WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript 

00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:02.350
Samantha: Hello, this is Samantha Shares.

00:00:02.910 --> 00:00:07.270
This episode covers N C U Aâs new
proposed rule on Succession  Planning

00:00:07.270 --> 00:00:09.760
voted on at the July 18th Board Meeting.

00:00:10.350 --> 00:00:12.920
The proposed rule passed
by a vote of 2 to 1.

00:00:13.698 --> 00:00:16.708
The following is a word for
word real audio of that item.

00:00:17.248 --> 00:00:20.448
This podcast is educational
and is not legal advice.

00:00:20.868 --> 00:00:24.848
We are sponsored by Credit Union
Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose

00:00:24.848 --> 00:00:27.908
team has over two hundred and
Forty years of National Credit

00:00:27.908 --> 00:00:29.768
Union  Administration experience.

00:00:30.308 --> 00:00:33.958
We assist our clients with N C
U A so they save time and money.

00:00:34.428 --> 00:00:38.398
If you are worried about a recent,
upcoming or in process N C U A

00:00:38.398 --> 00:00:42.778
examination, reach out to learn how they
can assist at Mark Treichel DOT COM.

00:00:43.288 --> 00:00:47.638
Also check out our other podcast called
With Flying Colors where we provide tips

00:00:47.638 --> 00:00:50.198
on how to achieve success with N C U A.

00:00:50.951 --> 00:00:52.511
And now the N C U A Board.

00:00:52.871 --> 00:00:56.781
Our first item of business, we will
consider proposed rules, succession

00:00:56.781 --> 00:01:01.341
planning, 12, uh, CFR parts 701 and 741.

00:01:01.691 --> 00:01:05.491
Staff presenting are John
Berry, Policy Officer, Office

00:01:05.491 --> 00:01:06.951
of Examination and Insurance.

00:01:07.306 --> 00:01:11.356
And Ariel Pereira, Senior Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel.

00:01:11.696 --> 00:01:14.366
Good morning, John, and
good morning, Ariel.

00:01:14.386 --> 00:01:15.286
Always good to see you.

00:01:15.286 --> 00:01:18.386
And, John, welcome to the
board table for the first time.

00:01:18.416 --> 00:01:18.596
Thank you.

00:01:18.596 --> 00:01:20.726
I understand that you're
going to do double duty today.

00:01:21.096 --> 00:01:23.586
Uh, I am looking forward
to your presentation.

00:01:24.031 --> 00:01:25.781
Please begin whenever you are settled.

00:01:25.961 --> 00:01:26.131
Thank you.

00:01:27.111 --> 00:01:29.031
Staff 1: Uh, good morning
Chairman Harper, Vice Chair

00:01:29.031 --> 00:01:30.781
Hoffman, and Board Member Otzka.

00:01:31.201 --> 00:01:34.671
My colleague John Berry and I are here to
present for your consideration a proposed

00:01:34.671 --> 00:01:36.411
rule entitled Succession Planning.

00:01:37.191 --> 00:01:40.971
Today's proposed rule is the
second NCOA proposal on this topic.

00:01:41.491 --> 00:01:46.081
At its January 27, 2022 meeting,
the Board approved the proposed rule

00:01:46.081 --> 00:01:49.741
to establish succession planning
requirements for federal credit unions.

00:01:50.251 --> 00:01:54.371
This new proposed rule modifies the
earlier proposal based on the public

00:01:54.381 --> 00:01:58.241
comments received and upon further
consideration of the issues involved.

00:01:58.801 --> 00:02:01.711
The changes are designed to further
strengthen succession planning

00:02:01.711 --> 00:02:05.441
efforts for both consumer federal
credit unions and consumer federally

00:02:05.441 --> 00:02:07.631
insured state chartered credit unions.

00:02:09.261 --> 00:02:13.221
Failure by a credit union board to plan
for vacancies in elected and appointed

00:02:13.221 --> 00:02:17.331
positions as well as the transition of
its management can come with high costs.

00:02:18.221 --> 00:02:20.961
The FIQ runs the risk of
creating a leadership vacuum.

00:02:21.406 --> 00:02:24.836
It can disrupt operations, potentially
jeopardizing the credit union's

00:02:24.846 --> 00:02:29.406
ability to adequately manage liquidity
risk, address cybersecurity threats,

00:02:29.726 --> 00:02:33.786
or ensure continued compliance with
consumer protection, bank secrecy,

00:02:34.026 --> 00:02:35.876
and other critical responsibilities.

00:02:36.546 --> 00:02:40.586
The failure of FICUs to adequately
plan for succession poses a risk,

00:02:40.846 --> 00:02:44.266
not only to individual credit unions
and their member owners, but to

00:02:44.266 --> 00:02:45.896
the credit union system as a whole.

00:02:46.176 --> 00:02:48.506
and to the National Credit
Union Share Insurance Fund.

00:02:50.286 --> 00:02:53.666
Two factors have increased the relevance
of succession planning for credit unions.

00:02:54.206 --> 00:02:57.116
First is the ongoing trend
of industry consolidation.

00:02:57.646 --> 00:03:01.136
The number of FIQs has declined
steadily for several decades.

00:03:01.736 --> 00:03:05.266
This decline is largely due to the
long running trend of consolidation

00:03:05.316 --> 00:03:07.466
across all depository institutions.

00:03:08.406 --> 00:03:11.716
In some instances, voluntary mergers
can be used to create economies

00:03:11.716 --> 00:03:15.476
of scale to offer more or better
products and services to members.

00:03:15.961 --> 00:03:19.921
However, an NCOA analysis found that
poor succession planning was either

00:03:19.921 --> 00:03:24.691
a primary or a secondary cause for
almost a third of FICU consolidations.

00:03:25.621 --> 00:03:29.171
Another reason for a heightened
focus on succession planning is the

00:03:29.171 --> 00:03:32.211
ongoing, uh, the ongoing retirements
of the Baby Boom generation.

00:03:32.611 --> 00:03:36.866
According to some sources, Approximately
10 percent of credit union chief

00:03:36.866 --> 00:03:42.856
executive officers were expected
to retire between 2019 and 2021.

00:03:44.436 --> 00:03:46.976
The NCOA does assess succession
planning as part of the

00:03:46.976 --> 00:03:48.436
CAMEL's management component.

00:03:49.016 --> 00:03:53.446
However, there is no NCOA regulation
requiring FICUs to implement a

00:03:53.476 --> 00:03:55.296
formal written succession plan.

00:03:55.296 --> 00:04:00.516
As a result, the NCOA lacks a full
complement of regulatory tools to

00:04:00.516 --> 00:04:04.216
help address deficiencies in a credit
union's succession planning process.

00:04:04.216 --> 00:04:04.286
Thank you.

