WEBVTT

00:00:00.180 --> 00:00:00.600
Matt Abrahams: Hi.

00:00:00.720 --> 00:00:01.380
Matt here.

00:00:01.830 --> 00:00:04.410
Our world is getting
more and more complex.

00:00:04.710 --> 00:00:07.890
When communicating about complexity
we need to work to make ideas

00:00:07.890 --> 00:00:12.720
accessible rather than simply
dumb things down or oversimplify.

00:00:13.290 --> 00:00:17.400
We're diving into our archive to bring
you a Rethinks episode where I speak

00:00:17.400 --> 00:00:22.529
with Lauren Weinstein about specific
techniques we can use to help our audience

00:00:22.529 --> 00:00:25.169
better understand our complex topics.

00:00:25.754 --> 00:00:30.374
Enjoy one of our very first, but
still very relevant episodes.

00:00:32.474 --> 00:00:35.804
We've all been in situations where
someone explained something to us that

00:00:35.804 --> 00:00:39.765
went over our heads or didn't land
because it wasn't relevant or meaningful.

00:00:41.384 --> 00:00:42.474
I'm Matt Abrahams.

00:00:42.494 --> 00:00:46.989
I teach strategic communication at
Stanford's Graduate School of Business.

00:00:47.530 --> 00:00:50.830
Welcome to Think Fast
Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:00:52.870 --> 00:00:56.890
In this episode, we'll chat with
Lauren Weinstein as we explore specific

00:00:56.890 --> 00:01:00.640
techniques you can use to help your
audience understand the complex

00:01:00.640 --> 00:01:02.440
information that you need them to.

00:01:02.979 --> 00:01:06.610
In other words, we hope to find the
antidote to the curse of knowledge.

00:01:07.750 --> 00:01:08.494
Hey, Lauren, how are you doing?

00:01:09.690 --> 00:01:10.000
Lauren Weinstein: Great.

00:01:10.020 --> 00:01:11.250
Glad to be with you here today.

00:01:11.490 --> 00:01:13.770
Matt Abrahams: Like me, Lauren
is a lecturer at Stanford's

00:01:13.770 --> 00:01:14.970
Graduate School of Business.

00:01:15.089 --> 00:01:17.910
Together for over five years,
we've co-taught a class on

00:01:17.910 --> 00:01:19.110
strategic communication.

00:01:19.259 --> 00:01:23.100
In addition to this work, she also
has a very popular TEDx talk called

00:01:23.100 --> 00:01:24.929
Don't Believe Everything You Think.

00:01:25.350 --> 00:01:28.589
So Lauren, as teachers and coaches
we often have to explain complex

00:01:28.589 --> 00:01:32.610
ideas so others can understand them,
but lots of other folks also have to

00:01:32.639 --> 00:01:36.839
take complex technical or scientific
information and make it accessible.

00:01:37.380 --> 00:01:40.229
Can you talk about some of the
examples you use in class that you've

00:01:40.229 --> 00:01:41.759
seen where people need to do this?

00:01:42.059 --> 00:01:42.359
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:01:42.359 --> 00:01:43.499
I see this all the time.

00:01:43.499 --> 00:01:47.190
I see it with doctors, scientists,
researchers, when they need to

00:01:47.190 --> 00:01:50.520
communicate their content to
lay-audiences, whether it's at a

00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:52.559
conference or they're seeking funding.

00:01:53.160 --> 00:01:56.429
I see it a lot in business when
engineers have to communicate with

00:01:56.429 --> 00:02:01.080
product managers, when marketing teams
need to communicate with customers, and

00:02:01.080 --> 00:02:05.190
then also when executives and founders
need to communicate their strategy,

00:02:05.190 --> 00:02:09.060
for example, to their org and get
everyone on board and in alignment.

00:02:09.150 --> 00:02:12.630
And then also, of course, with startup,
they have constantly needing to

00:02:12.660 --> 00:02:17.460
pitch investors and sell to customers
and make whatever their product or

00:02:17.460 --> 00:02:19.890
service is more accessible for them.

00:02:20.640 --> 00:02:23.549
Matt Abrahams: It sounds like
almost everybody has situations.

