Transcript:
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/54280251Speaker 0 (0s): Did you hear about that new restaurant called karma? You get what you deserve. Thank you. Thank you. Welcome to the future. A future future. It's cracking out there where everybody, but you guys getting into have a good weekend. How's the weather. Nice. A warm, or is it raining where you are you part of that hurricane that's for me, it don't worry about me doing fine.
Live in the dream. As they say he was doing some thinking this whole fire is thing is pretty interesting. Isn't it? It got me thinking, what is the difference between a computer virus and a human virus? It seems to me that there's a lot of similarities, right? In some ways, in a lot of ways, the coronavirus has having the effect of mass hysteria.
It's causing people to act out of control. It's causing some people not to act at all. Same thing for a computer virus, right? It makes the computer just stopped. Sometimes that makes the computer act out of control. Both of them seem to want to hijack your data. One of them wants to hijack your DNA. No one wants to hack your passwords or your routing number.
Are your pictures or something like that. Right? Isn't it funny that we have some of the same people that work on computers trying to work on this virus or a lot of similarities. They're I'm just sayin I was talking to a friend of mine and he's got, I got an Apple computer. He's got a, like a Microsoft, he's got windows on his computer and his computer has a lot of problems.
Microsoft has a lot of viruses. That's interesting because bill Gates is they had a Microsoft, right? Well, isn't he also the head of like the world health organization, the CDC, if his computers have a lot of viruses, why would we trust him being in, being in charge of the coronavirus? Like he can't keep off his computer. He was going to keep them off for people.
Does it make any sense? He was an issue there to me. It seems there was a whole lot, a lot more going on behind the scenes. Obviously it's an election year and there's a lot of people that are jockeying for position utilize the different strategies to win. However, and after election day, I think regardless of who wins, the same strategy for the coronavirus is going to be an effect.
As far as the vaccine goes, when it comes to the wall street, both sides have there team have winners that they are going to funnel all the taxpayer money to, to win. However, when it comes to the vaccine, both camps are adamant about you getting that vaccine. That's the real deal. I mean, the real distraction is to keep your mind off of that. I don't think people need a vaccine and if you need a vaccine than go get it.
But when you talk about forcing people to take a vaccine, you are talking about something that has that the very least some sinister undertones. I left to go on to the world health, the organization website, and listening to some of their podcasts and what they got going on. And there's a team of people currently in Switzerland that are working on a package, support vaccination identification, and they bring up some interesting points that I think everybody should be aware of.
One of them is that they want anyone who flies on a plane to be, to have this vaccine documentation. There's a lot of issues with that. That's where the whole chip thing comes in. You know, they have this quantum dot or they have this RFID chip that will allow you to get on a plane, go into a sports stadium or go to work.
However, no one wants that. And not only do people not want it, but it's in my opinion, I think that it is it's unethical. Right? Good to understand the grand scheme of things, where smart cities want to be able to track people, smart cities want to be able to have your ID. Smart cities want to be able to have your bank accounts. Smart cities want to be able to have all that information on a small chip in your body.
Now you can just walk around and doors will open for you. Not only that, but also I think there's a lot of technology isle right now that it depends on that. Think the future of healthcare is being inside your body. They want to have these, these RFID chips that wood, you know, send a alert to a hospital. If your blood pressure was high or send an alert, if your blood sugar dropped somewhere or send an alert to a computer or to an AI system somewhere to make sure that your Okay I, on some level, I can understand the beauty of that.
That's that's awesome. But what, at what expense, at what expense, if you think about it from a logistics point of view, think about how much money they would save in healthcare. If they didn't have to have you come in all the time, if they could monitor you from afar. If instead of having doctors, they just had an AI system, you know, prescribe you, drugs are prescribed to you treatment.
You could do a way with so much of Docker's and then that would completely do away with so much schooling for people. And they could find other professions that's on the utopia side, right? So let's rewind it back and talk about some other unethical issues. So let's say that the first people that get a vaccine are the people that need at most.
And from, from what I read. And I also try to utilize the maximum of believe, none of what you hear and a half of what you read. So you should probably believe none of this since you are hearing it. However, I believe half of it. So here we go. Let's say that the people they get the vaccine or the people that are most are in danger of getting coven. And from what I've read, that appears to be minorities, people with underlying conditions and like homeless people are the poor people.
