WEBVTT

00:00:03.210 --> 00:00:07.410
Matt Abrahams: Advancements in AI are not
only revolutionizing work, they're shaping

00:00:07.410 --> 00:00:09.990
careers and opening up new possibilities.

00:00:10.680 --> 00:00:14.040
My name is Matt Abrahams and I
teach strategic communication at

00:00:14.040 --> 00:00:15.960
Stanford Graduate School of Business.

00:00:16.230 --> 00:00:19.500
Welcome to Think Fast
Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:00:20.350 --> 00:00:24.160
Today I am excited to once again
be joined by Andrew Seaman, senior

00:00:24.160 --> 00:00:27.190
Managing Editor for Jobs and
Career Development at LinkedIn.

00:00:27.490 --> 00:00:29.910
Andrew joined me in episode 151.

00:00:30.490 --> 00:00:34.240
Andrew oversees a team of journalists and
editors at LinkedIn who are focused on

00:00:34.240 --> 00:00:36.760
helping people navigate work and life.

00:00:37.180 --> 00:00:41.260
Through his Get Hired podcast, which
he has kindly had me on a few times,

00:00:41.290 --> 00:00:45.460
he and his team helped thousands of
people get jobs and advance careers.

00:00:45.824 --> 00:00:46.875
Welcome back, Andrew.

00:00:46.875 --> 00:00:49.665
It is really exciting to have
yet another conversation.

00:00:49.665 --> 00:00:52.334
Thank you for hosting us in
this beautiful studio of yours.

00:00:52.425 --> 00:00:52.754
Andrew Seaman: Of course.

00:00:52.754 --> 00:00:53.474
Thanks for having me.

00:00:53.655 --> 00:00:55.394
Matt Abrahams: I'm really excited
to have a conversation that's

00:00:55.394 --> 00:00:59.235
part of our Catalyze Your Career
miniseries, sponsored by LinkedIn.

00:00:59.235 --> 00:00:59.955
Should we get started?

00:01:00.015 --> 00:01:00.584
Andrew Seaman: I'd love to.

00:01:00.855 --> 00:01:04.095
Matt Abrahams: Clearly the world
is changing in terms of how people

00:01:04.185 --> 00:01:06.315
find jobs and the tools they use.

00:01:06.435 --> 00:01:10.215
I'm curious, what are you seeing as
changing in the world of job search and

00:01:10.215 --> 00:01:11.595
what should people be thinking about?

00:01:11.890 --> 00:01:14.380
Andrew Seaman: Right now, it's
definitely like a transition period.

00:01:14.380 --> 00:01:18.370
Obviously we have a lot of things
happening in the macro economy, so

00:01:18.700 --> 00:01:26.830
you have hiring that is stable-ish,
but we see dips and accelerations

00:01:26.830 --> 00:01:30.340
here or there, but it's not an easy
time to be a job seeker right now.

00:01:30.370 --> 00:01:35.260
And then you also have the fact
that a lot of places aren't hiring.

00:01:35.445 --> 00:01:39.525
They weren't doing that already, but then
at the same time, you have companies that

00:01:39.525 --> 00:01:41.835
are being a little bit more cautious.

00:01:41.865 --> 00:01:46.395
So you have those factors at play, but
then you also have this looming idea of

00:01:46.395 --> 00:01:49.995
AI, and we don't know what we don't know.

00:01:49.995 --> 00:01:55.215
So it's hard to say exactly when and
how people will be affected by it.

00:01:55.245 --> 00:01:59.955
We know that it's already having an impact
on some people, there's so many different

00:01:59.955 --> 00:02:03.164
things at play and it's uncertain.

00:02:03.164 --> 00:02:07.755
And then you also have a lot of people
who are gonna be graduating soon, so it's

00:02:07.755 --> 00:02:09.285
gonna be a really competitive market.

00:02:09.285 --> 00:02:12.084
I think overall on LinkedIn,
we've seen a forty-five percent

00:02:12.105 --> 00:02:14.204
increase in applications overall.

00:02:14.265 --> 00:02:18.195
You have a lot of competition
going on for jobs that aren't as

00:02:18.195 --> 00:02:19.454
plentiful as people would hope.

00:02:20.040 --> 00:02:22.500
Matt Abrahams: And so really
thinking about your strategy and

00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:24.120
your approach can be really helpful.

00:02:24.510 --> 00:02:28.740
Part of my teaching job is to prepare my
MBA students for not just their impending

00:02:28.740 --> 00:02:30.630
careers, but for their job searches.

00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:35.640
And when I speak with them, I break down
job searching into four I's, identifying

00:02:35.640 --> 00:02:40.170
a potential job, investigating the company
and the role, initiating contact and

00:02:40.170 --> 00:02:42.090
applying, and then finally interviewing.

00:02:42.269 --> 00:02:44.970
I'd love for you to use my
four I structure to help me

00:02:45.030 --> 00:02:46.350
answer some of these questions.

