WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.000
I

00:00:07.380 --> 00:00:10.780
Now understand how much that hurts because I'm normally not wearing headphones

00:00:12.660 --> 00:00:14.720
The audience is now deaf

00:00:16.459 --> 00:00:19.379
Everyone is awake. I will finally fix that for next week

00:00:20.900 --> 00:00:26.860
What's up, everybody? What's up? What's up? It's better by Bitcoin the whole dog gangs here plus jam Bush rights

00:00:27.860 --> 00:00:29.860
We're talking about Hollywood

00:00:30.860 --> 00:00:38.459
Talking about the movie business if you've watched previously, you know that all of us here are involved in the movie business, especially Jordan Bush

00:00:40.259 --> 00:00:43.580
Prophetic career he's out. He's gone

00:00:53.500 --> 00:00:56.299
Jordan where you driving right now? I'm driving

00:00:56.860 --> 00:01:01.160
In an undisclosed location because we don't dox ourselves. That's right

00:01:02.980 --> 00:01:04.980
Sure looks like

00:01:05.339 --> 00:01:09.379
It's like North America someone get some good AI on this stat

00:01:09.379 --> 00:01:13.839
Yeah, somebody get that that dude who can you know diagnosed if if you show him a leaf, you know

00:01:13.839 --> 00:01:18.720
He knows right where you are. He carries his keys in his rectum. So just get him and pull him out

00:01:19.699 --> 00:01:26.279
Anyway, we're gonna be talking do we do it? You want to an intro again JD like usual JD introduce yourself. Yeah

00:01:26.860 --> 00:01:30.459
JD Bitcoin ad guy. I love Megan ads. What about you bond or?

00:01:32.339 --> 00:01:34.940
Bond or guilty plea. I've been around Bitcoin for a bit

00:01:34.940 --> 00:01:40.220
I've had a career trying Mike really trying to just nail this thing this little this little intro piece

00:01:40.220 --> 00:01:44.699
So here's what I got working on working on so far. I've had a career in

00:01:46.180 --> 00:01:47.820
Finance

00:01:47.820 --> 00:01:49.220
entertainment

00:01:49.220 --> 00:01:50.779
education

00:01:50.779 --> 00:01:52.779
and the last one is

00:01:52.820 --> 00:01:54.820
Engineering and I've seen how

00:01:55.260 --> 00:02:00.940
Fiat can ruins all of it and I'm burned a lot of bridges to get here, but I'm

00:02:01.459 --> 00:02:05.580
Set on Bitcoin redeeming at all. So that's

00:02:10.419 --> 00:02:16.660
Anton sign my ex bio just says film in Bitcoin. That's enough

00:02:18.300 --> 00:02:20.300
Bush

00:02:20.339 --> 00:02:22.020
Can you guys see me

00:02:22.020 --> 00:02:23.179
Yeah

00:02:23.179 --> 00:02:30.500
Okay, just tell me I'm backstage. It's tell me the backstage. Anyhow, so yeah, so I am the executive director of TGFB media

00:02:30.500 --> 00:02:34.179
We help Christians understand and use Bitcoin for the glory of God the good of people everywhere

00:02:34.179 --> 00:02:39.300
I was a missionary pastor and now I help people understand Bitcoin full-time

00:02:40.580 --> 00:02:42.779
Joe that's the way you do a bio

00:02:43.380 --> 00:02:47.660
Perfect. Yeah, I need to work on mine Pike rock and roll

00:02:48.300 --> 00:02:51.419
I'm Corey Pike and co-founder of indie hub studio and

00:02:52.619 --> 00:02:54.619
Hollywood film film and television producer

00:02:55.940 --> 00:02:58.660
Dope, I'm Zach founder of indie hub studio

00:02:59.660 --> 00:03:02.179
worked in film and TV pretty much my whole career and

00:03:03.220 --> 00:03:09.380
Here we are. So today's topic. We're gonna talk a little bit about AI and filmmaking. I just went to

00:03:10.100 --> 00:03:11.699
the

00:03:11.699 --> 00:03:13.699
International AI Film Festival

00:03:14.460 --> 00:03:16.580
over this last weekend and

00:03:17.580 --> 00:03:19.339
I

00:03:19.339 --> 00:03:21.339
Don't know man. Lots of report. I went in

00:03:23.179 --> 00:03:27.779
Kind of nervous, you know, like this is either gonna be the most cringe thing

00:03:27.779 --> 00:03:32.220
I've ever been a part of or I'm gonna lose my job tomorrow. It's sort of one or the other

00:03:33.580 --> 00:03:35.059
and

00:03:35.059 --> 00:03:40.979
To be honest, it was a little bit of both. It wasn't really it wasn't really cringe, but I was shocked

00:03:40.979 --> 00:03:43.100
I was honestly shocked at how

00:03:43.860 --> 00:03:48.160
How far along this tech has come? I've just sort of avoided the topic

00:03:49.339 --> 00:03:51.300
just out of

00:03:51.300 --> 00:03:57.699
General a it takes a lot of time to like dive into this stuff. But but be it's it's it's a little bit scary

00:03:57.699 --> 00:03:59.899
I mean AI has been really effective in a lot of other ways

00:03:59.899 --> 00:04:05.460
I've been using it myself quite a bit for various activities and I have to say that you know

00:04:05.460 --> 00:04:07.339
I you know kind of coming out of it

00:04:07.339 --> 00:04:11.020
I do think that we're on the we're on the precipice of a new medium

00:04:12.020 --> 00:04:16.940
And it is moving faster than than anybody could really imagine I think

00:04:18.500 --> 00:04:21.059
Yeah, I don't know Anton you got any questions you can lead me around

00:04:22.019 --> 00:04:26.459
Yeah, it seems like we're in an exponential growth phase of AI

00:04:28.140 --> 00:04:31.660
Yeah, I mean tell us about the festival you went to were there

00:04:32.299 --> 00:04:34.299
Was it people who have made?

00:04:34.899 --> 00:04:36.859
short films who are

00:04:36.859 --> 00:04:41.980
like showing the films just like a normal film festival, or was it more of a

00:04:42.500 --> 00:04:48.859
Like a expo type of thing. Yeah, so I'm traditional film festival. They kind of did three short blocks

00:04:49.500 --> 00:04:52.940
over at the Los Feliz Theater across from Fred 62 and

00:04:54.059 --> 00:04:57.459
The the vibe I got I only did the third block so I wasn't there the whole day

00:04:57.459 --> 00:05:01.019
I did an hour and then I listened to one of the panels they did and

00:05:01.579 --> 00:05:06.059
What it seemed like to me is really you had a bunch of filmmakers in there kind of traditional filmmakers

00:05:07.100 --> 00:05:11.920
They had they had the zoom going so they had people from all over the world and some of the filmmakers zooming in

00:05:12.700 --> 00:05:15.459
You know this one woman from Korea

00:05:16.179 --> 00:05:20.059
She's a teaches film in Korea, so you know filmmaker

00:05:21.260 --> 00:05:22.459
professor

00:05:22.459 --> 00:05:27.540
You had people from USC in in our industry kind of teaching film working on AI

00:05:28.779 --> 00:05:33.579
You know people who run production companies out here have been in traditional docs narratives people who work at studios

00:05:34.579 --> 00:05:40.700
Some other people who are just massive AI enthusiasts, but honestly mostly filmmakers mostly people who are somewhat familiar with the business I

00:05:42.700 --> 00:05:49.579
You know I've been noticing that in the film world just like and so many things it's kind of easier to ask for

00:05:50.100 --> 00:05:56.220
Forgiveness than permission, and I think a lot of studios and a lot of filmmakers have treated AI this way

00:05:56.220 --> 00:06:01.380
I mean take that you had the Roadrunner the Anthony Bourdain movie. I watched that whole movie

00:06:01.380 --> 00:06:06.700
I knew that they had used his voice at some point and done like an AI I forgot about it completely

00:06:06.700 --> 00:06:09.739
I watched the whole movie, and I was like wait a second there was AI

00:06:10.299 --> 00:06:12.940
Voice over and it might have been the whole movie. I don't even know

00:06:13.619 --> 00:06:19.420
And then Peter Jackson did that World War one movie where he took little

00:06:19.940 --> 00:06:22.980
square like eight millimeter film and

00:06:23.859 --> 00:06:26.059
Made it into widescreen widescreen

00:06:26.579 --> 00:06:28.140
35 millimeter

00:06:28.140 --> 00:06:35.059
4k then he did the one with the Beatles where they didn't even know what the guys were saying they went and recreated their voices

00:06:36.179 --> 00:06:43.100
And and made it 4k so you could actually hear what they were saying in their voices, and there wasn't even audio of it

00:06:43.540 --> 00:06:45.859
I just saw that Netflix is

00:06:46.579 --> 00:06:48.779
They took an 80s sitcom

00:06:48.779 --> 00:06:52.019
And they upscaled it to 1080 and it's supposedly

00:06:52.220 --> 00:06:57.459
Horrifying because like little little girls who are in the background look like bald men and

00:06:59.299 --> 00:07:04.459
So anyway all that's just to say that AI is being used no matter

00:07:04.859 --> 00:07:08.420
What you're hearing because you're hearing a lot of people say that oh

00:07:08.859 --> 00:07:15.459
We're not gonna allow it in Hollywood because it'll kill the film industry and like no no it's been being used for years

00:07:15.500 --> 00:07:20.500
Yeah, so what are some of the ways that you see things going in the short term well?

00:07:20.619 --> 00:07:27.059
I mean, it's it's interesting. It's like any new tech right you you had you know a lot of the discussions and panels

00:07:27.059 --> 00:07:32.619
We were talking about regulation talking about unions the last contract negotiations Warner Brothers

00:07:32.899 --> 00:07:37.700
You know supposedly was like oh, we're not gonna use AI and you know the unions kind of won that argument

00:07:37.700 --> 00:07:42.299
But like of course they are they're gonna go create another division or whatever that wasn't in the contract and do whatever the fuck

00:07:42.299 --> 00:07:44.299
They were doing anyway

00:07:45.579 --> 00:07:47.820
I'll say this and then I'll get more specific

00:07:47.820 --> 00:07:51.700
I've said this to you guys in different context, but I I think that you know

00:07:52.380 --> 00:07:55.859
We as a as a species we entered the information age

00:07:55.859 --> 00:08:03.619
and I think very rapidly a byproduct of us entering the information age is that the actual age we're in is the age of discernment and

00:08:04.339 --> 00:08:09.579
Being able to discern the truth out of a massive amount of noise

00:08:10.299 --> 00:08:17.660
And possibly fake you know fake visuals and fake information and lies is going to be the defining factor of our time

00:08:17.820 --> 00:08:19.820
Because this stuff is incredibly difficult

00:08:20.820 --> 00:08:26.059
Especially if you're looking at you know looking at it on a two-dimensional screen, or you're looking at you know information coming from a screen

00:08:26.420 --> 00:08:29.380
To discern what the truth is it's remarkable and moving quickly

00:08:30.100 --> 00:08:32.099
I would say

00:08:34.299 --> 00:08:36.299
You know in 2008

00:08:37.020 --> 00:08:42.419
The industry went through a similar transition you had politics technology and economics sort of collapse it and

00:08:43.140 --> 00:08:48.099
A whole new businesses were born. I mean YouTube stars weren't a thing 20 years ago

00:08:49.179 --> 00:08:51.979
and they're a thing today and I

00:08:52.619 --> 00:08:57.099
Think that we're going to see an entirely new category of filmmaker come out

00:08:57.099 --> 00:09:01.059
I saw some remarkable stuff done over a matter of weeks

00:09:02.820 --> 00:09:04.820
You know I

00:09:06.099 --> 00:09:08.099
Will say though that

00:09:08.340 --> 00:09:15.580
The tools themselves are I'm convinced of this are we're going to remain tools and that the artist is

00:09:15.820 --> 00:09:18.260
Going to be the most important part

00:09:19.619 --> 00:09:26.500
You're using these tools to tell stories you're using these tools to convey something that is uniquely human and

00:09:27.099 --> 00:09:31.219
Human beings will connect to things that are uniquely human and they won't to things that that aren't

00:09:32.820 --> 00:09:37.260
So I think that creativity raw creativity is

00:09:38.340 --> 00:09:40.340
Going to be more valuable than ever

00:09:42.260 --> 00:09:43.619
You know one way to look at it

00:09:43.619 --> 00:09:47.460
I was having this conversation with somebody recently like you know to make a movie

00:09:47.500 --> 00:09:54.820
Let's say let's say just go back to celluloid days. Let's go back to 20 years ago 25 years ago making a movie was an incredibly

00:09:55.219 --> 00:09:57.219
expensive technical

00:09:58.380 --> 00:10:03.020
You know drawn out process and a lot of people made their living

00:10:03.299 --> 00:10:07.780
By being willing to do the technical shit that really creative people weren't willing to do

00:10:08.099 --> 00:10:12.580
Like I'm gonna go learn how to mix sound I'm gonna go learn how to do color on a da Vinci

00:10:12.580 --> 00:10:19.419
I'm gonna learn how to do this hyper technical thing that a director. You know which is really God on a movie set or should be

00:10:20.700 --> 00:10:25.260
Wasn't really interested in doing and so this these massive industries were built

00:10:26.460 --> 00:10:31.700
Doing all of this technical stuff that creative people didn't really want to do to tell a story. I would say that

00:10:32.700 --> 00:10:38.219
Almost all of that at least as far as if you're saying you're gonna go make an AI movie like that's out

00:10:38.739 --> 00:10:46.500
You know there's still room to be technical and you but but more importantly than other than anything is can you be?