00:04:05.351 --> 00:04:09.391
The proposed regulatory changes are
designed to mitigate these risks, and

00:04:09.391 --> 00:04:13.131
we believe are consistent with the
Board's statutory authority to ensure

00:04:13.151 --> 00:04:16.941
a safe and sound system of cooperative
credit unions for its member owners.

00:04:17.951 --> 00:04:21.971
To be clear, the proposed requirements
would not supplant the vital role

00:04:21.981 --> 00:04:25.661
that credit union member owners and
their elected boards have in selecting

00:04:25.661 --> 00:04:27.301
directors and other officials.

00:04:27.901 --> 00:04:30.361
Neither would it dictate
management hiring processes.

00:04:31.311 --> 00:04:33.661
The proposal focuses
on continuous planning.

00:04:34.106 --> 00:04:38.156
and development to prepare credit
unions to handle vacancies and

00:04:38.156 --> 00:04:41.306
transitions successfully and
in a safe and sound manner.

00:04:42.066 --> 00:04:45.506
I'll now turn it over to John, who will
provide an overview of the proposed rule.

00:04:45.696 --> 00:04:46.286
Thank you, Ariel.

00:04:46.596 --> 00:04:50.806
Good morning, Chairman Harper, Vice
Chairman Hoffman, and Board Member Otsuka.

00:04:51.306 --> 00:04:53.776
I would like to briefly summarize
the contents of the proposed rule.

00:04:53.936 --> 00:04:56.666
As Ariel noted, the proposal
would apply to all consumer

00:04:56.686 --> 00:04:57.746
federally insured credit unions.

00:04:58.101 --> 00:04:59.831
including federally insured
state charter credit.

00:05:00.211 --> 00:05:03.171
However, to the extent that a federally
insured state charter credit union

00:05:03.221 --> 00:05:07.311
is subject to a state statutory or
regulatory requirement that conflicts

00:05:07.321 --> 00:05:09.941
with the proposed rule, the NCA
will defer to the state requirement.

00:05:10.491 --> 00:05:12.831
The proposed rule would require
the board of directors of the

00:05:12.831 --> 00:05:16.531
federally insured credit union to
establish a written succession plan

00:05:16.531 --> 00:05:17.991
that addresses specific positions.

00:05:18.421 --> 00:05:22.081
At a minimum, the succession plan would
be required to cover members of the board

00:05:22.081 --> 00:05:26.131
of directors, members of the supervisory
committee, management officials,

00:05:26.161 --> 00:05:27.361
and assistant management officials.

00:05:27.361 --> 00:05:31.326
Thank you The Federal Insured Credit
Union's Senior Executive Officers and any

00:05:31.326 --> 00:05:34.076
other credit union personnel the Board
of Directors deems critical given the

00:05:34.076 --> 00:05:36.746
size, complexity, and risk of operations.

00:05:37.836 --> 00:05:40.126
The succession plan would also be
required to address the members

00:05:40.156 --> 00:05:42.856
of the credit committee and loan
officers where such officials are

00:05:42.856 --> 00:05:44.186
involved in the daily review of loans.

00:05:45.106 --> 00:05:47.816
In addition, the succession plan
would be required to address the

00:05:47.816 --> 00:05:50.046
Federal Insured Credit Union's
strategy for recruiting candidates,

00:05:53.966 --> 00:05:56.126
The potential to assume each
of the covered positions.

00:05:56.256 --> 00:05:59.266
The strategy must consider how
the selection of diversity among

00:05:59.266 --> 00:06:01.926
the employees covered by the
succession plan collectively and

00:06:01.936 --> 00:06:04.886
individually promotes the safe and
sound operation of the credit union.

00:06:05.536 --> 00:06:07.946
The Board of Directors would be
required to review the succession plan

00:06:07.976 --> 00:06:10.966
in accordance with the schedule it
establishes, but no less than annually.

00:06:10.986 --> 00:06:15.376
The NCOA recognizes that circumstances
might require changes to the planning,

00:06:15.796 --> 00:06:17.346
um, filling specific positions.

00:06:17.346 --> 00:06:23.726
The proposed regulation text accommodates
this situation, but as with significant

00:06:23.726 --> 00:06:26.936
deviations in budgets and in strategic
plans, it would be expected that the

00:06:26.936 --> 00:06:29.656
board would be informed of changes
and the rationale for the changes.

00:06:29.991 --> 00:06:31.581
And document them in its meeting minutes.

00:06:32.201 --> 00:06:35.901
The proposed rule would also
amend NCA Regulation 701.

00:06:36.011 --> 00:06:39.841
4b3, which contains education requirements
for federal credit union directors.

00:06:40.151 --> 00:06:43.451
The proposed rule would require that
directors have a working familiarity

00:06:43.461 --> 00:06:46.661
with the succession plan no later
than six months after appointment.

00:06:47.101 --> 00:06:49.831
The expectation is for a federally
insured credit union to develop a

00:06:49.831 --> 00:06:52.621
succession plan that is consistent
with its size and its complexity.

00:06:53.251 --> 00:06:56.681
As an aid, the proposed rule includes
a sample template for a succession

00:06:56.681 --> 00:07:00.291
plan that may be appropriate for some
smaller federally insured credit unions.

00:07:00.611 --> 00:07:02.841
So, all federally insured credit
unions would benefit from it.

00:07:03.611 --> 00:07:04.891
This concludes our presentation.

00:07:04.941 --> 00:07:07.031
We would be happy to address
any questions that you have.

00:07:08.011 --> 00:07:09.811
Chairman Todd Harper: John, deeply
impressed that you delivered

00:07:09.811 --> 00:07:11.091
that with just one breath.

00:07:11.091 --> 00:07:18.421
Um, and Ariel, thank you for your
presentation on the revised proposed

00:07:18.421 --> 00:07:19.911
succession planning rulemaking.

00:07:20.421 --> 00:07:23.901
This new proposal would require
federally insured credit union boards

00:07:24.011 --> 00:07:28.471
of directors to establish succession
planning process for key positions.

00:07:28.916 --> 00:07:31.516
This latest proposal also
builds on our prior efforts

00:07:31.516 --> 00:07:33.216
to issue a rule in this area.

00:07:33.616 --> 00:07:38.206
And as one of the commenters in our
prior rulemaking, uh, noted, the costs

00:07:38.206 --> 00:07:43.276
associated with this rulemaking are,
quote, a burden worth bearing, unquote.

00:07:43.711 --> 00:07:46.961
I could not agree more and
strongly support this rulemaking.

00:07:47.581 --> 00:07:52.091
One of the NCUA's supervisory
priorities for 2023 was a review

00:07:52.091 --> 00:07:55.511
of the credit union's approach to
succession planning for senior leaders,

00:07:55.771 --> 00:07:59.141
including any written succession
plan the credit union established.

