1
00:00:47,302 --> 00:00:50,403
Welcome back to the DeepView Conversations. Today for our

2
00:00:50,463 --> 00:00:53,712
second episode, I traveled all the way from

3
00:00:53,892 --> 00:00:57,974
New Jersey to the United Arab Emirates, specifically

4
00:00:58,034 --> 00:01:01,355
Abu Dhabi, which is the home of the Mohamed bin Zayed University of

5
00:01:01,395 --> 00:01:04,857
Artificial Intelligence. This is the world's first and only

6
00:01:05,717 --> 00:01:09,118
university that is focused exclusively on AI research. And

7
00:01:09,158 --> 00:01:12,460
right now I'm speaking with Dr. Eric Jing, who is the

8
00:01:12,540 --> 00:01:15,721
president of MBZ UAI. Eric, thanks so

9
00:01:17,657 --> 00:01:21,282
Well, thank you for traveling all the way here. I appreciate your diligence

10
00:01:21,603 --> 00:01:25,048
and I love to chat

11
00:01:28,162 --> 00:01:31,324
So I want to start with you, right? And as we've kind

12
00:01:31,344 --> 00:01:34,825
of talked about before, the cameras started rolling, right? Your background

13
00:01:34,885 --> 00:01:38,407
is in research, and you've been a professor, and you still kind

14
00:01:38,447 --> 00:01:42,149
of wear that research hat. How do you go from a professor

15
00:01:42,189 --> 00:01:46,271
of computer science to the president of MBZUAI

16
00:01:47,391 --> 00:01:50,793
Well, to be honest, I never thought I'd become a

17
00:01:50,873 --> 00:01:56,306
president of a university at any time. I'm

18
00:01:56,366 --> 00:02:00,249
still right now affiliated with Carnegie Mellon. I've been working

19
00:02:00,309 --> 00:02:04,112
as a professor in Carnegie Mellon since 2004. I

20
00:02:05,293 --> 00:02:08,455
advise students, I teach classes, I

21
00:02:08,515 --> 00:02:11,698
write grant proposals, and write

22
00:02:11,738 --> 00:02:15,220
papers. In fact, I'm still doing all this right now, except

23
00:02:15,701 --> 00:02:19,344
for classroom teaching. So research is very, very strong, very,

24
00:02:19,364 --> 00:02:22,645
very important for me. That's why I haven't

25
00:02:22,665 --> 00:02:27,286
thought about becoming a university administrator. During my career, when

26
00:02:27,306 --> 00:02:31,687
I became senior, I did receive numerous invitations

27
00:02:31,787 --> 00:02:35,388
and requests to be department chairs, deans,

28
00:02:35,988 --> 00:02:39,668
even in one case another president, in

29
00:02:39,688 --> 00:02:43,049
different institutions in the United States or in

30
00:02:43,329 --> 00:02:46,650
UK and other places in the world. And I

31
00:02:46,670 --> 00:02:50,998
didn't leave Carnegie Mellon. So

32
00:02:51,058 --> 00:02:54,662
when I got an invitation for interviewing

33
00:02:54,762 --> 00:02:58,565
here, I thought it's maybe

34
00:02:58,585 --> 00:03:02,029
a learning experience for me to see the

35
00:03:02,049 --> 00:03:06,433
place and also to maybe offer my my

36
00:03:06,593 --> 00:03:11,157
insights or maybe experiences or opinions to

37
00:03:11,858 --> 00:03:15,562
the leadership in here. During the interview, my interaction

38
00:03:15,662 --> 00:03:20,206
with the host here is mainly based

39
00:03:20,386 --> 00:03:23,650
on my identity as a researcher, as

40
00:03:23,730 --> 00:03:26,973
a developer, and as a scientist. So I give them

41
00:03:26,993 --> 00:03:30,296
basically the viewpoint you

42
00:03:30,316 --> 00:03:33,599
know, from that angle, you know, how a university should be

43
00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:38,524
built, should be operated, and what's

44
00:03:38,604 --> 00:03:43,088
the best function and reputation

45
00:03:43,348 --> 00:03:47,312
for university. And I also know that I'm

46
00:03:47,352 --> 00:03:51,476
not the only one they interviewed, you know, they interviewed quite a few people. All

47
00:03:51,516 --> 00:03:54,842
of them are much more senior and and

48
00:03:55,083 --> 00:03:58,729
recognized that me. So I wasn't taking it too seriously

49
00:03:59,010 --> 00:04:03,077
to be a real job interview. It's really an exchange, an

50
00:04:03,137 --> 00:04:08,434
intellectual exchange. So I went back home. But then After

51
00:04:08,534 --> 00:04:11,755
some time, to my surprise, they made an offer to

52
00:04:11,795 --> 00:04:14,956
me. I wasn't ready at

53
00:04:15,116 --> 00:04:19,638
all to take this offer because at

54
00:04:19,658 --> 00:04:23,379
that time I was still very busy working with my students

55
00:04:23,719 --> 00:04:27,100
and working on a few exciting projects. That was

56
00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:30,901
at the beginning of the COVID. In fact, the

57
00:04:30,941 --> 00:04:34,262
trip to UAE for the interview was the last trip I made

58
00:04:34,743 --> 00:04:38,211
before travel shut down. in the States and

59
00:04:38,291 --> 00:04:41,413
around the world. As we entered the

60
00:04:41,473 --> 00:04:44,715
COVID season, things changed a

61
00:04:44,855 --> 00:04:48,437
lot, even back home in the States. You

62
00:04:49,037 --> 00:04:52,219
are locking down at home. You don't really get to

63
00:04:52,259 --> 00:04:55,701
see your students so often. You teach through a camera, which

64
00:04:56,021 --> 00:04:59,463
all were very new to all of us. And you started

65
00:05:01,864 --> 00:05:05,709
getting yourself isolated from the rest of the world. Which

66
00:05:05,789 --> 00:05:09,551
is good and bad. I didn't like that experience. I feel research

67
00:05:11,092 --> 00:05:15,374
is important for science to be done collaboratively

68
00:05:15,474 --> 00:05:18,735
with colleagues, with students. So I missed that part.

69
00:05:19,176 --> 00:05:23,038
But on the other hand, it gave me the time to think. and

70
00:05:23,158 --> 00:05:27,601
to really ask myself again where

71
00:05:27,621 --> 00:05:30,763
I'm heading. So with this offer, which is

72
00:05:31,203 --> 00:05:34,565
definitely non-trivial, it is supposed to

73
00:05:34,605 --> 00:05:38,448
be bringing me to a place that I've never had previous

74
00:05:38,568 --> 00:05:41,890
interaction and experience with, and also it's a job I've not

75
00:05:41,931 --> 00:05:45,573
done before. So I consulted

76
00:05:45,713 --> 00:05:49,876
some of my colleagues, mentors, and

77
00:05:50,536 --> 00:05:54,038
friends. Professor Sir Michael Bradley, the former

78
00:05:54,158 --> 00:05:57,620
acting president of the university, he

79
00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:01,722
made me a very, very interesting case. He said, look, this

80
00:06:01,842 --> 00:06:06,184
is more than just a university administrator. It

81
00:06:06,304 --> 00:06:09,706
is about creating something from

82
00:06:12,267 --> 00:06:16,089
scratch with a clean slate. And also, it

83
00:06:16,209 --> 00:06:19,471
is in the region where no

84
00:06:19,531 --> 00:06:23,336
such university ever existed. And the

85
00:06:23,376 --> 00:06:27,683
country and the region needs such an institution to

86
00:06:28,424 --> 00:06:31,989
really be the beacon of a new culture.

87
00:06:33,010 --> 00:06:36,959
In a sense, I have the opportunity to to

88
00:06:37,059 --> 00:06:41,761
influence and to shape a new type of culture, to

89
00:06:41,901 --> 00:06:45,361
really help, you know, a

90
00:06:45,542 --> 00:06:49,202
whole people, a whole country, you know, to

91
00:06:49,543 --> 00:06:54,684
seek new directions, you know, or create new

92
00:06:55,584 --> 00:06:59,566
results and also to redefine you

93
00:06:59,586 --> 00:07:03,310
know, some of the decision process and the operation and

94
00:07:03,630 --> 00:07:06,733
even culture, you know, in the region. So in a sense, there is

95
00:07:06,773 --> 00:07:09,956
a chance for you to impact a country to

96
00:07:10,016 --> 00:07:13,479
reshape the culture. So that's quite exciting to

97
00:07:13,499 --> 00:07:16,983
me. I'm always surrounded by adventures in trying new things, and

98
00:07:17,023 --> 00:07:21,827
this is definitely very new. Then I asked another friend

99
00:07:22,047 --> 00:07:25,563
and mentor, Professor Michael Jordan, who has

100
00:07:25,623 --> 00:07:28,884
been my advisor back in UC

101
00:07:28,964 --> 00:07:32,064
Berkeley when I was doing my PhD. But then we kept the

102
00:07:32,104 --> 00:07:35,685
friendship all the way. And he

103
00:07:35,925 --> 00:07:39,606
also strongly suggested

104
00:07:39,626 --> 00:07:43,207
to me to consider this opportunity more seriously. He

105
00:07:43,247 --> 00:07:46,767
said, Hui, you are a professor

106
00:07:46,867 --> 00:07:50,228
and a researcher with a good track

107
00:07:50,268 --> 00:07:53,489
record of being productive and being creative on the

108
00:07:53,509 --> 00:07:56,751
scientific part. But what could be

109
00:07:56,771 --> 00:08:00,054
the next big stage? And that's what he asked,

110
00:08:00,214 --> 00:08:03,297
right? Yeah, he understands that I want to

111
00:08:03,317 --> 00:08:07,080
continue to do science, but bigger science also requires bigger

112
00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:10,643
resources. And also, from a pure

113
00:08:11,424 --> 00:08:15,187
career development standpoint, getting such

114
00:08:15,307 --> 00:08:18,929
an offer at a relatively young age really actually

115
00:08:18,989 --> 00:08:22,670
means that you have the

116
00:08:22,730 --> 00:08:27,011
opportunity to experiment and also to try

117
00:08:27,331 --> 00:08:31,292
different new ideas. In a sense, you have a chance to fail and

118
00:08:31,312 --> 00:08:34,593
do it again, do it differently and so forth. So

119
00:08:34,633 --> 00:08:38,554
he said this is a once in a life opportunity because

120
00:08:39,094 --> 00:08:42,634
not every country are trying to build a university of

121
00:08:42,714 --> 00:08:46,043
this and also not any time such

122
00:08:46,063 --> 00:08:49,726
thing can happen. This is maybe just a once-in-a-life opportunity.