00:02:46.350 --> 00:02:52.255
So, what are the things that job
seekers can do and what tools can

00:02:52.255 --> 00:02:53.815
they leverage to help with each stage?

00:02:53.815 --> 00:02:56.515
So when it comes to identification,
what are some things you would

00:02:56.515 --> 00:03:00.085
recommend that job seekers do and
what tools are available to help them?

00:03:00.505 --> 00:03:03.025
Andrew Seaman: The first one is
definitely being inquisitive.

00:03:03.085 --> 00:03:06.565
I think knowing what's out
there, knowing what resonates

00:03:06.565 --> 00:03:08.365
with you, utilize your network.

00:03:08.545 --> 00:03:12.145
Obviously you could do that on LinkedIn,
but there are so many different ways you

00:03:12.145 --> 00:03:13.735
could reach out to friends and family.

00:03:13.950 --> 00:03:16.890
You could reach out to former
coworkers, and I think the trick is

00:03:16.890 --> 00:03:18.959
to be genuine in those outreaches.

00:03:18.989 --> 00:03:23.670
Because so many people, they do an
outreach, but it's more or less, hey, I

00:03:23.670 --> 00:03:25.079
saw a job at your company, gimme a job.

00:03:25.380 --> 00:03:30.420
And nothing makes a networking
conversation or a conversation

00:03:30.595 --> 00:03:34.225
sort of spoil faster or even a
whole relationship because that

00:03:34.225 --> 00:03:35.875
person just ends up feeling used.

00:03:36.144 --> 00:03:41.575
So what I often tell people is just let
your genuine curiosity guide you and let

00:03:41.575 --> 00:03:45.325
people know like, hey, I'm looking for
work, and see what they offer you and

00:03:45.325 --> 00:03:49.045
say, oh, you should talk to so and so
because they have this really cool job.

00:03:49.160 --> 00:03:53.180
Whatever you do, when you ask and you
bring someone in for a conversation,

00:03:53.540 --> 00:03:55.490
be more interested in them.

00:03:55.760 --> 00:03:58.430
And obviously you could end with, I'm
looking for new opportunities, so if you

00:03:58.430 --> 00:04:00.740
have any suggestions, please let me know.

00:04:00.740 --> 00:04:02.570
Like don't make too big of an ask.

00:04:02.720 --> 00:04:06.230
Asking for information is totally
valid and it's a light lift

00:04:06.260 --> 00:04:09.859
for that other person, but I
think that's the biggest part.

00:04:10.130 --> 00:04:13.185
And also what I tell people
is search on LinkedIn.

00:04:13.365 --> 00:04:17.685
Our search is changing right now, so
we're gonna be rolling out AI job search.

00:04:17.925 --> 00:04:21.195
So traditionally when you job
search, you would say, I want to

00:04:21.195 --> 00:04:24.855
be an accountant and I wanna be an
accountant in Savannah, Georgia.

00:04:25.185 --> 00:04:28.935
And then there'd be other filters that
said, I wanna work at a big company or

00:04:29.130 --> 00:04:31.110
these are the requirements that I have.

00:04:31.440 --> 00:04:35.280
And you know, you had to be pretty
good at searching and you could set

00:04:35.280 --> 00:04:36.690
up an alert and all that other stuff.

00:04:36.690 --> 00:04:41.100
But the way that our engineers
are now making the search work is

00:04:41.100 --> 00:04:43.409
through basically natural language.

00:04:43.409 --> 00:04:47.790
So it's an AI job search, and what you
could say is, you could basically say,

00:04:47.820 --> 00:04:52.470
okay, I want to work in accounting
in Savannah, Georgia, and I'd

00:04:52.470 --> 00:04:54.090
like a minimum salary of whatever.

00:04:54.270 --> 00:04:58.140
And this tool basically goes
into LinkedIn's files and says,

00:04:58.290 --> 00:04:59.970
okay, we have these positions.

00:05:00.060 --> 00:05:00.870
Here you go.

00:05:01.050 --> 00:05:02.220
So it's much more natural.

00:05:02.650 --> 00:05:05.935
Matt Abrahams: So it sounds to me
like the key to identifying potential

00:05:05.935 --> 00:05:10.225
jobs is through conversation
rather than direct request.

00:05:10.225 --> 00:05:13.555
And that those same skills you might
use when I'm talking to a friend,

00:05:13.555 --> 00:05:17.335
or a friend of a friend, I can use
with AI, and that will also help me

00:05:17.335 --> 00:05:18.895
find the things that I'm looking for.

00:05:18.895 --> 00:05:22.975
So taking the time to be thoughtful
about identifying the jobs and not

00:05:22.975 --> 00:05:26.755
being so direct and blunt, perhaps at
least with people, could be helpful.

00:05:26.965 --> 00:05:30.025
So the second step I talk to my students
about is investigating, doing the

00:05:30.025 --> 00:05:33.475
research, because if you are gonna get
an interview, it's important to know.

