WEBVTT

00:00:03.060 --> 00:00:06.450
Matt Abrahams: At one level,
effective communication boils down

00:00:06.450 --> 00:00:09.360
simply to making things accessible.

00:00:09.570 --> 00:00:14.370
Simplifying so people can understand,
providing the context to help them learn,

00:00:14.520 --> 00:00:19.260
and allowing yourself to build curiosity
to motivate people to pay attention.

00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:23.070
My name is Matt Abrahams and I
teach Strategic Communication at

00:00:23.070 --> 00:00:24.960
Stanford Graduate School of Business.

00:00:25.260 --> 00:00:28.784
Welcome to Think Fast,
Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:00:29.265 --> 00:00:32.685
Today I am really excited to
be speaking with Adam Bryant.

00:00:33.074 --> 00:00:37.695
Adam is a senior managing director and
a partner at the EXCO Group, and he

00:00:37.695 --> 00:00:41.355
is a former New York Times journalist
and bestselling author, known for

00:00:41.355 --> 00:00:46.785
his Corner Office column where he
interviewed over 500 CEOs and executives.

00:00:47.084 --> 00:00:51.285
His work focuses on demystifying
leadership, identifying the key qualities

00:00:51.285 --> 00:00:55.695
of successful leaders, and translating
those insights into actionable advice.

00:00:55.735 --> 00:00:59.425
For managers, he's the author of
several books, including Quick

00:00:59.425 --> 00:01:02.095
and Nimble, and the CEO test.

00:01:02.485 --> 00:01:03.295
Welcome, Adam.

00:01:03.595 --> 00:01:05.660
I am really excited for our conversation.

00:01:06.390 --> 00:01:07.350
Adam Bryant: Great to be here, Matt.

00:01:07.350 --> 00:01:08.220
Thank you for the invite.

00:01:08.490 --> 00:01:09.810
Matt Abrahams: Alright,
shall we get started?

00:01:09.990 --> 00:01:10.650
Adam Bryant: Let's do it.

00:01:10.980 --> 00:01:14.550
Matt Abrahams: You've documented the
career journeys of countless leaders.

00:01:14.850 --> 00:01:18.000
What are some of the specific
patterns or trends you've identified

00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:20.850
that have helped these leaders to
be successful in their careers?

00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:23.400
Adam Bryant: It's something I think
a lot about, and I've come up with

00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:25.410
my top three if you'll indulge me.

00:01:25.410 --> 00:01:29.300
So, the first one is the ability to
simplify complexity, which I know is

00:01:29.300 --> 00:01:32.509
a topic that's near and dear to your
heart, but I don't think you can be an

00:01:32.509 --> 00:01:34.759
effective leader if you can't do that.

00:01:34.850 --> 00:01:38.059
So much of leadership is like, there's
a lot going on in the world, in your

00:01:38.059 --> 00:01:39.710
particular industry inside your company.

00:01:40.395 --> 00:01:44.175
I think it's a key leadership moment
to be able to stand on a stage and

00:01:44.175 --> 00:01:47.475
say, this is where we're going, this
is how we're gonna get there, and

00:01:47.535 --> 00:01:48.765
this is when we're gonna get there.

00:01:48.765 --> 00:01:50.025
what the timeline is.

00:01:50.295 --> 00:01:53.805
That's a high art of leadership,
being able to simplify but

00:01:53.805 --> 00:01:55.785
not oversimplify complexity.

00:01:55.785 --> 00:01:56.835
So that's number one.

00:01:57.179 --> 00:01:59.940
I do think a lot about this
word authenticity, which I think

00:01:59.940 --> 00:02:02.880
has become much more important
just in the last several years.

00:02:02.940 --> 00:02:05.610
People want that and expect
that from their leaders.

00:02:05.640 --> 00:02:07.800
Authenticity is one of those words
that means a lot of different

00:02:07.800 --> 00:02:09.120
things to a lot of different people.

00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:14.730
The way I think about it is that you need
to know what your values are and to be

00:02:14.730 --> 00:02:19.200
able to communicate them and not just in
terms of fridge magnet poetry that, you

00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:22.705
know, integrity's in part, but to be able
to say like I wanna share with you the

00:02:22.705 --> 00:02:24.205
three values that are important to me.

00:02:24.205 --> 00:02:27.960
I want to tell you the stories about
how these became important to me.

00:02:28.635 --> 00:02:32.265
I want to tell you how these values
show up in my leadership style day

00:02:32.265 --> 00:02:35.775
to day, so you know what to expect
and you know where they come from.

00:02:35.775 --> 00:02:39.435
And to me like that's a big component
of being an authentic leader.

00:02:39.765 --> 00:02:44.265
The final point I'll make is just leaders
have to be comfortable in the balancing

00:02:44.265 --> 00:02:48.900
acts, the paradoxes, the contradictions
of leadership because the thing about

00:02:48.900 --> 00:02:51.780
the leadership space, people are always
looking for shortcuts and saying,

00:02:51.780 --> 00:02:55.620
leadership is about this one thing,
and it's never about one thing, right?

00:02:55.620 --> 00:03:00.019
It's always about two things
that are usually in tension.

00:03:00.180 --> 00:03:02.820
Part of your job as a leader
is to create a sense of urgency

00:03:02.820 --> 00:03:04.440
while also being patient.