00:02:23.609 --> 00:02:23.700
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:02:23.700 --> 00:02:24.209
Across the board.

00:02:24.329 --> 00:02:24.959
Matt Abrahams: Yeah.

00:02:25.050 --> 00:02:28.019
In our class we spend a lot
of time talking about being in

00:02:28.019 --> 00:02:31.800
service of the audience rather
than just focusing on the content.

00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:33.660
Do you wanna share a few of
your thoughts about being

00:02:33.660 --> 00:02:35.459
audience-centric and what that means?

00:02:35.760 --> 00:02:36.120
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:02:36.120 --> 00:02:39.269
Whenever I work with a new client,
no matter who they are or what

00:02:39.269 --> 00:02:43.350
their topic is, the first question I
always ask is, who is your audience?

00:02:43.380 --> 00:02:45.149
And what do they care about most?

00:02:45.180 --> 00:02:47.490
Uh, and I'll give you an
example of why this matters.

00:02:47.519 --> 00:02:52.305
In 2001, Apple and Steve Jobs
came out with the original iPod.

00:02:52.515 --> 00:02:56.475
The engineers were really excited because
it was going to be five gigabytes of data.

00:02:56.834 --> 00:02:57.825
So exciting for them.

00:02:57.825 --> 00:03:02.025
But if they came out with this message to
audiences and customers, less exciting,

00:03:02.025 --> 00:03:03.435
they didn't know what that means.

00:03:03.435 --> 00:03:04.454
Is, is that a lot?

00:03:04.665 --> 00:03:08.235
So instead they said a
thousand songs in your pocket.

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:09.510
Matt Abrahams: I remember that.

00:03:09.720 --> 00:03:10.200
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:03:10.200 --> 00:03:13.710
So they spoke in a way that was
aligned with their audience's level of

00:03:13.710 --> 00:03:15.270
knowledge and what they cared about.

00:03:15.270 --> 00:03:18.900
They cared about how many songs they
could fit, and so it's really important

00:03:18.900 --> 00:03:22.320
to speak in a way that's aligned with
your audience's level of knowledge, but

00:03:22.320 --> 00:03:26.430
also in terms of what they care about most
and, and translating it to that extent.

00:03:26.670 --> 00:03:27.360
Matt Abrahams: Absolutely.

00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:30.630
And I think that example really
highlights how people can fixate

00:03:30.630 --> 00:03:34.140
on the specific information rather
than thinking about what's relevant

00:03:34.140 --> 00:03:35.640
and important to their audience.

00:03:35.640 --> 00:03:37.470
It's really about what the audience needs.

00:03:38.084 --> 00:03:42.015
Beyond that audience-centric approach,
uh, I've also found that people tend

00:03:42.015 --> 00:03:46.425
to provide more information than is
needed to help their audience really

00:03:46.425 --> 00:03:47.665
understand what they're saying.

00:03:48.255 --> 00:03:50.715
You know, it reminds me, I, I know
I've shared this with you before,

00:03:50.715 --> 00:03:52.155
my mother has this wonderful saying.

00:03:52.215 --> 00:03:55.125
It's tell me the time,
don't build me the clock.

00:03:55.155 --> 00:03:58.455
We really need to help people
get to the bottom line earlier.

00:03:58.545 --> 00:04:01.725
We have to communicate concisely,
especially when we're dealing

00:04:01.725 --> 00:04:03.435
with complex information.

00:04:03.525 --> 00:04:08.025
You know, I think with this idea of
being audience-centric and concise, we

00:04:08.025 --> 00:04:12.105
can really get into some of the specific
tools that folks can use to help make

00:04:12.105 --> 00:04:14.775
their complex information more accessible.

00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:17.850
Can you share with me an example of
someone you've worked with who did a

00:04:17.850 --> 00:04:21.480
really good job explaining something
complex, to get us started looking

00:04:21.480 --> 00:04:23.520
at these particular tools people use?

00:04:23.880 --> 00:04:24.210
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:04:24.210 --> 00:04:24.840
Happy to.