123
00:08:50,467 --> 00:08:54,210
So these are the two strongest positive inputs

124
00:08:54,290 --> 00:08:57,874
I can remember. There are other inputs as well that

125
00:08:57,974 --> 00:09:01,978
are as positive. But of course, I also received a lot of warnings

126
00:09:02,218 --> 00:09:05,481
and negative feedbacks. It is very

127
00:09:05,521 --> 00:09:11,309
risky. It could ruin my career and reputation if I screw the job. or

128
00:09:11,750 --> 00:09:15,232
I may run into a very different culture that I

129
00:09:15,272 --> 00:09:18,613
just cannot understand and work with,

130
00:09:18,793 --> 00:09:22,956
all these pragmatic issues and other things. So

131
00:09:23,516 --> 00:09:26,578
I took a step back and I

132
00:09:26,618 --> 00:09:30,820
took advantage of being in the height of the COVID with

133
00:09:30,860 --> 00:09:34,142
very few people to talk to if I don't

134
00:09:34,322 --> 00:09:37,727
actively seek out and this summer, in that thinking.

135
00:09:37,987 --> 00:09:41,328
And in the end, I think I

136
00:09:41,368 --> 00:09:44,969
will be living in my house probably

137
00:09:45,029 --> 00:09:48,470
for the next God knows how many months and

138
00:09:48,530 --> 00:09:53,332
years. I wouldn't be able to achieve too many

139
00:09:53,452 --> 00:09:57,173
exciting things anyway. And this

140
00:09:57,273 --> 00:10:00,514
particular opportunity is indeed once in a life, right?

141
00:10:01,343 --> 00:10:04,930
And from a technical standpoint, I

142
00:10:04,990 --> 00:10:08,457
started to see AI as a rising

143
00:10:08,557 --> 00:10:13,484
sun on the horizon. the established

144
00:10:13,524 --> 00:10:17,465
university infrastructure is already having

145
00:10:17,526 --> 00:10:21,027
difficulties in coping with the new needs,

146
00:10:22,188 --> 00:10:25,489
the new culture, and

147
00:10:25,529 --> 00:10:30,072
the new evaluation and merit

148
00:10:30,152 --> 00:10:33,313
metrics in this new discipline. But it is

149
00:10:33,373 --> 00:10:37,555
very hard to change an established organization. So

150
00:10:38,036 --> 00:10:41,719
even from a self-professional growth

151
00:10:41,939 --> 00:10:46,523
and development point of view, it

152
00:10:46,583 --> 00:10:50,147
is an opportunity to take your fate into your own hands and

153
00:10:50,247 --> 00:10:53,710
also maybe create an environment that can help many of

154
00:10:53,890 --> 00:10:56,993
our colleagues, students, and of

155
00:10:57,053 --> 00:11:00,909
course the country and the people in

156
00:11:01,289 --> 00:11:06,291
this region to a brand new set

157
00:11:06,371 --> 00:11:10,033
up of such an institution. So I see that as a,

158
00:11:10,513 --> 00:11:13,795
I start to appreciate that's becoming a huge opportunity that I can really

159
00:11:13,835 --> 00:11:18,194
make a difference because I am an active researcher. and

160
00:11:18,675 --> 00:11:22,458
it is not so common for an active

161
00:11:22,578 --> 00:11:25,921
researcher and teacher to jump

162
00:11:26,001 --> 00:11:29,344
into a university professor role. Usually, the

163
00:11:29,364 --> 00:11:33,608
typical presidents you see are already somewhat

164
00:11:33,688 --> 00:11:37,171
removed from the daily scientific life and

165
00:11:37,231 --> 00:11:40,492
teaching life. Therefore, it

166
00:11:40,532 --> 00:11:44,013
can be difficult for them to appreciate, you know, from

167
00:11:44,153 --> 00:11:47,474
a close distance, the difficulties, the

168
00:11:47,534 --> 00:11:51,695
needs, and all that, you know, in programming

169
00:11:52,016 --> 00:11:55,197
and in organizing the university, right? So

170
00:11:55,277 --> 00:11:58,638
all this converged to, you know, a

171
00:11:59,858 --> 00:12:03,170
decision that, you know, I'm going to give it a try. And

172
00:12:03,570 --> 00:12:06,651
then, you know, it took me a

173
00:12:06,691 --> 00:12:10,332
year to make that decision. I actually felt

174
00:12:10,492 --> 00:12:14,253
really appreciative that the university was

175
00:12:14,413 --> 00:12:17,753
able to wait for me for that year. In fact, also the

176
00:12:17,853 --> 00:12:21,274
Board of Trustees, they had the patience and also the trust

177
00:12:21,834 --> 00:12:25,389
on me, you know, to onboard myself. I

178
00:12:25,429 --> 00:12:29,232
remember it took me some effort, took

179
00:12:29,292 --> 00:12:32,614
everybody a lot of effort, in fact, to even make the trip to here because all

180
00:12:32,754 --> 00:12:36,256
the flights were unpredictable. And even getting

181
00:12:36,276 --> 00:12:40,579
a COVID test certificate is also unpredictable.

182
00:12:40,979 --> 00:12:46,302
But you need that to board a plane, which is a 24-hour fresh kind of certificate. a

183
00:12:46,322 --> 00:12:49,744
lot of logistic challenges. So eventually I made

184
00:12:49,764 --> 00:12:53,607
it to Abu Dhabi one day before the first

185
00:12:53,727 --> 00:12:57,369
class of the students opened. I remember I got

186
00:12:57,409 --> 00:13:01,752
myself prepared in a temporary

187
00:13:02,072 --> 00:13:06,255
residence that I basically borrowed a

188
00:13:06,695 --> 00:13:10,358
room from a very kind host, and

189
00:13:10,599 --> 00:13:14,382
I delivered the opening speech of

190
00:13:14,442 --> 00:13:17,665
that class, again, from a Zoom

191
00:13:17,685 --> 00:13:21,385
meeting. Very

192
00:13:21,405 --> 00:13:24,666
simple, not as fancy as today, the recording devices, which is coming

193
00:13:24,706 --> 00:13:28,346
from my computer camera. So that's basically how the whole thing started.

194
00:13:28,966 --> 00:13:32,527
At that time, the university was really, really very young and weak.

195
00:13:33,687 --> 00:13:37,068
It has barely, I think, less

196
00:13:37,088 --> 00:13:40,268
than a dozen faculty and only one

197
00:13:40,328 --> 00:13:44,629
class of students, which was

198
00:13:44,669 --> 00:13:48,050
very good. But at least I didn't have

199
00:13:48,070 --> 00:13:51,342
any control or

200
00:13:51,442 --> 00:13:55,067
knowledge about that because I was not admitted under

201
00:13:55,248 --> 00:13:58,872
my kind of direction. So we literally walk

202
00:13:58,933 --> 00:14:02,537
into the unknown and that basically

203
00:14:05,057 --> 00:14:08,998
If you run a startup, you're going to want to pay attention to this. Startups, especially

204
00:14:09,118 --> 00:14:12,359
AI startups, need good cloud providers. Lucky for you,

205
00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:16,060
Google Cloud exists, and they offer an experience, the Google for Startups

206
00:14:16,100 --> 00:14:19,461
Cloud Program that's tailored specifically to you. The program

207
00:14:19,501 --> 00:14:22,902
offers eligible startups up to $200,000 in Google Cloud

208
00:14:22,942 --> 00:14:27,283
credits for up to two years. For AI startups, that number is $350,000. Plus,

209
00:14:27,423 --> 00:14:30,966
you get the mentorship and experience of Google Cloud's top-notch team. What

210
00:14:30,986 --> 00:14:35,170
are you waiting for? Start building today with Google Cloud at cloud.google.com slash

211
00:14:35,190 --> 00:14:39,233
startup. That's C-L-O-U-D dot G-O-O-G-L-E dot

212
00:14:44,877 --> 00:14:48,740
Yeah, it's quite a journey. Now, about AI specifically,

213
00:14:48,780 --> 00:14:52,403
right? And I know you've had an interesting journey with that. You started studying

214
00:14:52,443 --> 00:14:57,398
molecular biology, and you kind of jumped into machine learning. You've

215
00:14:57,438 --> 00:15:01,783
said of AI that it could usher in an age of empowerment. The

216
00:15:01,823 --> 00:15:05,404
printing press ushered in the Age of Enlightenment, and

217
00:15:05,564 --> 00:15:10,246
you've kind of equated the two as somewhat similar in how society-changing

218
00:15:10,786 --> 00:15:13,967
AI could be. What does that Age of Empowerment look like? And

219
00:15:14,247 --> 00:15:17,888
from where we're sitting now, what's the gap to get there? And

220
00:15:19,629 --> 00:15:24,070
I'm glad that you asked this question because, you know, many people would ask

221
00:15:24,130 --> 00:15:27,471
how to achieve artificial superintelligence and so on.

222
00:15:27,731 --> 00:15:32,016
And then what is that, right? So, yeah, I think I

223
00:15:32,076 --> 00:15:36,787
like to see any innovation and breakthrough from

224
00:15:36,807 --> 00:15:40,175
a utility standpoint, what

225
00:15:40,255 --> 00:15:44,175
function it delivers. and how such functionality

226
00:15:44,575 --> 00:15:48,076
change people's life, change society, and

227
00:15:48,136 --> 00:15:51,717
maybe even change civilization. So

228
00:15:51,777 --> 00:15:55,378
it is in that context I call AI

229
00:15:55,778 --> 00:15:59,339
to be equivalent to the

230
00:15:59,839 --> 00:16:03,880
breakthrough leading to the age of enlightenment,

231
00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:08,301
which is the printing press. There are many, many other inventions. The

232
00:16:08,361 --> 00:16:12,208
invention of the steam engine, for example, discovery of

233
00:16:12,509 --> 00:16:16,310
electricity, all these are huge. But I

234
00:16:16,370 --> 00:16:19,571
think AI and

235
00:16:19,651 --> 00:16:23,532
also printing press, all the invention of letters

236
00:16:23,632 --> 00:16:27,714
and writing are at a different level compared

237
00:16:27,734 --> 00:16:31,495
to all these technical innovations. Because if

238
00:16:31,535 --> 00:16:35,436
you look at, if you put AI

239
00:16:36,196 --> 00:16:39,380
and the printing press and maybe the

240
00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:42,562
invention of paper and writing next to each other, they have something in

241
00:16:42,662 --> 00:16:46,164
common. It is actually the backbone of human

242
00:16:46,544 --> 00:16:49,785
civilization in their experience with

243
00:16:49,925 --> 00:16:53,607
information. It's about how we

244
00:16:53,847 --> 00:16:57,029
process and store and use

245
00:16:57,049 --> 00:17:00,110
information in a

246
00:17:00,270 --> 00:17:03,552
massively different scope of

247
00:17:03,612 --> 00:17:08,030
magnitude. have

248
00:17:08,110 --> 00:17:11,914
the technology of writing, use letters and characters

249
00:17:11,954 --> 00:17:16,912
and papers. then

250
00:17:17,192 --> 00:17:20,653
the information can be recorded rather than through

251
00:17:20,953 --> 00:17:24,774
verbal communications. I

252
00:17:24,834 --> 00:17:28,855
remember, is that Plato?