00:03:04.440 --> 00:03:07.329
Part of your job as a leader
is to be compassionate, but

00:03:07.329 --> 00:03:09.350
also hold people accountable.

00:03:09.635 --> 00:03:12.995
You need to be a really good listener,
but you also need to know when

00:03:12.995 --> 00:03:14.765
to say, folks, I made a decision.

00:03:14.765 --> 00:03:16.565
We're going left, we're not going right.

00:03:16.985 --> 00:03:21.425
And so just all those sort of gray areas,
those balancing acts, I think that's

00:03:21.425 --> 00:03:25.415
another thing that you simply have to
be able to do to be an effective leader.

00:03:25.770 --> 00:03:28.079
Matt Abrahams: I really appreciate
you distilling that down.

00:03:28.079 --> 00:03:31.590
So it's to take complexity and
make it accessible, simplify

00:03:31.590 --> 00:03:33.359
it, help people to prioritize.

00:03:33.540 --> 00:03:38.550
Authenticity, which is really about values
and setting people's expectations for

00:03:38.550 --> 00:03:40.770
what you expect from them and yourself.

00:03:41.025 --> 00:03:44.595
And then this ability to deal
with the dialectics and tensions

00:03:44.595 --> 00:03:45.555
that present themselves.

00:03:45.555 --> 00:03:49.245
We spent a whole episode talking with Rob
Siegel, who I teach with, who wrote a book

00:03:49.245 --> 00:03:52.995
on system leadership, and you're right,
there are so many tensions that we all

00:03:52.995 --> 00:03:54.855
have to deal with, especially leaders.

00:03:55.095 --> 00:03:55.905
That's critical.

00:03:56.144 --> 00:04:00.285
When you look back at the synthesis
you've done, the career journeys that

00:04:00.285 --> 00:04:04.275
you've seen, is there a particular
mistake or two that leaders tend to

00:04:04.275 --> 00:04:09.045
make, especially when it comes to
communicating around themselves or

00:04:09.045 --> 00:04:12.945
their companies that you've seen that
we could learn from and try to avoid?

00:04:13.305 --> 00:04:15.525
Adam Bryant: I do keep
coming back to simplicity.

00:04:15.675 --> 00:04:19.035
So two things: one,
simplicity and two repetition.

00:04:19.410 --> 00:04:23.970
I think for a lot of leaders, things
tend to be very clear in leader's heads.

00:04:23.970 --> 00:04:27.270
In the work that I do at my firm,
we coach senior leaders and usually

00:04:27.270 --> 00:04:30.690
there's a gap between how clear
things are in the leader's head and

00:04:30.690 --> 00:04:32.790
how clear they are to everybody else.

00:04:32.940 --> 00:04:37.680
And look, earlier in my career when I was
a reporter, I followed around a CEO for

00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:39.860
a couple of days doing a profile on them.

00:04:40.100 --> 00:04:42.830
And there was a moment where they
stood on a stage in front of literally

00:04:42.830 --> 00:04:47.510
thousands of employees, and the first
words were, I've got 11 things on my mind.

00:04:47.660 --> 00:04:51.050
And you could literally just feel
the energy drain out of the room.

00:04:51.200 --> 00:04:54.050
And all the science shows that most
people can't remember more than

00:04:54.050 --> 00:04:55.640
three or four things day to day.

00:04:55.840 --> 00:04:59.110
So I do think there's this learning
curve that I've seen that I've heard

00:04:59.110 --> 00:05:02.830
a lot about in leaders, which is
just, I have to keep simplifying.

00:05:02.830 --> 00:05:06.380
This from one of the CEOs I
interviewed a guy named Marcus Ryu.

00:05:06.405 --> 00:05:09.490
He, he had this great expression
that really stayed with me

00:05:09.490 --> 00:05:10.660
in terms of communication.

00:05:10.660 --> 00:05:14.440
I think about a lot myself when
I give talks and my shorthand

00:05:14.470 --> 00:05:17.860
version of his theory is the
Einstein Theory of Communication.

00:05:18.100 --> 00:05:22.300
And what he said is that you can have
a room full of Einstein's, literally

00:05:22.300 --> 00:05:26.440
the smartest people on the planet,
but there's something about the human

00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:31.030
brain that the bigger the audience,
the more the collective IQ drops.

00:05:31.180 --> 00:05:32.770
So I think about that a lot.

00:05:32.770 --> 00:05:36.550
And so when you're giving talks
like my advice is big fonts, a few

00:05:36.550 --> 00:05:38.800
bullet points, short sentences.

00:05:38.830 --> 00:05:42.280
Because yes, everybody in the audience
is smart, but there's something

00:05:42.280 --> 00:05:45.965
about, as audiences get bigger, you
have to keep it simpler and simpler.

00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:49.320
So the second point I'll
make is about repetition.

00:05:49.320 --> 00:05:52.620
And again, I've heard this a lot from
leaders as part of their learning curve.

00:05:52.920 --> 00:05:54.570
You're like, why do I
have to say this again?

00:05:54.570 --> 00:05:57.960
I just said it at the last town
hall, and you have to say it again.

00:05:58.230 --> 00:06:01.110
You've gotta say it seven
times, seven different ways

00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:02.550
for people to hear you once.