And that's at least what's what I'm hearing in the United States. So let's say that there is negative side effects from the vaccine, those of the people that are going to see all those side effects. First, the people that are already hurting people that are already in danger, they will see the most rapid side effects. If you read the literature, it also talks about once people get the vaccine, then they will be monitored closely.
And there is a term for it's called. It might have to come back and say Cause, I don't remember exactly what it was called. It's like pharmacol, pharmacological going to have to come back. I don't remember it. It's like pharmacological surveillance. And if you look up that word, you'll see that its it's being tracked well, were going to work.
How do you know that there's going to be any side effects on this particular vaccine while were going to utilize the process of farmer pharmacological surveillance. Okay. What's that? Well, that's us tracking him. Well, how are you going to track them? Oh, what? We're going to have a small RFID chip. That'll send us a signal. So when you started digging into the literature about what the vaccine is, the vaccine is a chip. It's a implantable device that allows you and everyone who gets the vaccine to be volunteered into phase four clinical trials, have the vaccine.
Do you see that's where the unethical part comes in. Imagine being someone that gets the vaccine while a lot of people don't have it. Don't you think that it would be some sort of stigma about that person? Like, do you, Oh, you got the chip in you. Oh man, I don't want to be around you or, Oh, you got the ship. That must be, and you have it. That must mean you have COVID so I don't want to be around you. I think one big issue there thinking about right now is this certain stigma about having this disease. I've also heard of that.
Once you have COVID-19 that you can, and we'll in the future. Be diagnosed as someone with a preexisting condition. Lord knows what that means or, or how the insurance companies going to treat you. If you have a preexisting condition on top of the vaccine, I think that COVID is a large umbrella for other things. I know that I was thinking about. I don't understand why, you know, we had the new deal and we created all this infrastructure and they put all these people to work.
There is if you look it like Venice beach or California or Hawaii, or probably in your neck of the woods somewhere, I was just probably a lot more homeless people. Then there has been quite some time just because of the way of the economy is one of the new deal. They went to those people and said, look, we can't give you a much, but we can give you a job and you can feed your family. We're gonna build some damns and build some roads, got to build some infrastructure. I was racking my brain trying to think about like, well, why don't we do that now?
Like this is the perfect time to build some infrastructure, right? We got all the people that, or that need help or that need a job that are probably willing to go out and work hard if we just provided them an opportunity. And if we can provide bailouts to the central bankers all day long, why can't we bail that the people, you know, why can't we give, create some sort of government jobs for them to make money, to feed their families. They're just to give the money, but you should be able to give them an opportunity.
And that got me doing some digging and thinking, as I did that, there was a great article by a Whitney web. I will put it in the show notes, but there's a lot of infrastructure going on right now, stuff you wouldn't think of. There's plans to build three smart city's in New York, they are going to be built by Israel. I think there's plans for those are the three that I've read about. I think there's also plans for some cities in California to be smart cities.
And the current infrastructure they're setting up are smart sewer systems where they go in and then they put monitors and censors into the sewage so that they can see where the next outbreak is, where they can see what city are eating healthy, what cities, you know, what, what percentage of narcotics or what percentage of pharmaceuticals are in the sewage.
And then they can go into those cities and try to fix them. Theoretically. However, it seems that that could be used pretty nefarious as well. And if indeed they are setting up smart sewer, shouldn't the people have a right to vote on that particular thing. That's another sinister part that I see going on is that an I kind of get, like, if you let people vote for stuff, you're probably not going to get much accomplished.
For example, I live in Hawaiian, they have this Trane going through and they voted on it and it didn't pass and they voted on it and it didn't pass. Then they voted on it and then it past and they have voted on which direction was going to go. Then they voted on what kinds of technology is gonna be And, you know, it's a disaster because it just sits at a standstill and no one gets anywhere. There's too much money on both sides.
There's too much interest. And so you've got traffic and you have jams. Then the rail, the rail over here is way behind budget or a way over budget in a way behind schedule. And that is one of the problems with infrastructure in the U S and That is another reason why I think you're seeing this COVID-19 and all of these lockdowns be hammered home.
Speaker 1 (15m 23s): Additionally, I think that, I mean, you could make the argument that under the umbrella of COVID, we are trying to radically and fundamentally change our financial system. It's so interesting. The way things are worded or what you read in the paper, what you read on the internet or YouTube or wherever you get your news from when it comes to the monetary system in the new stimulus package that they are trying to push through, you know, it seems both sides are in agreement that it should be trillions of dollars.