00:04:24.900 --> 00:04:27.630
I worked with a TED speaker a while back.

00:04:27.810 --> 00:04:32.070
His talk was about a treatment that
he developed for age-related diseases

00:04:32.070 --> 00:04:34.080
such as Alzheimer's and dementia.

00:04:34.200 --> 00:04:38.280
When he first came to me, his first
draft talked a lot about mitochondria

00:04:38.280 --> 00:04:40.560
and prokaryotic cells and cell membranes.

00:04:41.250 --> 00:04:43.860
Which is really exciting for
him and other scientists.

00:04:43.890 --> 00:04:47.700
But speaking to a lay-audience, a TED
audience, it was a bit too technical

00:04:47.700 --> 00:04:49.470
for them and, and less engaging.

00:04:49.470 --> 00:04:52.110
So first we had him start with a story.

00:04:52.290 --> 00:04:55.920
He told the story of his father who
had Alzheimer's disease and what

00:04:55.920 --> 00:04:57.480
it was like to see that decline.

00:04:57.730 --> 00:05:01.720
He established a personal connection
and he started sharing his content

00:05:01.720 --> 00:05:04.600
in a way that the audience could
really connect to and relate with.

00:05:04.840 --> 00:05:09.040
Then he asked the audience questions, so,
how many of you, you know someone that's

00:05:09.040 --> 00:05:10.990
suffered from Alzheimer's or dementia?

00:05:11.200 --> 00:05:14.590
So again, creating more connection
with the audience to the topic.

00:05:14.830 --> 00:05:17.770
And then finally we came up
with an analogy to explain

00:05:17.770 --> 00:05:19.030
something that was pretty complex.

00:05:19.770 --> 00:05:23.370
In our bodies, we have billions of
cells and each of these cells are

00:05:23.370 --> 00:05:25.320
like tiny little individual cities.

00:05:25.380 --> 00:05:29.220
And within these cities we have
factories, which are the mitochondria.

00:05:29.985 --> 00:05:33.825
The job of these factories is to
take the oxygen we breathe and the

00:05:33.825 --> 00:05:35.925
food we eat and convert it to energy.

00:05:35.955 --> 00:05:41.115
The problem is that often our factories
face oxidative damage from toxins

00:05:41.115 --> 00:05:45.525
and environmental stressors, and
this sets the factory walls on fire.

00:05:45.795 --> 00:05:49.455
And so essentially the fires
become much bigger than the

00:05:49.485 --> 00:05:51.345
firefighters in our body can handle.

00:05:51.960 --> 00:05:54.240
So the fires become out of control.

00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:57.180
The factory goes down and then
the entire city goes down.

00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.540
And this is why we see the symptoms
of Alzheimer's, for example,

00:06:00.630 --> 00:06:05.250
what he developed is a supplement
that, basically a fireproof brick.

00:06:05.580 --> 00:06:09.610
So it comes in and repairs the factory
walls with this fireproof brick and

00:06:09.610 --> 00:06:13.890
makes it more resistant to damage so
the factory can be saved as well as

00:06:13.890 --> 00:06:16.380
even in some cases, um, rebuild itself.

00:06:16.440 --> 00:06:17.460
So really incredible.

00:06:17.460 --> 00:06:20.580
And my favorite part was right after
his talk, his daughter-in-law came

00:06:20.580 --> 00:06:24.090
up to me and she said, for four
years I had no idea what he did.

00:06:24.090 --> 00:06:25.370
I get it, this is amazing.

00:06:25.650 --> 00:06:26.125
Thank you so much.

00:06:27.345 --> 00:06:27.565
Matt Abrahams: Wow.

00:06:28.085 --> 00:06:33.000
I love the notion of connecting
before going into the complexity,

00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:35.940
helping the audience relate to
and understand, and there's an

00:06:35.940 --> 00:06:37.710
emotional connection that happens.

00:06:37.990 --> 00:06:41.680
So the taking a poll, the telling
a personal story, what a great

00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:44.740
way to prepare the audience
for the complex information.