00:05:33.565 --> 00:05:37.825
What advice do you have about how people
can better investigate the companies and

00:05:37.825 --> 00:05:39.265
the roles that they're interested in?

00:05:39.535 --> 00:05:41.695
Andrew Seaman: I think again,
it comes back to conversations.

00:05:41.785 --> 00:05:44.875
Nothing's going to give you
better information than someone

00:05:44.875 --> 00:05:46.315
who's living that experience.

00:05:46.345 --> 00:05:51.155
So you wanna look for people who are
at that company who are maybe in a

00:05:51.155 --> 00:05:55.445
similar role, and even if there's not
a job open or they're not advertising

00:05:55.445 --> 00:05:59.045
for a role, you want to reach out
and just set up those conversations

00:05:59.045 --> 00:06:02.284
and say, hey, would you be open for
a ten, fifteen minute conversation?

00:06:02.405 --> 00:06:07.655
And these conversations could be super
beneficial because even if you don't

00:06:07.655 --> 00:06:10.955
know that person, if you get in front
of them or you have a good conversation

00:06:10.955 --> 00:06:14.115
with them, they could give you a lot of
information about what their day-to-day

00:06:14.115 --> 00:06:16.094
is like, what the company's like.

00:06:16.215 --> 00:06:20.085
Are there any green flags where, you
know, something really resonates with you?

00:06:20.265 --> 00:06:21.344
And you could use AI too.

00:06:21.344 --> 00:06:24.885
Like you can keep a running
list of like, oh, here's a job

00:06:24.885 --> 00:06:26.145
description that I really like.

00:06:26.205 --> 00:06:31.155
Add that to a file and then you could
have AI and analyze it and come up with,

00:06:31.155 --> 00:06:34.905
here are the main things that people are
looking for in this field or profession.

00:06:34.960 --> 00:06:39.669
So it's really doing digging and
coming up with a good idea of what

00:06:39.669 --> 00:06:43.120
the companies are, what they're
looking for, and then finding out

00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:44.620
what it's actually like on the ground.

00:06:44.859 --> 00:06:47.950
Matt Abrahams: I think this investigation
is really important, and I really

00:06:47.950 --> 00:06:52.000
like that idea of starting to flag
job descriptions that you see and

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:55.179
start looking for what's common across
them that might be attracting you.

00:06:55.539 --> 00:06:58.630
In a previous conversation you and I
had, we talked about coming up with

00:06:58.630 --> 00:07:03.895
questions and I think as you investigate
a role or a company, really thinking

00:07:03.895 --> 00:07:07.794
through your questions to get at what
you're really interested in is important.

00:07:07.794 --> 00:07:10.495
A lot of people, I think, stay too
high level with their questions,

00:07:10.495 --> 00:07:13.104
but being really specific and
give you important insight.

00:07:13.375 --> 00:07:16.015
So let's move to the third step
in the four I's model, which

00:07:16.015 --> 00:07:17.784
is really initiating contact.

00:07:18.025 --> 00:07:21.414
What advice do you have about how
do you actually set up the first

00:07:21.414 --> 00:07:23.215
meeting or ask for that meeting.

00:07:23.275 --> 00:07:24.805
How does contact initiation work?

00:07:25.045 --> 00:07:26.395
Andrew Seaman: It works
in a few different ways.

00:07:26.485 --> 00:07:29.755
What I would say is look at the
job description, see what it says.

00:07:29.755 --> 00:07:32.875
On LinkedIn there are a few
tools that they've rolled out

00:07:32.875 --> 00:07:35.185
recently that can be beneficial.

00:07:35.185 --> 00:07:38.425
So one thing that we've been hearing
a lot from people is basically that

00:07:38.485 --> 00:07:39.805
they don't know if a job is real.

00:07:39.865 --> 00:07:43.105
And people get those text messages,
I don't know if you do, but hey,

00:07:43.105 --> 00:07:46.165
I'm a recruiter for so and so
and there are all these scams.

00:07:46.165 --> 00:07:51.169
But, so on LinkedIn they wanted to
basically have people more reassurance

00:07:51.169 --> 00:07:52.549
that like, this is a real job.

00:07:52.549 --> 00:07:54.229
This is a company that's actually looking.

00:07:54.320 --> 00:07:57.560
So now when you go into the job
descriptions or like job search

00:07:57.560 --> 00:08:02.419
results, there'll be little notes
that say, oh, this is a verified job.

00:08:02.479 --> 00:08:04.549
They're actively looking at resumes.

00:08:04.549 --> 00:08:06.500
This is how long it
takes to get back to you.

00:08:06.799 --> 00:08:10.130
So it might also even say the
person who's hiring for the

00:08:10.130 --> 00:08:11.239
role, if they're a recruiter.

00:08:11.299 --> 00:08:14.690
So make sure that you're actually
looking at the whole job posting

00:08:14.690 --> 00:08:18.350
to get a sense of, can you use any
additional information from there?