00:06:02.925 --> 00:06:07.035
I love the rule that I heard from one CEO,
which is you have to get comfortable with

00:06:07.035 --> 00:06:10.695
people almost teasing you because they
know exactly what you're going to say.

00:06:10.875 --> 00:06:12.435
And when you do that, you've got them.

00:06:12.435 --> 00:06:16.125
But just being comfortable in the sense
of like, folks, you've heard this before.

00:06:16.305 --> 00:06:18.885
It's important to say it
again, let's reset on our

00:06:18.885 --> 00:06:20.565
strategy, et cetera, et cetera.

00:06:20.940 --> 00:06:23.370
Matt Abrahams: This notion of
distilling things down so people

00:06:23.370 --> 00:06:24.750
can really understand them.

00:06:24.900 --> 00:06:28.740
I like the term accessibility over
simplicity, simply because sometimes

00:06:28.740 --> 00:06:32.610
simplicity implies dumbing something
down, and I'm not a big proponent

00:06:32.610 --> 00:06:36.240
of that, but making it accessible
so people really understand, helping

00:06:36.240 --> 00:06:37.890
them prioritize, see what's important.

00:06:38.099 --> 00:06:41.010
And you're right, we suffer from the
curse of knowledge and sometimes the

00:06:41.010 --> 00:06:45.090
curse of passion, and that leads us
to say much more and get into the

00:06:45.090 --> 00:06:47.130
weeds in a way that actually detracts.

00:06:47.130 --> 00:06:50.840
So I love this idea of, really
focus on keeping it simple.

00:06:50.840 --> 00:06:54.590
And you're right, the more people that
you're communicating with, just because of

00:06:54.590 --> 00:06:58.910
the diversity of experience and knowledge,
I do think you have to really focus on

00:06:58.910 --> 00:07:00.620
accessibility, the larger the group.

00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:02.540
And then this notion of repetition.

00:07:02.630 --> 00:07:06.230
I also coach people, you have to
say it over and over again, not

00:07:06.230 --> 00:07:08.420
necessarily in exactly the same words.

00:07:08.670 --> 00:07:10.470
Maybe you say it and
then you give an example.

00:07:10.470 --> 00:07:14.070
You show a statistic, you use an image,
whatever, but you do really have to

00:07:14.070 --> 00:07:16.050
reinforce for people to understand.

00:07:16.350 --> 00:07:19.410
And I like that test, if people
start teasing you for it, then you've

00:07:19.410 --> 00:07:22.620
probably done enough repetition,
and I think that's important.

00:07:22.860 --> 00:07:24.090
You've written several books.

00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:28.890
Your book, The CEO Test outlines some
critical challenges leaders face.

00:07:29.070 --> 00:07:31.140
One of these is, can the
leader really listen?

00:07:31.140 --> 00:07:34.500
What advice do you have for leaders and
for all of us really to better listen.

00:07:34.775 --> 00:07:39.485
Adam Bryant: I think the first point is
be aware that people may be coming to

00:07:39.485 --> 00:07:44.285
you or probably coming to you with side
agendas that they may not necessarily

00:07:44.285 --> 00:07:46.325
want to tell you that there's a problem.

00:07:46.594 --> 00:07:50.045
There's that famous expression about,
be careful about how your jokes

00:07:50.045 --> 00:07:53.960
become funny when you become a leader
and people don't really want to go

00:07:53.960 --> 00:07:55.835
to the boss to bring them bad news.

00:07:55.925 --> 00:07:59.405
So just this awareness that you're
actually trapped in an information bubble.

00:07:59.405 --> 00:08:02.805
And this is the contradiction to
me of the CEO role, which is that.

00:08:03.130 --> 00:08:07.060
You have access to more lines of
communication than anybody else in the

00:08:07.060 --> 00:08:11.650
company, but all those lines are probably
compromised in terms of the accuracy

00:08:11.650 --> 00:08:12.909
of the signal that you're getting.

00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:15.219
So the first step is to be aware of that.

00:08:15.460 --> 00:08:19.480
And then the second thing is to
build up literally almost a listening

00:08:19.690 --> 00:08:24.435
infrastructure so that you could find out
what's really going on in the company.

00:08:24.435 --> 00:08:28.095
And that comes from making sure that
you've got those confidants that

00:08:28.095 --> 00:08:32.294
are going to be straight with you
when people do give you difficult

00:08:32.294 --> 00:08:34.365
news that you thank them for it.

00:08:34.365 --> 00:08:38.775
So that word gets out that you
actually get points for telling the

00:08:38.775 --> 00:08:41.804
boss something they might not wanna
hear, rather than getting in trouble.

00:08:41.804 --> 00:08:44.084
Because that word spreads really quickly.

00:08:44.355 --> 00:08:45.405
I often tell the story.

00:08:45.405 --> 00:08:50.084
So the book I wrote, The CEO Test was with
Kevin Sharer was the former CEO of Amgen,

00:08:50.355 --> 00:08:52.485
and he was very aware of this phenomenon.

00:08:52.485 --> 00:08:56.775
And so on the annual employee survey,
the last question on the survey for

00:08:56.775 --> 00:09:00.839
everybody was the question, what do
you think of the job Kevin is doing?