And I want you to think about that word, trillions of dollars. Like that number is so large, that was really difficult to wrap your mind around trillions of dollars. Why don't they say we are going to spend $50,000 for every man, woman and child in the United States or whatever the equivalent is. We're going to spend a hundred thousand dollars every man, woman, and child, and were going to take that a hundred, a thousand dollars for every man, woman and child in the U S and were going to give it to the corporations and the banks.
That's a lot different than saying we're going to do a trillion dollar stimulus package, but if they send it the ladder, if they said, we're going to take a hundred thousand dollars for every man, woman and child and were going to give it too, the largest corporations we are going to give to the airlines, general electric, we are going to give it to show and all of these companies. And if you've already got so much money for bail outs, if they said that the people would be up in arms to be riots on the street.
So they don't say that, but the fact that they are planning this multi-trillion dollar package and the fact that they are not being honest about how much money they're spending, or the fact that they're not telling you or me, or are these people that get up and go to work everyday. The fact that all
Speaker 2 (17m 50s): Our politicians are making a conscious decision to conceal from the people where their money's going. I think that is a pretty bold statement. I think that that is telling us that the monetary system is failing. There's talks about a digital dollar there's talks about blockchain technology. Another interesting point to think about is if you can kinda take a, a wider look, if you can expand your vision and not just think about the United States, but think about how everything is unfolding in the world.
Like this is a world crisis. And it seems that there's also a monetary crisis that proceeded the outbreak. Right? We had the bank bailouts in Oh eight, then we had another problem and 2012 and there was a liquidity crisis, like the bank's and the monetary system have been in real trouble for a long time.
There was an interesting comment by the president of Belarus. You shank off, I think is his name. I could be wrong about that name. I think that's his name. However, a few months ago, he came out in, you can go online and find it just probably Google Bellaruse. President talks about the IMF. And what he said is that the international monetary fund offered him a $1 million to shutdown his country.
If they weren't wearing masks. Cause they weren't taking Covitz seriously. And he had said that they don't have COVID in Belarus. So he came out and said, you know, there were, there were pretty well documented. I would urge you to go and look, he says, listen, the IMF came to me and they said, we will give you a million dollars. If you shut down and ruin your economy right now, I need told them to buzz off. If that's true, if that's true, wouldn't it make sense that the IMF has gone too.
A lot of other country's and made the same deal and people did take the money. If that's true. There's a great book by John Perkins, it's called a confessions of an economic Hitman. And what he talks about is about the international monetary fund. What they do is they go to countries and countries that are in debt to think about a third world nation.
That's trying to industrialize. They wanna build a port or are they want to build some infrastructure so they don't have any money. So they are, they get a loan from the IMF. And when you think we get back to kind of a lone, they get, they get a predatory loan alone. That sounds good. Well, they get a bunch of money up front. However, the main things pay back that loan are ridiculous. It probably has a interest rate that fluctuates, you know, 20 or 30% of the way the lone is structured is four.
The people that get it to Never pay it back on. The reason they do that is they want to be able to take the resources out of the country. So they'll give the leader's the lone, the leader's the country will be unable to pay it back. And then the IMF can be on good terms in negotiate for the natural resources of that country. And there'll be able to extract the resources and that way. And then its a never ending cycle to think about somebody who know who's a debt that used like a payday loan system and they just never catch up.
It's the same system only on a Countrywide basis. If you think about it from that aspect, by the way, that's a great book. John Perkins, economic Hitman, you should definitely read it. Do you take that into account? I look at all the places. This is that are really hard hit in. All right. And if you look at New York, California, both of these States, they have to stay. I have no money. They have no money.
So is it that far of a stretch to think that it could, it has been approached by the central banks and say, listen, it will pay off all your debts. However we need you to do these things. It was right now. It seems plausible to me, it's the same strategy that the international bankers have used not only in a third world countries, but throughout it's throughout history. Do you, you know, they start with, they end up funding, both sides of the Well was that way.
If you look okay, At whether it's world war one or world war two, if you look out that was financed and it was financed on both sides by the same bankers, by the same people that own the banking institutions, they fund both sides. They make all the money, the same people that fund, the proud boys are the same people that fund black people and the same people that are fun.
The military industrial complex, right at the same people that fund Trump's foreign policy, they fund Biden's foreign. Paula's the same people that fund Trump's foreign policy. They fund Obama's foreign policy. And why is it that we don't even talk about foreign policy? If we don't even talk about foreign aid going into other countries, instead we are fed this garbage about how, how unfair it is to be in America and how these people don't respect these people.
