The Georgia Guidestones were attacked in an unthinkable act of cruelty against
humanity, the protectors of mother earth, the globalists and the new world order
of lawlessness banned together, making a joint statement on this issue, the attack
of the monument that sought to slow.
Commit genocide of 7.5 billion people through war famine, inflation
viruses, and the granting of licenses only to the brightest and fittest
to reproduce and finally produce the perfect airing race, utterly condemn
the destruction of this satanic Olu.
They go on and say, we know this was the working of the
one and only Nazi Donald Trump.
And if not directly by him, then he probably paid the farmers
in the Netherlands to destroy the Opolis regardless they say.
It is clear that farmers are the greatest threat to society as they feed people.
And we at the humanism and reason Institute have decided that all humanity
is inherently good, which makes them very, very bad, which is why we put
up and published our plans to destroy his plague of humanity, to nature
in the guide to humanity in Georgia.
The mother earth spokesperson went on waxing eloquence about
how hunger is a good thing as it causes the poor to work hard.
And it is the greatest form of equality in the world because global poverty, if
everyone is equally dead from starvation and war, then there'll be no more war.
The vice president of the United States also weighed in on the
destruction of the Georgia.
Guidestones commenting by saying there is a significance to the passage of time
and everyone stopped paying attention.
After that, CNN was also jolted by the news that the destruction of
their propaganda portal was destroyed.
They were so shook to their core that they decided to become.
Committed to journalism again, stating quote, we now have lost our
communication to this spherical plane through the satanic monument that
we had now, no choice, but to become a news outlet that does journalism
instead of satanic propaganda.
As the lay lines and waning power of child sacrifice across
America begins to crumble.
The pro sacrifice politicians become even more emboldened as
they hang on for dear life stating.
Quote most all the nations on the earth, either fully restrict
or largely restrict abortion.
America used to proudly stand among a few nations that stand for the
destruction of human rights and the supporting of satanic rights to kill
babies in their mother's womb on demand.
We used to stand alongside of countries like the great North Korea.
And China in its ability to kill babies at free will, but it is clear.
We are now finding our moral bearings again as a nation, and
that must be stopped unquote.
Now of course you are probably wondering what the celebrities
of America is saying about the destruction of the Georgia monument.
Well, Rihanna Cardi B and Greta, Thunberg all made public statements
in a joint public statement saying, quote, I don't know what the Georgia
Guidestones were, but clearly if Alex Jones wanted them destroyed, they must
have been human's last hope, a hope.
Being destroyed by the farmers in the Netherlands.
When asked about their support for the Indian farmer protest and contrasts to
the Netherlands farmer protest, they said, quote, we've been doing a lot
of listening, reflecting and learning.
It is clear.
We must do better.
We now see how farmers everywhere are Aris to humanity.
And just as they were dragged off to the blogs in the SSR.
And the farmers were stripped of their land and the CCP.
We must do the same for farmers all across the world before
the world ends in 12 years.
Welcome to Lucas Skrobot show I'm Lucas Skrobot.
And this is where we uncover purpose, pursue truth and own the future.
It is episode 290.
We are Al already.
At, uh, July 7th, 2022.
Well, UN apparently the UN thinks that hunger is a good thing.
There was a.
Post floating around.
It's actually from an article from years back by the UN where it, it is
written by the author, George Kent.
And he starts by saying some, the title of the, the article
is benefits of world hunger.
He starts by saying, we sometimes talk about the hunger in the world
as if it was a scourge that all of us want to see abolished viewing
it as comparable with the plague.
Or aids, but naive views.
Prevent us from coming to grips, which cause and sustain hunger.
Hunger has a great positive value for many people.
Indeed.
It is fundamental to the working of the world's economy.
Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where
there's a need for manual labor.
Well, ironically enough, the.
Those who are so good at satire did not catch the satire of this piece.
George Kent is actually has a book on how, uh, it is in people's best
interests to keep people hungry.
And so he was actually writing a satirical piece, uh, but apparently
those who resurfaced this.
Found it not to be so satirical.
And it, it kind of ties into a lot of the, uh, globalist world, one
world government theories, conspiracy theories that are floating out about
there, which in fact, we are going to talk a lot about in today's episode,
uh, but on its face, if you see this floating around the interwebs.