00:09:01.110 --> 00:09:02.850
And it was an open field.

00:09:02.880 --> 00:09:05.490
People could do it anonymously
or sign their name.

00:09:05.730 --> 00:09:09.089
Basically saying like, I need
to know what you're thinking.

00:09:09.089 --> 00:09:12.839
And he said he would gather all those
and read them just to make sure that

00:09:12.839 --> 00:09:14.220
you're getting the straight feedback.

00:09:14.220 --> 00:09:18.060
Because history is full of companies that
got into trouble because people on the

00:09:18.060 --> 00:09:21.240
front lines knew there was a problem,
but nobody wanted to tell the bosses.

00:09:21.599 --> 00:09:26.520
Matt Abrahams: I really like this idea of
reminding yourself, uh, being aware that

00:09:26.520 --> 00:09:29.069
there might be some other issue going on.

00:09:29.069 --> 00:09:31.020
So what's the question
behind the question?

00:09:31.020 --> 00:09:34.229
What's the feedback behind the
feedback and seeking that out?

00:09:34.319 --> 00:09:37.680
And not just paying attention
to what is said, but perhaps why

00:09:37.740 --> 00:09:39.689
it might be said in that way.

00:09:40.020 --> 00:09:43.319
And I really like this notion
of listening infrastructure.

00:09:43.589 --> 00:09:46.740
So it's about having trusted
others who can give you insight.

00:09:46.740 --> 00:09:50.040
It's about rewarding
people who do come forward.

00:09:50.160 --> 00:09:54.090
I would add it's being specific in
the type of information you want.

00:09:54.090 --> 00:09:58.050
Often we don't ask specifically,
and when you ask for something

00:09:58.050 --> 00:10:01.830
specific, you are likely to get
it versus a more general ask.

00:10:02.190 --> 00:10:05.340
I appreciate that guidance and we
can all make sure that we do that.

00:10:05.400 --> 00:10:08.100
And I think another factor there, and
I'd love to get your opinion on this,

00:10:08.250 --> 00:10:12.120
is demonstrating that you actually
listened, not just thanking somebody for

00:10:12.120 --> 00:10:16.410
it, but maybe paraphrasing or delineating
the action you're taking as a result.

00:10:16.530 --> 00:10:17.760
Is that important as well?

00:10:18.505 --> 00:10:19.225
Adam Bryant: Oh for sure.

00:10:19.225 --> 00:10:22.575
And to your point, it's not just,
I hear you, but I think the most

00:10:22.575 --> 00:10:27.105
powerful thing is thanking them for
that and then acting on it, right?

00:10:27.105 --> 00:10:30.495
Because again, the word spreads
very quickly in culture.

00:10:30.825 --> 00:10:33.315
And if somebody has an experience
where I went to the boss, gave

00:10:33.315 --> 00:10:36.725
'em some tough news, they thank
me for it, and they acted on it.

00:10:37.085 --> 00:10:40.665
And now I've got like a gold star on
my forehead because of that experience.

00:10:40.665 --> 00:10:42.195
Like people are go, I'm gonna do that too.

00:10:42.525 --> 00:10:45.735
Matt Abrahams: We've talked a bit
about simplifying complex information.

00:10:45.735 --> 00:10:49.395
As somebody who's done what you do, as
somebody who's written about this now,

00:10:49.395 --> 00:10:52.725
as somebody who consults on this, do
you have specific advice and guidance

00:10:52.725 --> 00:10:56.565
frameworks for how you take something
complex and make it easier and more

00:10:56.565 --> 00:10:58.185
simple for people to understand?

00:10:58.185 --> 00:11:00.165
Do you have a tool that
you recommend or use?

00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:03.300
Adam Bryant: I don't have a
simple tool, but I've had sort

00:11:03.300 --> 00:11:04.740
of two chapters in my career.

00:11:04.740 --> 00:11:08.490
One is 30 years as a journalist,
15 years as a reporter, where I was

00:11:08.490 --> 00:11:10.650
having to simplify complexity myself.

00:11:10.920 --> 00:11:14.670
And then 15 years as an editor where
I was having to help the reporters

00:11:14.670 --> 00:11:17.190
I worked with simplify complexity.

00:11:17.190 --> 00:11:20.834
And now eight years in its
consulting chapter where again this

00:11:20.834 --> 00:11:24.314
skill of simplifying complexity
is so important for leadership.

00:11:24.314 --> 00:11:27.675
But just starting with clarity of
what you want to say and what the

00:11:27.675 --> 00:11:30.165
message is, that's the hardest part.

00:11:30.194 --> 00:11:34.515
And it might even be painful, just like
staring at a blank piece of paper or blank

00:11:34.515 --> 00:11:39.074
screen saying, what is it that I'm saying
and that I want to say and need to say?

00:11:39.074 --> 00:11:41.115
And doing that thinking work.

00:11:41.339 --> 00:11:44.730
And then just understanding this simple
thing about human nature, which is

00:11:44.730 --> 00:11:48.089
most people can't absorb or remember
more than three or four things.

00:11:48.089 --> 00:11:52.650
So if you are going to distill it down
and be tough with yourself, because

00:11:52.920 --> 00:11:56.219
you talked about it earlier, the
dangers of oversimplifying, right?