00:07:59.521 --> 00:08:03.601
In a broader analysis of this exam
priority for a large subset of

00:08:03.601 --> 00:08:08.281
examined credit unions, we found that
roughly one in four credit unions

00:08:08.531 --> 00:08:13.786
either lacked Uh, succession plan or
had an inadequate succession plan.

00:08:14.146 --> 00:08:16.746
That finding demonstrates
our need to act now.

00:08:17.066 --> 00:08:20.636
Without a rule, we can only encourage
credit unions to adopt effective

00:08:21.026 --> 00:08:24.206
succession plans through exam findings.

00:08:24.436 --> 00:08:28.366
A rule would allow us to require such
planning through a document of resolution.

00:08:29.006 --> 00:08:32.036
The continued health and success
and diversity of the credit union

00:08:32.036 --> 00:08:34.106
system requires foresight by all.

00:08:34.446 --> 00:08:37.726
That includes the NCUA and the
credit union leaders who serve as

00:08:37.726 --> 00:08:39.266
the stewards of their member owned.

00:08:39.641 --> 00:08:42.271
Uh, their members, owners,
financial security.

00:08:42.791 --> 00:08:46.261
After all, as Benjamin Franklin
once reportedly said, if you

00:08:46.261 --> 00:08:48.281
fail to plan, you plan to fail.

00:08:48.731 --> 00:08:51.521
Therefore, it isn't surprising
that the term succession planning

00:08:51.761 --> 00:08:55.651
includes the word success in the
first seven letters of the phrase.

00:08:56.326 --> 00:08:59.716
Regardless of the economic environment,
the consolidation of credit unions has

00:08:59.716 --> 00:09:02.136
been a constant over several decades.

00:09:02.436 --> 00:09:06.806
One reason why, and Ariel, you noted
this, so many mergers are occurring is the

00:09:06.806 --> 00:09:10.826
absence of effective succession planning,
especially in smaller credit unions.

00:09:11.116 --> 00:09:14.716
We see that factor frequently
cited as a reason for a merger.

00:09:15.286 --> 00:09:19.076
With this new proposal, the NCUA
has revised its 2022 succession

00:09:19.076 --> 00:09:22.246
planning proposal to account for
the public comments we received.

00:09:22.726 --> 00:09:27.286
Several commenters have asked for greater
details and specifics in the proposal.

00:09:27.701 --> 00:09:30.071
This proposal provides those specifics.

00:09:30.291 --> 00:09:34.341
What's more, the revised proposal
the Board is considering today would

00:09:34.341 --> 00:09:38.181
strengthen succession planning efforts of
both Federal Credit Unions and Federally

00:09:38.181 --> 00:09:40.281
Insured State Chartered Credit Unions.

00:09:40.691 --> 00:09:43.871
Generally, the proposed rule would
require all Federally Insured Credit

00:09:43.881 --> 00:09:48.051
Unions to have a succession plan that
covers the Board of Directors, the

00:09:48.051 --> 00:09:55.266
Supervisory Committee, and And in any
other personnel, the Board of Directors

00:09:55.266 --> 00:10:00.216
deems critical given the credit union's
size, complexity, or risk of operations.

00:10:00.586 --> 00:10:04.006
The succession plan would also
address the members of the credit

00:10:04.006 --> 00:10:07.706
union, uh, credit committee and loan
offices where such officials are

00:10:07.706 --> 00:10:09.716
involved in the daily review of loans.

00:10:10.096 --> 00:10:13.986
And the Credit Union's Board of Directors
would be required to review the succession

00:10:13.986 --> 00:10:16.326
plan no less than annually, as noted.

00:10:16.326 --> 00:10:16.341
it.

00:10:17.081 --> 00:10:21.611
In a prior role before joining the NCUA
board, I served as a board member and

00:10:21.611 --> 00:10:27.041
officer for a small non profit with a
budget of approximately 600, 000 a year.

00:10:27.551 --> 00:10:32.081
Without any contractors or money
spent, that board was able to research,

00:10:32.081 --> 00:10:36.301
develop, and approve an effective
succession plan within just a few months.

00:10:36.571 --> 00:10:40.241
And that succession plan proved
effective a short time later when

00:10:40.241 --> 00:10:41.841
the executive director departed.

00:10:42.326 --> 00:10:44.686
All credit unions would
benefit from having effective

00:10:44.686 --> 00:10:46.236
succession plans in place.

00:10:46.786 --> 00:10:50.786
As part of this latest proposal, the
NCUA has developed a draft template.

00:10:50.796 --> 00:10:54.376
This is an important piece for
use by smaller credit unions.

00:10:54.626 --> 00:10:57.366
The NCUA Board would like to
receive comments from credit union

00:10:57.366 --> 00:10:59.426
stakeholders on the template as well.

00:10:59.756 --> 00:11:03.066
While the proposed rule would not
make it mandatory for credit unions

00:11:03.066 --> 00:11:07.211
to use the NCUA template, the NCUA
Board recognizes that this Some

00:11:07.211 --> 00:11:10.561
credit unions may experience a
cost if they don't already have a

00:11:10.561 --> 00:11:12.911
succession planning process in place.

00:11:13.271 --> 00:11:15.921
This template is intended to
reduce the time and effort

00:11:16.151 --> 00:11:17.751
to develop a succession plan.

00:11:18.191 --> 00:11:22.181
Any feedback from stakeholders to improve
the template would be very helpful.

00:11:22.791 --> 00:11:27.011
The NCOA expects a credit union would
develop a succession plan that is

00:11:27.011 --> 00:11:29.431
consistent with its size and complexity.

00:11:29.781 --> 00:11:33.451
Therefore, smaller institutions may
have a simple succession plan that

00:11:33.451 --> 00:11:35.541
addresses a few key leadership positions.

00:11:35.596 --> 00:11:40.116
more complex institutions would
have more extensive plans for

00:11:40.116 --> 00:11:41.566
a variety of critical roles.

00:11:42.151 --> 00:11:46.181
In either instance, the succession
plan must consider how the selection,

00:11:46.201 --> 00:11:50.321
skill, experience, and diversity of
the covered employees collectively

00:11:50.351 --> 00:11:54.481
and individually promote the safe and
sound operation of the credit union.

00:11:55.201 --> 00:11:56.781
And I can't say this enough.

00:11:57.201 --> 00:12:01.581
Succession planning is vital
to the long term success of any

00:12:01.601 --> 00:12:04.041
institution, including credit unions.

00:12:04.501 --> 00:12:08.321
A credit union board's failure To plan
for the transition of its management

00:12:08.321 --> 00:12:12.741
and key decision makers could come with
high costs, including the potential

00:12:12.801 --> 00:12:16.901
for an unanticipated merger of the
credit union if key personnel depart.