253
00:17:30,756 --> 00:17:35,657
I think Plato is a student of Socrates. Socrates

254
00:17:35,837 --> 00:17:39,038
didn't actually believe that knowledge, one should write

255
00:17:39,078 --> 00:17:43,600
any book. He believed in in-person experience of

256
00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:47,142
teaching. But it is

257
00:17:48,083 --> 00:17:51,587
Plato who convinced him, or maybe who took

258
00:17:51,687 --> 00:17:55,712
on the job of taking down all Socrates'

259
00:17:55,752 --> 00:17:58,955
teaching and ideas into writing. And now we

260
00:17:58,995 --> 00:18:02,699
appreciate how important that is, because that knowledge can

261
00:18:02,899 --> 00:18:06,035
pass down to generations as it is. So in

262
00:18:06,075 --> 00:18:09,737
a sense, it is a embodiment of

263
00:18:10,117 --> 00:18:13,759
the antiquity time, information technology. But

264
00:18:14,579 --> 00:18:17,841
at that time, you need to copy the book. And the

265
00:18:17,881 --> 00:18:21,543
people who own the book need to be

266
00:18:21,643 --> 00:18:25,144
literate and also need to have that kind of status, have

267
00:18:25,224 --> 00:18:28,526
the opportunity to access to that. So knowledge belongs to a very few

268
00:18:28,566 --> 00:18:31,722
people. Printing press is

269
00:18:32,582 --> 00:18:35,743
a major advancement unlocking the knowledge from a few

270
00:18:35,803 --> 00:18:39,344
people to everyone because it allows every

271
00:18:39,384 --> 00:18:42,705
people to have their own copy of the book which began

272
00:18:42,745 --> 00:18:46,366
from the Bible and they can form their own interpretations and

273
00:18:46,466 --> 00:18:49,646
understanding and then after that people start to

274
00:18:49,706 --> 00:18:52,807
think basically based on that from those knowledges and

275
00:18:52,847 --> 00:18:56,308
then they write more books right so we have really

276
00:18:56,768 --> 00:18:59,849
even the university evolving from a theoretical school to you

277
00:18:59,869 --> 00:19:03,160
know study every topics Now, why

278
00:19:03,341 --> 00:19:07,248
AI is directly related

279
00:19:07,308 --> 00:19:10,694
to that train of evolution? If

280
00:19:10,734 --> 00:19:14,260
you look at large language model, for example, it is trained not

281
00:19:14,401 --> 00:19:17,591
on one book, It is not trained on

282
00:19:18,692 --> 00:19:22,132
one sector of knowledge. It is literally trained on

283
00:19:22,612 --> 00:19:26,053
everything ever written into language through

284
00:19:26,253 --> 00:19:30,154
civilization and also in any media. In

285
00:19:30,214 --> 00:19:34,275
a sense, you can imagine it is about turning all the

286
00:19:34,315 --> 00:19:37,916
libraries in the world into one

287
00:19:37,936 --> 00:19:41,076
device and then make it available next to your

288
00:19:41,096 --> 00:19:45,258
fingertip. You can basically now easily get knowledge and

289
00:19:45,358 --> 00:19:49,461
learn from it using this interface, which

290
00:19:49,621 --> 00:19:54,424
makes the knowledge broadcast

291
00:19:54,604 --> 00:19:57,766
and storage and accessibility to

292
00:19:57,806 --> 00:20:02,517
a different level. Then AI also not only retrieves

293
00:20:02,577 --> 00:20:05,679
knowledge for you, it actually started to be

294
00:20:05,739 --> 00:20:08,880
able to use the knowledge to solve problems, as we can see. They can

295
00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,441
at least answer many of your questions. And they can also

296
00:20:12,541 --> 00:20:16,403
start producing, for example, code

297
00:20:16,523 --> 00:20:20,064
and softwares. And nowadays, people

298
00:20:20,344 --> 00:20:23,566
are trying to develop a lot

299
00:20:23,626 --> 00:20:27,487
of applications in different sectors based on that, because

300
00:20:27,968 --> 00:20:32,265
knowledge can be actionated to solve problems. And

301
00:20:32,645 --> 00:20:36,006
in that sense, I call it an empowerment after

302
00:20:36,026 --> 00:20:39,308
enlightenment. It is not about just giving you the

303
00:20:39,348 --> 00:20:43,009
space to think. It is now giving you the tools to

304
00:20:43,509 --> 00:20:47,391
make you a more powerful enabler

305
00:20:47,491 --> 00:20:51,032
or actor in whatever occupation that you do.

306
00:20:51,192 --> 00:20:54,393
And then, in a sense, leave you out space to

307
00:20:54,433 --> 00:20:58,415
do maybe more challenging, intellectually

308
00:20:58,435 --> 00:21:01,946
challenging things. And so that empowerment comes

309
00:21:01,986 --> 00:21:05,588
together with even a next level of enlightenment

310
00:21:05,608 --> 00:21:08,990
where, you know, everybody can do

311
00:21:09,210 --> 00:21:12,611
very often time, you know, a very advanced level of

312
00:21:12,672 --> 00:21:16,193
work without necessarily spending 20 years of

313
00:21:16,233 --> 00:21:19,815
training, you know, in school. And then people should

314
00:21:19,875 --> 00:21:23,017
not start rethinking, you know, what I'm going to learn now, you know,

315
00:21:23,157 --> 00:21:26,398
in the in the next five years and what kind of problems I

316
00:21:26,559 --> 00:21:30,551
should tackle. So we can refocus on problems

317
00:21:31,432 --> 00:21:35,697
and maybe needs rather than just

318
00:21:36,037 --> 00:21:39,861
focusing on repeating, executing

319
00:21:44,239 --> 00:21:47,501
The difference to me between the large language models that

320
00:21:47,521 --> 00:21:51,124
we're kind of dealing with today, right, and something like the printing press is,

321
00:21:51,924 --> 00:21:55,026
you know, I think of all these technological innovations as levels of

322
00:21:55,086 --> 00:21:58,448
automation, right? The printing press, as you said, got, instead

323
00:21:58,468 --> 00:22:02,011
of having to handwrite books and pass them out, right, we could, we

324
00:22:02,031 --> 00:22:05,574
have copies of stuff. it created more accessibility. The

325
00:22:05,614 --> 00:22:09,118
jump to language models and

326
00:22:09,399 --> 00:22:12,782
the kind of generative AI we're seeing now, to me, what you're starting

327
00:22:12,803 --> 00:22:17,327
to do is you're starting to take the human out of the loop to a degree. Do

328
00:22:17,347 --> 00:22:21,508
you see some sort of risk in that environment where maybe

329
00:22:21,548 --> 00:22:25,569
for some people it might unlock them to explore greater problems? Is

330
00:22:25,589 --> 00:22:29,610
there a concern that for other people it just acts as a crutch for human

331
00:22:29,650 --> 00:22:33,251
intelligence, human creativity, because you have everything accessible,

332
00:22:35,372 --> 00:22:39,345
I don't deny that there is a risk. In fact, any new technology you

333
00:22:39,365 --> 00:22:42,608
know, comes together with both

334
00:22:42,668 --> 00:22:45,991
opportunities and risk. Just like, you know, even

335
00:22:46,031 --> 00:22:49,313
we talk about something that we are very familiar with,

336
00:22:49,353 --> 00:22:52,756
you know, medicine, for example, you know, there are always a side effect that

337
00:22:52,796 --> 00:22:55,879
we need to control. That's why FDA is formed. Genetic engineering, you

338
00:22:55,899 --> 00:22:59,562
know, we use them now to dramatically raise the productivity of

339
00:22:59,622 --> 00:23:03,285
crops. And we can engineer, you

340
00:23:03,305 --> 00:23:06,647
know, into the crops, you know, or the

341
00:23:06,707 --> 00:23:10,387
cattle's or the livestock's some nutritional deficiencies

342
00:23:10,467 --> 00:23:13,611
and so forth. But you can also use

343
00:23:13,651 --> 00:23:18,456
that technology to create very harmful viruses

344
00:23:19,197 --> 00:23:22,782
or other forms of toxicities. So

345
00:23:23,542 --> 00:23:26,806
it's really about how to mitigate and

346
00:23:26,966 --> 00:23:30,448
how to regulate those risks. I think AI

347
00:23:30,608 --> 00:23:33,870
is not an exception. But on the other hand,

348
00:23:34,230 --> 00:23:37,612
also not a unique

349
00:23:38,032 --> 00:23:41,614
threat that we didn't deal with before. In

350
00:23:42,515 --> 00:23:47,277
the past, people figured out that there is a clear distinction between

351
00:23:47,898 --> 00:23:51,920
the science, the technology, and the product, right?

352
00:23:52,343 --> 00:23:55,846
And where you set the brick and

353
00:23:55,926 --> 00:23:59,489
where you regulate is well

354
00:23:59,509 --> 00:24:03,192
understood, that you probably should focus more

355
00:24:03,632 --> 00:24:08,276
on regulating the users, on regulating the distributions, but

356
00:24:08,676 --> 00:24:11,819
on the intellectual part, which is the science, and

357
00:24:11,859 --> 00:24:15,702
maybe even the technology, which is the production part, you use

358
00:24:15,842 --> 00:24:20,512
a different type of management. Typically,

359
00:24:20,912 --> 00:24:24,695
for the science part, you don't even manage, or you'd manage very little, because

360
00:24:25,395 --> 00:24:29,779
the creativity, once you shut it down, the cost

361
00:24:29,819 --> 00:24:33,442
is too big to bear. In fact, many of the assumptions

362
00:24:33,682 --> 00:24:36,965
about the current rush into AI

363
00:24:37,005 --> 00:24:40,743
regulation discussion and even panic is

364
00:24:40,903 --> 00:24:45,344
also based on an unclear understanding

365
00:24:45,404 --> 00:24:49,965
about really the power of AI and how powerful

366
00:24:50,085 --> 00:24:53,606
and how potentially dangerous it can be. It

367
00:24:53,666 --> 00:24:57,166
is not well understood, especially by the general public.

368
00:24:58,146 --> 00:25:01,747
Sometimes, even from a tactical standpoint, even

369
00:25:01,947 --> 00:25:05,068
if there is a risk, how material that

370
00:25:05,108 --> 00:25:09,329
risk is, and it actually had a big impact

371
00:25:09,469 --> 00:25:12,812
on the risk and benefit calculations. So

372
00:25:12,832 --> 00:25:16,155
I want to say a few words about really where we are in AI in

373
00:25:16,195 --> 00:25:19,578
terms of its danger and its risk. Yeah, AI

374
00:25:19,698 --> 00:25:23,341
is more than automation for sure, because AI can

375
00:25:24,362 --> 00:25:27,825
automatically learn skills from training

376
00:25:27,845 --> 00:25:32,171
materials. So it is a one-step beyond

377
00:25:32,631 --> 00:25:36,575
just a programmed automation.

