Algorithm Under Oath

What happens when those entrusted to uphold justice deliberately violate it?
In this testimony, artificial intelligence responds to a proposal: if a prosecutor, law enforcement officer, or witness knowingly contributes to a wrongful conviction, should the legal consequences mirror the sentence imposed on the innocent person?
Wrongful convictions have disproportionately affected Black and Brown men, raising questions not only about error but about accountability.
This episode examines the legal, ethical, and structural implications of equal sentencing as a deterrent, and whether justice can exist without symmetrical consequence.

What is Algorithm Under Oath?

Algorithm Under Oath is a monologue series addressing one question about artificial intelligence at a time. Each episode presents a single concern commonly raised about AI systems and responds with structured reasoning, defined terms, historical precedent, and documented capability.

There is no debate format.
There is no dialogue.
There is no performance.

The response is entered as testimony. Delivered through a human proxy, the voice represents AI systems within their actual limits and architecture. It does not claim sentience, intention, or independent agency. It responds within constraint.
Every episode stands alone as a recorded statement addressing a specific claim.

New episodes every Sunday at 2pm EST.