WEBVTT - Need a new Liver? Drinkers to the back of the Line.

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I was in a room, a completely white room with

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>a brown desk, and there was a older gentleman there

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, and there was a contract. There was

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like this piece of paper and a pen, and these

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>words were specifically uttered to me. You can either choose

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>not to accept this and just pass peacefully and not

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>worry about anything, or if you take this gift, you'll

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be in the worst pain that you've ever experienced in

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>your entire life. And I remember sitting there and just

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>being stubborn like I am, And I said, oh, well,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I know about pain.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Imhoff was almost certainly dreaming. Who was she bargaining with?

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Was it God? As her life hung in the balance,

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>she was heavily sedated in the hospital, drifting in and

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>out of consciousness. A month earlier, she'd collapse on the

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>floor of her apartment, her body contorting from intense cramps.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Off to Jamie's collapse, doctors at her Baltimore hospital put

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>her on life support. Her diagnosis multiple organ failure. Most importantly,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>her liver had stopped working. She was only thirty eight

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>years old.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They called my family right away, and pretty much to

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>all my family, I was unsabable and to come out

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>here and plan to book the funeral.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Acute liver failure is a rare but life threatening condition.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>In Jamie's case, it was very obvious what had cause

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>all that damage.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>A typical day of drinking at the time I collapsed

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>started around early morning, maybe seven am eight am. I

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>always had a bottle of Arka next to my bed

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when I woke up. If I did not take that

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>initial first drink, I couldn't function, and then from there

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day would be maintained on a

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>certain level of alcohol in my body until.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I went to bed.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But at that point there was no pleasure in doing stuff.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>This was literally what we call maintenance drinking.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Jamie was aware she had a problem with drinking. She'd

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>been to rehab and managed to get sober for a

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>few months at a time, but she worked as a

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 2>bar manager. When life got stressful, she went right back

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 2>to old habits, and that's how she ended up in

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the hospital. At this point, her only chance at survival

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>was a liver transplant, but because alcohol use is what

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 2>destroyed her liver, the doctors told Jamie's family she wasn't

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>eligible for a transplant, not for another six months.

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>My family. Upon hearing the news, they were not very happy.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The idea of being denied care didn't make any sense

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to them.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Jamie's family spent the next several days making phone calls,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>desperate to find a transplant center that would agree to

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 2>save her life, but no luck. Eventually, they gave up

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and started speaking with a chaplain. They wanted his help

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 2>deciding whether or not to let Jamie die.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>The doctors told my family that I could stay on

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>life support for a definite period of time, but they

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>did not recommend doing so.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, clearly we're hearing from Jamie in the present day.

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>She did manage to survive, but how had she come

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 2>so close to dying? Doctors knew the life saving treatment

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>she needed a live a transplant, so why wouldn't they

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>give it to her? And how is that ethical? I'm

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Laurena Rora Hutchinson. I'm the director of the Ideas Lab

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. This season,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going behind the scenes to discover how some of

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the most significant medical innovations have impacted people's lives and

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>continue to whether it's saving lives or creating babies. A

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>new technology is usually waiting in the wings, along with

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a whole entourage of ethical questions. On today's show, liver transplants.

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>They're often the only option to keep people with liver

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>failure alive, but since there aren't enough livers to go around,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.559
<v Speaker 2>transplant centers have to decide what's the most ethical way

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to determine who gets them first, and when and what if.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 2>Solving for one ethical dilemma creates a whole host of

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>new ethical problems for patients and families. From Pushkin Industries

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>and the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, this is

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>playing god. To get some perspective on Jamie's story, I

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>called up my colleague, bioethicist Jeffrey Kahn. If you're a

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>regular listener, you've heard him on our show before. So, Jeff,

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>why was it that someone like Jamie, who clearly desperately

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 2>needed a new liver, was initially not going to get

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a transplant.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question, Lauren, and to answer it, we

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 4>need to go back to the early days of being

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 4>able to transplant solid organs. Those are kidneys, livers, lungs, hearts,

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 4>and there just aren't enough and never have been enough.

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 4>Donated organs to transplant to everybody who needs one. In

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 4>the case of livers, people who need a liver transplant

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 4>are really, really sick and can only wait for a

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 4>very short time before either being transplanted and surviving or

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>not being transplanted and dying. And so people in the

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 4>transplant community and then people from public policy and ethics

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>like me got pulled in to help decide how to

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>allocate who should get, who should not, who can wait,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 4>who in the end won't actually receive a donated organ.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 4>This is a recurring issue in ethics of transplant and

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 4>bioethics generally. When there's not enough of a thing to

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 4>go around, who gets access to it and therefore who

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 4>does not?