This particular article from the UN is not factual.
It is a satire and I love satire.
If you couldn't tell the entire intro from the show is a satire.
So God bless George Kent.
I love your wits.
I love your satire and is totally ironic that people actually fell for this.
But I think the reason that people actually fell for it is because
the UN and other organizations.
That are are committed to their globalist agenda.
It seems like something that they would say they often talk about
limiting the world population.
They talk about this population collapse.
They talk about, uh, humanism.
They talk about transhumanism and how we need to control the world's population.
So many people don't actually feel it's far off.
I actually think that, uh, I, I love Kent's.
As far as this article that at least the intro goes, I know he's
making the argument that it is capitalism that keeps people hungry,
but history proves quite otherwise.
It's actually capitalism, the, the free market people being able to work for
themselves and negotiate their labor.
That has led to more people being pulled out of poverty than ever before.
And those things, the foundations of that thought that if you work, you get
the, the rewards of your labor and that if you don't work, you don't get food.
The, that the foundation of those thoughts are Judeo-Christian worldview.
Judeo-Christian beliefs that come from the Bible.
So.
Capitalism has its roots in, in monotheistic Abrahamic, faith.
And that is why it has been so successful worldwide versus what the new world
order, the new liberal world order, which is really just a, a new, uh,
phrasing, a new phrasing for communis.
Socialism and Marxism and redistribution of wealth so that we can all
be on the equal playing field.
Well, the equal playing field that we will all be on is being this close millimeters
away from starvation on a worldwide level.
That is what happened in the USSR when they seized the land from the
farmers and they threw them all into the glue logs, no one knew how to farm.
And so it was a man-made famine.
That's what happened in the CCP with, with the cultural revolution.
Where the Chinese government took the land away away from the land
owners and the farmers, and they redistributed the land, but all the
produce had to go to the government.
It caused a manmade famine, tens of millions of people died well in the intro,
we talked about these Georgia Guidestone.
Oh man, the Georgia Guidestones what a, what a hot topic.
Well, we are gonna go live to our, on the ground correspondent,
who was just at the Georgia.
Guidestones just a little bit ago.
The, the one and only Alex Jones.
He is guessing on the show today, guest appearance, his cameo first
cameo of not first cameo, but on the show today by Alex Jones.
He is going to read off for us.
Exactly what is written right there on the Georgia.
Guidestones maintain humanity under 500 million perpetual balance with
nature guide reproduction, wisely, improving fitness and diversity, United
humanity with a living new language esperan of the UN global language
rule, passion, faith tradition, and all things with tempered reason, meaning
they are the gods that give us reason.
They decide who the social justice warriors are.
They decide what's moral, protect people and nations with fair laws
and just courts through the UN let all nations rule internally resolve
external disputes in our world court.
All of its double speak, avoid petty laws and useless officials need a world
government that dissolves your local.
Go.
That you control.
And then you can't say a damn thing to the United nations that runs extermination
operations, worldwide balance, personal rights with social duties.
You don't really have any rights in article 30 of the UN universal
declaration of human rights.
It says, oh, you have all these previous ones, unless we say
so then we can take 'em away.
Well, right.
You can take is not a right at all.
Prize truth, beauty love seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth.
Leave room for nature.
You've got in eight major languages of the world.
This was this Georgia Guidestone.
This was directed back in the 1980s by globalist new world order of,
uh, organizations, billionaires who.
Built this monument kind of like a hedge stone in Georgia with what Alex Jones just
read printed in eight different languages on the, the sides of these massive stones.
Well, in the last 24 hours, someone came and bombed the stones.
Bomb the stones destroyed one of the stones to the point that they had
to tear the entire monument down.
Uh, I think is, I think it's, uh, one, a, a crime to do, but at the same
time, I think it's brilliantly ironic.
I think it's awesome that, uh, I just think it's funny because so many
people have talked about destroying the stones and finally, someone did it.
We're gonna talk a little bit more about.
Our theories of who exactly is responsible for destroying these stones, but we're
gonna go back to our correspondent live.
On the ground, Alex Jones, you know, just talking a little bit more about
the, the new one world order and what these stones were all about.
A very dark OS, a very, very evil temple to the destruction of humanity.