00:10:46.780 --> 00:10:52.820
Specific and can you tell a good story? Do you know how the structure of story works?

00:10:52.940 --> 00:10:54.940
You know can you?

00:10:55.179 --> 00:10:59.780
Can you build tension and can you release it in the right ways and at the right moment at the right beat?

00:10:59.780 --> 00:11:04.820
Do you have characters that people can relate to do you have a story? That's relevant to human beings, so?

00:11:05.500 --> 00:11:08.179
I think a bunch of technical people

00:11:08.780 --> 00:11:13.659
are gonna be out and I think a bunch of other people that would have never been able to get into the industry because of

00:11:13.659 --> 00:11:15.299
the spiderweb of

00:11:15.299 --> 00:11:16.500
technicians

00:11:16.500 --> 00:11:19.659
Are going to be able to tell stories that would have never been told before

00:11:20.979 --> 00:11:23.580
You know and that's really just from the creative side. I mean

00:11:24.299 --> 00:11:26.940
from the like social media we can go make a

00:11:27.900 --> 00:11:31.500
Visual that looks like things that are actually happening. You know like for example

00:11:33.140 --> 00:11:37.619
One of the one of the things that always gets people with Trump is a

00:11:38.140 --> 00:11:40.140
Lot of the leftists are like I got it

00:11:40.140 --> 00:11:41.099
You know he said that he

00:11:41.099 --> 00:11:44.419
Nazis are great people and I'm they told it he told everybody to drink bleach

00:11:44.419 --> 00:11:49.380
And I'm like he literally fucking did not pull up a video that said that shows him telling people to drink bleach

00:11:49.380 --> 00:11:52.059
And they can't do it because it doesn't fucking exist

00:11:52.700 --> 00:11:54.700
but with this tech

00:11:55.059 --> 00:12:03.059
Zero question that those videos will start to exist and we're gonna start to get really fucking confused from a news media perspective

00:12:04.099 --> 00:12:08.940
But I do think we got to delineate you know storytelling and filmmaking from the other stuff

00:12:08.940 --> 00:12:11.900
But the the thing that's confusing in the middle

00:12:11.900 --> 00:12:16.020
There is like the documentary side of things like one of the guys who won most of the awards really cool

00:12:16.020 --> 00:12:18.020
Dude talk to him all night

00:12:19.020 --> 00:12:22.340
He he did his film was called Lincoln at Gettysburg

00:12:22.340 --> 00:12:26.940
And he basically did the Gettysburg address with Lincoln giving the speech and of course it's all AI generated

00:12:26.940 --> 00:12:28.940
and he had all this b-roll of the war and

00:12:29.500 --> 00:12:31.140
combat and

00:12:31.140 --> 00:12:35.900
You know just really really well done stuff, and it conveys a message

00:12:35.900 --> 00:12:40.059
And and it has a point, but we're gonna get to a point where you're like fuck, man

00:12:40.059 --> 00:12:45.500
I got was that Lincoln at Gettysburg. You know a kid growing up in you know 25 or 30 years from now

00:12:45.619 --> 00:12:50.500
You're not gonna know what an old photo the real photo was versus what you're seeing on a screen

00:12:51.340 --> 00:12:53.020
Yeah, wow

00:12:53.020 --> 00:13:00.380
Yeah from the storytelling perspective. I'm curious if anybody has a really negative take on where they think that

00:13:01.260 --> 00:13:06.940
Filmmaking and like the film industry and storytelling is going in the near future if you have a negative take

00:13:07.900 --> 00:13:09.900
hyper-negative I

00:13:10.900 --> 00:13:12.900
I would be curious to

00:13:13.659 --> 00:13:17.580
Just piggyback on the the last comment that Zack made and it's it's I

00:13:18.140 --> 00:13:20.979
Don't necessarily know filmmaking is a be we're gonna have the problem

00:13:20.979 --> 00:13:27.140
I think the problem we're gonna have is media and by that I mean like mass psychosis like this is essentially MK ultra in

00:13:28.539 --> 00:13:31.260
real time and it's a

00:13:32.659 --> 00:13:35.039
You know I think one of the things that we're seeing with

00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:41.179
And when you know all the stuff coming out about the JFK files potentially and like Epstein stuff, yeah

00:13:41.919 --> 00:13:48.280
What's gonna be really interesting is what's actually real like the wild part to think about with like the Epstein stuff that hasn't come out

00:13:48.960 --> 00:13:53.960
Are they making stuff up to plant on people like we're in this world now where?

00:13:54.640 --> 00:13:56.479
verifiability of

00:13:56.479 --> 00:13:58.479
core or rather

00:13:58.679 --> 00:14:00.039
first

00:14:00.039 --> 00:14:05.919
Research I'm blanking on what is it the the actual witnesses like of actual valid sources of like the source material

00:14:05.919 --> 00:14:07.919
That's what I'm looking for like source material

00:14:08.719 --> 00:14:10.719
verifiability is so

00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:15.400
Challenging with digital stuff, that's why you know the Dead Sea Scrolls are so

00:14:16.479 --> 00:14:19.880
Important as a text for history not even just Christianity

00:14:19.880 --> 00:14:25.359
But like for history is it's a thing that they found a bunch of times over and now on the internet

00:14:25.359 --> 00:14:29.460
You know if I want to make a picture of a dick, but it's immediately verifiable as a dick, but everywhere

00:14:30.039 --> 00:14:34.640
But like who made the original dick, but who cares like you know, I don't know it's interesting

00:14:34.640 --> 00:14:40.559
So if they were going to take his Epstein files right now if they were just to release those files right now

00:14:41.719 --> 00:14:43.640
Would JD would you even?

00:14:43.640 --> 00:14:49.960
Believe any of them like if they release videos of Epstein there were like evidence videos. Would you believe any of them?

00:14:50.719 --> 00:14:52.599
This is the challenge is honestly

00:14:52.599 --> 00:14:57.880
I don't know like if the funny thing is to we know this tech has existed since the Obama era

00:14:58.479 --> 00:15:02.400
Because they kept saying in the 2016 election watch out for deep fakes

00:15:02.400 --> 00:15:08.440
And so this tech has been around for a long time and they've been trying to tell people don't believe your lying eyes

00:15:09.520 --> 00:15:11.799
Rightfully, but don't believe your lying eyes for a long time

00:15:11.799 --> 00:15:14.479
But I do think it wasn't as good back then for sure

00:15:14.479 --> 00:15:19.239
And so I think a lot of it was that was kind of air cover for them to be able to like have

00:15:19.719 --> 00:15:24.039
Crap like shady malicious stuff come out and then for them to be like all this is fake

00:15:24.039 --> 00:15:27.679
I think now it would actually be fake. And so to your point of like

00:15:29.599 --> 00:15:33.559
Yeah, five years ago I would I would have believed him now when they do come out

00:15:34.159 --> 00:15:35.880
I'm gonna have questions

00:15:35.880 --> 00:15:41.299
Yeah, I mean, I think you think of something like the like the the steel dossier right where they're like

00:15:41.299 --> 00:15:45.479
Oh, you know strippers and you know, like sex tape with Trump

00:15:45.640 --> 00:15:52.760
You're just like they can convincingly make like make that tape now and like just drop it on some site somewhere and people would be

00:15:52.760 --> 00:15:55.599
Like, oh, you know like it again. It just would be like the door brothers already did

00:15:56.440 --> 00:16:00.840
Yeah, sure. Yeah, but I just think I mean, yeah, there's just so many

00:16:01.440 --> 00:16:03.799
Terrifying ways that this kid this could go

00:16:04.599 --> 00:16:09.659
Like I would love to ask Corey like is this or not Corey Zack was it's kind of your take

00:16:10.080 --> 00:16:12.880
Because I've talked to programmers who are looking at you know

00:16:12.880 --> 00:16:20.039
Chad GBT and these other tools and they're basically like they're kind of take away which is kind of my my realization was it's not going

00:16:20.159 --> 00:16:21.119
To eliminate

00:16:21.119 --> 00:16:26.400
It's not going to eliminate the jobs of people who know what they're doing people who are already know what they're doing are gonna be

00:16:26.400 --> 00:16:29.479
Able to learn learn how to use these AI tools and they're gonna be way more productive

00:16:29.840 --> 00:16:35.599
Like is that kind of what your takeaway is as well in the film front in addition to like the the novel stuff

00:16:35.599 --> 00:16:36.880
That's gonna happen

00:16:36.880 --> 00:16:41.039
You know the novel tools and just normal people's hands. Yeah, I I think that

00:16:41.679 --> 00:16:45.960
Same thing that happened in 2008 the pile of shit at the bottom is going to get massive

00:16:46.080 --> 00:16:53.640
Yeah, it's going to get absolutely huge but the cream always rises I think it'll take you know years if not a decade and a

00:16:53.640 --> 00:16:55.400
half to

00:16:55.400 --> 00:16:58.479
Kind of settle a workflow for it

00:16:59.479 --> 00:17:01.479
But I think that I think that

00:17:02.200 --> 00:17:04.199
voices and brilliant storytellers

00:17:04.680 --> 00:17:10.719
Globally people that would have never in a million years had an opportunity to tell good stories will have an opportunity to tell good stories

00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:13.040
and

00:17:13.040 --> 00:17:15.040
You know the big budget live-action

00:17:16.040 --> 00:17:18.560
Kind of projects. I think that those will dwindle

00:17:19.119 --> 00:17:21.119
I I

00:17:21.239 --> 00:17:25.560
Think I think ultimately the market is going to expand like I people are always afraid

00:17:25.560 --> 00:17:29.319
Oh, it's just gonna take jobs. It's gonna take jobs like no, this is this is going to blow up

00:17:30.280 --> 00:17:32.719
this industry in terms of a dollar amount

00:17:33.439 --> 00:17:34.760
by

00:17:34.760 --> 00:17:36.760
multiple times

00:17:37.119 --> 00:17:43.079
It's gonna take a while to settle but projects that could have never been greenlit before are going to start getting greenlit

00:17:43.880 --> 00:17:50.839
So, you know, it's just you got to deal with the pile of crap at the bottom and people who are gonna get fatigued by that

00:17:50.839 --> 00:17:53.719
You know audience members are gonna be like I was just like too much shit to watch

00:17:55.479 --> 00:17:57.800
But yeah, I don't know if that answer the question

00:17:58.439 --> 00:18:03.439
Yeah, I want to actually you to you Corey. I actually want to tap on that like as

00:18:04.239 --> 00:18:09.599
Somebody who's done development and knowing there's new access for people with these tools

00:18:09.599 --> 00:18:13.079
Like how do you see the the landscape changing over the next 5-10 years?

00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:17.520
Especially now having been in like Italy for a while. Like what's the what's the

00:18:18.239 --> 00:18:20.239
How do you see this?