00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:23.420
My biggest piece of advice is
first apply because a recruiter

00:08:23.420 --> 00:08:27.260
can generally not do anything until
your information is in the system.

00:08:27.650 --> 00:08:33.110
So a lot of times people will see a job
post on LinkedIn or somewhere else and

00:08:33.110 --> 00:08:34.820
they'll say, ooh, who do I know there?

00:08:34.909 --> 00:08:38.690
And it's great to work those channels,
but also you wanna make sure your

00:08:38.690 --> 00:08:40.789
application gets in as soon as possible.

00:08:40.880 --> 00:08:44.095
And then what you can do is
then use your contacts and say,

00:08:44.125 --> 00:08:46.135
hey, I saw this job, I applied.

00:08:46.345 --> 00:08:47.725
Can you gimme any insight?

00:08:47.995 --> 00:08:51.595
And even if they give you a referral
afterward, like usually, you know,

00:08:51.595 --> 00:08:55.255
that person could message the recruiter
and say, hey, I know this person.

00:08:55.435 --> 00:08:56.935
Can you add me as a reference?

00:08:57.175 --> 00:09:01.704
But what I would also say is if they
list the recruiter, if they list any

00:09:01.704 --> 00:09:06.685
other details, you can find them also on
LinkedIn and say, send them a message and

00:09:06.685 --> 00:09:08.545
say, hey, I just applied for this role.

00:09:08.755 --> 00:09:10.555
I am really interested in it.

00:09:10.555 --> 00:09:12.354
Almost like, you know, your cover letter.

00:09:12.584 --> 00:09:16.614
So make sure that you're sending those
messages, even if they don't reply to you,

00:09:16.765 --> 00:09:18.239
it's still worth your time to do that.

00:09:18.824 --> 00:09:21.405
Matt Abrahams: What I'm hearing there that
I think is so important, many things you

00:09:21.405 --> 00:09:24.645
said are really important, but putting
yourself in the position of the recruiter

00:09:24.645 --> 00:09:26.475
or gatekeeper is really important.

00:09:26.475 --> 00:09:29.355
'Cause we think as soon as I see a job I
want, I'm gonna try to find connections

00:09:29.355 --> 00:09:30.824
and figure out how I can get that job.

00:09:30.824 --> 00:09:34.814
But in fact, there are well-known
procedures that those companies

00:09:34.814 --> 00:09:36.194
and those jobs have to follow.

00:09:36.314 --> 00:09:39.729
And if you're not playing that game,
if you will, you're in trouble.

00:09:39.750 --> 00:09:42.689
So I like that idea of work your
network, but make sure you get it

00:09:42.689 --> 00:09:46.890
through and make sure that you're
using language that is enticing.

00:09:46.890 --> 00:09:48.930
'Cause essentially it's
like a movie preview.

00:09:48.930 --> 00:09:52.560
You're trying to get people interested
and excited to take a little more time.

00:09:52.589 --> 00:09:55.800
And thinking of it that way, I think,
changes everything because many

00:09:55.800 --> 00:09:59.130
people just wanna list an itemize
instead of saying, hey, here's

00:09:59.130 --> 00:10:00.460
something I spent some thought on.

00:10:00.640 --> 00:10:00.850
Andrew Seaman: Yeah.

00:10:00.850 --> 00:10:03.990
And I think we've talked about this
before and it's something that I've

00:10:03.990 --> 00:10:06.720
been telling a lot of people, think
outside the box of like, don't just

00:10:06.720 --> 00:10:09.420
think that just because you've been
an accountant in your entire life

00:10:09.420 --> 00:10:10.860
that you have to be an accountant now.

00:10:11.010 --> 00:10:14.550
And what I sort of suggest to people
is if you're making a career change,

00:10:14.550 --> 00:10:18.425
but also even if you're not, have
your narrative that supports why

00:10:18.425 --> 00:10:21.995
you're the best candidate for these
roles, and make sure you're leading

00:10:21.995 --> 00:10:23.795
with that with your messages.

00:10:23.795 --> 00:10:27.155
Because if you just say, hey, I'm
interested in this role, you might get a

00:10:27.155 --> 00:10:28.985
look, but they may not look too deeply.

00:10:28.985 --> 00:10:31.685
They might say, okay, you probably
sent that to fifteen other recruiters.

00:10:31.834 --> 00:10:34.895
But if you have the narrative that
says, listen, yes, I'm making a career

00:10:34.895 --> 00:10:39.454
change, but here's why it's beneficial
to me, or you set it up as saying,

00:10:39.515 --> 00:10:43.685
I was made for this role, whatever
your story is, I think it makes them

00:10:43.745 --> 00:10:47.280
think twice and say, oh, you're worth
fifteen seconds instead of five.

00:10:47.340 --> 00:10:49.470
Matt Abrahams: I think it's not just for
people changing careers, but somebody

00:10:49.470 --> 00:10:53.760
who's starting in a career to really think
through what is the story you tell versus

00:10:53.760 --> 00:10:57.540
what are all the qualifications in check
boxes I do, and taking the time to do that

00:10:57.540 --> 00:10:59.280
as you initiate contact are important.