00:12:17.401 --> 00:12:22.101
In my view, it's better to maintain
many small credit unions serving a wide

00:12:22.101 --> 00:12:27.041
variety of purposes and niche markets
than continuing to consolidate credit

00:12:27.051 --> 00:12:29.591
unions into ever larger institutions.

00:12:30.296 --> 00:12:36.106
What's more, a credit union's failure
to adequately plan for its succession

00:12:36.336 --> 00:12:39.696
can pose risks to the system as a
whole and the share insurance fund,

00:12:39.986 --> 00:12:41.886
which the NCUA is tasked to protect.

00:12:42.306 --> 00:12:46.126
For these reasons, this revised succession
planning proposal is an important

00:12:46.126 --> 00:12:50.896
step to ensuring credit unions plan
for and are successful in the future.

00:12:51.556 --> 00:12:54.716
One last thing that I do
want to add, um, uh, before I

00:12:54.746 --> 00:12:56.154
recognize the Vice Chairman, Mr.

00:12:56.154 --> 00:12:56.181
Chairman.

00:12:56.641 --> 00:12:59.741
Please know that we are very
open to changes in this.

00:12:59.821 --> 00:13:04.801
We first proposed a rule
that was relatively easy,

00:13:04.961 --> 00:13:06.641
relatively non prescriptive.

00:13:06.691 --> 00:13:08.781
This rule is a little
bit more prescriptive.

00:13:09.101 --> 00:13:13.031
If we need to move it back one way or
the other, dial it up, dial it down,

00:13:13.271 --> 00:13:16.881
I am certainly open to working with
my fellow board members on that point.

00:13:17.541 --> 00:13:20.301
This proposal will be open
for a 60 day comment period.

00:13:20.606 --> 00:13:23.636
And I encourage all interested
stakeholders to provide

00:13:23.636 --> 00:13:24.666
substantive comments.

00:13:24.946 --> 00:13:27.926
That concludes my remarks, and I
now recognize the Vice Chairman.

00:13:29.196 --> 00:13:29.686
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman:
Thank you, sir.

00:13:30.206 --> 00:13:31.966
And thank you for your
presentation, Ariel and John.

00:13:32.016 --> 00:13:35.576
I appreciate the hard work staff has put
into this proposed rule and, uh, updating

00:13:35.576 --> 00:13:37.156
from the one we did two years ago.

00:13:37.716 --> 00:13:41.146
Uh, I also agree, successor planning
is important and recognize it's

00:13:41.146 --> 00:13:43.956
a real challenge for some credit
units, especially smaller ones,

00:13:44.386 --> 00:13:47.006
uh, and I appreciate the intent
to assist small credit units.

00:13:47.046 --> 00:13:49.626
I'm not convinced this
rulemaking is the best approach.

00:13:49.831 --> 00:13:52.741
In fact, I'm concerned regulation in this
area could make things more difficult.

00:13:53.351 --> 00:13:57.401
In January 2022, I voted in favor of a
proposed rule on succession planning,

00:13:57.401 --> 00:14:01.391
partly because I was genuinely interested
in hearing from the stakeholders.

00:14:03.161 --> 00:14:07.601
I appreciate the 26 commenters who
shared their thoughts and ideas, although

00:14:07.601 --> 00:14:10.891
the proposed rule we're talking about
today is not the same one as 2022.

00:14:11.451 --> 00:14:14.911
Stakeholder comments from then have
helped shape my decision on this new rule.

00:14:15.381 --> 00:14:17.631
Today's rule is almost twice
the size of the previous one.

00:14:17.761 --> 00:14:19.151
It now includes state chartered.

00:14:27.446 --> 00:14:31.106
This is one reason why most of the
comments have been negative, both

00:14:31.106 --> 00:14:36.596
on the old one and, and through more
informal channels, um, on this new one.

00:14:37.726 --> 00:14:40.766
This plan also includes a
comprehensive template intended to

00:14:40.776 --> 00:14:42.086
make things easier for credit unions.

00:14:42.336 --> 00:14:43.086
I appreciate the effort put in.

00:14:44.611 --> 00:14:46.311
I fear it may be daunting for many.

00:14:46.861 --> 00:14:49.881
Additional data was included to justify
the need for a rule, but many of the

00:14:49.881 --> 00:14:53.661
commenters pointed out the data on murders
went back 10 years and lacked the rigor

00:14:53.661 --> 00:14:55.371
necessary to draw accurate conclusions.

00:14:55.771 --> 00:15:00.401
Succession planning was included in
the 2023 Supervisory Priorities and

00:15:00.401 --> 00:15:04.291
in the 2022 CAMELS Letter, and I'm not
sure if we've measured those results.

00:15:04.691 --> 00:15:07.131
How many more credit unions added
or improved their succession

00:15:07.131 --> 00:15:08.461
plans because of that guidance?

00:15:09.341 --> 00:15:10.361
Do you have a handle on that?

00:15:12.246 --> 00:15:13.396
We don't have the analysis.

00:15:14.346 --> 00:15:17.496
Without measuring that impact, we can't
claim the guidance was ineffective.

00:15:17.936 --> 00:15:20.456
Nor can we assume that new
guidance will be more effective.

00:15:20.576 --> 00:15:20.596
We

00:15:22.676 --> 00:15:25.776
certainly can't conclude that this
much longer rule of more paperwork

00:15:25.776 --> 00:15:28.156
would be more effective than the
guidance which we haven't even

00:15:28.156 --> 00:15:29.406
looked at to see if it did anything.

00:15:29.776 --> 00:15:32.906
I'm inclined to agree with my former
colleague, Rodney Hood, who, in

00:15:32.906 --> 00:15:36.216
voting against that proposal in
2021, said guidance is a better

00:15:36.216 --> 00:15:37.546
way to address succession planning.

00:15:37.656 --> 00:15:40.846
I recall a small credit union CEO, I
believe from one of the southern states,

00:15:41.266 --> 00:15:44.256
telling me that if we passed a succession
planning rule, they would immediately

00:15:44.256 --> 00:15:45.466
look to merge with another credit union.

00:15:47.426 --> 00:15:49.046
That would reduce the
number of credit unions.

00:15:49.636 --> 00:15:55.216
Not keep it higher because they felt
unable to satisfy the NCUA's requirements.

00:15:55.666 --> 00:15:57.456
They would promote
murders, not reduce them.

00:15:58.116 --> 00:16:00.656
We also heard from credit unions
that have successfully managed

00:16:00.686 --> 00:16:04.496
leadership transitions but were
still against the 2022 proposed rule.

00:16:05.276 --> 00:16:06.186
Their reasoning was twofold.