And they intend to mesmerize you brainwash you, or you love your
servitude and can't even fight back.
But I believe in you, I believe you're gonna wake up.
I believe you're gonna wake other people up now while you still have a chance.
But if you won't do it now, if you won't fight now, you're
never gonna be able to fight.
This is the time when it's out in the open, they think you're weak and
you're gonna give it acquiescence.
You cannot do this.
Civilization must expand.
Humanity is good.
We're not dirty.
We shouldn't have to wear a mask.
We shouldn't have to hear how we're bad for the earth all day.
These are people getting you to turn off your life force and to
hate yourself so they can rule you.
They don't give a damn about the earth.
These people are evil, selfish.
Alex, you seem very, uh, very emboldened by what's happening here at this monument.
Can you at least maybe take a step back Alex and give us some history
on where this worldview comes from?
What, what is the, the beginning seed in history of people thinking that we.
Limit our population that we should control, uh, humanity through
eugenics, that, that there are some who are elite and worthy to live.
And some who are not here's Alex Jones.
This is a little bit of a lengthy clip, but he actually breaks down a lot of
great historical, uh, precedent and history, historical history, uh, that.
Really brings us to the modern day where a lot of the, the thoughts and
the language around what a globalist is or the new world order is, or
eugenics is, uh, why these thoughts are prevalent in so much of society and why
people are fighting so hard against it.
Alex.
Plato 2,300 plus years ago, the modern father of eugenics, and so much more
saying there's too many people we need to depopulate because humans are
crushing the breast of mother earth.
And then mouth is 270 years ago, 250 years ago saying we should kill the poor.
We should spread disease.
We should pack them into tiny little coffin, like apartments in London.
There's too many people.
This is the excuse of the elites to rule over the population.
And then you had the social Darwin at the turn of the last century,
1900 and the robber Barrons.
And that was only a shadow.
You see, that was all just the beginning.
That was all the testing.
And we were there showing you the shape of their plans, showing you the books.
They wrote, the quotes they put out about depopulation prince.
Prince Charles all saying, we need to cut the world economy off.
We need less consumption.
And they said 10 years ago in the Rockefeller foundation operation lockstep,
we'll use a global threat of a virus to kill civilization and collapse the
third world and collapse the first world.
And now we're told it never ends.
So all of that was the build up to where we are moving from play.
Right here 2000 plus years ago,
over the ages, all the slavery, all the wars and all the way up in time, 550 years
ago, we finally have the Renaissance and real Christian ideas and egalitarianism
to build up humanity, to take care of the poor, to have running water.
And that actually created our golden.
But they're deciding to go back to what Plato wanted and that's where we are.
We're not in the shadow of this anymore.
We're not in the planning phase.
We're now in the future with those evil visions of the past now manifesting
in the year 2020, we're now zero hour and cloud swab and the UN the Davis
group all admit that their plan is to be the guardians of the galaxy.
They all decide who lives and dies.
This is a UN temple, a UN shrine maintain humanity under 500 million
in perpetual balance with nature.
That that is the history of Malian thought comes from all the way from Plato.
That man really is a scourge on the, the breast of mother nature and that we
are nothing but a virus on the earth.
And so these thoughts evolved over time.
To be brought to some of its full conclusions, which we saw in the
early, uh, 20th century, the turn of the 19th, 20th century with socialist
Marxist angles ideology that says we are nothing but a sack of chemicals.
If you are nothing but a sack of chemicals, then there, there
is no such thing as morality.
There's no such thing as God.
It is all materialism.
And if, if the world is all material.
Then then who is to say that there is something that is moral or imoral,
who is to say that a, a baby in its mother womb should be protected
also, who is to say that a two year old who's not fully developed into a
human being ought not to be protected.
Who is to say that you or I are not to be protected because maybe we're.
Fully developed.
This is the worldview.
This is the ideology of.
All those who are pushing this idea of, I want, I wanna say global warming or
climate change, cl global warming has changed to, to climate change and it is
good to take care of our environment.
We ought to take care of our environment.
We ought to make sure we are good stewards of the things that we have
been given, including the earth.
The, the problem is that movement has been hijack.