00:11:56.219 --> 00:12:01.260
There is a sweet spot there of truly
simplifying but not oversimplifying.

00:12:01.860 --> 00:12:07.935
I also sometimes think about how
the word empathy has additional

00:12:07.935 --> 00:12:10.305
meanings that we typically talk about.

00:12:10.305 --> 00:12:12.075
Because we usually talk
about empathy, it's like, I

00:12:12.075 --> 00:12:13.425
understand what you're feeling.

00:12:13.605 --> 00:12:17.805
But I also think that we need to talk
more about empathy as a component

00:12:17.805 --> 00:12:21.375
of communication, because to be an
effective communicator, whether it's

00:12:21.375 --> 00:12:25.395
a presenter or it's a writer, you have
to be able to get in the head of the

00:12:25.395 --> 00:12:29.875
audience and be able to see what you're
saying or writing with fresh eyes,

00:12:29.905 --> 00:12:31.709
and ask yourself, is this clear to me?

00:12:31.709 --> 00:12:32.939
Am I getting this?

00:12:33.120 --> 00:12:37.140
Because usually people aren't good
writers or communicators or speakers.

00:12:37.260 --> 00:12:38.819
They lack that ability, right?

00:12:38.819 --> 00:12:42.510
Like you don't seem to be able to
understand how the audience is not going

00:12:42.510 --> 00:12:44.339
to be able to process what you're saying.

00:12:44.699 --> 00:12:48.810
So I think almost that forcing
function of having that empathy,

00:12:48.930 --> 00:12:52.140
forcing yourself out of your own
head, because we're all trapped by

00:12:52.140 --> 00:12:54.500
our own context, our own expertise.

00:12:54.930 --> 00:12:58.875
And imagine somebody receiving this
information for the first time and

00:12:58.875 --> 00:13:00.704
making sure that it's clear to them.

00:13:00.704 --> 00:13:04.125
I mean, in all my years of working
with writers after they submitted

00:13:04.125 --> 00:13:08.175
their story, I would sometimes say to
them, you are suffering from the most

00:13:08.175 --> 00:13:10.724
noble disease of great journalists.

00:13:11.025 --> 00:13:13.045
You are suffering from expertitis.

00:13:13.155 --> 00:13:15.375
You are too close to this subject matter.

00:13:15.375 --> 00:13:20.265
You know too much about it, and you're
having trouble resetting and getting in

00:13:20.265 --> 00:13:22.064
the head of somebody hitting it cold.

00:13:22.530 --> 00:13:25.560
And I think that's another way
of thinking about this empathy.

00:13:25.560 --> 00:13:29.880
How do you take yourself out of your own
expertise to see it through fresh eyes?

00:13:31.095 --> 00:13:33.584
Matt Abrahams: I love the term
expertitis you know, when I do

00:13:33.584 --> 00:13:36.795
this work, I talk about the curse
of knowledge and curse of passion.

00:13:36.795 --> 00:13:40.275
And I say the only antidote is
empathy and curiosity, because

00:13:40.275 --> 00:13:41.685
those get you out of your head.

00:13:41.685 --> 00:13:46.245
And I 100% agree with you that effective
communication is not broadcasting.

00:13:46.395 --> 00:13:49.635
Effective communication is making sure
the other person understands what you

00:13:49.635 --> 00:13:52.905
meant, and the only way to do that
is to see it from their perspective.

00:13:52.905 --> 00:13:54.675
So being audience-centric is critical.

00:13:54.975 --> 00:13:56.775
This notion of being tough on yourself.

00:13:56.785 --> 00:13:59.995
To really force yourself
to be clear is important.

00:13:59.995 --> 00:14:04.314
And starting with that bottom line,
really thinking through what is the key

00:14:04.314 --> 00:14:06.355
essence of what I want to get across.

00:14:06.564 --> 00:14:09.745
A lot of us start doing work
before we really even understand

00:14:09.745 --> 00:14:12.655
what it is we're trying to say,
we discover that along the way.

00:14:12.954 --> 00:14:16.405
And if we do that work up front, I think
it just makes us more clear and concise.

00:14:16.405 --> 00:14:17.605
And I appreciate you sharing that.

00:14:18.074 --> 00:14:21.465
I have read a lot of your work, and I've
enjoyed your work over the many years.

00:14:21.495 --> 00:14:24.795
And one of the things that I note that
you do, and I'd love to know if this

00:14:24.795 --> 00:14:28.155
is just innate and you don't think
about it or if it's strategic, you do

00:14:28.155 --> 00:14:32.025
a very good job of getting people's
attention early and building that

00:14:32.025 --> 00:14:34.305
curiosity and motivation to learn more.

00:14:34.605 --> 00:14:38.444
That type of engagement upfront,
especially in a world where our attention

00:14:38.444 --> 00:14:41.685
is being pulled in lots of different
directions, is really important.

00:14:42.045 --> 00:14:45.315
How much of that is innate and can
you walk us through a little bit

00:14:45.315 --> 00:14:48.555
of that because it's clear when
you look at your body of work that

00:14:48.555 --> 00:14:49.935
that's something you do very well.

00:14:50.385 --> 00:14:53.295
Adam Bryant: So I started The Corner
Office series at the New York Times.

00:14:53.295 --> 00:14:56.475
It was a side project in addition
to my day job managing reporters.