00:18:20.439 --> 00:18:25.079
Revolution like bringing about like a new renaissance and filmmaking and like what does that mean?

00:18:25.859 --> 00:18:26.359
Yeah

00:18:26.359 --> 00:18:28.040
I mean when I look at a film budget

00:18:28.040 --> 00:18:34.280
the things the things that are the most costly that don't show up the most on screen are a lot of the things that AI

00:18:34.479 --> 00:18:37.160
addresses like sound is insanely expensive and

00:18:37.680 --> 00:18:39.479
AI

00:18:39.479 --> 00:18:46.000
Cleaning up of sound has gotten so much better and from my perspective on an independent film. Do I need three sound guys now?

00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:47.439
No, I probably need one, right?

00:18:47.439 --> 00:18:47.959
You know

00:18:47.959 --> 00:18:54.760
Those are the types of things that I see VFX is like this massive thing when you when you walk into an animation project

00:18:54.760 --> 00:19:01.079
That's like 60% 70% of your budget is just just like paying animators and and computer-generated things

00:19:01.400 --> 00:19:05.040
Those things are the computers are using are being used for those things anyway

00:19:05.040 --> 00:19:11.479
and the the I think you're just gonna see a massive reduction in cost in those sorts of things and those are all kind of

00:19:11.479 --> 00:19:12.319
below the

00:19:12.319 --> 00:19:18.959
Below the line type things all of those things all of that tech all of that work is in support of a creator vision

00:19:18.959 --> 00:19:20.959
so from a Hollywood film perspective

00:19:21.000 --> 00:19:28.599
AI is doing absolutely nothing in my opinion to remove the director and the writer as being the the center of the film medium

00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:36.880
There's it's just slowly and surely and increasingly fast making it easier for them to get their vision out there

00:19:37.160 --> 00:19:42.040
So Zack, I agree with you in one sense that the pile of crap at the bottom will grow

00:19:43.119 --> 00:19:46.400
But I would say if you ask any of your people who aren't in Hollywood at all

00:19:46.880 --> 00:19:50.959
How much are you actually watching right at peak television at the peak fiat?

00:19:51.119 --> 00:19:53.959
nonsense of printing money and sending it into Hollywood just

00:19:54.479 --> 00:19:59.920
Inventing value out of nowhere and pretending that the industry was as a big as it was we made I think it was

00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:04.680
700 TV shows at the peak of that that year and then there were about

00:20:05.280 --> 00:20:11.359
14,000 movies and how many did you watch right and I'm in the industry and it's my job to stay on top of all that

00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:13.119
Stuff and I probably watched

00:20:13.119 --> 00:20:19.359
120 movies that year and maybe 30 series right and I watch an enormous amount of stuff for my job

00:20:19.400 --> 00:20:21.119
Which means

00:20:21.119 --> 00:20:27.040
99% of everything that was made I didn't watch as a professional in the industry and if that number just

00:20:27.439 --> 00:20:33.160
Grows at the bottom. It's just nonsense, right? I think about old movies and I watch a lot of old movies and

00:20:34.280 --> 00:20:36.000
watching like

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:38.079
Rashomon or diehard or

00:20:39.079 --> 00:20:43.839
Heat or some other thing some other movies when you go back and watch them now and you say that's a little cliche

00:20:43.920 --> 00:20:51.319
Some creator figured out that this is a formula that works right Rashomon invented the unreliable narrator and diehard made the modern

00:20:52.119 --> 00:20:57.199
pacing for an action movie or the first one to figure that out and then since then there's been

00:20:57.839 --> 00:21:02.599
Thousands of people who can't come up with that level of idea on their own

00:21:03.400 --> 00:21:04.880
recreating it

00:21:04.880 --> 00:21:10.119
And just like reproducing it based on a formula that someone else figured out some of those movies are fine

00:21:10.119 --> 00:21:11.680
Most of them are absolute garbage

00:21:11.680 --> 00:21:15.599
I think AI is gonna allow for that sort of recreation to happen

00:21:15.599 --> 00:21:20.839
But I think it will allow the people that actually want the next thing whatever the next generation is gonna do

00:21:21.319 --> 00:21:26.160
It's gonna people aren't gonna stop looking for that next thing that next creator voice

00:21:26.280 --> 00:21:33.599
So I think I see the bottom of the pyramid getting really big but it's it's just a bigger mess of cheaper nonsense

00:21:33.599 --> 00:21:38.719
Right, like the Hallmark movie. It's just been imitating the rom-coms that worked from 30 years ago

00:21:39.199 --> 00:21:43.079
I think that's just gonna keep keep growing that mess at the bottom

00:21:43.079 --> 00:21:45.079
I don't think it really does anything at all

00:21:45.280 --> 00:21:51.000
to remove the the fact that the creators that figure out the next formula that works for the next generation are

00:21:51.199 --> 00:21:54.119
Incredibly necessary and incredibly central to being

00:21:54.800 --> 00:21:59.959
Culturally responsive. Yeah, I I agree. I you know, the cream always rises

00:22:00.479 --> 00:22:02.280
and

00:22:02.280 --> 00:22:06.760
Ultimately the market is doing what the market does and it's opening it up to competition

00:22:06.760 --> 00:22:07.319
You know

00:22:07.319 --> 00:22:11.079
That's kind of my kind of what I was trying to say earlier like it was a very closed

00:22:11.239 --> 00:22:16.359
system because you had this highly technical spiderweb that was in the way of doing the producing and

00:22:16.719 --> 00:22:19.280
Really a lot of people who are creative got edged out

00:22:20.040 --> 00:22:24.880
And they're not gonna be edged out. They're gonna be attacking this with a vengeance and

00:22:26.199 --> 00:22:30.260
And yeah, I mean, I think there's gonna be some revolutionary stuff going on

00:22:31.160 --> 00:22:34.560
You know from a story structure standpoint, there's gonna be more we're going

00:22:35.400 --> 00:22:37.400
We're gonna be able to iterate

00:22:37.439 --> 00:22:42.319
Faster and faster and faster and we'll see what works faster and faster and faster

00:22:43.160 --> 00:22:47.040
but I think you know, I can I would say for sure that

00:22:47.880 --> 00:22:50.400
you know the Hollywood that we grew up with and

00:22:51.000 --> 00:22:56.959
You know, that's it. I think it's dead. It's done. It's over. It might have a few last gasps, but

00:22:58.680 --> 00:23:01.079
Yeah, it's it's pretty remarkable what they're up to

00:23:01.719 --> 00:23:07.560
There's a really so I've been watching the Star Wars and Timeline order and

00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:09.680
if you

00:23:09.680 --> 00:23:13.119
Not that I recommend you do this, but I'm just like which I was just gonna do it

00:23:14.839 --> 00:23:22.400
But watching a timeline order is fascinating because all of these series and TV shows like a half dozen TV shows with multiple seasons

00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:26.359
came out like and then there they they

00:23:26.719 --> 00:23:33.760
Are before and after the original movies and if you watch these series you see character development you see like a

00:23:34.199 --> 00:23:37.800
whole hood like that's just character development like group like the group's

00:23:37.920 --> 00:23:43.160
character gets developed and you get to see how their friends are and how they interact with their world and like all this other stuff and

00:23:44.119 --> 00:23:48.280
then you watch the original three Star Wars movies and it's like

00:23:49.239 --> 00:23:52.959
what the like what is this this is like this feels like a

00:23:53.520 --> 00:23:58.560
Like almost an insult to the audience because you're like Luke goes through this thing where

00:23:59.119 --> 00:24:02.239
I'm gonna butcher this specific example, but it's something like

00:24:03.680 --> 00:24:10.760
He flies a plane one time and then he's the best pilot that anyone's ever seen and then he blows up the Death Star

00:24:10.760 --> 00:24:14.680
But I met a chlorine count is super high. We all know this but they don't even

00:24:16.680 --> 00:24:18.359
It's not as Mel de Corrine count

00:24:18.359 --> 00:24:24.199
It's not as Mel de Corrine count. It's that every single other person in the entire fleet of rebels

00:24:25.359 --> 00:24:27.920
Recognizes that Luke is the best pilot they have

00:24:28.599 --> 00:24:35.479
After flying one time and you're just like this it's not human at all. It's just pure

00:24:36.000 --> 00:24:38.000
1970s storytelling and

00:24:38.560 --> 00:24:41.640
The point is I'm trying to get to is that with AI?

00:24:42.119 --> 00:24:48.160
You're gonna have the this crazy amount of breath to actually like dig into characters because all of that

00:24:48.760 --> 00:24:51.920
Garbage that you had to produce like oh, we you know to

00:24:52.920 --> 00:24:53.959
garbage, right

00:24:53.959 --> 00:24:55.719
all of the all of the

00:24:55.719 --> 00:25:02.119
set design and everything else that you had to put together to get all these characters to to fill out all of these seasons is

00:25:02.880 --> 00:25:06.599
Just gonna be so much easier and that goes Corey. It's the same thing with them

00:25:07.439 --> 00:25:10.560
What's the what's the big screen that everyone shoots on now?

00:25:10.680 --> 00:25:13.160
It's like all LED wall, right like

00:25:13.920 --> 00:25:15.920
Instead of doing these crazy

00:25:16.719 --> 00:25:20.199
Practical sets just do an 80 LED wall and then you're like, okay cool

00:25:20.199 --> 00:25:23.439
We got an entire world we and the person can interact with that world

00:25:24.040 --> 00:25:26.599
you know to some degree and then

00:25:27.280 --> 00:25:31.400
Okay, cool. We can flush out this this whole broader deeper thing

00:25:32.000 --> 00:25:38.199
And I see that happening with AI as well and but in a different capacity, it's just it just makes it more

00:25:38.880 --> 00:25:40.479
Accessible

00:25:40.479 --> 00:25:41.280
It to you

00:25:41.280 --> 00:25:48.599
It kind of has this interesting blend of there's gonna be like this weird middle ground where it's not animation and it's not live-action

00:25:49.359 --> 00:25:51.800
I saw a few of these movies at the fest that like

00:25:52.319 --> 00:25:56.479
Really really blended the two well, and some of them went like full animation style

00:25:56.479 --> 00:26:00.359
They had their own visual, you know, totally their specific, you know book

00:26:01.680 --> 00:26:05.560
Other ones tried to be hyper real, but you're still gonna have this

00:26:05.560 --> 00:26:07.560
Fuck you

00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:14.199
Yeah, I it's it's definitely going to blend a lot of genres and it'll be interesting to see like what

00:26:14.719 --> 00:26:21.199
What what genres come out of AI and what ones are the most specific what ones are the best?

00:26:21.640 --> 00:26:25.239
What is AI the best genre as a tool for if that makes sense?

00:26:25.839 --> 00:26:27.839
Anton I'm curious your take on

00:26:27.839 --> 00:26:33.439
Like I would argue Breaking Bad is the best series ever made and people can fight me on that one

00:26:33.439 --> 00:26:37.880
But I really think they did a phenomenal job

00:26:37.880 --> 00:26:42.280
But the main reason is the best job that it was on the page like

00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:45.959
Vince Gilligan was was interviewed over and over again

00:26:45.959 --> 00:26:51.520
He would say like the goal was to paint ourselves in a way that would make us feel like we were in the right place

00:26:52.040 --> 00:26:58.760
Vince Gilligan was was interviewed over and over again. He would say like the goal was to paint ourselves into a corner and

00:27:00.040 --> 00:27:04.680
I'm just really curious your take on do you think we're gonna get to a place where?

