disposal as a
more virulent, dangerous various take hold those variants, those, those variants.
I think we're on moon now.
I don't know how many barriers there are out there, but it's this is the cycle.
They're saying there's, you know, there's another pandemic coming.
There's another pandemic coming.
But recently I've been seeing articles saying that likely what's going to
happen is that we are not going to, and it's probably more than likely.
It is a fact.
We are not going to rid ourselves of COVID.
COVID zero is not a reality that we are going to reach.
And the pandemic is really going to turn into what's called an endemic.
Now an end.
Is a disease that ends up being with us ongoing.
So the influenza would be an endemic.
The common cold would be an endemic.
And those are things that are typically seasonal that comes in with.
And there's no vaccine, there's no cure for it.
That every season there is a new variant that kind of flows through.
Well, here's this shocking clip by professor, sir, Andrew polar, who
is the director of, of Oxford, uh, Zeneca, who is the director of the
vaccine talking just about how.
The vaccines are not going to cause herd immunity.
Now this is what people have been saying that it's all about herd
immunity, and that's why they're trying to get these numbers up.
But here's sir, Andrew polar.
I think we are in a situation here with this current parent where herd immunity
is not a possibility because it's still in affects at vaccinated individually.
Um, and I suspect that what, uh, the virus will throw out next is a, is a
veteran, which is perhaps even veteran transmitting in vaccinated populations.
And so that's an, even more of a reason not to be making a vaccine
program around herd immunity.
I don't think there's anything that UK can do to stop the immersion,
Sunni Arab, like going to happen.
And, uh, if anything, we need to focus now, not.
Um, what might stop me barons, because I don't think we have any facility
to control that we need to focus on thinking about how do we prevent
people dying or going into hospital.
There's a couple things that I hear him saying.
One he's admitting that vaccinated people are getting COVID and
can spread it and can get it.
So this isn't, this isn't about creating a total immunity, but it's hopefully.
Going to, and this is what he's saying, that hopefully this will result in
people not going to hospital as much due to these shots, but he's also saying
we need to focus on not just, okay.
We need to create herd immunity because he's saying, well,
that's not going to happen.
We're going to have another variant and another variant in another variant.
And we're not going to ever create that herd immunity.
If I'm understanding what he's saying, right.
It's not going to be.
So instead of focusing on that, we need to focus on how to treat the
disease, rather than just creating a, a vaccine, a vaccine to the disease.
And maybe he is talking about a vaccine, but what I'm hearing and I would think
would be rational is okay, how can we treat, get, get a treatment, which there
are treatments, preventative treatments and vitamin D ivermectin, vitamin C.
These are all things that have proven themselves.
Probably there's a whole list of other things on those, you know, there's
so many COVID podcasts out there that could tell you everything that is
helping would help with preventative.
It's just fascinating that he is making this point, that this is here
to stay and we're not going to get this, this magical herd immunity.
We're not going to get to COVID zero.
We have to learn to live with it, and we have to learn how to keep people
healthy through it and move on with life.
This, this clip goes on.
The last 50 seconds.
And I think this is an enormously important thing to be thinking about
today because this, during the course of this week will pay about 65,000 deaths
in the world we have now, um, over 4 billion doses deployed on the vaccines
globally, and that is now enough doses to prevent it almost all of those.
Did you catch that, but 66,000 deaths this week globally, then he says we've
distributed 4 billion doses globally, which should be enough for herd immunity.
And yet the deaths are still continuing, which means that this herd immunity is
not going to be reality for this disease.
We have to come up with.
Solutions.
And yet here is president Joe Biden.
Another short clip from him at the UN bombs and bullets cannot defend
against COVID-19 or its future variants.
To fight this pandemic.
We need a collective act of science and political will.
We need act now to get shots in arms as fast as possible.
Well, Australia is taking that to heart.
They are acting now to get shots in arms as fast as possible, whole over
the last number of days, riots have begun to break out across Australia.
Here's just a short clip.
You can hear what's going on in the back.
Now, they're now shooting.
You can hear the OMA.
They're now shooting people.
I don't know if this is the shots in arms that president Joe Biden was
referring to was that this sort of shots in arms in this other clip, this
clip that we just played by president.