00:16:06.196 --> 00:16:09.446
One, the rule would just be
another burden during exams.

00:16:09.746 --> 00:16:14.136
And two, their prior successions that
went very well didn't necessarily

00:16:14.136 --> 00:16:18.016
follow what they would have written
if NCUA had had a rule back then.

00:16:19.116 --> 00:16:21.556
They'd feel pressured to follow
their plan that they wrote.

00:16:21.966 --> 00:16:25.736
Or be penalized for not taking
their plan seriously, because they

00:16:25.736 --> 00:16:29.766
would have on the record a plan they
gave to their regulator insurer.

00:16:30.056 --> 00:16:32.166
The data didn't follow at all, so
what's the point of the next one?

00:16:33.296 --> 00:16:36.436
Examiners already have the authority to
question the sufficiency of a federally

00:16:36.436 --> 00:16:39.676
insured credit union's plan to manage
vacancies and executive positions.

00:16:39.976 --> 00:16:42.596
This authority is valid in connection
to safety and soundness and

00:16:42.596 --> 00:16:43.886
should be considered during exams.

00:16:44.406 --> 00:16:49.506
However, mandating a prescribed succession
plan and the paperwork and process,

00:16:49.926 --> 00:16:51.506
it goes beyond safety and soundness.

00:16:51.526 --> 00:16:53.686
We're not talking about succession
planning, we're talking about fulfilling

00:16:53.686 --> 00:16:55.336
NCUA's paperwork requirements.

00:16:55.846 --> 00:16:59.396
The people who are very good at succession
planning still object to our rule.

00:17:00.396 --> 00:17:02.576
I agree with commenters that
regulatory authority should not

00:17:02.576 --> 00:17:04.466
substitute for sound board governance.

00:17:04.806 --> 00:17:08.696
It should not replace or infringe upon the
fiduciary duty of the board of directors.

00:17:09.246 --> 00:17:13.586
Simply requiring a succession plan
documentation will not address

00:17:13.586 --> 00:17:16.496
the root cause of difficulties
in finding qualified candidates.

00:17:17.026 --> 00:17:20.506
Ultimately, succession planning is
a key responsibility of management.

00:17:21.631 --> 00:17:23.721
Credit union leadership must
address successional planning,

00:17:23.761 --> 00:17:24.881
even if it is difficult.

00:17:25.801 --> 00:17:29.661
The cooperative business model is meant to
give individual members a greater choice

00:17:29.661 --> 00:17:31.101
regarding their credit union's direction.

00:17:31.111 --> 00:17:35.081
When members are forced to vote for a
merger due to the lack of CEO succession

00:17:35.081 --> 00:17:38.811
plan, they lose that choice and ultimately
they lose that native credit union.

00:17:39.251 --> 00:17:40.971
There's nothing inherently
wrong with mergers, even as

00:17:40.971 --> 00:17:42.031
part of a succession plan.

00:17:42.761 --> 00:17:45.651
However, mergers should be deliberate,
intentional, and supported by membership.

00:17:46.301 --> 00:17:51.551
The FDIC and the OCC have issued guidance
on succession planning, with the OCC

00:17:51.551 --> 00:17:55.101
suggesting that it be a regular topic of
discussion among the Board of Directors.

00:17:56.741 --> 00:17:58.881
When considering any proposed
rule, I'm concerned about the

00:17:58.881 --> 00:18:01.591
needless burdens it may place on
already stressed credit unions.

00:18:01.901 --> 00:18:05.631
So, today's vote is not about whether
succession planning is important.

00:18:06.741 --> 00:18:11.371
Today's vote is not about whether some
credit unions out there really ought to

00:18:11.381 --> 00:18:12.771
think more about succession planning.

00:18:13.861 --> 00:18:17.656
It's about whether this rule, as
written We'll do more good than harm.

00:18:18.386 --> 00:18:21.376
I don't feel it passes that test,
thus I'll be voting against it.

00:18:21.606 --> 00:18:22.043
Thank you, Mr.

00:18:22.043 --> 00:18:22.280
Chairman.

00:18:22.280 --> 00:18:23.156
That concludes my remarks.

00:18:23.526 --> 00:18:25.626
Chairman Todd Harper: I,
as always, I appreciate the

00:18:25.626 --> 00:18:27.276
thoughtfulness of the gentleman.

00:18:27.526 --> 00:18:28.406
Board Member Otsuka.

00:18:29.206 --> 00:18:29.756
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: Thank you.

00:18:30.296 --> 00:18:32.586
And thanks, John and Ariel,
for your presentation on the

00:18:32.586 --> 00:18:34.136
NPR and succession planning.

00:18:34.996 --> 00:18:36.476
Appreciate the work that you guys put in.

00:18:36.996 --> 00:18:37.586
Um.

00:18:38.151 --> 00:18:41.561
I also want to thank Chair Harper for
re proposing this rule and creating

00:18:41.561 --> 00:18:47.211
the opportunity for us, uh, to
see comments on the most effective

00:18:47.211 --> 00:18:49.751
version, um, which I, I do support.

00:18:50.581 --> 00:18:52.331
So bear with me with this anecdote.

00:18:52.341 --> 00:18:53.551
It does mention a bank.

00:18:54.051 --> 00:18:59.921
Um, back in 2019, I recall a conversation
at a community bank conference

00:18:59.951 --> 00:19:01.531
with the CEO of a very small bank.

00:19:02.281 --> 00:19:04.871
He explained that the biggest
problem facing his institution was

00:19:04.871 --> 00:19:08.361
attracting talent and training staff
to prepare for a change in leadership.

00:19:08.931 --> 00:19:11.561
He and his board were approaching
retirement and he wanted to be

00:19:11.561 --> 00:19:15.281
sure he could ensure the long term
viability of the institution with

00:19:15.281 --> 00:19:16.791
the right people taking the reins.

00:19:17.521 --> 00:19:21.241
And since that time, I mean, that, I
remember that conference, I remember

00:19:21.241 --> 00:19:22.681
that conversation very vividly.

00:19:22.721 --> 00:19:27.091
It really resonated with me because since
that time, I have had so many similar

00:19:27.091 --> 00:19:32.651
conversations with credit union executives
and, and other credit union leaders

00:19:32.651 --> 00:19:34.341
who are facing this same challenge.

00:19:35.341 --> 00:19:38.031
Um, Transcripts As Chair Harper
mentioned, one of the goals of

00:19:38.031 --> 00:19:41.011
the rule is to help ensure the
continuity of small credit unions.

00:19:41.621 --> 00:19:44.351
Small credit unions are often left with
little choice but to merge when their

00:19:44.351 --> 00:19:47.541
leadership retires or leaves because
of the difficulties associated with

00:19:47.541 --> 00:19:49.591
finding new talent on short notice.