00:27:06.040 --> 00:27:11.560
It's gonna be harder to do that because of AI because like people are not paying themselves in a box

00:27:11.560 --> 00:27:17.479
Like it is is story going to suffer or is it gonna get is it gonna change because I feel like the way we understand

00:27:17.479 --> 00:27:18.640
stories

00:27:18.640 --> 00:27:20.920
Not gonna change like that's just a human thing

00:27:21.520 --> 00:27:29.520
Yeah, you know Cory was saying how he basically was saying that all art is derivative and essentially somebody makes this

00:27:29.520 --> 00:27:33.839
This first thing that's kind of new and then it's accessible. And so a lot of people

00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:39.280
Copy it and you know, like a year ago two years ago. I heard people saying oh, hey

00:27:39.280 --> 00:27:41.280
I'll never make things as good as a human being

00:27:42.000 --> 00:27:45.760
It seems more like we basically were being AI

00:27:45.920 --> 00:27:53.760
We were just doing it really really slowly and we were just copying and copying and copying and making worse copies of the thing that

00:27:53.760 --> 00:28:00.359
Every once in a while something new would come out and you know, we're talking about these different ways that AI can be used right now

00:28:00.880 --> 00:28:03.800
AI can make really great animation

00:28:03.800 --> 00:28:10.560
It's already great for that or it can it can fill in little gaps and things but then we're talking about volume stages

00:28:11.040 --> 00:28:13.319
There's ways that you could just film somebody

00:28:14.040 --> 00:28:19.000
Without a volume stage and AI can add the lighting to their face can change the background

00:28:19.719 --> 00:28:20.839
or

00:28:20.839 --> 00:28:21.880
like

00:28:21.880 --> 00:28:29.040
Personally, I'm doing a project right now where I needed a mountain lion in the background like walking through it through the trees

00:28:29.040 --> 00:28:31.119
so kind of far in the background I

00:28:31.560 --> 00:28:36.719
Can film a real shot have the mountain lion put into the background

00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:40.479
No one will be able to tell if this was a year ago

00:28:40.479 --> 00:28:46.680
I would have had to pay some VFX house to make a 3d rendering of a mountain lion or

00:28:47.079 --> 00:28:52.959
to do some sort of rotoscoping and take a shot of a mountain lion from like a nature documentary and place it in the

00:28:52.959 --> 00:28:58.520
Trees and I can know just you just get a practical mountain lion. Why would you not just use a practical real mountain lion?

00:28:58.520 --> 00:29:03.880
What's the problem right here? You wanna hear a funny story about that real quick. There's that guy. His name's Wolfgang Bayer

00:29:03.880 --> 00:29:08.640
He was a he was a nature documentarian back in like the 60s and 70s

00:29:09.040 --> 00:29:11.359
They used to fake all the nature documentaries

00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:15.400
So they would they would pretend that Death Valley was the Serengeti

00:29:15.400 --> 00:29:18.199
And so they wanted to get this shot of a mountain lion

00:29:18.359 --> 00:29:23.780
Like who was like starving to death and was drinking but the mountain lion was kind of fat and out of shape

00:29:23.780 --> 00:29:26.959
It was just what they had available to him. So they drove him out to Death Valley

00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:32.920
They completely dehydrated the mountain lion and then they like made a puddle and they released the mountain lion

00:29:32.920 --> 00:29:35.560
So it would go and drink and they're like, he doesn't really works kind of fat

00:29:35.560 --> 00:29:40.839
But whatever people buy it right as they did this a family pulls up in a station wagon

00:29:41.239 --> 00:29:47.479
jumps out of the car and is like whoa a mountain lion the mountain lion turns looks at one of the kids and

00:29:48.040 --> 00:29:52.479
Instinct takes over and the mountain lion attacks one of the kids and mauls them didn't kill him

00:29:52.839 --> 00:29:55.880
But I want to say it was Disney too who did it?

00:29:55.880 --> 00:30:00.160
So this kid got like two million dollars in the lawsuit from the nature documentary

00:30:00.160 --> 00:30:02.760
I'm gonna we don't get sued but yes

00:30:02.920 --> 00:30:05.760
We will confirm that it was Disney if not, we're sorry

00:30:06.000 --> 00:30:13.160
I'm pretty sure the book is called a wildlife by Wolfgang Bayer. It's really good, but we don't have to do stuff like that anymore

00:30:15.719 --> 00:30:18.640
One thing put pose this question to the group

00:30:20.880 --> 00:30:26.560
One of the things that I was thinking about in the film fest was that becomes really apparent

00:30:27.839 --> 00:30:31.160
And kind of to what you guys are saying is like all of this shit was fake anyway

00:30:31.680 --> 00:30:39.040
You know, there's the definition the best definition of acting I ever heard is that you're behaving truthfully under imaginary circumstances and

00:30:39.800 --> 00:30:45.239
The thing that was magical about movies back in the day is there was this magician like quality

00:30:45.520 --> 00:30:48.479
To trick us into believing that a thing was happening

00:30:49.400 --> 00:30:54.400
Like, you know in Jurassic Park came out. It was like, holy fucking shit. This is real

00:30:55.400 --> 00:30:57.400
And one of the things that just

00:30:58.079 --> 00:31:03.239
Has been a an abject failure as far as I'm concerned with with CGI is

00:31:03.839 --> 00:31:06.880
They're not even really trying to trick us

00:31:06.880 --> 00:31:14.400
They're like the magician craft has sort of gone and they just everybody accepts odds computer-generated and we just make it the most cool outlandish

00:31:14.959 --> 00:31:18.000
Explosion we can imagine but there's real magic in

00:31:18.680 --> 00:31:23.400
Looking at something and and being like, holy fucking shit. How did they do that? And

00:31:24.079 --> 00:31:26.079
One of the probably like

00:31:27.800 --> 00:31:33.800
The lead the most disappointing thing about the AI thing maybe the most negative take to your previous question Anton is like

00:31:35.439 --> 00:31:36.880
That

00:31:36.880 --> 00:31:38.400
Mystery is gone

00:31:38.400 --> 00:31:44.920
and that was such a huge part of the movie watching experience when things were live-action and they were able to

00:31:45.479 --> 00:31:51.479
Put something on a camera that you like pre CGI that you knew had to be real to some extent

00:31:51.520 --> 00:31:55.959
To some extent but you also know it's it's an illusion of some kind

00:31:55.959 --> 00:31:58.439
I mean, this is what the original silent movies were really great out

00:31:58.439 --> 00:32:05.119
They were able to do these camera tricks and do really cool shit to make something look real that wasn't and I I think that that

00:32:05.119 --> 00:32:08.839
might be permanently gone in the age of AI which I

00:32:10.719 --> 00:32:15.640
Don't totally agree that I don't totally agree that it's totally gone because there's enough examples of it working

00:32:15.640 --> 00:32:17.640
I think it's just very in our face

00:32:17.959 --> 00:32:22.560
How much the big studios could not care less about that anymore

00:32:23.199 --> 00:32:26.520
Right an example of something that works. What do you mean?

00:32:27.359 --> 00:32:30.959
So Godzilla minus one opened against the Marvels

00:32:31.280 --> 00:32:37.319
Godzilla minus one cost 15 million dollars the Marvels cost 300 million dollars and they made about the same amount of money

00:32:37.319 --> 00:32:40.760
Which is insane and Godzilla minus one is a thoughtful

00:32:41.040 --> 00:32:48.079
Post World War two Japanese drama about a guy living with survivors guilt as a kamikaze pilot who bailed on his duty

00:32:48.079 --> 00:32:52.319
And doesn't think he should be alive anymore and the villain of that movie happens to be Godzilla

00:32:52.359 --> 00:32:58.119
It's just artful filmmaking that works so well and it's CGI to the absolute

00:32:58.800 --> 00:33:04.599
Maximum or another example is like the Batman the Robert Pattinson one. Most people don't know

00:33:04.599 --> 00:33:08.560
I would imagine even people on this call that 95% of that movie was shot on an LED wall

00:33:08.599 --> 00:33:14.920
And if you look at that movie versus like one of the more recent Star Wars shows where Disney clearly does not care at

00:33:15.160 --> 00:33:21.439
All whether you believe all of their sets are in the shape of an ellipsis. That's insane

00:33:21.439 --> 00:33:23.439
It's like it's so obvious

00:33:23.439 --> 00:33:26.880
You just you you built an LED wall and now you have to use it

00:33:26.880 --> 00:33:31.959
but Matt Reeves does it with the Batman and all of a sudden you're transported to a gothic world where

00:33:32.560 --> 00:33:38.119
You're like actually like Christopher Nolan was like maybe maybe Gotham's like Chicago and a little bit of Pittsburgh

00:33:38.119 --> 00:33:42.439
And that reason is like what if the entire city was a gothic Cathedral, right?

00:33:42.599 --> 00:33:48.939
He's there. There are still people taking the tech and trying to trick you in a way. That's actually like meaningful and artistic

00:33:49.239 --> 00:33:51.839
I think it's just in the big budget movies

00:33:52.119 --> 00:33:58.359
Not only do they not care but the quality has gone significantly down like gladiator 2 vs. Gladiator 1

00:33:58.880 --> 00:34:03.079
Right Zack. We could go we could do a whole podcast on this. Don't get me started

00:34:03.319 --> 00:34:08.679
I know the water tank. I've shot in the water tank in Malta that they used where they shot

00:34:08.679 --> 00:34:13.120
I know the people that shot it and they still CGI the water

00:34:13.760 --> 00:34:15.760
That's insanity

00:34:15.840 --> 00:34:20.520
Why did you do that? You shot in a water tank and then you use CGI to make water

00:34:20.600 --> 00:34:23.719
It's it's terrible and it's just terrible work

00:34:23.719 --> 00:34:27.040
So I think part of what you're reacting to is what I react to as well

00:34:27.040 --> 00:34:32.639
Which is you have 250 million dollars to make a movie and you just did a bad job, you know

00:34:32.639 --> 00:34:34.639
It's just bad

00:34:35.239 --> 00:34:39.239
Agreed on that entirely. I I I think specifically though just like

00:34:40.199 --> 00:34:46.399
The ability to not know how they did a thing on a screen to be like how in the fuck did they do that?

00:34:46.399 --> 00:34:51.639
I think that's I think that's kind of gone because now we just go out somehow they tricked us with computers

00:34:51.639 --> 00:34:54.320
they they did something crazy with computers, but back in the day it was like

00:34:55.040 --> 00:34:57.439
How in the fuck is that even possible? What?

00:34:58.439 --> 00:35:02.520
Jordan do you think they actually kind of just popped up a question for me?

00:35:02.520 --> 00:35:06.399
but do you think it's going to be harder for people to

00:35:08.560 --> 00:35:15.679
Believe the Bible like believe the stories of the Old Testament believe the miracles believe these things and the world of AI like are we

00:35:15.679 --> 00:35:18.199
gonna have a crisis of faith for our kids where it's like

00:35:18.879 --> 00:35:20.879
They're just like oh, that's just made up

00:35:21.679 --> 00:35:25.600
Maybe believable. Yeah, I was gonna I was gonna say the exact same thing

00:35:25.679 --> 00:35:29.520
Maybe maybe more believable. I I don't know. I mean, it's a good question

00:35:29.520 --> 00:35:31.800
I think there's the thing that's been interesting to me

00:35:31.800 --> 00:35:38.560
I'm I'm like optimistic is this gonna open up more avenues for people who again wouldn't be able to find funding

00:35:38.719 --> 00:35:41.520
To do this in Hollywood. Is it gonna open up?

00:35:41.520 --> 00:35:46.199
You know open up that capacity to a whole new, you know a whole new group of people

00:35:46.879 --> 00:35:52.199
And so again one example of this is there's they released a couple weeks ago or last week or something

00:35:52.199 --> 00:35:54.199
It's called the life of David. I think

00:35:55.040 --> 00:35:57.360
Something like the house of David the house of David on

00:35:57.959 --> 00:36:03.879
Prime video and so it's like this series that's like live-action mixed with some, you know

00:36:03.879 --> 00:36:06.760
CGI stuff and it's really scripturally based

00:36:07.360 --> 00:36:11.600
And so again, I don't know what the process was. You can definitely tell there's some CGI in there

00:36:11.600 --> 00:36:16.879
It's not totally believable, but it's not awful. And then the actual scripting is fantastic

00:36:16.879 --> 00:36:23.399
And so I'm like more optimistic that again, there's just there's a whole bunch of just really good really

00:36:23.959 --> 00:36:28.080
Complex stories in the scripture that I just it's for the life of me

00:36:28.080 --> 00:36:31.760
I don't understand why people haven't been haven't been making it and I think again

00:36:31.760 --> 00:36:35.899
This would be more of the thing would be like the concern I have would be okay

00:36:35.899 --> 00:36:39.800
Now you've got you've got gazillions of people who live out in Hollywood who you know

00:36:39.800 --> 00:36:44.179
Everybody's got a script from what I understand, you know, you've got tons of people who've got these scripts everyone left

00:36:45.239 --> 00:36:47.239
What'd you say?