He also says, we need to, you know, bombs and guns, won't solve this issue.
We need to use science and we need to use political will in this right here.
It seems to be effective.
The same here's our sciences is the, the, what we have said is the bottom line.
We're going to mandate Burton Creek.
This mandate not we're paid.
This works.
Take it.
If you want.
If it works and you believe that it works, you're going to take it instead
of saying we're going to use our political will and the scenes, the
scenes from what what's happening right now in Australia, it's just shocking.
It looks like just full on war scenes.
Uh, just unbelievable.
The, the clash.
That we are seeing right now over these lockdowns and it's, it's just overtly
authoritarian and what president Biden is doing even in America and, and forcing
on private businesses saying you must, if you have over a hundred employees, you
must have this mandated that is classic textbook authoritarian move, but here
is biting again, back to the double-talk that we're talking about at the U S.
Mutual belong to those who give their people the ability to breathe free.
Not those who seek to suffocate their people with an iron hand authoritarianism.
The authoritarianism of the world may seek to proclaim the end of the
age of democracy, but they're wrong.
The truth is.
The democratic world is everywhere.
Like in Australia, like in America, like in the UK, like in New Zealand, which
are all behaving quite authoritarian.
Now there's many states in America.
That's not behaving authoritarian when it comes to this issue.
But when you look at what's happening in Australia and New Zealand to
democratic nations, it is the.
Of the majority.
And I don't even know if it's a majority.
It's the tyranny of the ruling class that is imposing this iron fist in democracy.
Democracies are not immune to authoritarianism.
Here is another little, little snippet, great little snippet
from the protests down into.
Communities, he's not welcomed.
Now.
Democracy will not stand for, we will not complete.
Communism is not welcome in our democracy.
Well, oh man.
Yeah, that makes sense.
In a post-truth society where we've exchanged truth for lies and reason for
postmodern irrationality, the absurd.
Makes sense, uh, in New Zealand, oh man.
New Zealand is just had some of the roughest lockdowns of anywhere.
Just absolutely insane.
But this week, a, an article came out exposing this new wave of dangerous
criminals, probably organized.
Uh, highly, highly dangerous smuggling, uh, illicit goods into
Auckland, New Zealand as you're under eight stage four lockdown.
And over the week, uh, some, some probably evil, horrible drug Lords
got stopped with a trunk full of KFC, Kentucky fried chicken.
Two men have been arrested it's from the guardian.
Two men had been arrested after the police said they found.
In a car boot full of Kentucky fried chicken and over a hundred thousand
dollars in cash, they're probably trying to get their, their cash to
'em cause they're, they're buying KFC and then delivering it around town.
That's what I would be doing.
The men were arrested after allegedly trying to flee from the
police near the Auckland border.
Their car was searched and they found large quantities
of KFC in such an environment.
Fast food can take on the aura of high, valued and listened to.
Here's here's another crazy line.
Last week, a man was charged by the police after posting a social
media video of crossing the Auckland border in search of McDonald's.
Because right now in Oakland, under the stage four lockdown,
all fast food places are closed.
So people are looking for fast food.
They're going to smuggle themselves.
Out of Oakland to try to find fast food elsewhere and come back.
But that is breaking the health mandates.
Oh man, this breach of the COVID-19 public health response act can
result in the imprisonment of up to six months or $4,000 fine.
And I mean, clearly if you have three buckets of chicken, um,
gallons of, I mean, multiple.
Containers, I don't know of coastline.
Uh, you're probably part of some sort of, of KFC trafficking organization.
And, uh, for sure you should be locked up and put away for a long time.
Well, this show is brought to you by listeners and by
listeners like you just like you.
So I want to start by saying thank you for being here.
Thank you for listening.
Thousands of people listen to this.
Every month and it's not fueled by massive ads.
We don't run ads on the show, but it's fueled by people like you giving value
back to the show and the value that you received and by doing so you help the
show, stay on the air and you help improve the quality and the time being able to
give given to this show, I speak English.
Very good.
Don't go away.
We'll be right back with our closing Weaver and boom segments.
Welcome back to Weaver Luma, part of the show where we take ancient wisdom and
we weave it in with our everyday lives.
Own our future.
