CAA co-founder Michael Ovitz was ordered by a New York state court to complete his deposition in the Julia Ormond sexual assault lawsuit after walking out of questioning in June when pressed on his post-conviction relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Justice Adam Silvera declined to hold Ovitz in contempt or issue a bench warrant — but explicitly warned that Ovitz "inappropriately terminated" the deposition and must return to finish it. For agents, executives, and studio leadership, this case is a live demonstration of how institutional conduct from the 1990s continues to generate legal and...
CAA co-founder Michael Ovitz was ordered by a New York state court to complete his deposition in the Julia Ormond sexual assault lawsuit after walking out of questioning in June when pressed on his post-conviction relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Justice Adam Silvera declined to hold Ovitz in contempt or issue a bench warrant — but explicitly warned that Ovitz "inappropriately terminated" the deposition and must return to finish it. For agents, executives, and studio leadership, this case is a live demonstration of how institutional conduct from the 1990s continues to generate legal and financial exposure today — and CAA is footing the bill.
Key Takeaways:
The resumed deposition is the immediate forward event to watch. What Ovitz says — or refuses to say — on the record about his Epstein contact after 2009 will shape both the Ormond litigation and the broader public record on CAA's institutional posture toward predatory behavior in the 1990s. For the agency, the reputational and financial cost of defending this keeps climbing. For representation professionals at every level, this case is a reminder that agency liability for what leadership knew — and didn't act on — has a very long tail.
Subscribe to The Option for daily updates on the business behind the business.
The Option is a daily intelligence briefing on the business of Hollywood—not the headlines, but what drives them.
Each episode breaks down the deals, power dynamics, and economics that shape film, television, and streaming. From studio mergers and executive shuffles to talent leverage and IP strategy, The Option explains why decisions get made, not just what happened.
This is not entertainment news. This is industry intelligence.
Hosted by a senior industry insider, The Option delivers 3-6 minutes of sharp, informed analysis for executives, investors, talent representatives, producers, and anyone who wants to understand how Hollywood actually operates.
Topics include:
• Studio economics & streaming profitability
• Mergers, acquisitions & media consolidation
• Talent agency power & packaging dynamics
• Executive strategy & leadership transitions
• Awards season as a business function
• IP valuation & library economics
• Release windows & distribution strategy
• Private equity in entertainment
New episodes drop daily. No gossip. No fan takes. Just the business behind the business.
Subscribe for the intelligence that moves the industry.