00:10:59.490 --> 00:11:02.610
We've talked certainly a lot about
interviewing in the previous episodes,

00:11:02.760 --> 00:11:06.780
so I'd like you to focus your response
on how have the tools changed?

00:11:06.840 --> 00:11:10.350
Are we approaching interviewing
differently now versus

00:11:10.350 --> 00:11:11.580
the way we might have?

00:11:12.000 --> 00:11:16.125
Andrew Seaman: I do think we've moved into
a space where it is more of a conversation

00:11:16.125 --> 00:11:18.465
of, is this the right fit for both of us?

00:11:18.585 --> 00:11:22.945
I think that's a good thing because
employment is a business agreement

00:11:23.225 --> 00:11:25.485
and you want both parties to be happy.

00:11:25.665 --> 00:11:29.175
The other thing is I think we have
many more tools to analyze what they're

00:11:29.175 --> 00:11:33.615
actually looking for, so obviously
job descriptions are super powerful.

00:11:33.705 --> 00:11:35.330
Not all job descriptions are great.

00:11:35.819 --> 00:11:40.260
I'll get asked quite a bit like who writes
these, and I'll usually say, usually what

00:11:40.260 --> 00:11:43.830
happens is I said, some hiring manager
who's never written a job description

00:11:43.830 --> 00:11:46.740
before in their life will write down
the requirements that they want.

00:11:46.740 --> 00:11:49.410
They'll pass it along, it'll get
cut and pasted into something

00:11:49.410 --> 00:11:50.640
else that already existed.

00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:54.365
And I said, you end up with this
Frankenstein thing that isn't perfect,

00:11:54.635 --> 00:11:59.195
but somewhere in there are the nuggets
of what that hiring manager wants.

00:11:59.285 --> 00:12:03.575
So just like we sort of talked about
earlier, analyzing a bunch of different

00:12:03.575 --> 00:12:07.355
job descriptions, you do want to
sometimes really take a look and say,

00:12:07.475 --> 00:12:09.755
okay, what in here is very specific?

00:12:09.815 --> 00:12:14.435
And I think those are the pieces that will
actually come from the hiring manager.

00:12:14.770 --> 00:12:17.560
At LinkedIn, we have now
a tool called Job Match.

00:12:17.620 --> 00:12:20.920
And essentially when you're
looking at a job description, you

00:12:20.920 --> 00:12:22.930
could say, what does AI think?

00:12:22.990 --> 00:12:24.189
Am I a fit for this role?

00:12:24.370 --> 00:12:29.500
And it'll show you, these are your weak
points, these are your strengths, or this

00:12:29.500 --> 00:12:31.820
is where you align on your application.

00:12:31.930 --> 00:12:35.094
So it can actually show you like the
things you need to address or prepare

00:12:35.094 --> 00:12:38.994
for in an interview, to say, I'm not
really good with conflict management

00:12:38.994 --> 00:12:43.104
right now, but I've been taking
courses to figure out how to actually

00:12:43.104 --> 00:12:47.094
do that so that way when I do take
charge of a team, I'll be prepared.

00:12:47.334 --> 00:12:49.555
Matt Abrahams: I hear two really
important things there that the actual

00:12:49.555 --> 00:12:51.995
interview itself is a conversation.

00:12:51.995 --> 00:12:55.415
And it's a conversation that these days,
I think two things are true, it's a

00:12:55.415 --> 00:12:57.605
little more equal in terms of status.

00:12:57.665 --> 00:13:01.385
So I'm not letting the
employer really run the show.

00:13:01.415 --> 00:13:04.835
I have to take an active part, and I
think they're a little less formal.

00:13:04.835 --> 00:13:07.325
I think ever since the pandemic,
these things have become

00:13:07.325 --> 00:13:08.765
just a little more informal.

00:13:08.915 --> 00:13:11.255
Again, leaning into this
idea of conversation.

00:13:11.255 --> 00:13:15.215
So as you prepare, you need to think,
how do I have a conversation versus

00:13:15.215 --> 00:13:16.964
how do I just answer the questions.

00:13:17.084 --> 00:13:23.115
And I got excited when you talked about
having a tool, an AI, help you see

00:13:23.115 --> 00:13:24.915
where you match and where you don't.

00:13:25.005 --> 00:13:29.025
And I think we can use a tool, I think we
can use other people, but to really get

00:13:29.025 --> 00:13:34.005
some external validation or encouragement
in areas where you might be deficient

00:13:34.005 --> 00:13:37.635
for that role, that can be really helpful
because that sets you up for success.

00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:41.230
One of the things we've talked about
in a previous conversation is looking

00:13:41.230 --> 00:13:44.380
at people's career paths, they're
doing a job that you're interested in

00:13:44.380 --> 00:13:45.640
doing and seeing how they got there.