00:36:47.320 --> 00:36:49.320
Everyone left

00:36:49.840 --> 00:36:56.520
But like I just think like is this gonna is this gonna expand like you're gonna have like the the note the people who are

00:36:57.000 --> 00:36:58.120
tangentially

00:36:58.120 --> 00:37:05.399
Connected to people in the film industry is there's like they're gonna be more of those people who get their projects greenlit with smaller budgets

00:37:05.399 --> 00:37:08.000
And so again, you get this mountain of crap at the bottom

00:37:08.199 --> 00:37:14.399
Like that'd be more of the concern because like again, one of the problems is just like it's not the technical problem

00:37:14.399 --> 00:37:18.280
It's something like Emilia Perez like that movie, which I haven't seen it

00:37:18.280 --> 00:37:20.800
But from all accounts is absolute dog crap

00:37:20.840 --> 00:37:27.479
like it's like insane horrible movie and yet and like there's people who were like astounded that it got selected for Best Picture and yet

00:37:27.479 --> 00:37:29.000
It's still got

00:37:29.000 --> 00:37:35.840
Selected so like it's it's one thing to actually be able to do like mechanically do the work and show create these films

00:37:35.879 --> 00:37:37.879
It's another thing to

00:37:37.879 --> 00:37:39.199
To just be like, all right

00:37:39.199 --> 00:37:45.679
There's there's like the the taste involved of the audience is something that's a moving target

00:37:45.679 --> 00:37:51.800
And that's something that like you can have people actually learn to embrace in like garbage stuff

00:37:51.800 --> 00:37:55.120
And so that's part of the be part of the concern, too

00:37:55.120 --> 00:37:55.919
It's like no

00:37:55.919 --> 00:38:01.600
It's like we go to the grocery store and almost all the food is just atrocious and yet people are still buying it

00:38:02.360 --> 00:38:06.879
People are still eating it. And so that that's a concern as well that that I you know

00:38:06.879 --> 00:38:09.219
I'm somewhat optimistic that it you know

00:38:09.479 --> 00:38:15.360
By virtue of being able to create better content and by people by virtue of people who who are smart and who are you know?

00:38:15.439 --> 00:38:20.639
Moral and ethical and and also have really good ideas. Like I'm hopeful that they're gonna be able to get their

00:38:21.320 --> 00:38:25.239
Content made and then it won't be so much of an issue or at least they'll be more to contrast

00:38:25.239 --> 00:38:32.520
How bad just ethically and and just aesthetically some of the stuff that's being lauded out there right now is I don't know if that makes

00:38:32.520 --> 00:38:38.679
Oh, so uh Zack you've you've touched on this point a lot, which is we're entering the age of discernment

00:38:39.199 --> 00:38:40.959
which is to say

00:38:40.959 --> 00:38:44.840
It's all gonna be AI but what's gonna matter is is like

00:38:44.840 --> 00:38:49.520
oh, I have to actually think about because you're gonna see you're gonna see Trump like

00:38:50.760 --> 00:38:56.360
doing something that is just absolutely insane and then you're gonna see another like the

00:38:56.879 --> 00:39:03.300
The footage of of during of the exact same time like the exact same angle like the exact same thing happening

00:39:03.560 --> 00:39:06.600
Totally, it's a totally different thing. We've already seen some of this too

00:39:07.360 --> 00:39:09.360
But you're gonna have to decide as a viewer

00:39:10.040 --> 00:39:14.399
What do I believe and what am I gonna believe how do I discern the truth here?

00:39:14.399 --> 00:39:17.199
And I think that to go back to your question JD

00:39:17.199 --> 00:39:22.760
I think that that is a training process that everyone's like you do not have the option to not think anymore

00:39:22.760 --> 00:39:27.919
You can't just turn on the TV and turn your mind off and be like, yeah, I trust the news anchor. Definitely

00:39:27.919 --> 00:39:35.300
No, no, you have to now think and what that's gonna do is it's gonna force people into this pattern of like if I don't

00:39:35.300 --> 00:39:39.020
Think I'm gonna get burned. I'm gonna get scammed. I'm gonna get like

00:39:39.360 --> 00:39:43.560
My relationships are going to be destroyed like it's a whole thing and then that you know

00:39:44.080 --> 00:39:45.959
jumps back into

00:39:45.959 --> 00:39:49.760
What do I okay. So what do I think about God? What do I think about the Bible?

00:39:49.760 --> 00:39:51.760
how like I need to actually like really

00:39:52.500 --> 00:39:56.080
go through the steps and the processes of thinking through this as

00:39:56.679 --> 00:40:00.360
Best as I can and then also learning the tools about how to think better

00:40:00.760 --> 00:40:06.959
Go through going through logic and rhetoric and understanding, you know fallacies and the whole the whole

00:40:07.360 --> 00:40:09.360
Argumentative process of

00:40:09.520 --> 00:40:14.399
Convincing yourself or persuading yourself or other people. It's gonna be it's gonna be interesting

00:40:14.639 --> 00:40:17.719
Do you think a lot of people care to think though?

00:40:18.600 --> 00:40:24.020
This is what I was gonna talk about JD. I I like your terms that I call it the trust economy

00:40:24.020 --> 00:40:26.520
Which is basically what we had before

00:40:27.760 --> 00:40:30.600
Mass media what you know came about right?

00:40:30.600 --> 00:40:34.879
It which was you only really can trust the people that you see face to face and that you know

00:40:35.280 --> 00:40:39.360
The people that have earned your trust and I think that's what we'll return to you

00:40:39.360 --> 00:40:43.719
I think it's gonna be a brutal adjustment period because we've had a very long run of

00:40:44.879 --> 00:40:46.360
And all of us, you know

00:40:46.360 --> 00:40:52.719
If we're honest with ourselves at some point have seen a news story that fits something that we wanted to be true and just believed

00:40:52.719 --> 00:40:53.879
it before

00:40:53.879 --> 00:41:00.600
Right, like we can all probably point to hundreds of those right where we go back and like that didn't turn out to be totally

00:41:00.600 --> 00:41:06.520
What I thought it was but I definitely wanted that to be true. So I believed it right on its face and

00:41:07.320 --> 00:41:11.239
You know, I think I think this this group of guys is very committed to truth

00:41:11.520 --> 00:41:16.000
So we're you know, we're probably on that bleeding edge of like, all right

00:41:16.000 --> 00:41:18.399
I just don't want to be a deceived whatever the answer is

00:41:18.399 --> 00:41:20.239
I'd rather know the answer and

00:41:20.239 --> 00:41:20.820
You know

00:41:20.820 --> 00:41:26.280
I think I think what you're getting at Bonder and Zach you as well is like if you as much as you don't live in

00:41:26.320 --> 00:41:29.199
Reality you will get burned by not living in reality

00:41:29.199 --> 00:41:33.479
Like there's no other option like if you believe that sugar doesn't make you fat

00:41:33.479 --> 00:41:36.280
You're welcome to believe that but you will get fat, right?

00:41:36.280 --> 00:41:36.919
You know

00:41:36.919 --> 00:41:43.500
It's that that's that sort of like like like bringing up of reality as much as you want to believe the deception

00:41:43.500 --> 00:41:49.399
That's being offered to you. You're welcome to do that. You're just gonna get met by the brick wall of reality, right?

00:41:49.399 --> 00:41:53.080
and we have a second I have a more inappropriate way of saying that as well, but

00:41:53.800 --> 00:41:55.800
probably not

00:41:56.479 --> 00:41:57.560
I think

00:41:57.560 --> 00:42:03.320
Go ahead. No, I was gonna say like the other thing that's the instant the instant feedback of like mockery

00:42:03.600 --> 00:42:08.399
You know like that's I think like the fact that you and if you say something stupid on the internet

00:42:08.399 --> 00:42:10.479
You can immediately get your you know

00:42:10.479 --> 00:42:13.679
Get ratioed within 30 seconds by some anon account

00:42:13.679 --> 00:42:19.439
But you can be you can be the president of the United States and get immediately ratioed and there's nothing you can do about it

00:42:19.439 --> 00:42:22.219
I think like that's a that is a healthy corrective. I agree

00:42:22.540 --> 00:42:27.739
It's interesting that you think about the like Bitcoin ramifications of that of like

00:42:28.620 --> 00:42:30.620
you know zaps and

00:42:31.620 --> 00:42:34.179
Bondo and I have talked about this but the the

00:42:35.860 --> 00:42:39.379
Like Nostra is an interesting protocol because it's essentially

00:42:39.979 --> 00:42:44.459
Creating a new social security number, but like a social security number. That's your nsec for

00:42:45.139 --> 00:42:49.120
Trust where it's like hey, you have this identifier now that you can take with you

00:42:49.239 --> 00:42:52.800
You know, I know fatty allows you to take you different places, you know Nostra you have yours

00:42:52.800 --> 00:42:59.179
You can use it on zap dot stream. Like there's a lot of different of those protocols, but it's interesting the thought you had of like

00:43:00.000 --> 00:43:06.239
The punishment layer I guess on top of that of like it can be instantaneous where it's like hey

00:43:06.239 --> 00:43:12.520
I said something factually incorrect and you could actually have tech that's monitoring things. It's like hey, this is the truth

00:43:12.520 --> 00:43:15.879
You're getting into then arbitration of like who's the arbiter of truth?

00:43:15.879 --> 00:43:21.679
What is actually true that stuff but there can be like instant ramifications outside of mockery where it's like, hey, I had a

00:43:22.679 --> 00:43:30.120
Instantaneous zap of my wallet got docked, you know, 20 sats or whatever was because I said something that was not correct

00:43:30.719 --> 00:43:35.080
And I was intentionally trying to mislead people. I don't know. It's interesting. This is a thought. Yeah

00:43:35.879 --> 00:43:39.520
Good, you know, we're talking about how you can fake things in media

00:43:39.520 --> 00:43:40.639
You can you know

00:43:40.639 --> 00:43:45.959
you had that meeting with Trump and Zelensky and a lot of people created these ones where they all of a sudden got into a

00:43:45.959 --> 00:43:48.439
Fistfight or like throwing each other. That wasn't the real ones

00:43:50.280 --> 00:43:52.280
So it's hard to believe that was real

00:43:53.239 --> 00:43:58.760
It's hard to discern the real thing from the thing that AI created and and within storytelling in Hollywood

00:43:58.959 --> 00:44:00.959
That is gonna happen with

00:44:01.280 --> 00:44:08.199
Some dude in Bangladesh is going to make a movie that people are not going to be able to tell is not a Marvel movie

00:44:08.199 --> 00:44:12.320
It'll be indistinguishable from what Hollywood is is putting out which is kind of exciting

00:44:12.439 --> 00:44:15.399
It's also nice that we have this thing that unites us

00:44:15.679 --> 00:44:20.679
Bitcoin where you actually can verify that something is real and has taken place and

00:44:20.959 --> 00:44:27.760
And so in the in the world of imagery and storytelling, how do you verify anything anymore?

00:44:27.760 --> 00:44:31.719
So there's some beauty to that because yeah, there's gonna be a lot of trash at the bottom

00:44:31.800 --> 00:44:37.800
But there's gonna be people who were held out of Hollywood. There was no way in their entire lifetime

00:44:37.800 --> 00:44:42.000
They could ever break into the industry and now they're just if they're good enough

00:44:42.239 --> 00:44:44.679
They're just gonna be able to do it from anywhere in the world

00:44:45.439 --> 00:44:49.679
What's what's kind of interesting is you think about what storytelling is?