And we've our Destiny's today's quote is actually a clip that I found from the
Atlas society, which is that libertarian society, uh, with, uh, by Richard Salzman.
And he is talking about not just having caution in our lives, but being pre
cautionary, any pre cautionary movement.
There's something called the precautionary.
Which may be almost no one has heard of, but I believe me, it's behind the scenes
and it's been an agony, EMEA and growing.
And if I said to you, we should live our lives with caution, you know, and
not be reckless risk-takers of most people would say, well, of course not,
some people take more risks than others.
And so it's just, you know, rational in many contexts to, to
have caution, but the idea of pre.
Which is what the precautionary principle is, is the idea that we
be, we should be super sensitive to things that might cause us.
To be cautious.
So it's like one step removed and it's a whole movement.
And I don't even know what you would call it.
There's journals of risk assessment.
There's journals, a risk analysis.
They apply these to climate change models.
They apply these to epidemiology.
They apply these to workplace incidents, but what has happened is they have.
Supercharged the whole idea of taking risks and they've set up a standard,
which is so platonic and actually so fear inducing that is causing people to not do
things within the norms of like low risk.
Uh, and that's what's happening, I think in COVID it isn't just
that there are these problems.
The world health organization, the CDC, the FDA, the authoritarianism and Biden.
There is also this kind of philosophic fuel being given to it
by this push again, to say that you shouldn't just be risk averse, you
should be massively risk averse.
You know, almost to the extent where you live in a bubble.
And this is an infected, even by the way, parenting for those of you who know
what helicopter parents are, parents who try to immunize their children have many
kinds of failure or risk, uh, at all.
I love this clip about being precautionary and how, when we're overly cautious,
it actually destroys or destroy.
Creative ability.
It destroys if you're an overly cautious parent that anytime a toy drops,
you're sanitizing it 20 times and you're making sure your kid is living
in a bubble, just, you know, Yolo.
You only live once you ought to look out, you better be safe precautionary.
And it's why people, maybe you don't know this, but people make fun of
other people when they say Stacy.
Yeah, stay safe.
It's like, well, how safe, how safe are we really going to stay?
Should I, should I just stay my house?
Should I just live, locked up, live in fear and not risk.
And there's, as he said at the beginning, there's a difference
between being cautious and not just being foolish and doing foolish
things that are going to cause harm and being precautious, which is this.
Before that.
And, and then right now we're being precautious about being precautious,
where we're having so many levels because in society, we have boiled
life down to our life that after our, our physical body, there's nothing
left after that, there's nothing left.
All that we have to hang on to is our health and our wellbeing.
And if that is the world that we live in, if that is our worldview, our
paradigm, that all we have to hang on to is our health and our wellness.
And we are going to live these lives of trying to self
preserve that self preservation.
That's self preservation will cause us to shrink back in our cages, into ourselves.
And we will not even live even though we're.
We won't actually fulfill our purpose of the reason that we are here on the
earth, because we will be so filled and flooded with fear as we work to
preserve ourselves rather than to give of ourselves freely rather than to risk
our lives freely to do something that we could fail and fail hard at taking true
risks with our lives, where we look for.
We ended up in dire situations.
Those are the people who succeed in the world.
Those are the people that we look up to and admire those people who
were not precautious, but they rate, weighed the risks and they took action.
So do that for your life.
Don't be safe this week.
Go out and take risks.
Go out and take risks within your community, within your relationships of
pushing the boundaries of, of loving one, another, pushing the boundaries of serving
other people, pushing the boundaries of how you dream about what you want
to do with your life, or how you dream about the vision that you want to lead
your family into take risks this week.
And one way that you can take a risk is by sharing this episode.
Those friends, those relationships, those colleagues you can do.
So by texting this, sending them this podcast, or even just talking about
some of the ideas that we talked about here on today's show together, and
that will be a risk for you because then you will be forced to engage
with them along these subjects.
And maybe they're going to disagree with you and maybe it will be
put in an awkward situation.
That is how we grow.
And that is how we build a strong society and culture and community around us.
It is brick by brick and you and I can lead in those societies.
We can lead
by.
Culture, we can lead by connecting people together.
And it's in the connecting people together in the joining people together,
there is purpose because purpose is always found in connection to
someone else and that my friends can help us and help us own the future.