00:13:45.640 --> 00:13:49.120
That's another way of trying to
figure out, where could I focus

00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:50.800
my efforts to better qualify?

00:13:50.800 --> 00:13:52.600
So I really appreciate those two pieces.

00:13:52.660 --> 00:13:54.700
Andrew Seaman: This is actually
my favorite way to use this tool.

00:13:54.875 --> 00:13:58.835
When people are looking at a job
description and they click that button,

00:13:58.835 --> 00:14:03.845
and if it says, you're not really strong
with the majority of these requirements,

00:14:04.235 --> 00:14:06.455
and you look at it and say, but I am.

00:14:06.545 --> 00:14:10.055
And actually what it does is it uses
all the information from your profile.

00:14:10.265 --> 00:14:13.925
So if you're not actually presenting
yourself appropriately on your

00:14:13.925 --> 00:14:17.855
profile for the jobs you want, it
can show where your weak points are.

00:14:18.065 --> 00:14:21.635
So maybe you don't think
of something as a strength.

00:14:21.880 --> 00:14:25.180
Or just there's something that's
not occurring to you to actually

00:14:25.180 --> 00:14:29.020
put on your profile or advertise
about your professional strengths.

00:14:29.260 --> 00:14:32.260
It can actually show you those holes
and like how you're presenting yourself.

00:14:32.680 --> 00:14:36.189
Matt Abrahams: So Job Match, doesn't
only help you identify how good of

00:14:36.189 --> 00:14:39.969
a match you are for the job, but it
helps you identify where perhaps your

00:14:39.969 --> 00:14:42.890
profile or the way you're presenting
yourself could be strengthened.

00:14:43.089 --> 00:14:46.329
So you might say, I feel this is true
about me, but the system is saying

00:14:46.329 --> 00:14:49.420
we don't see it, so then you have
to, again, adjust your narrative.

00:14:49.510 --> 00:14:49.959
Thank you.

00:14:50.230 --> 00:14:54.850
So going through the four I's of
identification, investigation, initiating

00:14:54.850 --> 00:15:00.220
contact and interviewing, is really about
being conversational, creating a narrative

00:15:00.220 --> 00:15:02.199
and leveraging tools like AI to help.

00:15:02.470 --> 00:15:05.920
If we take a step back, the job search
process can certainly be overwhelming.

00:15:06.400 --> 00:15:10.150
Do you have advice and guidance about
how to simplify or make it at least less

00:15:10.150 --> 00:15:12.340
stressful and easier for job seekers?

00:15:12.670 --> 00:15:13.150
Andrew Seaman: Yes.

00:15:13.150 --> 00:15:17.770
I think the first thing is that you really
need to have a strategic job search.

00:15:17.770 --> 00:15:22.785
So a lot of people, they think the job
search is a numbers game, and especially

00:15:22.815 --> 00:15:27.525
in this environment where you're
facing hiring rates that are either

00:15:27.555 --> 00:15:31.395
going down or staying the same while
we're seeing increased competition.

00:15:31.845 --> 00:15:35.145
And it leads to a vicious cycle
because you end up just applying

00:15:35.205 --> 00:15:39.435
everywhere with very generic
resumes that are not targeted.

00:15:39.435 --> 00:15:42.375
And then the result of that is
that you get more discouraged.

00:15:42.375 --> 00:15:45.075
So you send out more generic
resumes and things like that, and

00:15:45.075 --> 00:15:48.015
it just keeps going and you feel
worse and worse about yourself.

00:15:48.435 --> 00:15:52.890
So having a targeted job search where
you say, okay, this is what I want.

00:15:52.890 --> 00:15:56.699
And the way I recommend people do that
is once they have those conversations,

00:15:56.699 --> 00:16:01.229
then they sort of settle on, okay, I do
wanna work in sales in the healthcare

00:16:01.229 --> 00:16:05.670
industry, find the positions that you're
most interested in, and you could use

00:16:05.670 --> 00:16:10.319
that AI job search to say like, hey, I
wanna find sales jobs in healthcare in

00:16:10.319 --> 00:16:11.880
Tallahassee, or something like that.

00:16:12.375 --> 00:16:15.345
And it'll give you a bunch of job
descriptions and you could take those

00:16:15.405 --> 00:16:21.495
and put them in any free AI tool and
say, how can I construct my resume?

00:16:21.735 --> 00:16:25.485
What is the most important traits
of someone working in this area?

00:16:25.845 --> 00:16:29.745
And really focus your job search
on selling yourself as that coming

00:16:29.745 --> 00:16:32.355
up with that narrative of, okay,
here's where I'm coming from,

00:16:32.415 --> 00:16:33.945
here's how I'm pitching myself.

00:16:33.975 --> 00:16:35.415
And again, you could use AI for that.

00:16:35.645 --> 00:16:39.395
Don't ever take what it just spits
out and say, hey, here's my stuff.

00:16:39.725 --> 00:16:45.695
But use it as almost like that job search
coach and use your time to really go

00:16:45.695 --> 00:16:47.645
after the jobs that you really want.