00:44:51.239 --> 00:44:53.080
It's

00:44:53.080 --> 00:44:56.080
It's this, you know, let's go back like more traditional filmmaking

00:44:56.080 --> 00:45:02.060
It's it's a bunch of people who are basically getting together and they're they're they're basically making up a lie

00:45:02.659 --> 00:45:08.260
But the lies all serve a much bigger truth the the movies that we all agree were fantastic

00:45:09.620 --> 00:45:15.300
Were in service of something much larger. That was true. So it was like this organized lie in order to

00:45:16.580 --> 00:45:18.580
Express a superlative truth

00:45:19.739 --> 00:45:24.340
Which I think is still is still totally viable in the AI world

00:45:25.219 --> 00:45:27.219
But it begs the question of like

00:45:27.219 --> 00:45:33.899
What what is it about those stories, you know, it's like the phrase like that rings true

00:45:33.899 --> 00:45:37.979
Like when you hear a truth, you don't you don't need a bunch of fucking explanation behind it

00:45:37.979 --> 00:45:41.580
It permeates through your body and you go. Ah, that's right

00:45:41.580 --> 00:45:45.020
And you don't you don't need like a whole thesis on why it's right

00:45:45.020 --> 00:45:47.260
Usually if you need a thesis on why something is, right?

00:45:48.820 --> 00:45:55.219
You're you're wrong you're doing mental gymnastics to justify something that's obviously clearly not wrong on the inside

00:45:55.219 --> 00:46:01.699
So, you know, it's it's like it's like the same game is being played where you you know, the lie, you know

00:46:01.699 --> 00:46:03.500
Well I gets all the way around the world, you know

00:46:03.500 --> 00:46:08.379
It gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on the truth is always behind the lie

00:46:08.899 --> 00:46:17.459
But like a glacier it just demolishes those lies over time and those those lies go by the wayside and the truth continues to

00:46:17.459 --> 00:46:19.459
propagate and permeate

00:46:19.459 --> 00:46:24.860
I don't really have a point there. I don't know. I don't know. I don't I don't I don't I don't I don't know

00:46:24.860 --> 00:46:30.419
I don't really have a point more just of an observation of like what a story what storytelling really is kind of an interesting little

00:46:30.860 --> 00:46:32.139
You know

00:46:32.139 --> 00:46:35.060
Well, yeah, that's why I think that's the positive. Yeah, go ahead on

00:46:35.060 --> 00:46:40.100
I was gonna say that's why Hollywood's failing is because it's not because AI has

00:46:40.340 --> 00:46:46.260
Opened the floodgates of filmmakers if because they started telling crappy stories. They started making bad movies

00:46:46.500 --> 00:46:53.780
They were making their own sea of garbage. And so the truth is the movie is the movies are bad

00:46:54.379 --> 00:47:01.419
Yeah, because they're not getting it they're not attempting to get in any kind of deeper truth, they're they're literally just fucking propaganda well, yeah

00:47:01.820 --> 00:47:07.040
They think it's a deeper truth, but it's it's not it's just like some BS support like

00:47:07.580 --> 00:47:10.100
Yeah, it's it's self-serving like that

00:47:10.100 --> 00:47:13.580
They're telling self-serving stories rather than audience serving stories

00:47:13.780 --> 00:47:18.419
Because like there's there's so many of these things where the odd like there is no demand for the stories that they're telling

00:47:18.419 --> 00:47:22.060
Yeah, like there is no demand like nobody wants to hear a lot of these stories

00:47:22.060 --> 00:47:26.419
Nobody wants to you know, like it that's just the reality. That's why if you don't get good ratings

00:47:26.419 --> 00:47:28.739
It's largely because you're not telling a compelling story

00:47:28.739 --> 00:47:33.659
there's obviously there could be other things but like one of the one of the things is like if you're not telling compelling stories that

00:47:33.659 --> 00:47:39.739
Actually relate to the real people and so I think this is the thing is like when these guys are getting so much money

00:47:40.419 --> 00:47:46.939
like when the when the checks are so big that you can afford to make a vanity project that is literally just in service of

00:47:46.939 --> 00:47:54.459
You or your your boutique ideology that you know that that's true of you and 20 people and you know in California or something like that

00:47:54.459 --> 00:47:57.899
Like you just it's the the incentives are misaligned

00:47:57.899 --> 00:48:01.100
And so this is where I'd be hopeful that as you move to scarce money

00:48:01.340 --> 00:48:04.139
Like you you move to like people where this is real

00:48:04.300 --> 00:48:05.699
decisions that have to be made

00:48:05.699 --> 00:48:12.020
People are not gonna be as willing to just cut the check for something that just is in service of a director and 50 people

00:48:12.139 --> 00:48:14.139
Hollywood like they're gonna they're gonna be more

00:48:14.300 --> 00:48:16.020
incentivized to try to make things

00:48:16.020 --> 00:48:22.580
Because their money won't be able to be made as easily by getting cheap loans or whatever if you return to like a real cost

00:48:22.580 --> 00:48:26.219
Of capital like I'm more optimistic that you're gonna start to get

00:48:26.899 --> 00:48:32.060
You know stuff produced content produced. I know you guys don't like that word, but like films produced that

00:48:32.580 --> 00:48:35.179
that that are actually in service of people and

00:48:35.979 --> 00:48:38.820
society as a result instead of just again a small group of

00:48:39.699 --> 00:48:44.780
You know people who have weird views on the world, but shameless plug shameless plug for Indy hub there

00:48:44.780 --> 00:48:47.020
I mean like a to your point gonna say that

00:48:47.899 --> 00:48:51.300
You you know you like to your point Jordan about getting ratioed on Twitter

00:48:51.459 --> 00:48:53.459
You know that used to be called the box office

00:48:53.459 --> 00:49:00.060
and if the fucking receipts weren't there you didn't have a fucking career like they voted you out immediately and

00:49:00.820 --> 00:49:05.459
the audience did exactly the audience did exactly and when we use a

00:49:06.179 --> 00:49:10.820
When you we get back to you know the idea of streaming value per second watched

00:49:11.820 --> 00:49:14.179
And people are actually voting with real money

00:49:17.500 --> 00:49:21.820
All of those incentives get realigned I mean right now the money is coming from publicly traded companies

00:49:21.899 --> 00:49:23.899
Those are a few people that have agendas

00:49:23.899 --> 00:49:28.820
But when the audience gets to start to vote again with with actual value you're gonna see

00:49:29.219 --> 00:49:34.300
You're gonna see society reward the stories and the truths to your point like if you say something that's not true

00:49:34.300 --> 00:49:37.379
You're gonna get ratioed if you tell a story, that's bad. You're not gonna get paid

00:49:38.179 --> 00:49:40.620
So if we can realign those incentives correctly

00:49:41.219 --> 00:49:46.020
The cream the cream will rise to the top. I mean it's no question

00:49:46.699 --> 00:49:51.139
Reputation I'm really important in the film world. Yeah agreed Jordan

00:49:51.139 --> 00:49:57.100
I made this point on your podcast a while back, but but but basically that money printing era in Hollywood

00:49:57.219 --> 00:50:03.719
Now what we now see is this massive contraction. It's been going about on about 18 months, but that money printing in Hollywood

00:50:04.300 --> 00:50:07.379
Flowed all this free money that was literally just printed

00:50:07.379 --> 00:50:13.219
You know there was there was no extra consumer demand and we went from a film industry that was about 2x consumer demand to a

00:50:13.219 --> 00:50:16.500
film industry that was about 6 or 7x consumer demand and then

00:50:16.860 --> 00:50:22.179
The interest rates rose and the free money train stopped and there's this massive contraction

00:50:22.179 --> 00:50:24.179
And there's all this hand wringing in

00:50:24.419 --> 00:50:30.860
Hollywood and and people blaming people like David Zaslav for cutting things at Warner Brothers and that sort of thing this massive

00:50:31.020 --> 00:50:35.820
Contraction back down to what the actual demand was and if you look at theatrical revenues

00:50:36.020 --> 00:50:43.139
They haven't actually moved very much. They've gone down by like three four percent a year, which is a very minor contraction, right?

00:50:43.179 --> 00:50:45.179
but the this

00:50:45.179 --> 00:50:50.219
devastation of Hollywood is literally just going from 6x revenue to 2x revenue and

00:50:50.540 --> 00:50:52.340
It was never there right there

00:50:52.340 --> 00:50:57.219
It was a shell game the entire time and just returning back to to that

00:50:57.300 --> 00:51:03.260
I'm optimistic for that right even as it's it's pretty devastating for you know for my industry

00:51:03.780 --> 00:51:05.379
I'm optimistic that

00:51:05.379 --> 00:51:11.899
Resettling around reality is the only way that it moves forward in any form like there was never gonna continue while we were completely in

00:51:12.260 --> 00:51:16.379
Fantasyland about what the consumer demand actually was yeah, yeah

00:51:17.419 --> 00:51:19.419
Do you guys think?

00:51:19.739 --> 00:51:21.739
the share so I

00:51:22.580 --> 00:51:28.699
Think it's interesting AI kind of feels like a new like a modern-day Babel where we're getting to this like

00:51:29.739 --> 00:51:35.739
Originally everybody could speak the same language and then Babel happened and then everybody was kind of bifurcated in their own little pockets

00:51:35.939 --> 00:51:39.479
Like tribalism again, and I feel like it's gonna be interesting

00:51:40.780 --> 00:51:45.060
You're gonna have those pockets that can now it's like if you want to make an anime movie about

00:51:45.500 --> 00:51:47.500
The

00:51:47.580 --> 00:51:54.620
Alphabet stuff or whatever it is like you can do that and you can make one that's like hyper focused on like what being

00:51:55.219 --> 00:51:58.979
Pansexual is or whatever and I'm just like picking something. That's so specific

00:51:58.979 --> 00:52:04.659
But you can do that and if you want to try to tell a good story about it your market that that's that really small

00:52:04.659 --> 00:52:07.939
Fringe market will be able to tell you instantaneously you like it or it's like hey

00:52:07.939 --> 00:52:10.699
I'm an aviator and I want to make something about like really

00:52:11.419 --> 00:52:12.939
unique

00:52:12.939 --> 00:52:14.540
intricate systems about this

00:52:14.540 --> 00:52:21.060
Tim's about the difference between fly-by-wire and old like OG like flying with like actual hydraulics

00:52:21.060 --> 00:52:26.179
like you can go in and you can try and like make these nuanced pieces of content YouTube is a little bit of that but

00:52:26.179 --> 00:52:28.699
I think what we're in for is actually a

00:52:31.459 --> 00:52:37.840
Like a flippening to use the the F term you guys use Solana, right but like a flippening of

00:52:38.780 --> 00:52:40.379
storytelling to where

00:52:40.379 --> 00:52:44.540
We'll actually get a new mainstream if that makes sense, like we're gonna get a new

00:52:45.620 --> 00:52:50.179
Way for people to all be on the same thing. I hope it's Indy hub, but it's gonna be a a

00:52:51.860 --> 00:52:56.699
New way for us to talk about what's kind of coming out or what's that shared experience of the entire world?

00:52:57.540 --> 00:53:01.139
And I'm curious to see what it's gonna be because it's gonna be it's gonna be interesting. I

00:53:03.459 --> 00:53:07.360
Do agree I think that's a good analogy like we are definitely bifurcating

00:53:08.360 --> 00:53:12.760
No question and the question is how long are we gonna bifurcate and then where is the party gonna be at?

00:53:13.199 --> 00:53:18.120
After we all decide that bifurcation wasn't the greatest thing ever part is gonna be the big corners

00:53:18.639 --> 00:53:26.120
Yeah, no doubt these studios and the platforms they have legally they own a lot of these films

00:53:26.120 --> 00:53:33.040
So they own like the Miramax library. They own certain titles and so companies like Netflix Amazon Hulu

00:53:33.639 --> 00:53:35.639
HBO Disney, whatever

00:53:35.760 --> 00:53:40.199
They're gonna have older films if you want to go and stream those movies

00:53:40.199 --> 00:53:44.159
If you don't want to just steal them or whatever, you're gonna go to those platforms. They're gonna use those things

00:53:44.159 --> 00:53:47.399
There are going to be people that continue to use those platforms

00:53:47.399 --> 00:53:49.399
Some of them may fail some of them may succeed

00:53:49.600 --> 00:53:56.479
But there there is and this is already happening gonna be a whole new round of filmmakers who can

00:53:56.800 --> 00:54:04.439
Either use Bitcoin to finance movies use AI tools make them much cheaper and put them on their own

00:54:04.760 --> 00:54:09.399
Platforms people will go to places like indie hub where they can spend the little amount of Bitcoin

00:54:09.520 --> 00:54:16.739
They know this filmmaker is not going to put what if it's the leftist crap that's getting ham-fisted into storylines

00:54:16.800 --> 00:54:22.600
I'm not gonna get any of that. I'm gonna get this certain type of movie. This person's got a new one coming out

00:54:22.600 --> 00:54:24.120
I'm going to pay

00:54:24.120 --> 00:54:30.000
Like a thousand sats and I'm gonna sit down and watch this movie and it's gonna be exactly what I want to see

00:54:30.000 --> 00:54:32.439
And it's going to I don't know

00:54:32.439 --> 00:54:34.439
I mean, maybe it's gonna be the new mainstream

00:54:34.479 --> 00:54:41.159
but it's definitely gonna be a lot of really good filmmaking that you can go and pay a little bit of money for and

00:54:41.159 --> 00:54:43.540
Get a really good product for and it is going to

00:54:44.280 --> 00:54:52.360
Decimate this old structure that's existed for however long it's existed for in its current iteration of Hollywood

00:54:52.719 --> 00:54:57.719
that is dying and a new thing is is rising up and and Bitcoin is gonna

00:54:58.000 --> 00:55:03.080
Definitely help that because people are gonna pay in Bitcoin to watch the story. You guys answer an uncouth question

00:55:03.080 --> 00:55:05.520
That's totally off topic, but actually kind of relevant

00:55:06.080 --> 00:55:08.080
Do you guys think?