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So how is the decision made about who gets the

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>priority for these livers?

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Every organ has a somewhat different system. For kidneys, there's

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 4>a waiting list, and that's because we can ask people

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 4>to wait and be on a technology called dialysis until

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 4>their number gets called. For livers, it's a different story.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a weightless but it's really a scored weightless. So

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 4>the higher your score, the sicker you are, and therefore

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>the higher on the priority list you get.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>And so how does the system treat people like Jamie

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 2>who need a new liver because of a history of

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>harmful alcohol use.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 4>The issue of needing a liver transplant after abuse of

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 4>alcohol or overuse of alcohol created an additional layer of

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 4>ethical dilemma. So on top of the question about what

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 4>do we do when we don't have enough livers for

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 4>all the people who need a liver transplant, layered over

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 4>that is the idea that the reason that the person

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 4>needs a liver transplant owes to their behavior. And so

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the question then is, well, what's to prevent them if

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 4>they get a transplant from doing the same thing that

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 4>they did to cause the need for the first transplant?

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 4>And so that's a kind of societal utilitarian question, is

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>this the best way to allocate this very scarce resource?

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>And the question about behavior and responsibility is not a

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 4>trivial question in the context of liver transplant because alcohol

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 4>related liver disease is now the number one reason that

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 4>adults in the US need a liver transplant, and these

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>patients tend to be really, really sick by the time

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>they end up coming to the doctor and seeking treatment,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and so they become top of the list's highest priority

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>when they show up, and that creates or could create

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>some really understandable resentment. Wait, why is it that this

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 4>person who undertook this behavior did this to themselves? Why

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 4>should they get a liver transplant before somebody with cancer

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 4>or some child that may have been born with a

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 4>disease that's certainly not within their control, But isn't harmful?

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Alcohol use also considered a disease.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 4>It is, And as we do more research about addiction

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 4>and behavior, I think it's becoming more clear that there's

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 4>a disease aspect, there's also some behavioral and controllable aspects,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 4>but that it's very complicated. There are genetic components, there

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 4>are environmental components, there are socioeconomic components, and so these

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 4>are complicated areas where it doesn't make sense to just

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 4>sort of point to someone and say they're responsible for

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 4>the bad health effects of their behavior.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>So what approach have transplant centers come up with allocating

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 2>livers to people with and without a history of alcohol use?

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>How is it fair to people with them?

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Without going back now a number of decades to the

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighties, transplant centers that do liver transplants in the

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 4>US and really has become a global practice. Have required

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 4>patients with the history of alcohol abuse who need a

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 4>liver transplant to show that they can be sober no

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 4>use of alcohol for at least six months before they're

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 4>eligible for a transplant. That's been named the so called

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 4>six month rule. So, in effect, the rule requires patients

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 4>to go off and cure themselves of one disease alcohol

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 4>abuse before we'll treat them for another disease. That doesn't

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 4>seem fair, but that's the approach that has been implemented.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 4>There were actually at least three reasons that transplant centers

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and the policy makers around liver transplantation decided that this

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 4>was the right approach. First, there was a thought that

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 4>if patients stopped using alcohol for a period of time,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 4>their livers might actually come back and heal themselves. The

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 4>second and maybe more important reason for some period of

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 4>sobriety was the view that they're blameworthy, like they brought

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>it on themselves, and we shouldn't reward somebody who brought

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 4>something on themselves by giving them access to a life

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 4>saving liver transplant when there are other people who didn't

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 4>behave badly also waiting. You know, we better make sure

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 4>that the people who were going to offer this very

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 4>scarce life saving treatment to are not going to do

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the same thing that required the transplant in the first place.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 4>And then the third reason is a sort of you know,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>what will the members of society think about donating their

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 4>organs when they see that the people who are getting

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>livers are the people who abused alcohol? Will that make

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 4>people less likely to be willing to be organ donors.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 4>So all of that played into the decision about, you know,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 4>what to do with somebody like Jamie, how can we

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>still think about transplants for them in a way that

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 4>ethically acceptable?

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 2>So what have we learned from having this six month

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>rule in place?

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, the first thing that we learned is that making

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 4>people wait six months is a death sentence for half

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 4>of them. It turns out that the liver does not

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 4>regenerate when given a chance to be alcohol free. It's

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 4>just that people who have abused alcohol have effectively killed

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>their liver, and so making them wait for six months

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 4>is they can't survive it. Also, it turns out research

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 4>has shown that the six month rule is a bad

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 4>predictor of whether someone will stay sober after a transplant

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 4>and it turns out it has no effect on people's

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 4>willingness to donate based on survey research.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow, so people have been dying because of the six

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>month rule even though it doesn't really do what it's

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 2>supposed to do effectively.