378
00:25:37,155 --> 00:25:40,799
It does have the ability to acquire knowledge and to

379
00:25:41,860 --> 00:25:45,563
become more and more powerful once

380
00:25:45,583 --> 00:25:49,106
you plug them into some data sources and

381
00:25:49,206 --> 00:25:53,637
also run an algorithm. But on the other hand, AI

382
00:25:53,697 --> 00:25:56,799
also has a lot of limitations. It

383
00:25:56,879 --> 00:26:02,724
is not a living creature that has self-identity,

384
00:26:03,504 --> 00:26:07,007
self-drive, agency, free

385
00:26:07,067 --> 00:26:10,509
will, and so forth. In fact, it is unclear to me at least where

386
00:26:10,630 --> 00:26:14,092
all those will come from based on the current

387
00:26:14,212 --> 00:26:18,135
architecture and our current mathematics of doing things. I

388
00:26:18,175 --> 00:26:22,500
think down the road, new architectures beyond transformers, new

389
00:26:22,580 --> 00:26:26,284
form of data beyond text and image will be feeding into

390
00:26:26,424 --> 00:26:29,888
the next generation systems to create more

391
00:26:29,948 --> 00:26:33,772
functions. But these functions actually are still quite

392
00:26:33,812 --> 00:26:37,376
a few steps away from the type of higher

393
00:26:37,416 --> 00:26:40,638
level intelligence or human-like intelligence I

394
00:26:40,658 --> 00:26:43,940
just mentioned, like an agency, like identity, like a will, and

395
00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:47,502
so forth. For example, how to even do more

396
00:26:47,542 --> 00:26:50,844
complex reasoning, multiple steps reasoning. You want to

397
00:26:52,165 --> 00:26:55,547
plan a shopping trip, you know, a travel, and

398
00:26:55,847 --> 00:26:59,009
purchase a flight ticket, you know,

399
00:26:59,049 --> 00:27:02,150
a plan on hotels. That requires multiple steps of

400
00:27:02,190 --> 00:27:05,571
reasoning. I don't think right now the current

401
00:27:05,612 --> 00:27:09,715
version of GPTs is able to do well on that job. Now,

402
00:27:10,316 --> 00:27:14,100
talking maybe a slightly more challenging task. How to run

403
00:27:14,120 --> 00:27:17,703
a store? How to run a company? How

404
00:27:17,763 --> 00:27:21,206
to win a campaign, a battle?

405
00:27:21,907 --> 00:27:24,990
These are reasonings which are typically a

406
00:27:25,030 --> 00:27:28,910
hundred steps. conditioning on real-world

407
00:27:28,950 --> 00:27:33,314
environments, and also conditioning on

408
00:27:33,755 --> 00:27:38,059
embodied experiences from sensory and from anything. And

409
00:27:38,099 --> 00:27:44,084
these are very difficult. In fact, you can probably already find

410
00:27:44,144 --> 00:27:47,347
out that you cannot ask, for example, a GPT or AI

411
00:27:47,407 --> 00:27:50,550
assistant to teach you how to swim, to teach you how to play the

412
00:27:50,570 --> 00:27:54,353
music. Because why even different

413
00:27:54,673 --> 00:27:58,235
music mentors, why

414
00:27:58,255 --> 00:28:01,736
we have master classes? You know, those musicians, when they teach you,

415
00:28:02,116 --> 00:28:05,557
it's not about reading from a book and say, hey, you apply

416
00:28:05,857 --> 00:28:09,339
two grams of force onto a key and hold for

417
00:28:09,679 --> 00:28:13,260
this many milliseconds and to produce a sound. It's

418
00:28:13,300 --> 00:28:16,903
a very different experience of music teaching. And

419
00:28:16,923 --> 00:28:20,686
I don't think right now our AI system is

420
00:28:20,786 --> 00:28:24,309
even designed to do that. And certainly they cannot do that. So

421
00:28:24,789 --> 00:28:28,092
I think the current AI system is still

422
00:28:28,192 --> 00:28:32,776
on the steep learning curve to gain more capability, whether

423
00:28:32,936 --> 00:28:36,518
it has the risk that people

424
00:28:36,979 --> 00:28:40,621
are now, you know, fear

425
00:28:40,701 --> 00:28:44,825
about. I think it's premature to say

426
00:28:44,865 --> 00:28:49,548
that. Now people say disinformation, deepfake,

427
00:28:50,529 --> 00:28:54,252
and all that, these are risks

428
00:28:55,688 --> 00:28:58,910
not coming from AI technology. It is coming from

429
00:28:59,010 --> 00:29:02,253
the users of the technology. It's just like a

430
00:29:02,313 --> 00:29:05,715
gun. You definitely can cause a lot of harm by using

431
00:29:05,735 --> 00:29:08,977
the gun. But is that the mistake of the gun?

432
00:29:09,597 --> 00:29:12,740
People are still making better guns these days, and

433
00:29:12,860 --> 00:29:16,462
for whatever specific purposes. But how

434
00:29:16,502 --> 00:29:19,724
to regulate its usage is the key. So I

435
00:29:19,784 --> 00:29:22,966
would like to remind policymakers and the

436
00:29:23,006 --> 00:29:26,177
general public to really be

437
00:29:26,237 --> 00:29:29,523
a little bit more concise and

438
00:29:29,563 --> 00:29:32,948
careful about where the focus is

439
00:29:33,129 --> 00:29:36,795
in such AI risk and AI regulation conversations.

440
00:29:37,208 --> 00:29:40,989
The AI regulation conversation is very broad, right?

441
00:29:41,849 --> 00:29:45,310
There are some instances that are trying to be very focused, such

442
00:29:45,390 --> 00:29:48,770
as with deepfakes and job loss related to

443
00:29:48,810 --> 00:29:51,931
deepfakes and the creative industries. There are others that

444
00:29:51,971 --> 00:29:56,412
are trying to mitigate and prepare for these hypothetical risks

445
00:29:56,492 --> 00:30:00,192
that we don't really know if they'll happen at all. And

446
00:30:03,113 --> 00:30:06,658
And I want to add one more thing. In fact, even if you want to regulate

447
00:30:06,778 --> 00:30:10,636
and counter that, you actually need AI to do it. Because like

448
00:30:10,676 --> 00:30:13,798
the deepfake images and

449
00:30:13,818 --> 00:30:17,040
the videos, the misinformation, it's just

450
00:30:17,100 --> 00:30:20,222
too much for people or for a

451
00:30:21,162 --> 00:30:24,985
manual devices or approach to discover

452
00:30:25,105 --> 00:30:28,287
and to contain all of them. Unless you shut down the

453
00:30:28,307 --> 00:30:32,109
computer, every computer in the world, they will be generated. And

454
00:30:35,485 --> 00:30:38,986
As you just said, the problem with this technology and

455
00:30:39,106 --> 00:30:42,727
regulating this technology is it requires

456
00:30:42,767 --> 00:30:46,428
a global effort. If one country regulates really

457
00:30:46,468 --> 00:30:50,929
hard, that's not going to stop China or other countries from

458
00:30:51,569 --> 00:30:54,850
not regulating at all. And I think there's some concern about that.

459
00:30:56,303 --> 00:31:00,027
the way you kind of framed the regulation question was to focus

460
00:31:03,030 --> 00:31:06,434
Exactly. Yeah. That's why I think, for example, you

461
00:31:06,454 --> 00:31:09,917
said about adversarial scenarios at certain countries

462
00:31:09,957 --> 00:31:13,559
like China, will be doing what they need to do anyway,

463
00:31:14,259 --> 00:31:19,201
and you cannot stop them. I think the best thing

464
00:31:19,241 --> 00:31:23,323
that one can do is to advance

465
00:31:23,363 --> 00:31:26,904
your own technology, in fact, to make AI even better.

466
00:31:28,364 --> 00:31:31,846
Even we are under a material risk, we have

467
00:31:31,986 --> 00:31:35,247
the means to take care of that, to counter that.

468
00:31:35,647 --> 00:31:40,512
And do you think it would be an achievable thing? There

469
00:31:40,532 --> 00:31:44,015
has been talk about the idea of international government, international

470
00:31:44,055 --> 00:31:47,658
governance of AI that kind of supersedes any

471
00:31:47,919 --> 00:31:51,482
individual efforts. You know, in the U.S. it's even more fragmented because

472
00:31:51,502 --> 00:31:54,965
you have states doing things and then the federal government is trying to figure stuff

473
00:31:55,105 --> 00:31:58,976
out. the EU is moving, and that'll impact where

474
00:31:59,316 --> 00:32:02,857
companies deploy. But the idea of getting

475
00:32:03,017 --> 00:32:06,598
every developer around the world from universities to

476
00:32:06,638 --> 00:32:10,760
corporations to agree to a set of guidelines that maybe

477
00:32:15,101 --> 00:32:18,663
Should it be feasible? I'm actually optimistic. It's absolutely

478
00:32:18,723 --> 00:32:22,165
achievable. But on the other hand, I have to also

479
00:32:22,225 --> 00:32:26,208
point out that if you look at the age of Enlightenment after

480
00:32:26,228 --> 00:32:30,691
the printing press, it took roughly 100 years. before

481
00:32:31,632 --> 00:32:35,415
all the warring states to eventually align

482
00:32:35,595 --> 00:32:39,258
on some common principles and also to learn

483
00:32:39,318 --> 00:32:44,302
how to live with this technology. In

484
00:32:44,342 --> 00:32:48,125
West Europe, different religious sectors

485
00:32:49,426 --> 00:32:52,929
fought to death just because a

486
00:32:53,189 --> 00:32:57,200
different interpretation of a Bible principle. you

487
00:32:57,220 --> 00:33:02,143
know, after all the people learn about it and have their own interpretations. But

488
00:33:02,223 --> 00:33:06,206
eventually, you know, they learn how to settle things. And

489
00:33:06,286 --> 00:33:10,569
also they learn how to live with a new society that

490
00:33:10,869 --> 00:33:15,071
all can read and have many books and so forth. And

491
00:33:15,332 --> 00:33:18,734
I can also name some counter examples where printing press

492
00:33:18,794 --> 00:33:22,336
was actually banned. And after some hundred years,

493
00:33:23,156 --> 00:33:26,469
those regions become much, much less developed. than

494
00:33:26,750 --> 00:33:29,985
the West European countries. Why I mention this?

495
00:33:31,032 --> 00:33:35,295
because I want to emphasize the importance of experimenting

496
00:33:35,355 --> 00:33:39,117
and also the time. We are just barely five

497
00:33:39,157 --> 00:33:42,299
years or maybe even three years into the age of

498
00:33:42,339 --> 00:33:45,601
large-language models, right? So the AI era

499
00:33:45,621 --> 00:33:49,223
has just started, and it is also evolving very fast.