00:16:47.735 --> 00:16:51.425
You know, that you hope that
they'll just give you a moment.

00:16:51.425 --> 00:16:55.925
Because right now so many
people are applying to all jobs.

00:16:55.985 --> 00:16:59.195
And in fact, that's one of the complaints
I think we hear most from employers, is

00:16:59.255 --> 00:17:01.235
we're just getting so many applications.

00:17:01.295 --> 00:17:04.595
And that was actually one of the reasons
we created Jobs Match because we wanted

00:17:04.595 --> 00:17:08.735
people to be able to know whether or not
they are actually a good match for that.

00:17:08.795 --> 00:17:13.595
So what I hear from employers is
the really good resumes stand out.

00:17:13.625 --> 00:17:17.315
Because if you're going through so
many that are so lackluster, when you

00:17:17.315 --> 00:17:21.245
find one that is actually like, oh wow,
this person checks most of my boxes

00:17:21.515 --> 00:17:23.255
and actually wants to do this work.

00:17:23.255 --> 00:17:25.935
It's just like the
shining beacon for them.

00:17:26.235 --> 00:17:31.780
So put your effort into actually
doing a job search that is going

00:17:31.780 --> 00:17:33.070
to lead to where you want to go.

00:17:33.070 --> 00:17:36.399
And then also understand that a
successful job search is more than

00:17:36.399 --> 00:17:38.290
just applying, it's talking to people.

00:17:38.290 --> 00:17:40.120
It's setting up those conversations.

00:17:40.409 --> 00:17:44.680
And I always suggest
thinking of it as odds.

00:17:44.770 --> 00:17:48.639
What can you be doing that is going
to increase your odds of success?

00:17:48.730 --> 00:17:53.320
You're never gonna be guaranteed
anything or be guaranteed on a timeline.

00:17:53.620 --> 00:17:56.764
But what you could do is say,
okay, if I do X, it's going to

00:17:56.764 --> 00:17:59.735
gimme a little bit more of an
edge, and that will be networking.

00:17:59.735 --> 00:18:04.264
That'll be taking courses online or
even signing up for other courses

00:18:04.264 --> 00:18:08.915
in local colleges, volunteering to
gain additional experience, or also

00:18:08.915 --> 00:18:10.985
just taking time to go for a walk.

00:18:11.044 --> 00:18:14.165
So it's really about just
understanding that the job search

00:18:14.165 --> 00:18:16.745
process is a holistic thing.

00:18:17.074 --> 00:18:21.094
And a lot of people say it's a full-time
job, and I'll always tell them yes, but a

00:18:21.094 --> 00:18:25.890
full-time job usually comes with weekends,
so don't be afraid to build those into it.

00:18:26.070 --> 00:18:29.730
Because all of those things will
make your life more tolerable

00:18:29.790 --> 00:18:31.410
during a very difficult time.

00:18:31.530 --> 00:18:34.140
And then I think the most important
part is have a support network.

00:18:34.590 --> 00:18:36.480
Matt Abrahams: All of that
is really good advice.

00:18:36.690 --> 00:18:41.435
The defining of success of a
job search is really important.

00:18:41.525 --> 00:18:44.615
It may or may not be getting that one job.

00:18:44.615 --> 00:18:47.735
It might be planting the seeds
that open up other opportunities.

00:18:47.975 --> 00:18:50.735
It might be connecting with a
broader community that can lead to

00:18:50.735 --> 00:18:52.385
a job or at least lead to support.

00:18:52.655 --> 00:18:55.505
I think we, we put a tremendous
amount of pressure on ourselves

00:18:55.505 --> 00:19:01.480
when the solo goal of a job search
is to find that job instead of to

00:19:01.480 --> 00:19:06.760
make yourself a better candidate
and to be open to the possibility

00:19:06.760 --> 00:19:08.080
of other things that come your way.

00:19:08.380 --> 00:19:11.620
And then that notion of being
strategic where instead of doing the

00:19:11.620 --> 00:19:15.100
shotgun approach and just sending
out everything, really focus, can

00:19:15.100 --> 00:19:19.380
actually give you more of a sense of
control and make it more manageable.

00:19:19.380 --> 00:19:22.530
So I think that advice is
really good because getting

00:19:22.530 --> 00:19:23.820
a job is a wonderful thing.

00:19:23.820 --> 00:19:29.310
But if you get to that job fatigued and
frustrated and stressed, then the best

00:19:29.310 --> 00:19:31.530
job is not gonna at least start that well.

00:19:31.800 --> 00:19:34.860
Before we end, I'm asking everybody
who's participating in this Catalyze Your

00:19:34.860 --> 00:19:37.020
Career miniseries the same two questions.

00:19:37.020 --> 00:19:37.440
Are you ready?

00:19:37.560 --> 00:19:37.890
Andrew Seaman: Yes.

00:19:38.070 --> 00:19:41.010
Matt Abrahams: What is the best career
advice you've ever received and why?