I'm not saying that's not their I'm just seeing, it seems like a pretty big distraction to me. And that if you tie all these together, if you, if you look at what was said in Bella, Bruce, if you think about John Perkins book, the economic Hitman, if you think about the owner, his debts by States like California in New York, if you think about the amount of money we're constantly printing.
If you think about the bailouts, if you think about to new stimulus package, instead of being trillions of dollars, being $100,000, every man, woman and child in the U S and That money going to the banks, that money going to the largest corporations. I think that that's a lot of evidence to support the destruction of the monetary system.
You know, there's a additionally, when you look at Deutsche, the large bank in Germany, you know, they were out seeking criminals. Like they went and sought out Jeffrey Epstein after he got in trouble for being a pedophile. If you look at the money, the monetary system in a where they get their money from, its it goes to show you that they'll take money from anybody or are they taking money from anybody because they need that money to make the system work more than likely more than likely.
Anyways, it's just fascinating to think about where we're at right now as a country where we are right now as a world and where we are right now in our lives. More importantly, I think the real answer is like, what can you do right now to ensure that your future you are in livelihood, your family's livelihood can be a little bit protected.
It's a good question. And I try not to dwell too much on the negative aspects of COVID. Although I find it fascinating and interesting. And I think you have to try and define the problem before you can come up with a solution. And so you gotta, for me, for me right now was a great time to train and reinvent yourself.
You have a little bit of extra time, you know, what are, what are the things that are beginning to emerge, right? Yeah. What are the next phase of industrialization? What is the next phase of industrialization look like to us? And I would say that there's a lot more power coming to the individual. If you have more time, then you can have more time to be productive on your terms.
Think I think that education is something that everybody should be looking into that were seeing a giant divide by beginning to happen in that you can play a part on what side of that divide you want to be on. I was at the bookstore the other day and I saw the new wired magazine.
I used to be a nice to have a subscription to wired. It's a pretty good magazine. I think it's got a lot of influence from, from our government. Just like a lot of magazines these days that are on the shelf are a lot of the newspapers. There's a lot of propaganda in there. However, on the cover of the new wired magazine, there was an article that said the great work from home experiment. I just thought like, wow, that's exactly what this is on another level.
What COVID is, is like this giant social experiment to see what will happen or are we going to bring in a authoritarian regime throughout the world? Are we gonna utilize the China model, the state capitalism? Or is it going to be a more decentralized model? I would hope the latter, I would hope would be a little bit more decentralized and that people would be allowed to play a bigger part in their future rather than having their future dictated to them.
That being said, I think not only is it a work from home experiment, but it's also an educate from home experiment. I know a lot of people that are having tough times and I'm sure you do as well. If you go to work and your spouse goes to work, who's going to be there to make sure you're a kid follows the assignments online.
Well, you could say, well, they don't need to follow their assignments George they can just do, they can just be driven and they can experiment with the things that they find interesting. And that will make them more of an interesting person. Maybe a mind, I guess it depends on what age they are. What if one of you it works and your spouse stays home and tries to work from home. When anybody whose in that scenario knows that if you have a young child, it's difficult to get some things done due to the fact that a child needs help or learning online, it would be interesting to see those numbers.
I think people working from home are probably more productive then people that are going into an office and sitting down and just wait and take a break. But when you to take a lunch, I'm on board with that model. I I think that going into a building and having to drive in traffic for an hour or two hours, sit down and having someone try to watch over your back to see if you're doing what you should be doing.
And then no, that seems like an antiquated model to me. And I think that there's a lot of people that would say that's the same thing for education. That is also an antiquated model. That's why I'm bringing up the possibilities for the future are an education.
If you could establish a curriculum, you know, maybe not, maybe it is you don't have to be a whole curriculum, but if you have something interesting to offer to the world at large, then you could create a class four, it, you can go online or make a series of YouTube videos or a podcast or something that people could tune into maybe for an hour a day, or I dunno once a week or something. However, if you could create something that would benefit society, I think now is the time to begin shrine, do it the best way to predict the future is to create it right.
I've always heard that quote. It seems to be pretty true. I'm hopeful that after the election things will be a little bit not as divisive. You know, I, I realize that that's probably a pipe dream and things are probably going to be more divisive. It just seems to me that when we focus on our differences, we move further apart.