By Malian worldview to push forward their agenda, to destroy the human race,
to control the human race, to create an ING race, to create a superhuman.
And so they make humans hate themselves.
They're making youth hate themselves.
And love mother nature, and think that we are the Scorge that everything that we do
in this world, every breath that we take is only producing more destruction and
nothing could be further from the truth.
Well, people are, uh, outraged.
I'm sure.
That these beautiful ulous demonic, satanic monuments have been destroyed.
The, the guy to humanity is no longer with us.
What are we ever to do?
Well, there's some theories about who exactly decided to go and destroy.
This monument in Georgia.
The first theory is Alex Jones himself.
He's in fact, seen hitting one of these stones with his fist.
Some theorize that his hit, uh, was so powerful that it.
Destroyed the integrity of this granite stone.
And two to three years later, the stone just decided to crumble.
Uh, but that has been largely dismissed as Alex Jones makes a lot
of money talking about these stones.
Now he can no longer talk about these stones, so I'm sure it's gonna hurt his.
Overall net worth the other, the other person that people
are suspecting is bill gates.
Bill gates has a vested interest to destroy these
stones because he realized that.
His plan was published worldwide back in 1980.
And so people think maybe he's trying to cover his tracks.
You know, he's gained so much traction with, with buying farmland in America
and really pushing to control the masses that now he wants to destroy his plan,
but that also has been largely dismissed.
Why?
Well, because we know the, the globalists, like to.
Put their not so secret agenda agenda far out in the open.
So it's not likely that, uh, gates or the globalists with
their eugenic agenda decided to destroy their own ulus in monument.
Uh, so, so who was it?
Was it Trump?
Well, we have casidy we have Cassidy, uh, go, going to the
Senate saying I know who did this.
This was Trump here is, is Cassidy.
Testifying how Trump tried to run the presidential limousine
into the Georgia monument.
The president had very strong, very angry response to that.
Um, Tony described him as being irate.
So when the president former president Donald Trump heard about this Georgia
monument here hears he being described as being irate, very strong emotions to
hearing what, uh, was on this monument.
After all Trump was put into the presidency to drain the swamp.
So clearly, uh, Donald Trump mean a Nazi, as they say, uh, clearly.
It was in his best interest to destroy this monument that really
echoed, uh, not see ideology.
So here here's the next clip by, uh, Cassidy.
The president said something to the effect of I'm the fing president.
Take me up to the Capitol now and capital being code word for the Georgia monument.
Sir, we have to go back to the west wing the president.
Reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel.
Mr.
Engel grabbed his arm said, sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel.
we're going back to the west wing.
We're not going to the capital.
So there it is.
It is, it could have been former president, Donald Trump trying
to steal the presidential limo to run in and crash into the OS.
We are still looking for footage to confirm if that is true,
obviously that is also, uh, sat.
As, uh, that is her testifying about, uh, the, the date that cannot be
mentioned on Instagram or, uh, uh, YouTube or your content will get flagged.
So I won't even mention that the infamous date of American history.
Uh, but again, people don't think that is it.
I personally think that it could be the farmers.
Protesting in the Netherlands, but upon further research, digging
around the internet, uh, you know, searching the dark web of bitch.
Shoot.
I found this comment and I am certain that we hear on the show
have solved the mystery of who destroyed the George monument.
It is none other than Mike.
1956.
This is handle Mike 1, 9 56.
He says, quote, I think I'm going to form a group dedicated to destroying
this monument to conformity.
Well, Mike, 1956, you have won.
You have, you have achieved your goal?
Well, as he said, it's probably really just the, the Dutch
farmers in the Netherlands who are destroying the world, uh, right now.
If you're not familiar with the story as it, it's not getting as much air
time as I suspected it would get as I think that it ought to get.
But the Netherlands government recently passed laws and restrictions
against farmers, essentially restricting emissions of nitrogen
oxide from farm animals and manure.
This is from Reuters, from the use of amino.
Ammonia in fertilizers, the government says estimating a 30% reduction
in livestock numbers is needed.
High intensity farming of cows, pigs, and other animals has made the Netherlands
and Netherland Europe leading has made the Netherlands, excuse me, has
made the Netherlands Europe's leading emitter of the substances, construction
and traffic after off also contribute.