00:14:56.625 --> 00:15:00.015
And it was based on a very simple, what
if; I asked myself the question, what if

00:15:00.015 --> 00:15:04.065
I sat down with CEOs and never ask them
a single question about their companies?

00:15:04.455 --> 00:15:06.165
And everything flows from that.

00:15:06.405 --> 00:15:10.965
And for the last 15 years, interviewing
more than a thousand leaders, I stick to

00:15:10.965 --> 00:15:14.565
my swim lane of interviewing leaders about
leadership and not about their companies.

00:15:14.565 --> 00:15:16.665
'cause most of the time when
leaders are interviewed.

00:15:17.355 --> 00:15:19.365
They're interviewed as strategists, right?

00:15:19.365 --> 00:15:23.565
Like how does next quarter look, Bob,
and, and to me, I'm much more interested

00:15:23.565 --> 00:15:28.485
in how you lead, how you navigate the
universal challenges of leadership.

00:15:28.785 --> 00:15:31.910
And I think that the more I've
gotten into this, the more.

00:15:32.680 --> 00:15:36.550
I'm just really intrigued with the
humanity of leadership because who

00:15:36.550 --> 00:15:40.329
you are is how you lead, and when
I was doing corner ops, I always

00:15:40.329 --> 00:15:42.040
started with the same few questions.

00:15:42.040 --> 00:15:44.770
Tell me about when you were a kid,
what were you doing outside of class?

00:15:45.160 --> 00:15:48.790
Talk about your parents or whoever
raised you and important early

00:15:48.790 --> 00:15:51.880
influences there, questions like that.

00:15:51.969 --> 00:15:54.795
The world tends to talk about
children as young adults.

00:15:55.470 --> 00:15:57.510
I think adults are just older children.

00:15:57.780 --> 00:16:01.530
I'm always curious about those
early stories because why do

00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:03.360
people want these jobs, right?

00:16:03.360 --> 00:16:07.440
Like, yes, there's all these material
rewards and stuff, but like being a

00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:12.030
CEO, nobody ever feels sorry for CEOs,
but they're like really tough jobs.

00:16:12.330 --> 00:16:15.780
They come with a huge tax on your
personal lives and stress and

00:16:15.780 --> 00:16:16.950
strain and all that other stuff.

00:16:17.040 --> 00:16:18.480
So why do people want these jobs?

00:16:18.480 --> 00:16:21.180
And so I'm trying to ask
questions that get at that.

00:16:21.579 --> 00:16:27.130
The final point I'll make, Matt, is
that I generally boil down my q and as.

00:16:27.130 --> 00:16:30.339
The transcript is often like eight,
9,000 words, and I'll boil it

00:16:30.339 --> 00:16:32.890
down to 12, 1500 words, whatever.

00:16:33.040 --> 00:16:36.640
And early on I figured out the
three things that to me are the most

00:16:36.640 --> 00:16:38.560
powerful currencies of leadership.

00:16:38.739 --> 00:16:42.040
So when I'm condensing it, I'm
always looking to keep three things.

00:16:42.040 --> 00:16:45.099
One is an insight or lesson, right?

00:16:45.099 --> 00:16:46.239
I learned this.

00:16:46.660 --> 00:16:48.459
The second one is the story behind it.

00:16:48.459 --> 00:16:49.479
Back to stories.

00:16:49.540 --> 00:16:50.920
How did you learn this?

00:16:51.480 --> 00:16:53.820
The third one is, okay, spin that forward.

00:16:53.820 --> 00:16:57.840
How did that insight, that lesson,
how does that show up in your

00:16:57.840 --> 00:16:59.220
leadership style day to day?

00:16:59.955 --> 00:17:03.675
Matt Abrahams: I like that structure, and
I actually think that structure is useful

00:17:03.765 --> 00:17:05.325
for anything we're trying to communicate.

00:17:05.325 --> 00:17:06.885
What is it that you're trying to say?

00:17:06.975 --> 00:17:07.605
Why?

00:17:07.665 --> 00:17:08.655
How'd you come to that?

00:17:08.655 --> 00:17:09.915
And then how does it influence you?

00:17:09.915 --> 00:17:11.805
I think that's a lovely structure.

00:17:12.015 --> 00:17:15.915
And the bottom line answer to my question
that I heard you say is the way you

00:17:15.915 --> 00:17:18.885
motivate people to pay attention to the
things you write and the stories you

00:17:18.885 --> 00:17:23.995
tell is based on your curiosity and that
curiosity comes through in what you do.

00:17:24.265 --> 00:17:27.055
And curiosity is a very
powerful engagement tool.

00:17:27.055 --> 00:17:30.805
If you can get people to feel curious, you
know, in, in college I was a tour guide.

00:17:30.805 --> 00:17:33.595
It was the highest paying job I could
get, and I learned so much about

00:17:33.595 --> 00:17:38.095
communication and what I learned is if
I wanted my group to stay together and

00:17:38.095 --> 00:17:42.415
not wander off and leave and ultimately
give poor ratings to the experience.

00:17:42.745 --> 00:17:46.045
If I could build curiosity from where
we've been to where we were going

00:17:46.045 --> 00:17:47.955
next, that changed the whole thing.

00:17:47.955 --> 00:17:49.035
They wanted to move forward.

