1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,200
Welcome to the Pure Charity State of Good Report for March 30th, 2026.

2
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,600
This is your weekly intelligence brief for nonprofit leaders and fundraisers.

3
00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:31,200
My name is Mike Rush. I'm part of the team at Pure Charity, and this week we're looking at how artificial intelligence is creating a real trust tightrope for fundraisers, why your mid-level donors might be the most undervalued asset on your roster, and some federal policy shifts that deserve your attention right now.

4
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:35,600
So join me as we dive into the State of Good.

5
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:45,600
All right, let's start with what I think is the most important conversation happening in fundraising right now, and that's the role of artificial intelligence.

6
00:00:45,600 --> 00:01:03,200
NonprofitPRO published an analysis this week showing that while AI is enabling more personalized and targeted fundraising campaigns through donor behavior analysis, organizations that don't have proper AI oversight in place are actually risking the trust that makes giving possible in the first place.

7
00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:07,200
And that's the tension here. AI can do incredible things.

8
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:14,400
It can help you understand giving patterns, personalize communications, identify donors who are ready for an upgrade ask.

9
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:24,400
But here's the thing. The same capabilities that make it powerful are exactly what make it problematic if you don't have ethical frameworks around it.

10
00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:34,400
Think about it from your donor's perspective. They want you to know them well enough to communicate in a way that feels relevant and personal.

11
00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:38,400
But they don't want to feel like they're being surveilled.

12
00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:47,200
That's a fine line. And I would say most organizations right now are adopting AI tools faster than they're adopting AI governance.

13
00:01:47,200 --> 00:02:03,600
So if you're experimenting with any AI tools in your fundraising, and honestly even if you're not yet, now is the time to audit your data collection practices and create even a simple, public-facing statement about how you use donor data.

14
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,000
It doesn't have to be complicated. But it has to exist.

15
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:11,600
Now let's talk about something that connects to this.

16
00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:23,200
The Association of Fundraising Professionals, AFP Global, published a piece this week about flipping the script on the "fewer donors, more dollars" trend by focusing on mid-level donor retention.

17
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:26,400
And one finding really stood out to me.

18
00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:37,200
Retaining one mid-level donor, we're talking someone giving $500 to $5,000 a year, typically equals acquiring 10 to 20 new small donors in terms of revenue impact.

19
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:40,800
Let that sink in. Ten to twenty new donors.

20
00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:48,400
And yet most organizations are spending disproportionately on new donor acquisition while their mid-level donors sit in this no-man's-land.

21
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:57,1000
They're getting the same mass appeal emails as someone who gave $25, but they're not getting the personal attention of a major gift prospect.

22
00:02:57,1000 --> 00:03:01,1000
These are donors who have demonstrated both capacity and commitment.

23
00:03:01,1000 --> 00:03:14,800
They are your future major gift donors. So if you haven't already, segment your donor file, identify everyone in that $500 to $5,000 range, and create a distinct communication track for them.

24
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:19,600
More personal than your mass appeals, less intensive than major gift cultivation.

25
00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:27,200
Track their retention as its own metric. Because this group is where your stability and your growth potential live.

26
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:34,800
In our segment about why donors give, here's something interesting about donor psychology that's worth thinking about this week.

27
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:44,800
Research published in the Economic Journal by Shang and Croson found that simply showing donors that other people had contributed increased giving likelihood by 30%.

28
00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:55,200
Thirty percent. And the effect was strongest when the "others" were similar to the potential donor, same community, same age group, same connection to the cause.

29
00:03:55,200 --> 00:04:03,200
This isn't peer pressure. It's social validation. We look to other people to understand what's appropriate, what's expected, what's meaningful.

30
00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:07,600
Now, here's the practical takeaway. Display donor counts on your campaigns.

31
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:13,600
Something as simple as "Join 28 donors who gave this month" can move the needle.

32
00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:18,400
Use testimonials from relatable, everyday donors, not just your major gift stories.

33
00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:24,400
And consider creating giving challenges where donors can see real-time participation from people like them.

34
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:30,800
The bottom line is that donors give to organizations, but they are deeply influenced by people.