Dutch and European courts have ordered the Dutch government to address the problem.
Farmers say, it's not fair.
Essentially.
What this is doing to farmers is it's going to limit them from using fertilizer
and reduce the amount of livestock they're able to have on their farms, which will
effectively cause many of these farmers to have to just totally go out of business.
Totally go out of business.
And why, why is the government doing all this, uh, greenhouse gases?
We need to be net zero.
So what are we gonna do?
We are going to kill our food supply as if we don't already have a SU food
supply issue with inflation and supply chain issues worldwide right now.
But no, it is it's in the best interest of the people of the globe
for politicians to decide that farmers, what, what farmers can or can't do.
I mean, of course there needs to be some limitations.
Uh, farmers shouldn't just dump chemicals into the ground, but it is
liken to what happened in the U S Sr.
It is likened to what happened in, in the CCP where politicians come in.
No consequences, direct consequences for the laws that they've been in place.
To then say, Hey farmers, you can't do this.
Well, the farmers are protesting there's lines and lines of tractors down
the highway, across the Netherlands.
There is this one clip of, uh, the police opening fire on a tractor.
Here it is.
Hey, you hear the.
And they're stoked.
They got it on film.
The police shot at a tractor going around roundabout.
Uh, man, I remember, I remember just last year when the Indian
farmers were protesting and they were protesting against laws that
the Indian government was making.
And the Indian farmers protested and began to demand that there
was equal pay or, or, uh, set.
Prices for their food to be bought at their grains to be bought at, to
give them guarantees and assurances.
And I remember the entire world blowing up.
Remember Greta Thunberg and Rihanna, the rest of the world.
It was just hashtag everything support the farmers, no farmers, no food.
But now it's all silent.
Why?
Because the farmers are protesting against global warming regulations and
it's better if we just kill off all of society, it's better that humanity
starve than we produce greenhouse gases.
It is man that
the movement.
Of taking care of the environment has been hijacked by a communist socialist Marxist
activists that are actively seeking to destroy global economy, actively seeking
to cause revolts worldwide so that people rely on the government and the government
can redistribute everything to people.
But.
It always, it always turns out in global famine, every place or
national famine, every place that these ideologies have taken root.
And I just find it so ironic.
That just a year ago, people were fighting, standing in solidarity.
Everyone posting their fists in solidarity with the, the farmers in India.
But now as it goes against the, the green new deal, the world
is going to end worldview.
It is cricket.
So speaking of India, India, government is being sued by Twitter
for taking down some of Twitter's post.
Because the Indian government, as policies that states you are, are
not allowed to post, you know, certain political misinformation.
There's people on both sides who say, well, the, the government of India
ought to be able to limit what is posted on social media for the sake of the.
The, the safety of the nation or misinformation.
And then there's the other side that, well, this is infringement
upon speed, free, free speech.
You know, where we fall, we fall more on the belief that people
should have the freedom to speak.
But what is deeply, deeply ironic about this entire situation is that it it's
just completely hypocritical on Twitter's.
Twitter is saying, Hey, Indian government, it's not fair that you have a policy
seeing what people can or cannot post.
And we ought to have freedom of speech to post what we want to on our platform.
Freedom of speech ought to be all right.
At the same time, they have policies where they say, Hey, Jordan Peterson, Hey Ruben,
you are not allowed to say certain things.
On Twitter, if you do, we are going to censor you and we are going
to take your posts off Twitter.
It's deeply ironic.
It's deeply hypocritical.
Here is a platform that supposedly is standard for free speech.
They're suing the Indian government for not standing or not allowing free speech.
While at the same time, Twitter feels like they ought to be able to enforce their
policies when it comes to their accepted speech saying that calling someone by
their biological gender before they have a surgery is, is somehow hate speech.
It's absolutely absurd.
Anine here is Dr.
Jordan Peterson commenting on how he was taken off of Twitter and how he is.
He ain't never, never going back
and I'm not taking down that tweet or acknowledging that my tweet violated
the Twitter rules up, yours woke moralists we'll see who cancels.
Twitter's a rat hole in the final analysis.
And I have probably contributed to that while trying to use understand and
master that horrible toxic platform.
No doubt.
I owe some apologies for that and I'm trying to learn, but it's a relief
in some real sense to be banned.