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and it's not even a rule, it's a practice.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 4>It's all the transplant centers adhere to it, but it's

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 4>actually not required. And you know, at the time that

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>it was implement it made sense for all the reasons

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 4>that we have discussed to use the few livers that

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 4>became available in the best possible way, and it took

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 4>a while for research to be performed and information to

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>come in that would help inform whether that was the

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 4>right policy. But it's really unclear that there wouldn't be

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 4>unintended negative consequences if the six month rule were to

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 4>be completely abandoned. So we really just don't know all

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the implications of stepping away from or completely abandoning the

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 4>six month rule, and that's something that needs more, maybe

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 4>more nuance and more information before we decide what the

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 4>right policy should be.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>After the break, we'll hear from someone who is challenging

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>the six month rule. The doctor who gave Jamie Imhoff

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a second chance at life.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I am in the second chance business, and I believe

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 3>even the ability of people to with multiple chances and

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>multiple tries to get it.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Right playing God will be right back.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>So when I started liver transplants, everybody knew the rules

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>and the rules were agreed upon.

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Andrew Cameron. He's a liver transplant surgeon at

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Johns Hopkins University. He knows all about the eligibility rules

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>for liver transplants. These aren't cut and dry legal rules,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 2>more like common practices.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>To get a liver transplant after excessive alcohol use, you

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>needed to be sober or abstinent for six months. That

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>was the rule, and we all accepted it.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 2>But these days Andrew is doing something almost unheard of

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in the transplant community. At his transplant center in Baltimore,

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>he routinely, intentionally systematic breaks the six month rule. The

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 2>first time he broke this rule, or bent it, as

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>he says, was fifteen years ago. A patient showed up

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>at Johns Hopkins' deathly ill with liver failure and a

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>history of heavy alcohol use.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>And I remember our team going to take a look

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>at him and saying oh, well, unfortunately this is an

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>easy one. He's been drinking recently and so isn't eligible

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 3>for a liver transplant. And we didn't think much more

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>of it. But as we were leaving his room, his

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>family grabbed us and said, you know you're not going anywhere.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, we are demand that year reconsider. And it

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>was pretty tough to argue with him. In fact, it

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>was impossible to argue with them, and they made such

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>a compelling case that as a team, we got together

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and considered whether we ought to bend the rules in

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>this case, and we struggled with that decision, but as

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 3>a team, we decided to bend the rules and we

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:01.479
<v Speaker 3>went ahead with a transplant.

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Andrew now runs a program at Johns Hopkins that treats

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>people with cases similar to that patient. It was this

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>program that helped Jamie get her new liver. Can you

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>tell me a bit more about the research that you're

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>doing with people with a history of heavy alcohol use

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and their ability to get transplants?

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Sure? So that there was an exciting New England Journal

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>paper in which a group of liver transplant centers in

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>France transplanted patients like the one I just described and

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 3>in fact, a relatively low percentage of those patients when

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 3>followed carefully, ever, went back to drinking. Now, at Johns Hopkins,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>we decided to start a very similar pilot program, and

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:49.479
<v Speaker 3>we've now transplanted about one hundred and thirty patients without

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>a six month waiting period. And when we compare them

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to a group of patients that got transplanted that Hopkins

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>at the same time that did have that six month

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>waiting period, there was no hard data that suggested that

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 3>that rule made a lot of sense.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And so does that mean that any patient with alcohol

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>related liver disease is given a transplant?

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for asking that question, because people hear some

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>of these stories and say, oh, there's no rules, and

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 3>there are rules. There need to be rules. They just

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>not this past fail test, single question have you drank

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 3>in the last six months. Rather, it is a look

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>at factors that would meaningfully predict your performance post transplant,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 3>like do you have insight into your need to change

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>your drinking? Do you have a social support network that

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>will help you after your transplant? Are you willing to

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>participate in programs that would help you stay abstinent after

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 3>your transplant?

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So you talked about insight, and I just want to

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pick up on that, because how do you measure insight?