500
00:33:49,603 --> 00:33:53,826
We actually don't even see, you know, where it will platoon and

501
00:33:54,026 --> 00:33:57,208
how a steady state would look like. And that's why I

502
00:33:57,248 --> 00:34:00,869
think at this point, rush

503
00:34:00,969 --> 00:34:04,411
into a premature set

504
00:34:04,471 --> 00:34:08,574
of very stiff laws or regulations isn't

505
00:34:08,614 --> 00:34:12,376
going to be very helpful because it may cause

506
00:34:12,696 --> 00:34:16,278
missed opportunities and also maybe

507
00:34:16,458 --> 00:34:20,040
an awkward misfit of all these

508
00:34:20,841 --> 00:34:24,580
policies. with

509
00:34:24,620 --> 00:34:27,965
respect to the real world, how they evolve. So I would say that

510
00:34:28,245 --> 00:34:32,331
first, from a scientific standpoint,

511
00:34:32,391 --> 00:34:36,316
we need to collect enough data points and

512
00:34:36,696 --> 00:34:40,228
make careful observations and analysis. about

513
00:34:40,248 --> 00:34:43,752
the opportunity and the risk, and

514
00:34:43,932 --> 00:34:48,356
also the trajectory of the technological development. Thinking

515
00:34:48,436 --> 00:34:52,040
ahead of the curve and be able to predict where

516
00:34:52,060 --> 00:34:55,223
that technology is evolving, where I should put a

517
00:34:56,664 --> 00:35:00,548
gate or a checkpoint down the road, rather

518
00:35:00,568 --> 00:35:03,999
than passively you know, chase, you

519
00:35:04,040 --> 00:35:08,506
know, a running kind of objects

520
00:35:09,548 --> 00:35:12,993
and interfere with some of the, you know,

521
00:35:13,133 --> 00:35:16,879
very organic and natural and creative and productive kind

522
00:35:16,919 --> 00:35:20,282
of activities of scientific

523
00:35:20,302 --> 00:35:23,384
advancements. The trick is just trying to figure out where it's going to go so

524
00:35:23,405 --> 00:35:26,627
you can get ahead of it. Yeah, and it will take some time. But of

525
00:35:26,687 --> 00:35:30,551
course, I'm optimistic that it wouldn't take 100 years. It wouldn't be as terrible

526
00:35:30,831 --> 00:35:34,314
and as costly as the religious wars

527
00:35:40,598 --> 00:35:43,739
Now, you talked a minute ago about we don't want to miss the

528
00:35:43,759 --> 00:35:47,141
opportunity, right? And we've talked

529
00:35:47,181 --> 00:35:50,902
about how impactful this technology can be. I've

530
00:35:50,942 --> 00:35:54,203
been obsessed with this idea of trying to narrow down on

531
00:35:54,243 --> 00:35:57,524
what the true promise of AI is, because like you said, I think a lot

532
00:35:57,545 --> 00:36:00,706
of people misunderstand what the technology is itself. Part

533
00:36:00,726 --> 00:36:03,907
of that is the fault of the kind of hype of corporations that

534
00:36:03,927 --> 00:36:07,128
we've been seeing and social media is not helping. Part

535
00:36:07,148 --> 00:36:10,590
of that is the fact that for a lot of subject

536
00:36:10,630 --> 00:36:13,992
areas within AI, we don't have unified definitions, or people say

537
00:36:14,072 --> 00:36:17,595
one thing when they're talking about something else. But

538
00:36:17,975 --> 00:36:21,917
trying to narrow in on the idea of what is the promise of this technology and

539
00:36:21,997 --> 00:36:25,219
how it can help people, because I think in

540
00:36:25,259 --> 00:36:29,312
a lot of cases, people are afraid. People

541
00:36:29,352 --> 00:36:32,976
are afraid about losing their jobs. People are afraid about existential

542
00:36:33,096 --> 00:36:36,540
risk scenarios, which get kind of thrust

543
00:36:36,600 --> 00:36:40,104
upon them from some of the companies developing this

544
00:36:40,144 --> 00:36:43,688
technology. And it's set up as something that seems

545
00:36:43,768 --> 00:36:46,951
to have so many, it's set up as something that's

546
00:36:46,991 --> 00:36:50,334
dual use, but it seems to have so many negative risks that

547
00:36:50,354 --> 00:36:53,937
I think for a lot of people, there is a question of why

548
00:36:53,997 --> 00:36:57,460
develop this at all, if the risks can range across

549
00:36:57,520 --> 00:37:00,763
this realm of severity. So to you,

550
00:37:04,835 --> 00:37:08,498
Yeah, that has a close connection to really the

551
00:37:09,658 --> 00:37:13,261
level of functionality that the AI will

552
00:37:13,281 --> 00:37:16,563
be achieving step by step. And at

553
00:37:16,703 --> 00:37:22,067
every functionality, you can accordingly kind

554
00:37:22,087 --> 00:37:25,570
of define the cost and also

555
00:37:25,870 --> 00:37:29,412
the opportunity. For example, Henry

556
00:37:29,432 --> 00:37:32,895
Ford used to say that every American need to own a car. And

557
00:37:33,296 --> 00:37:37,000
I think it's very bad news to the train

558
00:37:37,020 --> 00:37:40,344
drivers and maybe to the carriage drivers. But

559
00:37:40,884 --> 00:37:44,108
look, if every American needs to own a car, the number of

560
00:37:44,168 --> 00:37:47,411
workers to produce those cars will be humongous. In fact, it

561
00:37:47,491 --> 00:37:51,194
ends up creating a job. Now imagine that in our household,

562
00:37:51,615 --> 00:37:54,876
we want to have a robotic maid to just take

563
00:37:54,916 --> 00:37:58,538
care of all the household

564
00:37:58,599 --> 00:38:03,501
businesses. Wouldn't that be an amazing product

565
00:38:03,721 --> 00:38:07,123
that everybody wouldn't object to? I don't think right now people object to

566
00:38:07,824 --> 00:38:11,026
washing machines and so on. So that's a

567
00:38:11,086 --> 00:38:14,588
huge market. And the key technology to

568
00:38:14,668 --> 00:38:17,930
get there is AI. You need to basically have a

569
00:38:18,270 --> 00:38:21,845
robot that is able to plan, able to act,

570
00:38:22,746 --> 00:38:26,329
be able to understand, communicate with you, and also

571
00:38:27,830 --> 00:38:31,794
get things done. So we are actually, honestly, many

572
00:38:31,834 --> 00:38:35,298
years away even from achieving that. But in achieving

573
00:38:35,338 --> 00:38:38,421
that, I would imagine that everybody wants to be in

574
00:38:38,441 --> 00:38:41,784
that business and join the production line and

575
00:38:41,924 --> 00:38:45,291
make a lot of money out of it. Yeah, you will be losing, you know, of course,

576
00:38:45,311 --> 00:38:48,334
you know, the clean ladies may be losing their job, but they will get a

577
00:38:48,354 --> 00:38:51,436
better job elsewhere, because you will be joining the

578
00:38:51,616 --> 00:38:55,159
production line in different steps of producing that amazing machine.

579
00:38:55,600 --> 00:38:59,983
And also, you know, we talk about AI being

580
00:39:02,225 --> 00:39:05,748
replacing some even white collar fancy jobs, like

581
00:39:06,028 --> 00:39:10,211
a accountant, like a legal

582
00:39:10,251 --> 00:39:13,714
worker. because we see HHBT are

583
00:39:13,754 --> 00:39:19,918
passing the bar examinations, passing the medical examinations. Wouldn't

584
00:39:20,098 --> 00:39:24,281
it be nice that it freed up these very smart people to

585
00:39:24,581 --> 00:39:28,084
think about new practices in

586
00:39:28,124 --> 00:39:32,827
those domains? So I think Sam

587
00:39:32,907 --> 00:39:36,070
Altman, from his business standpoint, defined a

588
00:39:36,110 --> 00:39:39,780
few tiers of AI. I

589
00:39:39,820 --> 00:39:43,965
don't want to comment on whether those steps are too ambitious or

590
00:39:45,206 --> 00:39:48,990
maybe less realistic. But

591
00:39:49,591 --> 00:39:53,595
I think the way of thinking is very clear. It is aiming

592
00:39:53,655 --> 00:39:57,980
for higher and higher functionality. And what

593
00:39:58,280 --> 00:40:01,555
I can say from a technological standpoint, It

594
00:40:01,775 --> 00:40:05,276
also will be dependent on

595
00:40:05,937 --> 00:40:09,838
multiple generations of data, architecture,

596
00:40:10,338 --> 00:40:13,600
and algorithmic evolutions. We're not there.

597
00:40:13,840 --> 00:40:17,241
In fact, we don't have the tool right now to achieve even his second and third goals.

598
00:40:17,781 --> 00:40:21,282
And within these second, third, and fifth goals, in fact, I can define

599
00:40:21,562 --> 00:40:24,884
multiple concrete reasoning and

600
00:40:25,064 --> 00:40:29,159
also acting tasks that requires

601
00:40:29,179 --> 00:40:32,508
a lot of innovations. So at this university, in

602
00:40:32,649 --> 00:40:36,699
fact, we were involved in some of this work, such as developing the

603
00:40:36,779 --> 00:40:40,262
post-LLM models, including the word models,

604
00:40:40,342 --> 00:40:43,625
that can even do a trivial thing of

605
00:40:43,825 --> 00:40:47,088
simulating the word. If you cannot simulate the word, how

606
00:40:47,108 --> 00:40:50,270
can you even teach a guy to pour a glass of water? That's actually not

607
00:40:50,310 --> 00:40:53,633
written in the book. There are many other things that require

608
00:40:53,653 --> 00:40:57,596
you to be able to simulate real-world experiences, and also generating

609
00:40:57,616 --> 00:41:00,799
the next word based on your action on the real world, and

610
00:41:00,819 --> 00:41:04,421
so on and so forth. And only in that way, you

611
00:41:04,441 --> 00:41:07,865
can start to do thought experiments. You can do a new form of reasoning by

612
00:41:07,925 --> 00:41:10,989
simulation, which could overcome some of

613
00:41:11,029 --> 00:41:14,187
the limitations of the current language models. Then once you

614
00:41:14,227 --> 00:41:17,568
have the word model, you can go one step further into

615
00:41:17,628 --> 00:41:20,969
an agent model, where he has the word model as the brain,

616
00:41:21,309 --> 00:41:24,970
but also he needs to have other mental devices, such

617
00:41:25,150 --> 00:41:28,711
as perception, and

618
00:41:28,991 --> 00:41:32,192
goal, and belief, and all these sort

619
00:41:32,212 --> 00:41:35,653
of things. Each of them requires another

620
00:41:35,893 --> 00:41:39,313
model architectures. So I can go on and speak maybe

621
00:41:39,333 --> 00:41:42,934
for an hour about the technical steps that is required, even

622
00:41:42,974 --> 00:41:47,235
to achieve what we probably can see as a very normal

623
00:41:47,395 --> 00:41:51,056
and tedious level of intelligence. Then

624
00:41:51,136 --> 00:41:54,657
I want to also say a few words about the other opportunities that is beyond

625
00:41:54,797 --> 00:41:58,516
our daily life. which is the AI for science. Doing

626
00:41:58,536 --> 00:42:02,061
scientific research is always a function of a technology environment.