00:17:49.035 --> 00:17:51.435
They were interested,
they asked more questions.

00:17:51.435 --> 00:17:55.845
So being curious yourself, I think
leads very nicely to communicating

00:17:55.965 --> 00:17:57.465
from a place of curiosity.

00:17:57.465 --> 00:17:59.055
So I appreciate you saying that.

00:17:59.295 --> 00:17:59.565
Adam Bryant: Yeah.

00:17:59.595 --> 00:18:02.205
I've learned so much from all
the leaders I've interviewed.

00:18:02.205 --> 00:18:04.395
I mean life wisdom, not
just leadership wisdom.

00:18:04.920 --> 00:18:08.610
One of the most powerful things I
heard from one leader was that, and

00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:12.390
she was the university president, her
advice to students is basically just

00:18:12.390 --> 00:18:16.410
to go through life in the way that
at any moment you could learn the

00:18:16.410 --> 00:18:17.940
most important lesson of your life.

00:18:18.390 --> 00:18:21.900
This could be the moment where I learn
the most important lesson in my life.

00:18:22.410 --> 00:18:24.510
Matt Abrahams: That is a very
valuable lesson, and I think we

00:18:24.510 --> 00:18:26.100
should all follow that for sure.

00:18:27.450 --> 00:18:30.480
Well, Adam, before we end, I like
to ask three questions of everyone.

00:18:30.480 --> 00:18:33.360
One I make up for you and the other
two I've been asking everybody as

00:18:33.360 --> 00:18:35.280
long as this series has been around.

00:18:35.490 --> 00:18:36.210
Are you up for that?

00:18:36.780 --> 00:18:37.290
Adam Bryant: Always.

00:18:37.560 --> 00:18:38.010
Matt Abrahams: All right.

00:18:38.010 --> 00:18:41.220
From all of your years of interviewing
leaders for your Corner Office

00:18:41.220 --> 00:18:45.600
column, what was the most surprising
communication, insight or piece of advice

00:18:45.600 --> 00:18:47.820
you heard that fundamentally impacted you?

00:18:48.419 --> 00:18:52.050
Adam Bryant: I think it's this idea
of who you are is how you lead.

00:18:52.199 --> 00:18:57.540
Because before I started doing all the
interviews, I was trapped in that idea,

00:18:57.540 --> 00:19:00.719
like there's different leadership styles
and what kind of leader are you itinerary

00:19:01.020 --> 00:19:03.030
books about different leadership styles.

00:19:03.310 --> 00:19:06.290
And, what I learned through interviewing
all these leaders and hearing their

00:19:06.290 --> 00:19:11.175
stories, and then seeing the direct
line between, okay, this is how I grew

00:19:11.175 --> 00:19:15.615
up, and the important influences, it
really shaped me, and that is how I lead.

00:19:15.705 --> 00:19:18.794
I think a lot of people, when they move
into new leadership roles, there's a

00:19:18.794 --> 00:19:20.865
sense of, okay, what is gonna be my style?

00:19:20.865 --> 00:19:24.165
It's like trying on different
jackets to see if they're gonna fit.

00:19:24.284 --> 00:19:28.125
And so I always say to people
like, who you are is how you lead.

00:19:28.125 --> 00:19:33.405
Be self-aware about all the things that
influence your leadership style, and then

00:19:33.405 --> 00:19:35.565
be explicit about that with your team.

00:19:35.774 --> 00:19:36.105
Right.

00:19:36.365 --> 00:19:39.725
People, they just want that sense
of trust and vulnerability and

00:19:39.725 --> 00:19:43.895
authenticity 'cause people can smell it
a mile away if you're not comfortable

00:19:43.895 --> 00:19:47.254
in your skin and you're trying to
pretend to be somebody you're not.

00:19:47.764 --> 00:19:51.095
Matt Abrahams: So taking the time to
really reflect on who you are, what's

00:19:51.095 --> 00:19:55.295
important to you, how you got to where you
are, and then be very clear with others.

00:19:55.385 --> 00:19:58.205
And that sets you up for
connection and success for sure.

00:19:58.504 --> 00:20:01.175
Question number two, and you have
interviewed a lot of people and

00:20:01.175 --> 00:20:02.735
watched a lot of good communicators.

00:20:02.735 --> 00:20:05.340
Who is a communicator
that you admire and why?

00:20:06.090 --> 00:20:08.580
Adam Bryant: So many, but
I will tell you the story.

00:20:08.610 --> 00:20:12.180
From the 1990s, I was a business
reporter at the New York Times and

00:20:12.180 --> 00:20:14.250
I was covering the airline industry.

00:20:14.460 --> 00:20:18.720
I spent a lot of time with a guy named
Gordon Bassoon, who was charged with

00:20:18.720 --> 00:20:20.400
turning around Continental Airlines.

00:20:20.730 --> 00:20:23.460
Continental Airlines at the
time was truly a punchline.

00:20:23.460 --> 00:20:26.730
It was just a terrible
airline in really bad shape.

00:20:27.300 --> 00:20:31.270
And Gordon came in, he assembled
this amazing leadership team.

00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:36.629
And the thing about Gordon, he had this
amazing ability to simplify complexity

00:20:36.629 --> 00:20:38.850
and just capture things in metaphors.