00:19:50.571 --> 00:19:54.231
Or worse, and I think this is where
this rule can play a role, the

00:19:54.231 --> 00:19:58.081
lack of leadership and the lack of
thoughtfulness results in serious

00:19:58.091 --> 00:20:02.161
financial and operational problems, which
hurts members and puts the viability

00:20:02.161 --> 00:20:03.961
of the entire institution at risk.

00:20:04.551 --> 00:20:08.171
And that is what can also put
the Share Insurance Fund at risk.

00:20:08.861 --> 00:20:12.131
You know, I know it's been discussed,
but yes, there are many credit unions

00:20:12.131 --> 00:20:16.571
who are taking succession planning
seriously, who are doing that, who are

00:20:16.571 --> 00:20:21.291
thinking ahead, but unfortunately there
are some that are not and we've seen that.

00:20:23.111 --> 00:20:28.891
Um, and so I think that, that is where
our responsibility really comes into play.

00:20:29.641 --> 00:20:33.211
And while of course our examiners
already look at management as part

00:20:33.211 --> 00:20:37.751
of the supervisory process, a rule
provides clearer guidance to both

00:20:37.751 --> 00:20:44.081
examiners and credit unions, um, on
what is expected and how to assess that.

00:20:45.071 --> 00:20:47.261
for those sound managerial practices,

00:20:49.721 --> 00:20:54.601
ensuring that credit unions don't fail
due to lack of leadership squarely

00:20:54.601 --> 00:20:59.121
within, um, our responsibility of
ensuring a safe and sound system.

00:20:59.761 --> 00:21:06.516
Um, you know, I, I know that we often, we
are concerned about, you know, You know,

00:21:06.696 --> 00:21:08.466
more paperwork, nobody likes paperwork.

00:21:09.056 --> 00:21:11.586
Um, I also don't like paperwork.

00:21:12.626 --> 00:21:16.156
But I think we have a responsibility
as regulators to make sure that

00:21:16.156 --> 00:21:17.746
our share insurance fund is safe.

00:21:18.056 --> 00:21:19.936
And that's ultimately
where the buck stops.

00:21:20.896 --> 00:21:24.666
The proposed rule would require federal
credit unions to establish and adhere

00:21:24.666 --> 00:21:26.456
to processes for succession planning.

00:21:26.796 --> 00:21:30.336
This is a gap in our regulatory framework
and one this proposal begins to fill.

00:21:30.356 --> 00:21:34.061
And again, this Chair Harper's point,
you know, I am interested in seeking

00:21:34.061 --> 00:21:35.751
comments on this revised version.

00:21:36.361 --> 00:21:39.231
It would require credit unions to
be proactive in thinking through

00:21:39.231 --> 00:21:42.501
how to maintain critical leadership
positions such as officers of the

00:21:42.501 --> 00:21:46.001
board and senior management officials
to ensure continuity of operations.

00:21:46.721 --> 00:21:49.001
This rule is not extremely prospective.

00:21:50.026 --> 00:21:54.486
Prescriptive, excuse me, but instead
provides basic standards for developing

00:21:54.486 --> 00:21:56.016
an effective succession plan.

00:21:56.556 --> 00:21:59.586
And again, the NCUA understands the
differing needs of credit unions,

00:21:59.596 --> 00:22:04.636
especially small and low income
designated credit unions, um, and

00:22:04.636 --> 00:22:08.976
I, I understand that the staff wrote
the rule in mind, with that in mind,

00:22:09.026 --> 00:22:10.766
uh, to provide enough flexibility.

00:22:11.896 --> 00:22:14.896
And in that vein, I would like to
highlight that although it is not part

00:22:14.916 --> 00:22:19.096
of the regulatory text, you know, I
think it is important for MDIs to account

00:22:19.096 --> 00:22:23.536
for retaining their MDI status as they
think about succession planning, as the

00:22:23.536 --> 00:22:28.176
composition of their leadership team is
a criteria to being designated as an MDI.

00:22:28.696 --> 00:22:32.586
Um, I mentioned this at the top, the
board recently reaffirmed our commitment

00:22:32.596 --> 00:22:36.636
to preserving MDIs and this is another
avenue through which we can execute this

00:22:36.646 --> 00:22:41.291
goal and think about, um, you know, the
preservation of MDIs because I think they

00:22:41.291 --> 00:22:43.981
are so important to so many communities.

00:22:44.461 --> 00:22:47.151
So just, um, a couple questions for staff.

00:22:47.201 --> 00:22:51.101
Um, many times we focus on how
our rules, including this one,

00:22:51.101 --> 00:22:55.551
will, um, uh, sorry, excuse me.

00:22:55.861 --> 00:23:01.171
Many times we focus on how our rules
will affect credit unions based on cost.

00:23:01.171 --> 00:23:02.721
How much will this cost credit unions?

00:23:03.511 --> 00:23:05.221
Um, which I think is an important.

00:23:07.071 --> 00:23:12.471
However, can you speak to the potential
savings and benefits of this rule, um,

00:23:12.591 --> 00:23:18.551
and ways that they can, it can provide
credit unions, uh, long term benefits?

00:23:18.921 --> 00:23:21.851
How might this outweigh the
costs associated with developing

00:23:21.851 --> 00:23:25.441
these plans, or at least at
the initial, uh, at the outset?

00:23:26.531 --> 00:23:27.231
Staff 1: for your question.

00:23:27.491 --> 00:23:30.241
Creating succession plans helps
credit unions prepare for key,

00:23:30.631 --> 00:23:33.141
Managerial changes, whether
they're expected or unexpected.

00:23:34.531 --> 00:23:37.681
Some potential benefits of succession
planning include maintaining business

00:23:37.711 --> 00:23:41.201
continuity, reducing disruptions
in operations and member services,

00:23:41.611 --> 00:23:47.671
knowledge transfer amongst employees,
cross training, and employee retention.

00:23:48.431 --> 00:23:51.731
These benefits can provide a more
seamless transition following the loss

00:23:51.741 --> 00:23:54.421
of a key employee, both internally
and for credit union membership.

00:23:55.131 --> 00:23:59.181
As you know, the proposed succession plan
requirements will impose some compliance

00:23:59.181 --> 00:24:00.501
costs on federally insured credit unions.

00:24:00.531 --> 00:24:03.161
However, we believe the benefits
of a strengthened planning

00:24:03.161 --> 00:24:04.371
process outweigh the costs.

00:24:05.331 --> 00:24:08.351
While the benefits of the regulatory
changes are difficult to quantify at

00:24:08.351 --> 00:24:12.291
present, should the rule be finalized,
we believe that its cost effectiveness

00:24:12.311 --> 00:24:13.721
will be demonstrated over time.