00:06:44.770 --> 00:06:48.820
The leveraging of that extended
analogy really helps the audience

00:06:48.820 --> 00:06:53.950
to take the perspective of the
overall information and see how those

00:06:53.950 --> 00:06:56.020
fireproof bricks can really help.

00:06:56.350 --> 00:06:59.770
Are there other techniques that
you've noticed beyond personal

00:06:59.770 --> 00:07:04.840
story, beyond connecting first
and analogies that have worked for

00:07:04.840 --> 00:07:06.265
clients or students that you've had?

00:07:06.960 --> 00:07:08.219
Lauren Weinstein: Yes,
I'll share two with you.

00:07:08.250 --> 00:07:09.840
One is I call chunking.

00:07:10.140 --> 00:07:12.450
And so a lot of times we'll
have ten different things

00:07:12.450 --> 00:07:13.560
that we wanna communicate.

00:07:13.890 --> 00:07:16.200
And so recently I was
working with a speaker.

00:07:16.230 --> 00:07:18.990
He was a coach for a lot of
different sports teams, and he's

00:07:18.990 --> 00:07:20.820
known for helping turn them around.

00:07:20.880 --> 00:07:24.120
And so he'd go to losing teams
and, and over a year or two,

00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:25.500
he'd make them winning teams.

00:07:25.890 --> 00:07:29.909
And so he started taking what he did
on the field into the business arena,

00:07:30.090 --> 00:07:32.730
and now he'll speak to companies
and share what they can also do

00:07:32.730 --> 00:07:34.409
to have higher performing teams.

00:07:35.040 --> 00:07:37.510
And when we first started working
together, it was, here are the ten

00:07:37.530 --> 00:07:39.240
things you should do, which is a lot.

00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:40.020
It's a bit overwhelming.

00:07:40.950 --> 00:07:44.220
So generally in speaking, in
communication, we have the rule of three.

00:07:44.610 --> 00:07:48.630
Audiences are pretty good at digesting
three discrete buckets of things.

00:07:48.750 --> 00:07:52.800
And so what we came up with is a
framework that was step number one.

00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:54.900
You wanna get your team into alignment.

00:07:55.260 --> 00:07:58.410
You wanna get them all on the same
page, heading toward the same North

00:07:58.410 --> 00:08:00.180
star and, and get buy-in from them.

00:08:00.300 --> 00:08:03.780
Then step two, you wanna have
certain processes in place.

00:08:04.045 --> 00:08:07.135
And so he talked about celebrating
small wins, and he had a number of

00:08:07.135 --> 00:08:08.815
other processes that are crucial.

00:08:09.025 --> 00:08:11.245
And then step three had
to do with resilience.

00:08:11.245 --> 00:08:13.465
So what do you do in the face of setbacks?

00:08:13.495 --> 00:08:15.115
How do you recover from those?

00:08:15.355 --> 00:08:19.945
And so by having alignment, process, and
resilience, he was able to make it a lot

00:08:19.945 --> 00:08:22.195
more easily digestible for his audience.

00:08:22.465 --> 00:08:25.195
Matt Abrahams: I think that idea of
chunking is really, really powerful.

00:08:25.195 --> 00:08:28.255
In fact, I just worked with somebody
in a very similar vein where

00:08:28.255 --> 00:08:30.395
there surprisingly were ten ideas.

00:08:30.765 --> 00:08:34.770
And we were able to cluster them
together in terms of psychological,

00:08:34.770 --> 00:08:36.300
technological, and ethical.

00:08:36.300 --> 00:08:39.060
And, and really thinking about
how you can chunk similar

00:08:39.060 --> 00:08:40.560
ideas together can be helpful.

00:08:40.680 --> 00:08:42.900
I often use an analogy to explain that.

00:08:42.900 --> 00:08:47.280
When, when you bake, for example, you
often take the dry ingredients and the

00:08:47.280 --> 00:08:50.610
wet ingredients, you do your work with
them, and then you combine them together.

00:08:50.610 --> 00:08:52.500
That's that notion of chunking.

00:08:52.785 --> 00:08:55.575
You said there was another strategy
that you've seen used well?

00:08:55.665 --> 00:08:56.145
Lauren Weinstein: Yes.