00:55:08.560 --> 00:55:12.320
slavery comes back and I actually mean that in a in a

00:55:13.320 --> 00:55:15.320
Here here

00:55:20.879 --> 00:55:26.919
Everyone in the world the slave right now, but yeah, but that's it's been alive in 71, dude. So that's actually

00:55:31.639 --> 00:55:38.919
But but but you know seriousness like I'm very curious because I'm going through the Old Testament right now and it talks about

00:55:39.520 --> 00:55:41.520
Like as Moses is handing over

00:55:42.360 --> 00:55:47.639
You know the the the new promised land to the Israelites he's basically like hey

00:55:48.199 --> 00:55:52.459
You're gonna put up these new stone tablets that are kind of big and they're gonna write all this stuff on them

00:55:52.679 --> 00:55:58.239
But one of the like big sections in there is basically about like slaves. It's like hey if you're a slave

00:55:58.879 --> 00:56:04.239
You can get out of your slavery at this point in time, but if you don't want to not be a slave anymore

00:56:04.959 --> 00:56:08.959
Then your master is responsible for you. And so where I'm going with this is like

00:56:09.360 --> 00:56:11.360
Are we gonna get to like a new

00:56:11.679 --> 00:56:17.320
serfdom or seat like like are we gonna get to a different alignment of things because we're taught with all of the

00:56:18.120 --> 00:56:21.239
Myths right that that Hollywood perpetuates slavery is bad

00:56:21.239 --> 00:56:25.280
but at the end of the day when you really think about it like if all you want to do is scroll on tik-tok and

00:56:25.280 --> 00:56:31.439
Find somebody you can go bang on tinder. You're already a slave. It's like I don't know. I'm just curious

00:56:32.199 --> 00:56:34.199
No

00:56:34.439 --> 00:56:39.360
Okay, I'll go first because your follow-up will be more important like I've talked to all you guys about this I think

00:56:40.479 --> 00:56:43.399
Individually, but I have this like spicy take about AI

00:56:44.239 --> 00:56:48.199
Kind of being the rapture a little bit because there's a bunch of people

00:56:48.439 --> 00:56:49.959
Who are who are not?

00:56:49.959 --> 00:56:56.639
They're not gonna be able to discern the truth and their responsibility of following the truth and being productive within the truth and moving

00:56:57.080 --> 00:57:01.239
Humanity forward moving consciousness forward by being servants of the truth

00:57:02.639 --> 00:57:03.679
You know

00:57:03.679 --> 00:57:07.919
They're just gonna be thrown back in the fucking washing machine until they figure it out in the next

00:57:08.000 --> 00:57:11.959
6,000 years or whatever when their soul comes back and they got to figure out who the fucking boss is

00:57:12.199 --> 00:57:16.360
Like you have to decide that you're a servant of the truth that you're a warrior of God

00:57:16.360 --> 00:57:22.959
However, you want to say it and if you're just gonna get totally overcome and overtaken by technology AI

00:57:23.840 --> 00:57:28.479
Tinder whatever it is. You're just a slave to dopamine to JD's point

00:57:28.479 --> 00:57:34.959
so I think that this technology back to you know to the point of being the age of discernment all of this technology is

00:57:35.159 --> 00:57:42.280
Forcing us to to ask ourselves who are actual who is the boss and what are we doing? What is the truth?

00:57:42.959 --> 00:57:48.840
Yeah. Yeah, I think one of the camera we've read so on the shout to the thank God for Nostra podcast

00:57:48.840 --> 00:57:51.959
I go go subscribe, but we we talked about this a lot

00:57:51.959 --> 00:57:53.959
we talked about like AI and

00:57:54.199 --> 00:57:57.199
And like VR and stuff and I Kimber who we were talking about

00:57:57.199 --> 00:58:02.159
But basically his his contention it was some well-known billionaire. It might have been Eli

00:58:02.159 --> 00:58:03.879
I don't I don't remember it might have been Zuckerberg

00:58:03.879 --> 00:58:09.760
But basically his contention was he was it was this pretty cynical take of there's gonna be hyper wealthy people

00:58:10.000 --> 00:58:13.840
who are gonna actually be able to afford to travel and to you know,

00:58:13.840 --> 00:58:20.439
Like afford life and do all these things and then there's gonna be people who are just they experience all those things virtually

00:58:20.439 --> 00:58:25.360
So you're gonna have a VR you're gonna go on like a VR vacation and you're gonna have like your VR porn

00:58:25.360 --> 00:58:30.919
you're gonna have all these kind of things and so like he just had this idea this, you know, this vision of like a

00:58:31.439 --> 00:58:37.199
You know again, it's it is kind of good. It's very dystopian but of like where you have large

00:58:38.199 --> 00:58:39.439
You know

00:58:39.439 --> 00:58:43.959
Where you have large income inequality and you have this, you know, you have like assets

00:58:43.959 --> 00:58:49.199
It's extreme asset thing where again even in the best-case scenario the people who are rich today

00:58:49.479 --> 00:58:52.719
They're gonna get Bitcoin and they're gonna be able to have even more Bitcoin

00:58:52.719 --> 00:58:54.719
and so just like this idea of

00:58:54.959 --> 00:59:01.040
you know like this being part of the use case for you know for AI and this part being part of the use case for

00:59:01.600 --> 00:59:09.439
For VR. Yeah, whatever it is virtual reality. Yeah, I just think like I could see it getting really really bad in a lot of ways

00:59:09.780 --> 00:59:11.520
We can keep going down that path

00:59:11.520 --> 00:59:15.360
I had I did have one more question for Zach like in terms of the in terms of the festival

00:59:15.959 --> 00:59:19.360
Like here's a question so here this would be like a more or less

00:59:20.679 --> 00:59:21.679
less

00:59:21.679 --> 00:59:24.040
awful use of you know unless

00:59:24.560 --> 00:59:29.719
This would be more fun use like is that was there any talk of doing like a kind of a good choose your own

00:59:29.919 --> 00:59:32.600
Adventure story for like some of these old films

00:59:32.600 --> 00:59:36.719
So if you're looking at somebody like Miramax and they're trying to figure out how can we monetize?

00:59:37.000 --> 00:59:39.399
These existing properties that we already have

00:59:40.080 --> 00:59:43.360
Here's one example. So on the the rewatchables podcast

00:59:43.800 --> 00:59:49.679
They do this they have like all these categories that they go through and one of the stories or one of the categories is would

00:59:49.679 --> 00:59:53.320
This movie have been better if it had Tom Cruise or Tom Hanks

00:59:53.520 --> 00:59:59.439
And so I'm like could you could you see a world where you can take some of these old movies and you could literally pop?

00:59:59.439 --> 01:00:04.879
In Tom Hanks like to this movie and like experience all these like parallel universes

01:00:04.919 --> 01:00:07.560
Like is that could you see something like that happening?

01:00:07.560 --> 01:00:10.600
I get obviously I think it's it's possible to actually do it

01:00:10.600 --> 01:00:15.800
But do you think like that would make sense on the business side of things or the where the interests align in any way to

01:00:15.800 --> 01:00:21.239
Kind of make that happen something like that before you answer. We did an entire podcast on this

01:00:25.360 --> 01:00:28.399
Yeah, exactly and I'd like to the figure out what number it is, but

01:00:30.439 --> 01:00:32.199
What you know, I think

01:00:32.199 --> 01:00:33.719
we

01:00:33.719 --> 01:00:35.320
Yes, it's possible

01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:41.719
You know choose your own adventure has actually been a thing, you know just in theater like live theater, you know

01:00:41.719 --> 01:00:46.080
That was a format for plays for a long time kind of like 3d movies. Just never really took off

01:00:46.520 --> 01:00:48.520
I think it's possible

01:00:48.520 --> 01:00:52.080
But I think what's actually gonna happen is the choose your own adventure AI

01:00:52.360 --> 01:00:55.520
Generated stories that are the most fun are actually going to be video games

01:00:56.439 --> 01:00:58.919
Okay, we're basically already there

01:00:59.600 --> 01:01:03.800
And as AI starts to kind of program, you know

01:01:04.320 --> 01:01:11.239
Program the real like imagine Skyrim, but where all of the NPCs are our AI's and they're having organic conversations with you

01:01:11.239 --> 01:01:12.959
I think that's gonna be

01:01:12.959 --> 01:01:14.959
infinitely more stimulating than like

01:01:15.360 --> 01:01:20.120
Watching the same script or story structure play out with a new face on it

01:01:20.879 --> 01:01:21.760
You know what? I mean?

01:01:21.760 --> 01:01:23.120
Like it might be interesting for a little bit

01:01:23.120 --> 01:01:26.719
But I don't I don't know if there's gonna be any any big viable

01:01:26.840 --> 01:01:31.600
Return on investment for doing something like that and then sure and then you're also dealing with rights issues

01:01:31.719 --> 01:01:35.280
Yes, that's kind of more where my question was coming in like how does that work?

01:01:35.280 --> 01:01:37.919
I know people are super protective over rights and all that kind of stuff

01:01:37.919 --> 01:01:43.520
So yeah in likeness and and then so they're already gonna they're already doing that and they're already gonna continue doing that

01:01:43.520 --> 01:01:47.120
That's what's what's interesting though on this this whole thing. That is actually

01:01:47.840 --> 01:01:54.199
Blizzard used quite a bit of AI in the and I might be I think I'm like 90% correct on this

01:01:54.199 --> 01:01:56.360
I don't play video games

01:01:56.360 --> 01:02:01.000
But I saw and I was reading something about like Diablo 3 or Diablo 7 or whatever the hell it is right now

01:02:01.199 --> 01:02:03.360
in the new Diablo 4

01:02:05.479 --> 01:02:12.399
The way the dungeons are made is actually AI generated which is it's like they basically have plot points and then let's say here's the

01:02:12.399 --> 01:02:16.120
big bad guy you got to have some of these things in there, but the

01:02:16.840 --> 01:02:22.040
the theory behind it from an engineering perspective is it's like an SVG graphic if you're familiar a

01:02:22.560 --> 01:02:29.639
Png is like a an image right or a JPEG that you're not traditionally aware of which is essentially like the computer has to know

01:02:29.639 --> 01:02:36.120
okay, pixel 1 is white and then pixel 2 is blue and then pixel 3 is this an

01:02:36.600 --> 01:02:42.639
SVG is a math equation. So you get to a point where it's infinitely says stands for a scalable vector graphic

01:02:43.280 --> 01:02:45.919
infinitely big or infinitely small and so

01:02:46.639 --> 01:02:52.760
What's gonna be more interesting is actually it's essentially using geometry. Like if you guys know the like the perfect

01:02:53.560 --> 01:02:58.719
Like circle thing that goes all the way down. I'm blanking on what it is. Yeah, but it's like in geometry

01:02:58.959 --> 01:03:00.600
Yeah

01:03:00.600 --> 01:03:07.239
Obviously, yeah, but you're talking about procedurally generated. Yes, and so it's gonna be and awesome

01:03:07.239 --> 01:03:10.080
Thank you camera for freezing at this perfect moment in time

01:03:10.199 --> 01:03:14.280
but it's like the the point where I'm going with this is

01:03:14.840 --> 01:03:19.520
the choose-your-own-adventure piece to Zach's point that I totally agree with is

01:03:20.760 --> 01:03:23.040
actually going to be a misnomer because

01:03:24.040 --> 01:03:28.320
You don't actually want to choose your own adventure like if it really comes down to it

01:03:28.320 --> 01:03:32.280
What you want is you want to go on a quest and you want to know?

