LLM.co

Migrating off a public LLM API doesn't have to mean a weekend rollback and a hard lesson. This episode walks through the disciplined 30/60/90 sequencing — gateway setup, shadow mode, and canary rollout — that makes private LLM migration actually stick.

Show Notes

Switching from a public LLM API to a private deployment sounds straightforward — until Monday morning standup reveals broken outputs and a hasty rollback. This episode of LLM.co breaks down why most first attempts fail and how a structured 30/60/90 migration plan changes that outcome. Drawing from this deep-dive guide on replacing a public LLM API safely, the discussion covers everything from the initial inventory to the final cutover decision, with practical sequencing that engineering and compliance teams can actually follow.

Here's what the episode covers:

  • Start with an inventory, not a sprint. Ninety days of API logs reveal the full surface area — chat completions, embeddings, transcription, vector stores, fine-tuned checkpoints — each requiring its own migration path and success criteria.
  • Rank workloads by sensitivity and volume, not convenience. High-sensitivity, high-volume tasks — patient record summarization, loan file extraction, controlled source code review — move first. That forty-dollar-a-month ad hoc job waits for wave two. Teams in regulated industries such as healthcare have particular incentive to prioritize these routes early.
  • The gateway comes before any model. A routing layer (LiteLLM Proxy being the common choice) that speaks the OpenAI wire format on the client side lets every application keep calling the same endpoint while backends change underneath — the strangler fig pattern applied to inference.
  • Shadow mode is where migrations are won or lost. Duplicating production traffic to the candidate model — without users ever seeing the response — builds the evidence base for cutover and exposes prompt transfer failures before they become incidents. Prompts tuned for a frontier model routinely drop below 70% accuracy on open-weight alternatives without rework; budget two engineering weeks per material workload.
  • Three parity thresholds before you look at results. Task accuracy on a held-out eval set, 95th-percentile end-to-end latency, and refusal/format drift must all be defined in advance — not negotiated after the numbers come in.
  • Canary before blue-green, and keep a thin public-API connection. A ten-to-fifty percent canary ramp under real production load reveals failure modes that shadow mode can't surface. And not everything should move: frontier reasoning tasks, bursty workloads, and experimental features often justify retaining a metered public-provider connection alongside a custom private LLM deployment.

The episode also covers why the gateway doubles as an audit boundary — logging model ID, token count, latency, and routing decisions to your SIEM in a format that satisfies SOC 2, HIPAA, and EU AI Act obligations the moment you flip the private backend on.

For more on infrastructure costs associated with private deployments, check out the related episode What a Private GPU Cluster for 200 Users Actually Costs. More from LLM.co on the full migration topic is available at the source article linked above.

LLM.co

hardware.co

What is LLM.co?

Private and custom large language models — the build, the boundaries and the bill. Fine-tuning versus retrieval, running models in your own environment, evaluation you can actually trust, data governance, and the questions to ask before a vendor answers them for you.

Each episode takes one decision a team is facing — whether your problem needs a custom model at all, how to evaluate output without fooling yourself, what "private" has to mean contractually — and works it through concretely. Written for engineering and data leaders putting a model into production. Five or six minutes, one idea, no demos.

Topics include fine-tuning versus retrieval, self-hosted and private deployment, evaluation you can trust, prompt and context design, data governance and retention, cost and latency tradeoffs, and what "private" has to mean contractually.

Produced by LLM.co, private and custom large language models. Full details, services and further reading at https://llm.co