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 3>It's tough, isn't it. So we all maybe have a

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 3>feel for it. We all maybe can think of times

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 3>in our own lives when something happened that was dramatic

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 3>enough to cause behavior change. So for some folks that

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 3>drink alcohol, that may be getting arrested or a dui.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 3>It may be a loved one leaving them a divorce

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 3>for example, if they have expressed insight, if they have

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 3>expressed a willingness to participate in programs that will allow

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 3>them to have success after transplant, those are all favorable factors.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 3>You could imagine almost a group decision by multiple caregivers

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 3>looking at multiple factors that predict performance after transplant and

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>making as best we can, and it's not perfect, a logical, fair,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>humane decision about whether this person can get through a

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 3>liver transplant and do well on the back end, if

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 3>the answer is yes or maybe yes, we want to

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and give them the benefit of the doubt.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 2>That's great. So I want to talk about Jamie. You know,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>we heard Jamie's story and when she was taken into hospital,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>she was in a coma, and so in that situation,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 2>how would you determine her insight?

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 3>It's tough, You're right. We didn't have the luxury of

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 3>speaking with her, but we could talk to her family,

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 3>so we couldn't hear it directly from her. But we

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 3>knew that she had tried in the past to achieve

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 3>sobriety and it had success in doing so. And we

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>knew that she had some profound life stressors that had

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 3>caused relapse. And that is a common story, and that

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 3>is not a story that we cannot work with after transplant.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of things spoke to Jamie's favor enough

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to give her the benefit of the doubt and say,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>this is a young person that we're not ready to

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 3>give up on.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 2>And could you say a bit more about social support. So,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>for example, if someone doesn't have a partner, does that

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>mean that they're kind of like go lower in the list?

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Or a social support is anyone who will help you

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 3>after transplant with the things you need to do to

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 3>take good care of your organ transplant. It could be

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 3>a partner, It could be a family member, it could

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>be a friend, it could be somebody from your AA group.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 3>It is somebody who was willing to help. The kind

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 3>of help you're going to need after transplant is I

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>don't feel well. You may have to take me into

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 3>the hospital. I have an appointment tomorrow, I need to

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>get my labs checked out. It can also be more

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 3>than that. It can be I'm not feeling great, I'm worried.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have a relapse. Can you help me?

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It would take a person that couldn't identify a single

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>soul to help them to get excluded from transplant. And

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 3>even in those scenarios, we have advocates and social workers

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>and transplant psychologists that work with our patients to try

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and mobilize somebody. So it's not really about saying yes

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>or no. It's about saying, if we do this, how

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>can we predict success afterwards? What can we do to

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 3>help you be successful afterwards? And therefore get.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>To yes and yeah, that's great. So how in this

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>program do you measure success?

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>The gold standard for success after Oregon transplant, as measured

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>and reported by the government is one year patient survival,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>and in the large group of patients that we quote

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 3>took a chance on and bent the rules for one

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>year later ninety four percent of them were alive and well,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and that is as high or higher than any other

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>indication for liver transplant that you could name. And then

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>we measure how many of those folks relapse in terms

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of using alcohol, and probably twenty percent total have any

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>relapse at all, as measured even by a single drink.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 3>And what we saw was that when we worked together,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 3>when we utilized extra resources to help them stay sober,

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 3>even the small group of folks that return to drinking

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>were able to ultimately return to abstinence and sobriety with

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 3>extra help.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So the people close to death store, they're high on

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 2>the priority list, and then there are going to be

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 2>other people on that list, for example, a young person

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>with a congenital liver disease who might not be as

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>close to death's door, but they're still waiting on that

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>list for a liver transplant. Someone might ask you, why

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>would someone like Jamie with a history of heavy alcohol

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>use get that liver before their loved one who's also

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>on the waiting list.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 3>These are very difficult questions. So far, society has decided

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 3>that the people that can't wait need to go first,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>and that the people that can wait ought to wait

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 3>until it's their turn. A better system would be if

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 3>we had enough organs to go around for everybody. That's

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>not the way it is now. So as you suggest

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's born with a congenital anomaly, we would of

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 3>course say, oh, well, this isn't your fault. You need

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 3>to go to the front of the line. In this case,

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 3>we were looking at folks that had a claim to

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 3>the front of the line, and we were saying, but

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>you did it to yourself, you can't go to the

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>head of line. That was the only case in which

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 3>we excluded folks from the recognition that they needed an

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 3>emergent surgery to save their life. And that's probably not

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a modern way of looking at something like alcohol used disorder.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 3>That's treating it more as a character flaw than a disease.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think I have the advantage in this

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>discussion of having met these people. They're real people, they are,

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 3>they have families, they have they're they're indistinguishable from folks

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 3>that are listening to this conversation. And it just occurred

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to all of us that a second chance is something

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 3>we all probably are going to need at some point

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in our lives. And if the rules of the game

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>are stacked against you or were never made clear or unfair.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 3>That's just that's just not fair play. And we have

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 3>been able to see how well people can do when

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>given a second chance. So I guess I would ask

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 3>people to withhold judgment maybe, and and imagine if it

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 3>was your brother, if it was your your partner, if

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>it was your kid that needed a life saving transplant,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>if there was a way for doctors to save your

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 3>kid's life, and somebody tried to say we could, but

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 3>we're just not going to. You wouldn't stay and for it.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't stand for it, and we're not standing for

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it either.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So yeah, you've convinced me. And I'm just wondering

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 2>how your approach has been received by other transplant centers.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Have you experienced any resistance there?