01:03:32.800 --> 01:03:39.080
What you're questing for but you want to be surprised on the way. Yeah. Yeah, and so the journey will change

01:03:39.639 --> 01:03:41.639
But the destination is the same

01:03:41.879 --> 01:03:47.639
Interestingly enough like if you look at it from that context JD like the choose if you want to choose your own adventure

01:03:47.639 --> 01:03:50.080
You get to go be a filmmaker and you get to make a movie using AI

01:03:50.399 --> 01:03:54.959
You now are choosing your adventure and then all the people who don't want to choose their own adventure get to like oh

01:03:54.959 --> 01:03:56.439
I'll go on that one with you

01:03:56.439 --> 01:03:56.939
Yeah

01:03:56.939 --> 01:04:01.840
But I actually think what you just said is unique and I didn't even think about that until right now and just kind of using

01:04:01.840 --> 01:04:03.840
That framework that I just set up

01:04:04.080 --> 01:04:08.479
It would be really really interesting to have diehard where every single character is Tom Hanks

01:04:08.639 --> 01:04:14.159
right or have diehard where every single character was Tom Cruise and I just mean that in the thing if it's like

01:04:14.479 --> 01:04:19.280
The beauty of this choose your own adventure of the future is not necessarily that it's choose your own story

01:04:19.800 --> 01:04:27.360
But it's gonna choose your own band of motley characters to to live out. It's basically Dungeons and Dragons, but you know

01:04:27.760 --> 01:04:33.479
With a little more defined storyline to it. I mean we already have that with memes right like the smash mouth where

01:04:34.679 --> 01:04:40.600
The song is just hey now. Hey now. Hey just goes on. Yeah, I'm just imagining again

01:04:40.600 --> 01:04:46.239
I was imagining something like again. Yeah, so it'd be like Jerry Maguire or something again

01:04:46.239 --> 01:04:49.639
The incentives don't align for them to actually go back and touch something like that

01:04:49.639 --> 01:04:53.280
But if there was it'd be like if there was a project it'd be it'd have to be less loved

01:04:53.280 --> 01:04:58.239
It'd have to be some kind of project that was like more middling and they're like, hey, maybe we could you know

01:04:58.239 --> 01:05:03.120
If we changed out this actor or again, you take like this new actor. We popped him back in there

01:05:03.120 --> 01:05:05.919
You know, how would it and so like there would be some sort of intrigue?

01:05:07.520 --> 01:05:11.760
What I would personally love to see though are actually things that died because of

01:05:12.199 --> 01:05:19.239
Somebody dying so for instance like yeah, I would love to see what that man three would have been if he'd ledger hadn't died

01:05:19.919 --> 01:05:22.800
Right, like that's what I would love is like I'd love to see that

01:05:24.520 --> 01:05:28.560
Yeah, I appreciate this is a thought experiment but as fast as AI is moving

01:05:28.560 --> 01:05:34.080
I don't think we're anywhere close from AI being able to replicate a good a great actor

01:05:34.239 --> 01:05:39.159
Giving a great performance that they prepared for and executed. I honestly don't think it's anywhere close

01:05:39.159 --> 01:05:43.959
I think I think it's I think it'd be fun. I think it'd be funny, especially for for more middling things

01:05:43.959 --> 01:05:49.120
But yeah, I mean if you tried to recreate with AI what Heath Ledger did in the dark night

01:05:49.120 --> 01:05:54.679
It would be so obvious that it wasn't him. Even if it looked the exact same

01:05:54.679 --> 01:05:57.360
There's I don't think we're anywhere close to that. Okay, I think

01:05:58.280 --> 01:06:00.280
Have you guys ever noticed on that?

01:06:01.479 --> 01:06:06.959
I agree 100% what you're saying Corey the the I guess the piece of where I'm saying though is the

01:06:07.600 --> 01:06:12.560
The beauty of like an LLM or the the large language models for AI is putting in

01:06:12.919 --> 01:06:17.080
Like you've put in this framework and so more of what it is. I actually I actually think

01:06:18.239 --> 01:06:24.800
It wouldn't work unless a human did it first and I guess that's where I'm going is like he's put in all of that

01:06:24.879 --> 01:06:32.679
Effort to create that Joker and so it's like what is another existence or another premonition of that Joker in that world?

01:06:33.040 --> 01:06:38.399
Based on AI now again AI is gonna make different decisions than Heathwood because he's gonna go have lunch with somebody and they're gonna give

01:06:38.399 --> 01:06:39.399
Him an idea and it's gonna like that

01:06:39.399 --> 01:06:45.239
But but I do think it's just an interesting thing, but I do think a human would need to prime it the prompt, right?

01:06:46.080 --> 01:06:50.280
What's both very cool about AI and can be horrifying?

01:06:50.280 --> 01:06:57.800
And if you've ever watched Black Mirror or read any old science fiction, that is no longer science fiction like

01:06:58.600 --> 01:07:06.639
Anything that you can imagine that AI is capable of doing it will eventually do these things all will eventually happen like

01:07:06.719 --> 01:07:12.280
Eventually you want to be the main character and die hard get in VR and it's no longer

01:07:12.840 --> 01:07:15.239
Bruce Willis you are that person and

01:07:15.840 --> 01:07:21.959
And then like think of like an Apple Vision Pro and you can take a movie and it will just expand all the scenes

01:07:21.959 --> 01:07:26.159
So now you can watch the movie, but you can also see like everything else that's going on

01:07:26.399 --> 01:07:31.280
But I will just say this I am confident from like a biblical perspective

01:07:31.919 --> 01:07:36.800
That there's nothing new under the Sun even though all there's all these advancements

01:07:37.120 --> 01:07:42.080
we're still just human beings and we like a certain type of storytelling and

01:07:43.159 --> 01:07:48.040
Everything that has that is going to come all already in some

01:07:48.800 --> 01:07:52.560
Version has existed in the past before that technology existed

01:07:52.560 --> 01:07:59.399
And so in the future, we still will like a very similar type of storytelling and I I mean, this is my personal opinion

01:07:59.399 --> 01:08:07.239
I think what we consider to be Hollywood is cyclical and it's all going to come back in in in a new form with new

01:08:07.360 --> 01:08:09.360
technology, but still the same

01:08:09.639 --> 01:08:11.159
so

01:08:11.159 --> 01:08:12.560
We can

01:08:12.560 --> 01:08:14.560
This is kind of a question for the group

01:08:15.679 --> 01:08:19.799
But how many of you have heard of the philosophical idea of a view from nowhere?

01:08:20.799 --> 01:08:27.560
Nope and note-takers. Okay. So the idea of that a view from nowhere it refers to this idea of we all have a perspective

01:08:28.200 --> 01:08:32.279
Right. So like Anton's perspective is going to be different than my perspective

01:08:32.600 --> 01:08:38.040
You know, we see some of the same things because you know, we live in proximity to each other

01:08:38.040 --> 01:08:40.040
So we like interact at the same places

01:08:41.600 --> 01:08:49.439
But fundamentally our perspectives are completely different right despite the fact of all the things we have in common North America, for instance

01:08:49.799 --> 01:08:51.799
It's a huge thing in common now

01:08:52.680 --> 01:08:57.200
everybody has their own perspective and then those perspectives have

01:08:58.120 --> 01:09:03.140
Problems in that it's hard to arbitrate truth between perspectives that are

01:09:03.839 --> 01:09:10.080
In conflict right now if you have if you have a perspective here and you have a perspective here

01:09:10.560 --> 01:09:17.720
The guy who has the perspective way up here can see the whole map and understands that like no this has not seen this thing

01:09:17.720 --> 01:09:23.240
It's outside of this guy's field of view and vice versa, right and therefore we can reconcile the conflict, right?

01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:28.120
it's like that that that that picture of like a you've got like a

01:09:28.479 --> 01:09:34.839
Cylinder and a light shining in two different angles and on the shadow of this looks like a square and the shadow over here

01:09:34.839 --> 01:09:41.479
Correct. Yeah, like whatever. Yeah, this is true. This is true. And then the overarching is this is truth. Yes. Yep, exactly. Perfect

01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:43.520
Okay, so

01:09:43.520 --> 01:09:45.520
with filmmaking with all the other

01:09:45.959 --> 01:09:49.040
Mediums and creative endeavors. We are telling a story

01:09:49.560 --> 01:09:56.720
From a perspective and what gives that perspective meaning is that it's our perspective and we can you know, have have interacted with this

01:09:57.359 --> 01:10:00.959
Our reality in it, you know other people have similar things

01:10:00.959 --> 01:10:07.120
And so there's a relationship there and all that now AI also has a perspective. It's not a

01:10:08.240 --> 01:10:14.040
Different like it's not a different perspective each time. It's like just the you know a universal perspective and it's not God's perspective either

01:10:14.160 --> 01:10:16.160
Because God would be the ultimate perspective, right?

01:10:17.359 --> 01:10:22.439
But AI only has the one perspective you have to train another AI model to get another perspective

01:10:23.279 --> 01:10:25.319
whereas a filmmaker will have

01:10:26.560 --> 01:10:32.000
his own unique perspective and a different filmmaker will have his own unique perspective and there's

01:10:32.439 --> 01:10:38.959
Thousands and thousands of filmmakers all gonna have their own unique perspective. I think that is where it's like

01:10:40.160 --> 01:10:42.959
the economics unless and unless the

01:10:44.040 --> 01:10:48.839
unless they're able to figure out a way to make AI crazy cheap where you can just

01:10:49.359 --> 01:10:52.720
run and train your own eyes for a couple hundred bucks like

01:10:53.479 --> 01:10:54.640
it's

01:10:54.640 --> 01:10:58.439
Bro, the human experience is just expansive beyond

01:10:59.279 --> 01:11:03.640
what computers will be able to do in terms of storytelling and porn in terms of

01:11:04.799 --> 01:11:11.720
Producing content that's that's new and unique because reality is informing us of our perspectives and then we get to

01:11:12.120 --> 01:11:14.640
Respond to that and have a new

01:11:15.720 --> 01:11:17.720
story a new take

01:11:18.399 --> 01:11:24.520
yeah, one of the things that was really clear about about the films from the AI film fest was that

01:11:25.399 --> 01:11:32.839
Everything came down to writing basically and your specificity and prompting and that specificity is coming from from your own perspective to your point

01:11:33.839 --> 01:11:35.839
and

01:11:36.479 --> 01:11:40.359
There's just an infinite amount of iterations of that it's inconceivable

01:11:41.479 --> 01:11:42.720
hopefully

01:11:42.720 --> 01:11:48.319
humans continue to use AI as the tool and AI doesn't use us as the tool and

01:11:48.439 --> 01:11:52.720
Put us in little pods where it sucks the heat energy out of our bodies

01:11:53.640 --> 01:11:56.520
This sounds like a really great idea for a good movie

01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:01.120
Corn hub

01:12:01.520 --> 01:12:04.799
My second favorite movie title of all the titles

01:12:06.359 --> 01:12:11.520
Alright team, this is the yeah. Yeah think we're think we're think we're near it

01:12:12.399 --> 01:12:18.439
Wrapping it up if you're into supporting filmmakers and you want to fucking stream and value go to indie hub studio

01:12:18.520 --> 01:12:25.479
Hit me up at indie hub. We'll give you a discount code. It'll be dope. We're new. We're in beta. It's small. It's growing

01:12:26.200 --> 01:12:28.200
That's what you said

01:12:29.479 --> 01:12:31.479
This is beta this is beta

01:12:32.200 --> 01:12:34.200
I

01:12:34.680 --> 01:12:36.680
Guess cheers