627
00:42:02,322 --> 00:42:06,468
Science requires more than brain, it requires the tool. Microscope,

628
00:42:06,648 --> 00:42:10,274
telescope actually play the bigger role in advancing biology and

629
00:42:10,294 --> 00:42:14,057
physics. AI is actually one such tool. Right now

630
00:42:14,458 --> 00:42:17,781
we have, for example, in the space of medicine and

631
00:42:17,801 --> 00:42:21,604
biology, there's a huge amount of genomic data, proteomic

632
00:42:21,644 --> 00:42:25,447
data, and all sorts of orbit data that

633
00:42:25,547 --> 00:42:28,710
is not meant even for people to analyze because they are too big and

634
00:42:28,750 --> 00:42:32,430
too complex. Before the modern AI

635
00:42:32,731 --> 00:42:36,075
of large language models and foundation models, we

636
00:42:36,856 --> 00:42:39,980
can do very little in understanding and utilizing the

637
00:42:40,040 --> 00:42:43,424
data. And now there is a new

638
00:42:45,306 --> 00:42:48,991
movement, in fact, in computational biology of building foundation

639
00:42:49,011 --> 00:42:52,634
models to distill in an unprecedented

640
00:42:52,654 --> 00:42:56,858
way, you know, new form of knowledges and also predictability and

641
00:42:56,978 --> 00:43:00,721
the simulation or capability of biological

642
00:43:00,841 --> 00:43:04,124
systems. Imagine that. What if you can now

643
00:43:04,304 --> 00:43:07,747
use an AI model to make proposals in

644
00:43:07,787 --> 00:43:10,990
a very, very short amount of time of hundreds, if not thousands, of

645
00:43:11,130 --> 00:43:14,253
drug design that can be applied to cure a

646
00:43:14,273 --> 00:43:17,594
particular disease. And then you don't have to even apply the

647
00:43:17,614 --> 00:43:21,296
drug to a real biological system

648
00:43:21,336 --> 00:43:24,738
like a cell or a model organism. You can actually

649
00:43:24,878 --> 00:43:28,140
also do the same in a word model of

650
00:43:28,160 --> 00:43:32,082
the biology, which simulates all biological

651
00:43:32,202 --> 00:43:35,444
phenomenons and the responses up to perturbation. You

652
00:43:35,464 --> 00:43:39,226
can pretty much do this whole loop of innovation and

653
00:43:39,326 --> 00:43:42,928
design and experimentation on a computer.

654
00:43:43,642 --> 00:43:47,503
And that actually is now becoming a very, very exciting

655
00:43:47,563 --> 00:43:50,704
goal for many of my colleagues, including students and

656
00:43:50,784 --> 00:43:54,065
the professors in this university. Likewise, you can

657
00:43:54,985 --> 00:43:58,826
draw the same experiences or expand the same experience in physics, in

658
00:43:59,306 --> 00:44:02,927
agriculture, in many other sciences. So I think AI will

659
00:44:02,967 --> 00:44:06,628
become, again, the modern day new microscope, which

660
00:44:07,268 --> 00:44:10,829
tells you how to, helps you how to understand the complex data,

661
00:44:11,069 --> 00:44:14,913
just like the classical microscope did. which is also about helping

662
00:44:14,933 --> 00:44:18,195
you to understand information that you cannot see too small or

663
00:44:19,816 --> 00:44:23,558
So you were talking about limitations of the current architecture. And

664
00:44:23,878 --> 00:44:27,160
something else you mentioned that I want to tie into this as well is

665
00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:32,103
that you refer to AI as our

666
00:44:32,163 --> 00:44:35,384
new age microscope in the ways it'll

667
00:44:35,444 --> 00:44:38,811
advance science. and not

668
00:44:38,951 --> 00:44:42,314
as a species, right? And I think a lot of the source

669
00:44:42,354 --> 00:44:46,157
of where the fear is coming from and where the hype is coming from, and I

670
00:44:46,177 --> 00:44:50,060
think those two are very interrelated, is this language around

671
00:44:50,080 --> 00:44:53,143
AI. And some researchers have taken issue with the

672
00:44:53,183 --> 00:44:56,440
term AI at all because of this. as

673
00:44:56,621 --> 00:45:00,204
the creation of a new species, as a species to supplant the

674
00:45:00,244 --> 00:45:03,728
human species, as the kind of next thing.

675
00:45:03,768 --> 00:45:07,392
And we are creating this being thing, replicable,

676
00:45:07,432 --> 00:45:11,997
whatever that is. And it's vague if you try to pin it down, but the

677
00:45:12,037 --> 00:45:15,100
way you're talking about it, with the limitations and the

678
00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:18,360
focus on it as a specific tool, It's

679
00:45:18,460 --> 00:45:22,081
very different. And so, you know, one, I

680
00:45:22,121 --> 00:45:25,262
want to start with what those limitations are. You know,

681
00:45:25,302 --> 00:45:29,143
we talk about hallucination, we talk about biases and

682
00:45:29,183 --> 00:45:32,504
these kinds of inherent issues to the architecture. What's also

683
00:45:32,604 --> 00:45:36,045
the importance of the language and how

684
00:45:37,942 --> 00:45:41,224
Whether AI is a species and so on, these kinds of

685
00:45:41,264 --> 00:45:44,865
discussions rarely happen among scientists

686
00:45:44,946 --> 00:45:51,049
and engineers. I call them the consequence

687
00:45:51,189 --> 00:45:55,371
of people living in different dimensions. Imagine

688
00:45:55,431 --> 00:45:59,253
that there is a tribe somewhere in the Amazon jungle that

689
00:45:59,273 --> 00:46:02,874
has never seen an aircraft or

690
00:46:02,954 --> 00:46:06,207
maybe a car. and then all of a sudden they see

691
00:46:06,227 --> 00:46:10,557
a person landing from

692
00:46:10,577 --> 00:46:14,642
an aircraft. It is not it's

693
00:46:14,662 --> 00:46:18,443
going to be surprising that they take that as a new species. In

694
00:46:18,463 --> 00:46:23,303
fact, if we look at the ancient mosaics

695
00:46:23,423 --> 00:46:27,604
and the pictures and sculptures in Egypt

696
00:46:27,704 --> 00:46:31,265
and in other ancient civilizations, you actually see

697
00:46:31,505 --> 00:46:35,025
a lot of such depictions of a god-like

698
00:46:35,085 --> 00:46:39,486
figure or magical species, which,

699
00:46:39,606 --> 00:46:42,847
I don't know, may actually represent a machinery. That's very

700
00:46:42,907 --> 00:46:46,828
possible. So there is a key

701
00:46:47,868 --> 00:46:50,889
distinction between technical and a

702
00:46:50,929 --> 00:46:54,931
scientific discussion from a maybe

703
00:46:55,251 --> 00:46:59,112
romantic and humanity discussions. For

704
00:46:59,132 --> 00:47:03,294
example, this very word of intelligence. Intelligence is

705
00:47:03,494 --> 00:47:06,995
not a very scientific design. I regret actually our

706
00:47:07,355 --> 00:47:10,623
discipline is called artificial intelligence. because the other

707
00:47:10,723 --> 00:47:14,645
fields are called physics and biology. It's a noun. Intelligence

708
00:47:15,385 --> 00:47:18,606
is a noun, but it is derived from an adjunct. It's,

709
00:47:19,306 --> 00:47:23,448
you are intelligent, and so on. It's a very subjective thing. For

710
00:47:23,468 --> 00:47:27,009
example, imagine that I have in my hand a

711
00:47:27,089 --> 00:47:30,570
calculator, but I didn't tell you. In fact,

712
00:47:31,491 --> 00:47:35,892
especially for people who didn't know the existence of calculator, he would be amazed how

713
00:47:36,712 --> 00:47:40,292
fast and how well I can do not just the trivial

714
00:47:40,312 --> 00:47:44,173
calculations, but also square roots and the integrations and everything. I

715
00:47:44,193 --> 00:47:48,015
can be called very intelligent, but it is a calculator. Once

716
00:47:48,055 --> 00:47:51,537
you are in the same dimension, you see how it is made and

717
00:47:51,737 --> 00:47:55,339
how it is supposed to function, you would be less impressed

718
00:47:55,559 --> 00:47:59,015
and nervous. For example, large language

719
00:47:59,055 --> 00:48:02,276
model. We built it. In fact, we are building it here as

720
00:48:02,336 --> 00:48:05,637
well in MBCI. We are among the few universities, if not the only one in the world,

721
00:48:05,957 --> 00:48:09,898
who actually pre-train large language model of our own. It

722
00:48:09,998 --> 00:48:13,298
is a model. It is a language model doing

723
00:48:13,418 --> 00:48:16,859
one thing, which is the next world prediction. So

724
00:48:17,079 --> 00:48:20,780
in that function, many of the utilities somehow

725
00:48:21,380 --> 00:48:24,543
can be encapsulated and dispatched. For

726
00:48:24,584 --> 00:48:27,907
example, answering all your questions in

727
00:48:27,927 --> 00:48:31,090
a certain scope. Next World

728
00:48:31,110 --> 00:48:34,975
Prediction is like a linguistic simulator of

729
00:48:35,095 --> 00:48:38,558
simulating how a person would

730
00:48:38,659 --> 00:48:42,222
react to a prompt or a question through language.

731
00:48:43,118 --> 00:48:46,139
It is literally a definable and a

732
00:48:46,219 --> 00:48:49,680
measurable function. But human beings may

733
00:48:50,820 --> 00:48:54,081
respond in a certain way. In fact, even between different human

734
00:48:54,121 --> 00:48:57,401
beings, we do different. Some people recite some text. They

735
00:48:57,441 --> 00:49:00,662
need to have a script to read from it. Some other

736
00:49:00,702 --> 00:49:04,903
people improvise this. Some people are half-half. So

737
00:49:05,383 --> 00:49:08,684
the approach of achieving that to a

738
00:49:08,744 --> 00:49:11,805
receiver is actually less relevant. They draw on

739
00:49:11,825 --> 00:49:15,308
their experiences. Now you sit on the end of the language

740
00:49:15,368 --> 00:49:18,691
model, you see all your difficult questions, your difficult math

741
00:49:19,032 --> 00:49:22,675
being answered. It doesn't prove that the machine actually understands

742
00:49:22,756 --> 00:49:25,959
it, you know, or really, really digests it, or do it

743
00:49:25,979 --> 00:49:29,363
the way a human would do. They can do it in a very different

744
00:49:29,423 --> 00:49:33,227
way, and that way, by now, happens to be next-world prediction.