And I regarded under the present conditions as a badge of honor.
Well, that was from daily wire, uh, daily wire just signed, uh, Jordan
Peterson to be on their platform, which deeply grateful for Jordan Peterson.
Uh, Ruben apparently reposted a link to Peterson's post saying he was de platform.
Now Ruben is being kicked off because he mentioned what was
happening on Twitter, on Twitter.
It's just, it's absolutely asinine is absolutely ridiculous.
Especially when you look at the hypocrisy of Twitter, suing the Indian government
for withholding their policies.
And yet Twitter feels like they ought Tobi hold their own policies.
In the limiting of speech is just completely, completely hypocritical.
Yeah.
That makes sense.
The post true society where we've exchanged truth for lies and reason
for postmodern and rationality, the truth and the, the, the
absurdities finally make sense.
Well, uh, Kamala Harris.
Did the unthinkable and she decided to weigh in on abortion and slavery.
You know, when I made the comparison of abortion and slavery, I received
comments from people saying, yeah, please don't compare to the two.
They're not comparable.
Don't compare the two.
Well here's Kamala Harris comparing the two.
What essentially has happened is the statement has been made that the
government has a right to come in your home and tell you as a woman and as a
family, what you should do with your body.
Uh, and it's just to correct.
MidAm vice president.
The government is saying, what not, what you can do with your body.
It's what you can't do with someone else's.
You can't murder and you can't kill someone else's body, but
continue Madam vice vice president.
Oh my gosh.
And the, and the point has to be this.
We have to recognize we're a nation that was founded on certain principles
that are, that are grounded in the concept of freedom and Liberty.
Yes.
Madam vice president, you do have the, in the constitution, freedom and Liberty.
Which means that the person being killed ought also have
freedom and Liberty to life.
There is no constitutional right to kill your offing.
Madam vice president.
We also know that we've had a history in this country of government trying
to claim ownership over human bodies.
Exactly.
And this is where this is where we agree the government.
Had laws where slave owners had the legal right to have ownership over
human bodies, just like we used to have a, a law gro view, Wade that permitted
that in made, not just permitted, it made it that states must enable
and must offer abortion services.
That it might not be illegal saying that.
The state has the right to kill a human body saying that mothers somehow have some
special right to kill their offspring.
Just like somehow white slave owners had some special right to own black slaves.
If they had plantations.
That's the, the, the, the correct equivalence, because it's both
our oppression of people who are suffering the consequences.
Which is the, the baby and the slave, but of course, Madam vice president
is referring to something else.
Yes, that is right.
And we had supposedly evolved from that.
Time and that way of thinking.
So this is very problematic on so many levels.
It is very problematic.
What the vice president here obviously is saying is she's saying that now
women are being enslaved, that the government is telling women what they
can and can't do with their bodies.
But that's not the case.
The government is saying one.
The states can decide what laws are in place to protect the born
unborn or not protect the unborn.
So that's one and two what's happening is the states are sane and deciding whether
or not a person can legally be killed.
Well, the.
The evil knows no bounds when it comes to this side and
what people are willing to do.
Of course, there's the, the endless argument that, well, you're not really,
pro-lifer, you're just a pro birther.
You just care about babies when they're inside the womb, not when they're outside
the womb, but if someone tries to care for babies outside the womb, it's totally
shut down and it's barred as well.
Uh, there.
On organizations within America.
Called crisis pregnancy centers.
These are centers that help women who find themselves in unexpected pregnancies
needing help, and they provide help financial aid, financial services,
uh, adoptive services for these women.
And they.
They walk with them.
They give them finances.
They give them resources.
They give them baby formula.
They give them diapers for women who find themselves in unexpected pregnancies.
Well, apparently according to the native American Elizabeth Warren from
the great state of Massachusetts, she, uh, she believes that helping women.
In crisis is incredibly evil.
Senator Warren also taking aim at pregnancy crisis
centers here in Massachusetts.
These so-called, uh, crisis pregnancy centers outnumber genuine
abortion clinics by three to one.
She says, women walk into the centers, believing they'll get abortions.
Instead they try to talk women out of it.
She calls it a bait and switch.
They are giving it over to people who wish them hard.
And that has to stop.
