This story was originally published on HackerNoon at:
https://hackernoon.com/can-chess-moves-be-verified-on-chain-the-answer-is-zero-knowledge-proofs.
zkautochess, ZeroKing, and a zkEmail referee prove chess moves were legal on-chain. None of them can catch a player consulting Stockfish.
Check more stories related to web3 at:
https://hackernoon.com/c/web3.
You can also check exclusive content about
#zero-knowledge-proofs,
#web3,
#chess,
#gaming,
#decentralization,
#cryptography,
#future-of-nfts,
#applied-cryptography, and more.
This story was written by:
@sriram-ramakrishnan. Learn more about this writer by checking
@sriram-ramakrishnan's about page,
and for more stories, please visit
hackernoon.com.
Zero-knowledge proofs let you prove a chess move was legal, or that a game ended in checkmate, without revealing the moves themselves. A small cluster of hackathon projects and research efforts — zkautochess, a Mina-based build called ZeroKing, a play-by-email "zkChess" referee, and general-purpose frameworks like ZkNoid — have actually built versions of this. It's a genuinely interesting corner of applied cryptography. It's also worth being honest about what it doesn't solve: proving circuits are expensive, chess has a large rule surface, and no proof can stop someone from quietly consulting an engine before typing a move in.