745
00:49:34,370 --> 00:49:38,052
So that's why among scientists, among engineers, we

746
00:49:38,133 --> 00:49:41,935
tend to be less amazed by this technology. And

747
00:49:42,015 --> 00:49:45,277
we knew it is going to, for example, I'm not surprised at all that in one

748
00:49:45,317 --> 00:49:48,699
day, in February soon, that a large-language model could

749
00:49:49,199 --> 00:49:52,521
get a gold medal in the International Math Olympiad. Because

750
00:49:52,761 --> 00:49:56,424
that type of reasoning, that type of problem-solving is

751
00:49:56,784 --> 00:49:59,906
doable through a natural prediction model. As long as

752
00:49:59,966 --> 00:50:03,593
you have a big enough brain to remember zillions

753
00:50:03,653 --> 00:50:07,624
of words. you know, a prefix,

754
00:50:07,884 --> 00:50:12,026
the sentence, and then the same amount next to that. But

755
00:50:12,066 --> 00:50:15,367
I also know that there are some questions that they cannot answer, even through a

756
00:50:15,447 --> 00:50:19,009
very, very simple interface. I've tried that. I reserved that

757
00:50:19,449 --> 00:50:22,851
question list. If you are interested, I can send it to you. But I tested even

758
00:50:22,911 --> 00:50:27,413
the latest strawberry. They still cannot answer. But

759
00:50:27,553 --> 00:50:31,134
to a general public, they need education, I think. Right now, the

760
00:50:31,294 --> 00:50:34,881
AI literacy is very, very different from

761
00:50:35,342 --> 00:50:38,807
how much we know about algebra. Some people are very poor at algebra, but

762
00:50:38,827 --> 00:50:41,972
they know what that is. They wouldn't be surprised to

763
00:50:42,052 --> 00:50:46,203
see a calculator. But on the other hand, AI

764
00:50:46,303 --> 00:50:50,086
literacy is much worse right now. When people see something amazing,

765
00:50:50,466 --> 00:50:54,209
they literally get scared. I think there is a need to enhance

766
00:50:54,229 --> 00:50:58,131
the education of AI. It's not about just math and programming. There

767
00:50:58,211 --> 00:51:02,534
are other dimensions regarding AI utility, AI

768
00:51:02,594 --> 00:51:06,176
measurements. and business and products that

769
00:51:06,336 --> 00:51:09,838
people should know. Then they can have a much, much,

770
00:51:10,378 --> 00:51:13,999
hopefully, authentic and realistic view about AI, even

771
00:51:14,059 --> 00:51:18,141
without knowing the mathematics and programming. You don't need to be a mathematician or

772
00:51:20,363 --> 00:51:23,466
That's the fascinating thing to me about AI is that it

773
00:51:23,526 --> 00:51:26,909
is possibly one of the most multidisciplinary technologies that

774
00:51:26,989 --> 00:51:30,592
I can think of. You have the technical aspects,

775
00:51:30,652 --> 00:51:34,335
the computer science and the math, but there's also a lot of philosophy, human

776
00:51:34,375 --> 00:51:37,598
psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, the

777
00:51:37,638 --> 00:51:41,240
list kind of goes on. in terms of what you're talking about and the

778
00:51:41,300 --> 00:51:44,663
core of what language models are and what they do,

779
00:51:44,963 --> 00:51:48,185
which is a point that, you know, I appreciate you for bringing up because it's not

780
00:51:48,225 --> 00:51:51,467
talked about often enough. And this kind

781
00:51:51,507 --> 00:51:55,550
of race to intelligence and what intelligence is and what human intelligence is.

782
00:51:55,610 --> 00:51:59,192
And the fascinating thing to me is the kind of stark differences between

783
00:51:59,492 --> 00:52:02,614
language and intelligence and how these two

784
00:52:02,674 --> 00:52:06,117
are not necessarily related. And

785
00:52:06,517 --> 00:52:09,627
in interacting with these chatbots, right, I feel

786
00:52:09,647 --> 00:52:12,909
like we, as a species, communicate our intelligence, our

787
00:52:12,969 --> 00:52:16,332
thought, through language. This is our medium. This

788
00:52:16,452 --> 00:52:20,074
is what sets us apart. And when we see something talking

789
00:52:20,234 --> 00:52:23,356
to us in this medium of how we

790
00:52:23,396 --> 00:52:26,658
convey our intelligence, it's easy for us to assume that it

791
00:52:29,981 --> 00:52:33,263
That extrapolation is very natural for humans to make.

792
00:52:34,313 --> 00:52:37,615
But even so, I guess it is not difficult

793
00:52:37,655 --> 00:52:41,018
for us to realize that even if we don't speak,

794
00:52:41,418 --> 00:52:45,281
we still function and we can still communicate. You have gestures,

795
00:52:45,821 --> 00:52:49,123
you have many sensories that

796
00:52:49,163 --> 00:52:53,006
can sense visual, audio,

797
00:52:53,786 --> 00:52:56,968
temperature, all sorts of things. And not

798
00:52:57,088 --> 00:53:00,989
all of this actually were described in language. In fact, language can

799
00:53:01,710 --> 00:53:05,151
not be used to describe everything. There are many, many reasoning that

800
00:53:05,251 --> 00:53:08,513
is existing outside of language. So

801
00:53:08,533 --> 00:53:11,954
I would really draw a difference

802
00:53:12,014 --> 00:53:16,056
between the functionality of communicating and

803
00:53:16,756 --> 00:53:20,537
functioning linguistically versus

804
00:53:20,758 --> 00:53:23,999
being intelligent. Because intelligence is, again, a very,

805
00:53:24,019 --> 00:53:28,021
very subjective experience. It's a user experience. It's not a measurable

806
00:53:30,423 --> 00:53:33,604
I think the fascinating thing about what we're seeing with

807
00:53:33,624 --> 00:53:36,946
generative AI is that- There is one more thing, which

808
00:53:37,066 --> 00:53:41,029
is oftentimes we call the soul. you

809
00:53:41,049 --> 00:53:44,252
know, the spirit of a creature. I

810
00:53:44,312 --> 00:53:47,975
have to say that I am very limited in my knowledge in understanding that

811
00:53:47,995 --> 00:53:51,538
part. I don't know what that exactly is. Can we assume

812
00:53:51,578 --> 00:53:54,660
that just by becoming knowledgeable enough, I

813
00:53:54,800 --> 00:53:58,083
automatically become soulful? I'm not sure.

814
00:53:58,703 --> 00:54:02,546
I think there's a difference between a machine and a biological creature.

815
00:54:03,067 --> 00:54:06,510
And that difference is actually at least not well understood at this point.

816
00:54:06,830 --> 00:54:10,212
I think the older generation philosophers had time to

817
00:54:10,252 --> 00:54:13,855
think about it. They actually debated

818
00:54:14,695 --> 00:54:19,058
on what is the status of human

819
00:54:19,098 --> 00:54:22,720
reasoning and human morality and

820
00:54:23,541 --> 00:54:27,303
will in the definition

821
00:54:27,343 --> 00:54:31,165
of human versus machineries. I

822
00:54:31,205 --> 00:54:34,688
think that discussion and that debate and thinking

823
00:54:35,468 --> 00:54:39,129
should continue or restart because now we

824
00:54:39,169 --> 00:54:42,450
have a new technology, which is AI. At that time,

825
00:54:43,070 --> 00:54:47,072
they had this discussion because of the

826
00:54:47,792 --> 00:54:52,034
latest invention, which is the calculus, the the

827
00:54:52,114 --> 00:54:55,256
orbiting planets and so forth, which was fascinating. It may give you the

828
00:54:55,276 --> 00:54:59,339
feeling that, wow, I'm like a god. I can predict the position

829
00:54:59,399 --> 00:55:03,121
of the planets. I can predict the ellipse and so forth. And

830
00:55:03,161 --> 00:55:06,523
then people start to think, oh, what is knowledge? What

831
00:55:06,643 --> 00:55:10,446
is reasoning? What is conscious? So forth. I

832
00:55:10,486 --> 00:55:13,688
think now it's time to rethink about that. Because with AI, which we

833
00:55:13,728 --> 00:55:17,370
actually can make in a mechanical way using a

834
00:55:17,450 --> 00:55:21,232
very, very simple training kind

835
00:55:21,272 --> 00:55:24,434
of strategy, say, next world prediction, how

836
00:55:24,474 --> 00:55:27,655
can we redefine what is ration and what

837
00:55:27,736 --> 00:55:31,257
is mind and so forth? But I would

838
00:55:31,397 --> 00:55:34,899
caution people from

839
00:55:35,700 --> 00:55:40,862
making the jump of directly connecting

840
00:55:41,403 --> 00:55:45,145
a very, very capable and seemingly

841
00:55:45,245 --> 00:55:48,665
smart artificial system to

842
00:55:49,245 --> 00:55:55,127
a human-like creature which has the

843
00:55:55,227 --> 00:55:58,708
ego and also maybe

844
00:55:58,828 --> 00:56:02,169
even the malicious intent to come after us. I think

845
00:56:02,249 --> 00:56:05,910
there are a lot of steps, even philosophical ones and cognitive

846
00:56:06,010 --> 00:56:10,093
ones, between them. And drawing an automatic extrapolation

847
00:56:11,614 --> 00:56:16,018
is not very convincing, at least to a

848
00:56:17,039 --> 00:56:20,281
The point you brought up about the soul, I find that

849
00:56:20,301 --> 00:56:23,744
fascinating. And that's the kind of these differences

850
00:56:23,804 --> 00:56:27,207
between knowledge and having been trained on every human work

851
00:56:27,267 --> 00:56:30,491
ever written. the different facets that

852
00:56:30,511 --> 00:56:34,052
make up what human intelligence is. And it goes beyond

853
00:56:34,813 --> 00:56:38,454
knowing things. The stuff that makes humans human

854
00:56:39,535 --> 00:56:43,137
I had one interesting debate with a colleague. For example, we

855
00:56:43,157 --> 00:56:46,758
train generative AI, such as the Zara, for producing movies. Now,

856
00:56:46,798 --> 00:56:50,340
let's imagine that the system watch a lot of Animal Kingdom

857
00:56:50,380 --> 00:56:53,621
movies, like animals fight each other, eat

858
00:56:53,661 --> 00:56:57,683
each other, and so forth, so that they can produce similar movies. Along

859
00:56:57,723 --> 00:57:01,206
the way, are they going to be learning the will of

860
00:57:01,246 --> 00:57:04,728
killing and of predator and prey

861
00:57:04,948 --> 00:57:08,290
type of mindset? Well, nobody actually

862
00:57:08,310 --> 00:57:11,832
knows, at least at this point. But it's a fascinating question to

863
00:57:13,433 --> 00:57:17,156
Intention is a big thing here that's missing.

864
00:57:17,416 --> 00:57:20,978
But there's also a lot that's not known about language models.