00:24:13.961 --> 00:24:16.641
We also know that the rule contains
several elements that mitigate the

00:24:16.641 --> 00:24:18.251
potential costs on credit unions.

00:24:18.301 --> 00:24:22.061
For example, the rule provides a
sample template that may be used by

00:24:22.061 --> 00:24:23.521
credients in developing their plans.

00:24:23.581 --> 00:24:26.791
The NCOA also offers training and
other resources to aid credients in

00:24:26.791 --> 00:24:28.061
developing their succession plans.

00:24:28.161 --> 00:24:31.291
For example, the NCOA has posted a
video series on succession planning

00:24:31.301 --> 00:24:32.431
on its learning management system.

00:24:33.441 --> 00:24:33.801
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: Great.

00:24:34.071 --> 00:24:34.851
Thank you for that.

00:24:34.871 --> 00:24:36.931
Um, I appreciate that.

00:24:37.011 --> 00:24:41.331
Um, so I also think it's important
for credit unions to understand

00:24:41.381 --> 00:24:45.451
what the expectations are when it
comes to how we evaluate management.

00:24:45.726 --> 00:24:48.486
during the examination and
supervisory process, and that

00:24:48.486 --> 00:24:49.806
includes succession planning.

00:24:50.366 --> 00:24:55.926
Um, can you explain how this proposed rule
would provide clarity for credit unions

00:24:55.936 --> 00:24:57.796
and examiners who are examining them?

00:24:58.926 --> 00:24:59.746
Staff 1: Thank you for the question.

00:24:59.916 --> 00:25:03.256
Currently, Letter to Credit Unions
22 CU 05 provides that succession

00:25:03.256 --> 00:25:06.836
planning is a factor to consider when
assessing the management of a credit

00:25:06.836 --> 00:25:08.376
union under the CAMELS rating system.

00:25:08.576 --> 00:25:11.756
Accordingly, the N2A currently assesses
succession planning under the CAMELS

00:25:11.756 --> 00:25:15.116
management component as part of the
overall safety and soundness evaluation

00:25:15.136 --> 00:25:16.286
of the credit union's operations.

00:25:16.641 --> 00:25:20.091
However, there is no regulation requiring
federally insured credeans to implement

00:25:20.091 --> 00:25:23.821
a formal written succession plan and
as a result, a credean's failure to

00:25:23.821 --> 00:25:28.631
establish a plan or the inadequacy of its
succession planning process will not in

00:25:28.631 --> 00:25:32.841
and of itself, uh, warrant an examiner
finding or a document and resolution item.

00:25:33.541 --> 00:25:35.071
Uh, the, the absence,

00:25:37.241 --> 00:25:40.021
the absence of the specific regulation
on this topic also means that there

00:25:40.031 --> 00:25:43.431
are no requirements as to the,
what constitutes an acceptable

00:25:43.451 --> 00:25:46.691
succession plan and the regulation
would therefore establish a needed.

00:25:47.046 --> 00:25:49.806
Clearly articulated and
consistently enforceable set of

00:25:49.806 --> 00:25:50.766
succession planning standards.

00:25:51.966 --> 00:25:52.426
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: Gotcha.

00:25:52.486 --> 00:25:53.216
Thank you for that.

00:25:53.216 --> 00:25:57.306
Thank you for your responses and
adding further context as to, uh,

00:25:57.316 --> 00:26:01.536
why we are proposing this rule, um,
and why it's needed to help preserve

00:26:01.536 --> 00:26:03.056
our system of cooperative credit.

00:26:03.476 --> 00:26:04.676
Um, thanks again.

00:26:04.676 --> 00:26:05.836
I turn it back over to Chair

00:26:05.846 --> 00:26:06.266
Chairman Todd Harper: Harper.

00:26:06.546 --> 00:26:07.206
Thank you so much.

00:26:07.486 --> 00:26:11.916
Um, one question I want to build on
off of, uh, the questions that you had.

00:26:12.551 --> 00:26:16.911
Um, oftentimes I hear with small
credit unions, the manager of 30

00:26:16.921 --> 00:26:19.331
years announces she's going to retire.

00:26:19.941 --> 00:26:26.491
Her salary has remained relatively flat
and isn't keeping up with market rates.

00:26:26.891 --> 00:26:31.721
Could a benefit of this proposal
be benchmarking and helping to the

00:26:31.721 --> 00:26:35.471
credit union to ensure that it's,
it's growing and building itself

00:26:35.471 --> 00:26:38.821
in a way and its budget that it can
attract talent at a later point?

00:26:39.641 --> 00:26:40.221
Staff 1: Absolutely.

00:26:40.231 --> 00:26:42.431
Understanding the cost
of replacing the skills.

00:26:42.741 --> 00:26:45.931
It's unnecessary to meet the, the
roles that that person, that key

00:26:45.931 --> 00:26:47.511
employee fills is, is absolutely.

00:26:48.011 --> 00:26:50.931
Um, necessary for credit unions to
be forward looking and, and not be

00:26:50.931 --> 00:26:53.161
looking at that when the time comes.

00:26:53.471 --> 00:26:53.621
Chairman Todd Harper: Yeah.

00:26:53.621 --> 00:26:57.901
I, I also know that there was an
initiative a few years ago, um, to

00:26:57.911 --> 00:27:02.901
bring in young NBAs who had recently
completed their training into the,

00:27:02.911 --> 00:27:05.281
uh, the credit union, uh, system.

00:27:05.541 --> 00:27:09.851
Uh, small credit unions are a perfect
place for a young, uh, person with

00:27:09.851 --> 00:27:13.651
executive training to, to cut their
teeth and, and, and to grow overall.

00:27:13.691 --> 00:27:14.071
Five minutes.

00:27:14.071 --> 00:27:14.086
Okay.

00:27:14.246 --> 00:27:14.896
Yeah, of course.

00:27:14.966 --> 00:27:16.166
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman:
Uh, only because you jumped in.

00:27:16.226 --> 00:27:17.226
Yeah, no, absolutely.

00:27:17.656 --> 00:27:21.636
Um, the FDIC has no similar
rule, is that correct?

00:27:23.066 --> 00:27:23.506
Okay.

00:27:24.206 --> 00:27:25.716
Tanya, you were with the FDIC for years.

00:27:26.146 --> 00:27:28.646
Do you know why they don't have
a rule like this forcing banks to

00:27:28.686 --> 00:27:29.696
fill out this kind of paperwork?

00:27:31.036 --> 00:27:33.946
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: Not off the top
of my head, but there are a lot of rules

00:27:33.976 --> 00:27:38.636
that the FDIC doesn't have that we have
and that we have that they don't have.