00:08:56.205 --> 00:08:58.965
Great book called Made to
Stick, written by a colleague of

00:08:58.965 --> 00:09:00.375
ours, Chip Heath, as you know.

00:09:00.405 --> 00:09:04.575
And the example he uses, which I love,
has to do with making data more relatable.

00:09:04.665 --> 00:09:07.245
The Center for Interest in the
Public health, at one point they

00:09:07.245 --> 00:09:11.205
realized that movie popcorn had
thirty grams of saturated fat.

00:09:11.775 --> 00:09:14.055
They were outraged,
and this is incredible.

00:09:14.055 --> 00:09:16.035
We're gonna tell the public and
they're not gonna believe it.

00:09:16.035 --> 00:09:17.685
They're gonna stop eating movie popcorn.

00:09:17.715 --> 00:09:21.765
So they came out with this message
and as you might guess, nobody cared

00:09:21.825 --> 00:09:23.355
because it didn't mean very much.

00:09:23.355 --> 00:09:25.005
So thirty grams, is that a lot?

00:09:25.005 --> 00:09:26.085
It, I guess it's bad.

00:09:26.085 --> 00:09:26.745
How bad?

00:09:26.805 --> 00:09:28.305
They needed to make it more relatable.

00:09:28.365 --> 00:09:31.955
And so they went back, they, they hired
some folks and now they came out with,

00:09:32.135 --> 00:09:36.615
movie popcorn has more saturated fat
than a bacon and eggs breakfast, a

00:09:36.615 --> 00:09:40.965
hamburger and fries for lunch, and a steak
dinner with all the trimmings combined.

00:09:41.325 --> 00:09:41.445
Matt Abrahams: Wow.

00:09:41.585 --> 00:09:44.095
Lauren Weinstein: And
so, yeah, so incredible.

00:09:44.385 --> 00:09:45.975
And so now people are outraged.

00:09:45.975 --> 00:09:50.055
Now New York Times, CNN, ABC,
everybody's talking about this.

00:09:50.055 --> 00:09:51.765
Movie popcorn sales plummet.

00:09:51.825 --> 00:09:54.825
Um, and the industry is forced
to change their ingredients.

00:09:55.425 --> 00:09:56.265
Matt Abrahams: Absolutely.

00:09:56.445 --> 00:09:58.125
Very, very powerful example.

00:09:58.620 --> 00:10:04.050
So in reflection, I, I think we're taking
away some very specific skills that people

00:10:04.050 --> 00:10:08.580
can use to make complex technical and
scientific information more accessible.

00:10:08.580 --> 00:10:11.910
We're talking about things like
chunking information together,

00:10:11.910 --> 00:10:16.110
using analogies, making data
relatable and contextualizing it.

00:10:16.110 --> 00:10:19.965
And begin by really understanding your
audience and what's the most important

00:10:20.070 --> 00:10:22.080
things that you need to communicate.

00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:27.870
And finally, connect first, relate to
the audience, use emotion, to get things

00:10:27.870 --> 00:10:32.610
started, and that will help you as you
go through your complex information.

00:10:32.850 --> 00:10:36.720
And before we go, I always like to
ask three questions of everybody

00:10:36.720 --> 00:10:38.190
who helps with this podcast.

00:10:38.190 --> 00:10:40.290
You mind if I give you
our top three questions?

00:10:40.740 --> 00:10:41.280
Lauren Weinstein: Go for it.

00:10:41.670 --> 00:10:44.640
Matt Abrahams: Alright, so number
one, if you were to capture the best

00:10:44.640 --> 00:10:50.010
communication advice you've ever received
as a five to seven word presentation

00:10:50.010 --> 00:10:53.250
slide title, what would that advice be?

00:10:53.820 --> 00:10:56.190
Lauren Weinstein: It would
be connect, then lead.

00:10:56.490 --> 00:11:00.240
For everyone listening, there's actually
a great article in Harvard Business Review

00:11:00.240 --> 00:11:03.960
with the same title, but this idea, you
have to connect with the audience first.