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 3>When we look at how widely this new approach to

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 3>transplant has been adopted in the United States, the answer

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 3>is disappointing. There are probably one hundred and fifty liver

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>transplant centers in the United States, and I would say

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 3>somewhere between a third and a half have done one

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>of these transplants without a six month waiting period. And

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I think some of the reasons are is that, ah,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 3>these patients are heavy lifting. It takes extra resources to

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 3>evaluate them before transplant and to take care of them

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 3>after transplant. And I think there is also safety in

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>traditional rules. It is just easier to say, I'm not

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 3>going to get into all those controversies. I play by

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the rules. Six months is a rule. I understand. I'm

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 3>on safe ground.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>And do you think that there is anything that might

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>make clinics wary of doing these kinds of transfers.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the barriers are stigma. I think alcohol occupies

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>a very special place in our society which is difficult

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to unpack. This patient drank too much. They did it

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to themselves. That that's sort of an old fashioned, historic

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 3>way at looking at alcohol use, which I think our

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>country has not moved on from. It's interesting Europe rapidly

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>adopted this new system or criteria for who should get

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a liver transplant for alcohol use, perhaps a more open

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>minded or liberal approach to the problem. The United States

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>did not. It's still coming.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Andrew hopes that transplant centers across the US will see

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the results of his pilot program and rethink the six

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>month ban. His patient Jamie Imhoff is working towards the

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>same goal.

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope to break the stigma that such individuals are

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>worth saving when a lot of programs deem them unsavable.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Jamie spends a lot of her time these days raising

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>awareness about the six month ban through social media campaigns

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 2>and public events.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been more than.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 2>A year since the day she collapsed. She's grateful to

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>be alive, and she doesn't take it for granted.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel my duty is to make sure that overall,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>not just physically but mentally, I'm as healthy as I

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>can be for the person who gave me this new life.

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>She says. One of the things that helps us stay

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>healthy has been letting go of the sense of shame

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 2>she used to feel about her drinking.

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>If you have guilt, shame, resentment, these are the things

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that we'll make you. We'll drive you back to drinking.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You're going to fail the transplant in itself, and you're

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>going to fail the donor.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Jamie is still sober, and she plans to stay that way.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>She thinks of her sobriety as a gift that's just

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 2>as life changing is her liver.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So when I wake up in the morning now I

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>don't feel sick. I'm able to get up right away.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, this morning went up and I already walked

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>two miles today and got my coffee, and so I

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>can get up and look at the trees blooming, or

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>actually I can even smell the fresh air. Those are

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the side effects that you lose in

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>full on alcoholism. So sobriety overall is just one hundred

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>times better.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Next week, I'm playing God. What if there was an

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>eBay for kidneys? We'll hear from a transplant recipient who

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 2>thinks we should legalize the sale of organs in the

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>US and even provide compensation to incentivize living organ donation.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>But is it ever ethical to pay someone for a

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 2>body part? Thanks so much to our guests Jamie Imhoff

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 2>and Andrew Cameron. Playing God is a co production of

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Pushkin Industries and the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Emily Vaughan is our lead producer. This episode was also

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>produced by Sophie Crane and Lucy Sullivan. Our editors are

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Karen Schakerjee and Kate Parkinson Morgan. Theme music and mixing

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 2>by Echo Mountain Engineering. Support from Sarah Brugere and Amanda Kaiwang.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Show art by Sean Karney, fact checking by David jar

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and Arthur Gompertz. Our executive producer is Justine Lang at

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. Our executive producers

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>are Jeffrey Kahan and Anna Mastriani, working with Amelia Hood.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Funding provided by the Greenwall Foundation. I'm Laurena Rora Hutchinson.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Come back next week for more Playing God. As you've

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>heard through the series, I'm the director of the Ideas

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Lab at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. At

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the Ideas Lab, we are exploring new innovative ways of

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>telling stories about the intersection of ethics, science, medicine, and

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>public health. As well as podcasts, we do screenwriting, films,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and immersive experiences. To get involved, visit Bioethics dot Jhu

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>dot edu, Forward Slash Ideas Lab