00:27:38.676 --> 00:27:43.606
And so, you know, I think that given
some of the things that we've seen,

00:27:43.626 --> 00:27:48.276
you know, Um, with credit unions, I do
think that this proposal makes sense for

00:27:48.276 --> 00:27:50.296
us to again solicit more feedback on.

00:27:50.496 --> 00:27:50.996
But yeah.

00:27:51.326 --> 00:27:51.786
But yeah.

00:27:51.996 --> 00:27:54.146
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman: We don't
have to copy the FDIC by any means.

00:27:54.176 --> 00:27:56.146
I'm actually trying to figure
out if it's a good idea.

00:27:56.146 --> 00:27:58.386
When you were at the FDIC, did
you advocate for such a rule?

00:28:00.066 --> 00:28:02.376
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: Um,
at the, while I was at the FDIC,

00:28:02.416 --> 00:28:04.546
I was a staff attorney and, uh,

00:28:04.926 --> 00:28:05.746
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman: no, I did not

00:28:05.796 --> 00:28:06.796
Board Member Tanya Otsuka:
advocate for such a rule.

00:28:07.156 --> 00:28:07.186
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman: Okay.

00:28:07.236 --> 00:28:10.476
But Congress can put a rule
like this any time they wish.

00:28:10.876 --> 00:28:12.796
When you worked for the Chairman
of the Senate Bank Committee,

00:28:12.826 --> 00:28:15.356
did you suggest that they put
forth legislation to do this?

00:28:18.411 --> 00:28:21.171
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: I don't
know how my work on the Senate

00:28:21.181 --> 00:28:23.601
Banking Committee and whether I
advocated for something like this

00:28:23.601 --> 00:28:27.241
or not has any bearing on whether
I support the proposal right now.

00:28:27.941 --> 00:28:28.901
Vice Chairman Kyle Hauptman: It
doesn't have any bearing on it,

00:28:28.901 --> 00:28:30.401
but good ideas are good ideas.

00:28:30.611 --> 00:28:33.771
And one regulatory body forcing
them, or Congress can do it.

00:28:33.781 --> 00:28:35.861
We wouldn't even be talking
about it if Congress mandated it.

00:28:36.261 --> 00:28:37.751
Uh, we have to do what Congress wants.

00:28:37.931 --> 00:28:39.931
So, I'm just saying if it was a good idea.

00:28:40.626 --> 00:28:44.286
Uh, at another agency, it seems
like it would be a good idea here.

00:28:44.306 --> 00:28:48.496
If it was a good idea here, it would
be a good idea for Congress to do it.

00:28:48.586 --> 00:28:50.706
Who probably should be making
most of these decisions anyway.

00:28:50.766 --> 00:28:51.686
That's what I wanted to mention.

00:28:51.686 --> 00:28:54.376
But, in terms of attracting talent,
small credit unions, it is hard.

00:28:54.826 --> 00:28:57.306
One great way to do it is
make the job less of a pain.

00:28:57.426 --> 00:28:58.806
A lot of these are labors of love.

00:28:58.806 --> 00:29:00.881
You mentioned a person whose
pay hasn't risen in years.

00:29:01.381 --> 00:29:02.561
Hey, would you like to run a credit union?

00:29:02.561 --> 00:29:03.011
How's the pay?

00:29:03.011 --> 00:29:03.611
Not very good.

00:29:03.611 --> 00:29:04.051
What do you do?

00:29:04.061 --> 00:29:06.981
Well, I spent an enormous amount of time
filling out paperwork for my regulator

00:29:07.291 --> 00:29:08.851
and rushing to meet their deadlines.

00:29:09.351 --> 00:29:10.851
That's not a job that attracts a lot.

00:29:10.921 --> 00:29:12.621
Why, uh, is it because you're risky?

00:29:12.621 --> 00:29:13.881
No, we have 800, 000 in assets.

00:29:15.301 --> 00:29:17.771
We're a microscopic risk to the
fund, but still we are forced

00:29:17.771 --> 00:29:18.621
to do all this paperwork.

00:29:18.761 --> 00:29:22.091
So if we really want to attract talent,
we can make the job more attractive and

00:29:22.091 --> 00:29:23.841
it's UA has some role to play in that.

00:29:24.731 --> 00:29:25.161
I'm done now.

00:29:26.291 --> 00:29:29.961
Chairman Todd Harper: Fair enough and,
um, just one, uh, two final points.

00:29:29.961 --> 00:29:33.641
One is, Just, just because one
agency hasn't acted first doesn't

00:29:33.641 --> 00:29:35.041
mean that we can't act first.

00:29:35.111 --> 00:29:35.591
Absolutely.

00:29:35.871 --> 00:29:41.181
Um, uh, and second, I do want to
reiterate this, um, to the Vice Chairman.

00:29:42.201 --> 00:29:47.201
This is an open, fluid process, um, I,
you know, at the end of the day where we

00:29:47.201 --> 00:29:49.921
ultimately land with something in final.

00:29:50.261 --> 00:29:53.471
Uh, I, I want to share the
commitment that, you know, we will

00:29:53.971 --> 00:29:56.761
continue to have the discussions
and where we might be able to land.

00:29:57.061 --> 00:30:00.361
The intent here is, is a good one.

00:30:00.681 --> 00:30:05.221
Um, the execution is what
I'm hearing, um, uh, overall.

00:30:05.931 --> 00:30:07.711
Board Member Otsuka, is there a motion?

00:30:08.551 --> 00:30:10.531
Board Member Tanya Otsuka: I move
that the board proposed proposed rules

00:30:10.531 --> 00:30:16.081
succession planning 12 C FFR part 7 0 1
and 7 41 for a 60 day comment period as

00:30:16.081 --> 00:30:17.431
attached to the board action memorandum.

00:30:17.581 --> 00:30:19.021
Chairman Todd Harper: Is
there a second to the motion?

00:30:20.081 --> 00:30:20.831
Hearing none.

00:30:20.831 --> 00:30:22.031
I second the motion.

00:30:22.151 --> 00:30:23.531
All those in favor say aye.

00:30:23.741 --> 00:30:24.101
Aye.

00:30:24.131 --> 00:30:24.551
Aye.

00:30:24.641 --> 00:30:25.871
All those opposed say nay.

00:30:25.871 --> 00:30:25.901
Aye.

00:30:26.801 --> 00:30:30.791
The ayes have it and let the record
show that the motion passes two to one.

00:30:31.901 --> 00:30:32.456
Thank you both.

00:30:32.856 --> 00:30:34.266
Samantha: This concludes this item.

00:30:34.966 --> 00:30:39.126
If your Credit union could use assistance
with your exam, reach out to Mark Treichel

00:30:39.126 --> 00:30:41.876
on LinkedIn, or at mark Treichel dot com.

00:30:42.426 --> 00:30:45.046
This is Samantha Shares and
we Thank you for listening.