00:19:41.280 --> 00:19:46.409
Andrew Seaman: When I was younger,
I remember someone who was a vice

00:19:46.409 --> 00:19:52.290
president of my college and I felt
really insecure about, even as a college

00:19:52.290 --> 00:19:54.149
journalist, going and interviewing people.

00:19:54.270 --> 00:20:01.200
And he said, the benefit you have is
that when you're new to a role, or young,

00:20:01.560 --> 00:20:03.330
people will always underestimate you.

00:20:04.345 --> 00:20:05.735
And you could always over deliver.

00:20:06.245 --> 00:20:10.895
So even though I'm not young or
new, I always tell myself that

00:20:10.895 --> 00:20:12.185
when I'm trying new things.

00:20:12.575 --> 00:20:15.155
Because when you're new to something that
people don't expect you to be good at it.

00:20:15.305 --> 00:20:20.135
And I always remind myself, I'm
always going to at least over

00:20:20.135 --> 00:20:23.825
deliver beyond their expectation,
their base level expectation.

00:20:24.245 --> 00:20:26.945
So I think that's the best
career advice I ever received.

00:20:27.389 --> 00:20:32.700
Matt Abrahams: Leverage the newness and
come at it with the focus on trying to

00:20:32.700 --> 00:20:36.240
be the best you can be, knowing that the
expectations might be a little lower.

00:20:36.540 --> 00:20:37.080
Very good.

00:20:37.500 --> 00:20:40.290
Second and final question, what
is the one thing you wish you

00:20:40.290 --> 00:20:42.555
would've done differently in
the way you managed your career?

00:20:43.635 --> 00:20:46.170
Andrew Seaman: I think I would
have been more proactive when I

00:20:46.170 --> 00:20:51.150
was younger, whether it was asking
for raises or career development.

00:20:51.450 --> 00:20:58.830
My first raise as a full-time professional
came to me because they felt bad for

00:20:58.830 --> 00:21:00.720
me because I had never asked for it.

00:21:01.080 --> 00:21:05.400
I literally went into like my
yearly review, and I had recently

00:21:05.400 --> 00:21:07.350
changed managers at that point.

00:21:08.280 --> 00:21:10.170
She goes, we're giving you a raise.

00:21:10.170 --> 00:21:11.430
And I was like, oh boy.

00:21:11.760 --> 00:21:14.100
And she goes, you've never asked for one.

00:21:14.129 --> 00:21:18.510
And I said, I didn't think I
had to, and I don't know why.

00:21:18.510 --> 00:21:21.570
It was just this weird thing
where I was like, I have to ask?

00:21:21.990 --> 00:21:28.110
So I think I would be much more proactive
in being an advocate for myself.

00:21:28.950 --> 00:21:31.350
Matt Abrahams: Being proactive and
being an advocate I think captures

00:21:31.350 --> 00:21:32.910
a lot of what we talked about today.

00:21:32.910 --> 00:21:34.080
Andrew, thank you very much.

00:21:34.544 --> 00:21:39.195
The introduction to all these really
cool tools, Job Match, AI assistance,

00:21:39.524 --> 00:21:44.385
the proactive approach, thinking about
your job search as the narrative.

00:21:44.625 --> 00:21:48.495
Really important advice, and I hope
those listening can take value if

00:21:48.495 --> 00:21:51.554
they're looking for a job currently
or if they're just thinking about

00:21:51.554 --> 00:21:52.875
what's next for them in their career.

00:21:52.905 --> 00:21:53.534
Thanks so much.

00:21:53.565 --> 00:21:54.075
Andrew Seaman: Thank you.

00:21:56.885 --> 00:22:00.275
Matt Abrahams: Thank you for joining us
for another episode of our Catalyze Your

00:22:00.275 --> 00:22:02.525
Career miniseries, sponsored by LinkedIn.

00:22:03.065 --> 00:22:07.415
Please listen to the prior two episodes,
episode 184 with Catherine Fisher

00:22:07.475 --> 00:22:09.575
and episode 187 with Dorie Clark.

00:22:09.605 --> 00:22:13.575
To learn more from Andrew
Seaman, listen to episode 151.

00:22:14.340 --> 00:22:18.750
This episode was produced by Ryan
Campos and me, Matt Abrahams.

00:22:18.900 --> 00:22:23.220
With special thanks to the LinkedIn
crew, especially Emily Reeves.

00:22:23.340 --> 00:22:25.080
Our music is from Floyd Wonder.

00:22:25.470 --> 00:22:27.570
With thanks to Podium Podcast company.

00:22:28.050 --> 00:22:31.230
Please find us on YouTube and
wherever you get your podcasts.

00:22:31.440 --> 00:22:33.510
Be sure to subscribe and rate us.

00:22:33.840 --> 00:22:38.610
Also follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram
and check out FasterSmarter.io for

00:22:38.610 --> 00:22:43.125
deep dive videos, English language
learning content, and our newsletter.