We need to put a stop to that in Massachusetts right now, one that's.
I mean, the obvious, the, the evil knows no end and that the
blatant lie that volunteers, these people are not getting paid.
They are volunteering.
In pregnancy centers to help women who find themselves in unexpected pregnancies
to help them in their situation.
There are being accused by the Senator that these people wish
them harm, seek to do them harm.
I mean, The, the turning of evil and making it good and good and making it
evil on a societal level that is truly, truly dark and truly destructive.
It is one thing for people to break righteous and good laws
in a country and do evil things.
And it's another thing for a nation to embrace wickedness and call it good.
Well, there was a thread that was going on about this originally posted by, in.
Hallworth and he write, writes this with a pro-abortion advocates,
painting the United States as barbaric for limiting abortions.
Let's take a look at when other countries ban abortions for
economic social or on toand reasons.
So Argentina, after 14 weeks can't have an abortion Austria.
After 12 weeks, can't have an abortion Brazil banned Bann Croatia, 10 weeks.
Cypress 12 weeks Czech.
The rev checks Republic 12 demark 12 Estonia 12 Finland 12 on demand is banned.
It's only could be for economic or social reasons.
France is 14 weeks Germany, 12 weeks Greece, 12 weeks Ireland,
12 Italy, 90 days, 13 weeks Lavia, 12 Lithuania, 12, 12 Norway, 12
Poland ban Portugal, 10 Russia, 12.
Uh, It is to bring some context in America.
What brought this Dobbs case to the Supreme court, which
essentially overthrew Roe V.
Wade was a lawsuit in Texas where they wanted to be able to
have abortions after 15 weeks.
and the state of Texas said, no, you can't have it after 15 weeks.
You can, you can have it before 15 weeks still.
It's still in our laws, but you can't have it after 15 weeks.
And that, which is what led to it being totally overthrow.
And seeing that Roe V.
Wade is unconstitutional.
Well, the majority of the world, the majority of the world believes.
That there is no such thing.
You should not be able to have abortion on demand.
And here he says, excluding risk, the mother mother's health or
life, uh, rape fetal impairment or social economic reasons.
Now I, I would say some of these nations have exceptions to rape
fetal impairment or social economic reasons, not all of these nations,
but virtually all of these nations.
If it's in a topic pre pre pregnancy, or if it's some crazy situation where it's
apparent that the, the life of the baby won't make it, or the mother won't make
it, then they do have access to abortion.
When really abortion is the intentional killing of a child.
If you are seeking to save the child's life and save the
mother's life at 23 weeks.
We now have the technology to, to have a viable baby.
A baby is viable at 23 weeks.
They can live outside the mother's wo without the mother's help at
23 weeks happens quite often.
So even when you look at the mother's health, that often is
something that's used when they talk about late term abortions.
When you can deliver the baby and you can still have the baby.
Well, he goes and lists virtually every other nation on the earth, starting
with a going through and ending with C.
We're not gonna read it all here on the show, but that is to say that
most rest of the world has actually a sane view on when life begin.
A sane view most every other nation in the world.
Well, there was a talk about how many other nations in the world allow
abortion on demand as is still legal.
In many parts of America, California, New York, you can still have an
abortion in Colorado, Illinois.
These are still quote unquote safe havens for the murder of innocent babies.
Well, there is approximately seven other nations, seven other countries that
virtually have no bans on abortion.
That would be Vietnam, North Korea, China, uh, Canada.
Uh, Australia in it's structured more like in America where each
state, well, in Perth, in Australia, there are pretty much abortions,
uh, upon request up to 24 weeks.
Um, and that is most of them.
And then America is, is one of them, Singapore, Netherlands.
Those are the nation.
So Canada, China, Netherlands, North Korea, Singapore, the United States
and Vietnam pretty much on demand.
This is, this is a small handful of nations in the world, and I am
glad to see that America is finally regaining their moral balance.
I am 4th of July week, this week, proud to be an American proud that
there are states that are standing up for, uh, Righteous injustice.
And for the life of the unborn, while this show is brought to you by listeners
like you, this is a value for value podcast, which means if you get value
outta the show we ask that you can give that you would give value back to the
show in the measure that you got it out, whatever that value is, that's up to you.