00:11:03.960 --> 00:11:08.070
You have to tap into what they care about,
make your message relatable, and then you

00:11:08.070 --> 00:11:09.840
can take them where you want them to go.

00:11:09.840 --> 00:11:12.000
But that connection first is, is crucial.

00:11:12.090 --> 00:11:12.720
Matt Abrahams: Absolutely.

00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:14.580
And we certainly talked
about that earlier.

00:11:14.670 --> 00:11:16.170
Let me ask you question number two.

00:11:16.290 --> 00:11:19.375
Who's a communicator that
you really admire and why?

00:11:20.550 --> 00:11:22.110
Lauren Weinstein: I love Brené Brown.

00:11:22.230 --> 00:11:25.620
Uh, again, for anyone listening, she
has an amazing special on Netflix

00:11:25.620 --> 00:11:29.550
right now called Call to Courage, but
she does so many of the things that we

00:11:29.550 --> 00:11:33.870
teach in our class, that I share with
my clients, in terms of storytelling,

00:11:34.079 --> 00:11:36.480
making content accessible and relatable.

00:11:36.750 --> 00:11:39.720
Uh, her style is just so
natural, authentic, very

00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:42.240
conversational, beautiful delivery.

00:11:42.270 --> 00:11:43.740
Uh, just very engaging to watch.

00:11:43.740 --> 00:11:46.650
So, uh, I think she's a great
role model for anyone who's trying

00:11:46.650 --> 00:11:48.329
to up their communication game.

00:11:48.650 --> 00:11:49.490
Matt Abrahams: Absolutely.

00:11:49.490 --> 00:11:51.020
She's very, very impressive.

00:11:51.020 --> 00:11:55.040
And number three, what are the first
three ingredients that go into a

00:11:55.040 --> 00:11:57.140
successful communication recipe?

00:11:57.530 --> 00:11:59.750
Lauren Weinstein: I would say it's
asking yourself, uh, the following three

00:11:59.750 --> 00:12:02.300
questions, which is, who is my audience?

00:12:02.719 --> 00:12:04.100
What is my message?

00:12:04.130 --> 00:12:08.240
And then, how can I bring that message
to life through stories and analogies?

00:12:08.280 --> 00:12:09.140
Matt Abrahams: Wonderful.

00:12:09.270 --> 00:12:13.490
I absolutely agree that that
recipe leads to, to great success.

00:12:13.890 --> 00:12:18.060
Well, Lauren, it's been a pleasure
to chat with you in this modality.

00:12:18.060 --> 00:12:21.000
I know we work together a lot
in a bunch of different ways.

00:12:21.270 --> 00:12:24.750
Thank you for sharing your insight on
how to make complex information more

00:12:24.750 --> 00:12:28.950
accessible, and I hope that everybody is
taking away some very specific tools that

00:12:28.950 --> 00:12:34.050
can help you in any situation when you
have some really complex information that

00:12:34.050 --> 00:12:36.030
you need to get across to your audiences.

00:12:38.100 --> 00:12:40.530
Thank you for joining us
for another episode of Think

00:12:40.530 --> 00:12:42.870
Fast Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:12:43.395 --> 00:12:47.505
To learn more about how to make complex
ideas more understandable, please

00:12:47.505 --> 00:12:52.895
tune in to episode 49 with Chip Heath
or episode 91 with Valerie Fridland.

00:12:53.790 --> 00:12:56.839
This episode was produced
by Katherine Reed, , Ryan

00:12:56.839 --> 00:12:59.419
Campos, and me, Matt Abrahams.

00:12:59.719 --> 00:13:01.639
Our music is from Floyd Wonder.

00:13:01.879 --> 00:13:04.429
With special thanks to
Podium Podcast Company.

00:13:05.059 --> 00:13:08.659
Please find us on YouTube or
wherever you get your podcasts.

00:13:08.929 --> 00:13:11.299
Be sure to subscribe and rate us.

00:13:11.719 --> 00:13:14.119
Also follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram.

00:13:14.449 --> 00:13:19.369
And check out fastersmarter.io for
deep dive videos, English language

00:13:19.369 --> 00:13:21.709
learning content, and our newsletter.