And our right to freedom of speech
- Don't we already have religious freedom in Australia?
- Can the bill actually create discrimination?
- Is a bill of rights – which also covers other freedoms – a better approach?
- Draft Religious Freedom Bills – including the Religious Discrimination Bill
- Sydney Anglican Archbishop's apology over letter about religious freedom
- Hobart Catholic Archbishop case of religious freedom
- With All Due Respect episode 5 – Public vs private schools, religious freedom and *that* letter on gay teachers
- A simple guide to the religious discrimination bill
- The Government’s Plans for Freedom of Religion Legislation
- The Madness of Crowds by Douglas Murray
- The Guardian's review – The Madness of Crowds by Douglas Murray review – a rightwing diatribe
- Black Lives Matter movement
- Cultural Marxism: an ambiguous term and many believe that what it refers to doesn't really exist. The term is often used to flag behaviour that applies Marxist class theory to broader categories – such as race, gender and sexuality.
- Raison d'etre: A French phrase meaning 'reason for being'
- AFP raid on ABC reveals investigative journalism being put in same category as criminality
- Katharine Graham's memoir Personal History
- Comparing 'The Post' to Katharine Graham’s memoir
What is With All Due Respect?
Less agro, more conversation.
Is it even possible to have a deep discussion without it descending into chaos? Michael Jensen and Megan Powell du Toit think yes, and want to show the rest of us how to do it.
There’s plenty of things they disagree on: free will, feminism, where you should send your kids to school and what type of church you should go to. But there are also plenty of other things that they have in common. They want to talk about all these things with conviction. But they also want the conversation to be constructive. Tune in to find out if that’s possible.