35
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:38,800
When we look at what changed this week, there are federal policy shifts happening right now that require your attention.

36
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:45,600
Maryland Nonprofits published an update outlining new federal policy changes that could impact nonprofit operations and fundraising.

37
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:51,200
Now, the specifics vary by subsector and geography, but the broader trend is clear.

38
00:04:51,200 --> 00:05:01,200
There is increased regulatory attention on how nonprofits operate, and these changes often come with both compliance requirements and, I should mention, potential funding opportunities.

39
00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:06,000
Organizations that stay informed can navigate challenges while capitalizing on new possibilities.

40
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,200
Organizations that don't pay attention end up scrambling.

41
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:12,400
Now, why does this matter for you specifically?

42
00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:21,600
Because policy changes can affect everything from your tax-exempt status requirements to how you report donor data to what funding streams are available.

43
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:29,200
Your move here is pretty straightforward. Subscribe to policy alerts from your state nonprofit association if you haven't already.

44
00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:34,400
Assign someone on your team to monitor changes relevant to your mission area.

45
00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:39,200
And budget for potential compliance adjustments in your next fiscal planning cycle.

46
00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:46,000
Don't get caught off guard.

All right, the bottom line for this week's State of Good Report.

47
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:49,600
So if you remember one thing, this is it.

48
00:05:49,600 --> 00:06:04,000
The fundraising landscape right now is demanding a sophisticated balance, between personalization and privacy in AI adoption, between donor acquisition and retention in a shrinking donor pool, and between innovation and risk management in your operations.

49
00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:09,600
Success comes not from choosing one side or the other but from thoughtful integration.

50
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:14,000
Here are three things you can think about doing this week.

51
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:25,200
One, conduct an AI readiness assessment. Before you adopt new tools, evaluate your current data governance and create ethical guidelines for how you'll use AI in your fundraising.

52
00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:28,400
Even a one-page document is better than nothing.

53
00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:31,600
Number two, launch a mid-level donor retention initiative.

54
00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:37,1000
Identify your $500 to $5,000 donors and create a targeted engagement plan for the next quarter.

55
00:06:37,1000 --> 00:06:49,200
Give them something that feels personal.

And third, subscribe to policy updates from your state nonprofit association and schedule a compliance review before the end of this quarter.

56
00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:52,400
Make sure someone on your team owns this.

57
00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:55,1000
And we'll finish with our good in action segment.

58
00:06:55,1000 --> 00:07:08,400
This is also my favorite part. It reminds us that there is so much good happening in the world today still, and it reminds us about why we do this work.

59
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:13,1000
A food bank in Texas discovered that their best donors weren't who they expected.

60
00:07:13,1000 --> 00:07:23,600
By analyzing giving patterns, they identified a group of mid-level donors who had been giving steadily for years but had never received personalized attention.

61
00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:29,600
These weren't major donors making five-figure gifts. These were families giving $500 to $1,000 annually.

62
00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:39,600
So the food bank created what they called a "Sustainer Circle" for these mid-level supporters, with quarterly impact calls and first-look opportunities at new programs.

63
00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:47,200
And I love this. Within six months, retention in that group jumped 40%, and average gifts increased by $200.

64
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:54,800
More importantly, three of those donors became monthly givers at higher levels, and one made their first five-figure gift.

65
00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:59,600
Here's the lesson that I think we can take away from this.

66
00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:05,200
Sometimes the biggest fundraising opportunities aren't in finding new donors or landing mega gifts.

67
00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:09,200
They're in better serving the committed supporters you already have.

68
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:12,400
That food bank didn't need a bigger net.

69
00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:17,600
They needed to take better care of the fish already in the boat.

70
00:08:17,600 --> 00:08:22,400
All right, that's the State of Good Report for March 30th, 2026.

71
00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:27,600
The full report with all the links and sources is available at purecharity.

72
00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:36,000
com. And if this has been helpful, I would ask you to share this with a colleague who could use it.

73
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:41,200
Again, my name is Mike Rush, and we'll check back in next week.

74
00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:48,000
Until then, thank you for doing the difficult and necessary work of creating the state of good.