00:20:39.060 --> 00:20:42.720
At that point, there was this big
push to cut costs and he said,

00:20:42.720 --> 00:20:46.290
look, you can make a pizza so cheap
that nobody will wanna buy it.

00:20:46.560 --> 00:20:50.040
And just that ability to create
those sort of little visuals or like

00:20:50.040 --> 00:20:51.659
we can't just keep cost cutting.

00:20:52.050 --> 00:20:54.960
He told me this one story about he
was at an all hands and some of the

00:20:54.960 --> 00:20:59.100
pilots were like giving him a hard time
about the direction, and he basically

00:20:59.100 --> 00:21:02.670
shot back at them and said, look, the
gateway is still attached to the plane.

00:21:02.670 --> 00:21:06.030
You can get off the plane if you
want, but right now this is my flight.

00:21:06.570 --> 00:21:08.310
And basically said, put up our shut up.

00:21:08.310 --> 00:21:11.790
And in those leadership moments,
I sometimes think of it as being a

00:21:11.790 --> 00:21:14.490
comedian dealing with hecklers, right?

00:21:14.490 --> 00:21:17.400
You have to know not to put people
down, but you have to know what the

00:21:17.400 --> 00:21:20.190
quick comeback is just to settle things.

00:21:20.520 --> 00:21:24.840
Matt Abrahams: In relying on metaphors
and direct communication can really help.

00:21:25.110 --> 00:21:25.830
Thank you for that.

00:21:26.340 --> 00:21:30.120
Final question, what are the first
three ingredients that go into a

00:21:30.120 --> 00:21:32.430
successful communication recipe?

00:21:32.820 --> 00:21:35.790
Adam Bryant: The first one, be really
clear about what you want to say.

00:21:35.790 --> 00:21:40.410
Spend all the time, give yourself like 12
words, right, just as a forcing function.

00:21:40.410 --> 00:21:42.180
What is it that I want to say?

00:21:42.390 --> 00:21:43.410
So be clear of that.

00:21:43.470 --> 00:21:46.920
Second is make sure you
provide the context of why

00:21:46.920 --> 00:21:48.270
it's relevant and important.

00:21:48.270 --> 00:21:51.150
You can't just assume that you have
to put it in the broader frame.

00:21:51.345 --> 00:21:54.554
And then third, keep it simple,
whether you're talking or using a deck.

00:21:54.554 --> 00:21:57.254
I would say big fonts,
short bullet points.

00:21:57.735 --> 00:22:00.745
I always make the joke that
nobody ever complained about too

00:22:00.764 --> 00:22:02.985
big fonts in PowerPoint decks.

00:22:03.225 --> 00:22:07.125
I see way too many presentations at
conferences where people clearly built

00:22:07.125 --> 00:22:10.695
the deck while they were on their laptop,
and then in a big hall, the person at

00:22:10.695 --> 00:22:12.195
the back of the room has to squint.

00:22:12.615 --> 00:22:16.820
And then just sort of use the visuals and
metaphors and stories to make it stick.

00:22:17.460 --> 00:22:18.240
Matt Abrahams: Absolutely.

00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:22.950
So clarity, context, so people understand
the relevance, reduce that complexity

00:22:22.950 --> 00:22:27.030
and really make it compelling through
the stories you tell, the metaphors

00:22:27.030 --> 00:22:28.740
you use, the visuals you show.

00:22:29.010 --> 00:22:31.860
Adam, this was absolutely
compelling and interesting.

00:22:31.860 --> 00:22:35.310
Thank you for the insights that you
shared, and I really appreciate your

00:22:35.310 --> 00:22:40.020
time decoding for us, what makes
for not just successful leaders but

00:22:40.020 --> 00:22:41.610
successful communication, thank you.

00:22:42.255 --> 00:22:42.585
Adam Bryant: That's great.

00:22:42.585 --> 00:22:45.015
Thank you for the invite
and for the great questions.

00:22:45.015 --> 00:22:45.285
Matt,

00:22:47.955 --> 00:22:49.815
Matt Abrahams: Thank you for
joining us for another episode of

00:22:49.815 --> 00:22:52.065
Think Fast Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:22:52.335 --> 00:22:56.745
To learn more about leadership, please
listen to episode 98 with David Dodson.

00:22:57.255 --> 00:23:02.154
This episode was produced by Katherine
Reed, Ryan Campos, and me, Matt Abrahams.

00:23:02.455 --> 00:23:03.955
Our music is from Floyd Wonder.

00:23:04.014 --> 00:23:06.235
With special thanks to
Podium podcast company.

00:23:06.745 --> 00:23:09.925
Please find us on YouTube and
wherever you get your podcasts.

00:23:10.074 --> 00:23:12.054
Be sure to subscribe and rate us.

00:23:12.294 --> 00:23:15.925
Also follow us on LinkedIn,
TikTok and Instagram and check

00:23:15.925 --> 00:23:17.604
out our faster smarter.io.

00:23:17.635 --> 00:23:21.804
For deep dive videos, English language
learning content and our newsletter,

00:23:22.225 --> 00:23:25.705
please consider our premium offering
for extended deep thinks episodes

00:23:25.975 --> 00:23:31.854
AMAs, ask Matt anything and much
more at faster smarter.io/premium.