When we focus on things we have in common, we can begin to build bridges, to rebuild our relationship with one another. However, it's difficult in the, in the new digital paradigm, this new digital format where we are subject, where we have access to everybody's problems. Look at these problems. Look at those guys. Look at these guys, looked at her and look at him.
Look at those kids. Oh no, we're not built to respond to all those issues. And so I think as a, as a country, we should prioritize what it is we want to solve. You know, you just do that old, that old Ben Franklin method, right? Where you just crease the paper on one side, your right, at the positive things.
And on one side to write the negative things, you start crossing them off. What's the number one issue we want to solve in our country. We want to solve healthcare. We want to solve the economy. I think they could all be solved, but we have to stop. We have to stop trying to save the world, right? You gotta save your community before you can save your state. You gotta save your state before you can save your nation. You gotta save it to save your nation before you can.
I don't think you can save the world. I think it's, I think it's just
Speaker 1 (35m 38s): This beautiful idea that has been exploited of, Hey man, let's save the world, save the world, man. We can't even save each other. I like how many homeless people are on the street and you got people running around. Let's save the planet, man. Yeah. I'm with you, man. I love the planet, but its like being in the airplane. You got a if for some reason you are on an airplane and its about to crash.
What are the stewards is to say, Hey, please attach your mask to yourself before you start trying to help other people attach their masks. It just seems like a giant distraction. The whole COVID the whole economic system. It's just this giant distraction to keep us from working together, to get ourselves and a better position. That's what it seems like to me.
I was reading this other book called when Google met Wiki leaks and what they talk about their is a form of censorship known as complexity. You know what I mean by that? If you think about the way people keep money and offshore accounts, if you think about the way that Epstein or Weinstein or you know, the, the Trump family are the Clinton foundation or whatever, whoever's, whoever's out there hiding and all their money.
They do it utilizing a set of show companies in a foreign country under a foreign name. And then it's just like that shell game were, you know, who, the guy that puts the ping pong ball under a couple of shelves, moving them around and bought a Bing bada boom, it's gone, right? The more complex something is the more you're unlikely to understand it. And the more unlikely you are to understand it, the more unlikely you are to continue investigating it.
And the more unlikely you are to continue investigating it, the more likely the people are likely to get away with the crime and the people that have gone to jail. The people that weren't complex enough, I think that is a form of like complexity is a form of censorship complexity as a way to hide things from people and its kind of a new term for international banking or is the new term for a number they used to be the quants.
They would create the derivatives like the new as complexity Hey were we're looking to hire are people who understand complexity. We want to hire people who can find ways to hide, to hide our money. That's what it, it seems like me, you know, it was, I think it's gotta get to a point where we were probably getting close.
Right like every year you hear about the hundred richest men have more than 80% of the world. If that concentration of wealth is not going away, it's only speeding up. Especially in times of crisis like this, where to the point now where we give billionaires money to build a building and a state like they give Jeff Bezos millions, if not billions of dollars in subsidies and tax breaks to bring jobs to a state, it seems like it should be the opposite.
Right? Shouldn't we be charging Jeff Bell's is, Oh, you want to build here? Okay. If you want to build here than we would love, you know, we are, as the state of Hawaii would prefer that we do some profit sharing. We would like you to open up your books and will take all. I don't know, how does you make 70 will pick? It will take 30% of all the profits. Additionally, we would like all the people in our state to be paid, say $22 an hour.
Either we have a state and a monthly minimum. So the, the hourly minimum is $23 an hour. And the monthly minimum is $4,400 a month. And then we'll take, our point will take our 30% that will go into funding, health care for all the people here. And we would love to have you write it. Isn't that a way better deal than okay. We'll give you, we'll make all the people paid to have you hear, you know what I mean? It just seems like it's it's backwards to me.
However, it's not it's that continued subjugation that continued concentration of wealth is already to the point where some people have aircraft carriers and hundreds of thousands of people that are homeless and you can't really continue that way and have the quality of life for people be worthwhile.
At least that's what it seems like to me. However, those are my thoughts on what's been going on and what I've been reading lately about COVID and the situation and ideas. And I wanted to kind of mix in some things that we could do better in solutions and just kinda of get my ideas down here are recorded and kind of get them out to everybody to see what you guys think and let me know, what am I way off base.
Am I close to it? Or is that what you guys see in your neighborhood? Or what else do you guys see going on? That's all I got for today. I love you. Aloha.