You can give value back to the show by donating your hard,
cold, uh, Bitcoin or Ethereum.
On platforms like by listening through platforms like SPX, where you can
give your Satoshis or Bitcoin as you listen, and as you stream, or
you can give your hardcore Fiats by visiting Lucas, scroll bott.com.
Backsack support.
And you can give value in the measure that you got value outta the show.
We thank you for everyone who gives to the show to keep this show going without you.
It really would not be possible.
So thank you to everyone who supports the show, who listens to the show who
shares the show, um, deeply grateful.
For your generosity and your attention, don't go away.
We'll be right back with our closing Weaver and loom segment.
Welcome back to Weaver and loom a part of the show where we take ancient
wisdom and we weave it in with our everyday lives so that we can own our
future and weave our destiny today.
We don't really have a quote.
Just more of a thought when I, when I think about this segment Weaver and
loom and where, where the ideas for this came from and what this segment is all
about, I thought it, it would be worth to kind of visit that as it's a bigger
framework that, that plays into our life.
When I think of a Weaver at his or her loom, You think of the loom
and if the loom is crooked, if the framework that you're viewing
the world through is crooked.
When that carpet comes out of the loom, it won't lay flat.
It won't lay straight.
It won't be a good carpet that are our framework by which we view the world, the
lenses that we view the world through.
If they are warped, then we will have warped results.
Another thing that I love about the image.
Of a carpet is that each knot is like an individual.
Each knot is like a generation and that we are individuals.
We have choices that we get to make.
For our life, but we were also part of a bigger narrative.
We're also part of a bigger story.
We were also part of a bigger carpet, the carpet of our, our lineage and our
generation from generation to generation and part of society as a whole, as a
whole, that we are individuals, but as individuals, we also exist within communi.
So how does our dot our one little breath and vapor of life?
How does that affect other people around us?
And then as a, a, as I was just reflecting on, on this thought and
idea of having a right framework and then being connected to lineage.
And then what, what is the one knot that we are gonna bring to the, the line of
history, to the, the tapestry of history?
That knot is the actions that you and I take in our life, the things that you
and I believe, and the things that we act on, not just believe in theory, but
believe in action, that if we believe something, if we truly believe something,
we act according to what we believe.
Otherwise it's just.
It's just ethereal knowledge.
It's not something that's worked through our life in a, in a manifest way.
And as I've been reflecting
on life on growing older, not that I'm old, I'm actually quite young.
Still.
I'm interested in my mid 30.
And I realized that really that's still pretty early on in the race
of life and what is more important, the starting or the finishing.
It's the finishing and there's many traps and snares along the way that
can keep us from finishing well there's many traps and snares that can cause
us to lose our way that can cause us.
Lose our, our so mindedness that can cause us to fall into loose ways of
thinking, or I wanna use the word debauchery, but really it's, it's
becoming drunk with the, the words of the world that tickle our ears, being
drunk with the thoughts of, of the world.
Comforts en soothes our hearts, but we are charged to be sober minded, to be of a
clear mind, to be aware because there are snares that are set up for each and every
one of us and those snares really, really, really can totally take our lives out,
destroy our lives, destroy our marriage.
It's not how our marriage starts, but how it end.
You make it 30, 40 years, and then you self destruct on your marriage.
It's still destructive to your kids, still destructive to your grandkids.
And I know it happens.
I know, uh, it happens for many different reasons and there is healing and
redemption on the other side of that, but it is worth saying that our families.
And that our sober mindedness and that what we believe in how we live
according to those beliefs are worth fighting for, because we will be
one little, not in the tapestry of history that our kids will attach to.
And the way that we order our lives will affect the way that our kids
order there's one way or another.
So go out this.
Remain sober minded, be aware of the ideas that you are adopting, the, the
actions that you are walking out and the roots of where those come from so
that you can really own your future.
Well, Thank you for listening to the show.
Uh, if you have any questions for me, you can WhatsApp me
a plus 1 2 0 2 9 2 2 0 2 2 0.
You can message me on the Instagrams.
Uh, if you want to get more outta this show, share it with a friend by
giving you'll actually get more back.
End, probably have some fun conversations.
That's all.
I will see you next week on the show.
Go out and own your.