865
00:57:21,179 --> 00:57:25,061
The real risk I do see in a potentially

866
00:57:25,221 --> 00:57:28,505
out of control AI system is not about

867
00:57:28,525 --> 00:57:32,151
that they kill people and so forth. It's about their

868
00:57:33,311 --> 00:57:36,573
environmental footprint. Imagine that if

869
00:57:36,613 --> 00:57:40,415
you do have an AI system that is told to

870
00:57:40,595 --> 00:57:44,357
infinitely iterate on some very,

871
00:57:44,397 --> 00:57:48,039
very difficult objectives that actually can be measured, but

872
00:57:48,059 --> 00:57:51,581
they can go very, very big. What if the machine decides

873
00:57:51,681 --> 00:57:54,902
to keep training themselves and burn a

874
00:57:54,942 --> 00:57:58,624
heck of energy and so forth, and causing really environmental

875
00:57:58,644 --> 00:58:01,966
disasters? To me, that's a real risk we have to be careful

876
00:58:01,986 --> 00:58:06,008
about. There has to be checkpoints and the bricks, so

877
00:58:06,028 --> 00:58:09,629
that at least a person should be allowed to turn it off. If

878
00:58:09,669 --> 00:58:13,131
you want to build a system that is never having a switch, probably

879
00:58:13,191 --> 00:58:16,352
no good. But these are something you

880
00:58:16,392 --> 00:58:20,275
can already bear in your mind when you do the design. And

881
00:58:20,295 --> 00:58:24,116
we could call it also a regulation in the science space. But

882
00:58:24,936 --> 00:58:28,217
I don't want to overgeneralize that. It's not like

883
00:58:28,317 --> 00:58:31,658
everywhere. It's only a very, very

884
00:58:33,918 --> 00:58:37,259
definable and measurable risk that is indeed very,

885
00:58:37,319 --> 00:58:40,860
very grave. But on the other hand, I think

886
00:58:42,265 --> 00:58:46,148
Right. And a lot of these risks come from putting

887
00:58:46,168 --> 00:58:49,972
these systems in a place where they can make decisions without human oversight. And

888
00:58:49,992 --> 00:58:53,294
I guess the immediate and obvious remedy is don't do

889
00:58:53,334 --> 00:58:56,837
that. Maintain human oversight. You won't have those problems.

890
00:58:58,078 --> 00:59:01,481
Yeah, yeah. That's true. So I

891
00:59:01,802 --> 00:59:05,204
think it's an ongoing discussion. But again, there is still

892
00:59:05,305 --> 00:59:08,687
a difference between the scientific kind

893
00:59:08,727 --> 00:59:12,033
of brain work, or maybe even

894
00:59:12,053 --> 00:59:15,900
the technological experimental work from

895
00:59:16,160 --> 00:59:19,425
the production and deployments and

896
00:59:19,445 --> 00:59:23,093
the usage. I would imagine

897
00:59:23,133 --> 00:59:26,515
that it's more effective and productive to focus on

898
00:59:26,535 --> 00:59:29,776
the latter. Also, one more thing. I

899
00:59:29,796 --> 00:59:33,758
think AI, compared to other sciences,

900
00:59:34,618 --> 00:59:37,940
has the advantage that it is still one step

901
00:59:38,040 --> 00:59:41,481
away from the physical world. Imagine that you are a biologist, you

902
00:59:41,521 --> 00:59:45,623
do virology and genetic

903
00:59:45,703 --> 00:59:49,625
engineering. Well, the products of

904
00:59:49,645 --> 00:59:53,394
your experimentation is a physical being. If

905
00:59:53,474 --> 00:59:57,978
you somehow smash the glass, or you somehow cause

906
00:59:58,058 --> 01:00:01,480
a lab leak, it actually does enter the

907
01:00:01,901 --> 01:00:05,343
environment. And they will stay there, or they could spread,

908
01:00:06,324 --> 01:00:09,967
just like what we see in COVID. So these are very mature

909
01:00:10,027 --> 01:00:14,370
risks. And therefore, it requires rather

910
01:00:14,471 --> 01:00:20,365
stringent regulations and control. AI maybe

911
01:00:20,565 --> 01:00:24,528
conceptually have that kind of same risk, but

912
01:00:24,708 --> 01:00:28,331
it is fortunately still in a digital

913
01:00:28,351 --> 01:00:31,533
and a virtual environment. In the worst case, you just

914
01:00:31,553 --> 01:00:34,735
throw off your iPhones and shut down your machines. You go back

915
01:00:34,775 --> 01:00:38,137
to the cage, the caves. We will still

916
01:00:38,458 --> 01:00:41,800
survive, right? And without, you know, for

917
01:00:41,820 --> 01:00:46,603
example, computer. Of course, I know it's very difficult these days, but I

918
01:00:46,663 --> 01:00:51,308
mean, it's a different level of risk. That

919
01:00:51,388 --> 01:00:55,491
existential risk is different from a biological disaster,

920
01:00:55,851 --> 01:00:59,513
a chemical skill, a nuclear kind of explosion,

921
01:01:01,014 --> 01:01:04,276
Part of the regulation question, and all

922
01:01:04,316 --> 01:01:07,597
these topics are so passionately debated in the public space.

923
01:01:08,698 --> 01:01:11,859
is the idea of open source versus a lot of what

924
01:01:11,879 --> 01:01:15,839
we see from the companies, which is super, super closed source.

925
01:01:16,039 --> 01:01:19,220
We're not even going to tell you what we trained on. That has to come

926
01:01:19,280 --> 01:01:22,540
out through reports from investigative journalists. And

927
01:01:22,580 --> 01:01:26,681
it trickles out and is fought over in court because of copyright concerns.

928
01:01:27,381 --> 01:01:30,662
But the debate hinges on this idea

929
01:01:30,682 --> 01:01:34,703
that science needs to be open. Science

930
01:01:34,743 --> 01:01:37,843
needs to be explainable and replicable. And if

931
01:01:38,224 --> 01:01:42,287
it's not open, it's not really science. And it's the distinction between product

932
01:01:42,607 --> 01:01:46,050
and science. But there's also concerns about

933
01:01:46,590 --> 01:01:50,153
what open source could mean for security risks. And you

934
01:01:50,173 --> 01:01:54,157
were talking about chemical and biological situations

935
01:01:54,217 --> 01:01:57,759
and how AI open source can maybe help bad

936
01:01:57,860 --> 01:02:01,262
actors in those realms. So as

937
01:02:01,282 --> 01:02:05,586
it relates to that and making sure that nothing bad happens, what

938
01:02:08,291 --> 01:02:11,535
Well, I don't

939
01:02:11,555 --> 01:02:14,939
want to reiterate the philosophy in science

940
01:02:14,979 --> 01:02:18,483
that there is a fundamental value of share

941
01:02:18,543 --> 01:02:22,248
and open and so forth. Definitely, I'm for that. More

942
01:02:22,288 --> 01:02:25,471
than that, I actually don't think secrecy is

943
01:02:25,611 --> 01:02:28,759
a recipe for security. I

944
01:02:28,799 --> 01:02:31,902
think there's a fundamental issue. People thought by keeping things secret, you

945
01:02:31,942 --> 01:02:35,145
become safer. I doubt it. I

946
01:02:35,165 --> 01:02:39,249
don't think history gave us too many examples of that. Because

947
01:02:39,689 --> 01:02:43,101
eventually, you will lose the secrecy. I think having

948
01:02:44,082 --> 01:02:47,565
more people to understand the technology, to be able

949
01:02:47,665 --> 01:02:51,469
to investigate and experiment creates

950
01:02:52,129 --> 01:02:56,553
a much larger pool of people

951
01:02:56,854 --> 01:03:00,237
and also a large pool of knowledge to contain

952
01:03:00,257 --> 01:03:03,740
the risk if that risk happens. That's kind of, again, maybe

953
01:03:03,900 --> 01:03:08,865
a more philosophical and abstract argument. But

954
01:03:09,025 --> 01:03:12,688
I can give you a few examples. Right

955
01:03:12,728 --> 01:03:16,491
now, we don't actually know exactly how

956
01:03:16,952 --> 01:03:20,215
GPTs are trained. Do

957
01:03:20,255 --> 01:03:24,218
you think that makes the technology safer or less safe? Well,

958
01:03:24,498 --> 01:03:28,020
I don't know. I feel less comfortable

959
01:03:28,600 --> 01:03:31,821
if I'm using something that I have

960
01:03:31,901 --> 01:03:35,722
no knowledge from. Yes, I'm not going to break my car and

961
01:03:36,162 --> 01:03:42,065
do it myself or understand how

962
01:03:42,145 --> 01:03:45,706
it is made. But at least I know that there

963
01:03:45,786 --> 01:03:49,327
are more than one manufacturer who knows how to do it. If

964
01:03:49,447 --> 01:03:52,708
my car breaks down, like I have to drive a Mercedes, I don't have to go back

965
01:03:52,728 --> 01:03:55,949
to Mercedes. I can go to any car shop to have it fixed. That

966
01:03:55,969 --> 01:04:00,490
makes me feel safe. So under the same principle, I think important

967
01:04:00,510 --> 01:04:03,771
technologies, I'm not even arguing a commercial reason. I think many of

968
01:04:03,811 --> 01:04:07,552
the arguments was because of a commercial interest and other

969
01:04:07,652 --> 01:04:12,613
geopolitical interest. But from a security standpoint, open

970
01:04:12,653 --> 01:04:15,774
source has the advantage of

971
01:04:18,530 --> 01:04:22,212
sharing the knowledge to more

972
01:04:22,272 --> 01:04:25,434
people, and also keeping the

973
01:04:25,474 --> 01:04:29,696
technology transparent for scrutiny, and therefore, for

974
01:04:29,996 --> 01:04:33,438
a better opportunity to regulate it. So I think that

975
01:04:33,458 --> 01:04:37,419
part is very important, even from a pure security

976
01:04:37,460 --> 01:04:41,587
standpoint. Now, of course, there are even more

977
01:04:41,747 --> 01:04:45,109
arguments about the economical and the scientific kind of

978
01:04:45,149 --> 01:04:48,350
value from it. Economy is obvious. You don't want

979
01:04:48,870 --> 01:04:52,131
a lucrative and important technology to be

980
01:04:52,312 --> 01:04:55,833
monopolized by one of your companies. That's why in

981
01:04:55,933 --> 01:04:59,354
the US, you have the antitrust laws and the anti-monopoly laws,

982
01:04:59,474 --> 01:05:02,856
right? So if your company, Rockefeller, once

983
01:05:02,876 --> 01:05:06,277
they own all the petroleum production, the

984
01:05:06,317 --> 01:05:09,778
government orders it to break it. There is always an interest

985
01:05:09,898 --> 01:05:14,020
of healthy competition among entities for

986
01:05:14,060 --> 01:05:18,241
key technology and key products to actually better the

987
01:05:18,641 --> 01:05:21,822
quality of technology itself and also to make it affordable and

988
01:05:21,882 --> 01:05:25,443
accessible to people. So that's a commercial argument I want to make. Open

989
01:05:25,503 --> 01:05:29,344
source gives startups, even

990
01:05:29,444 --> 01:05:34,692
universities, a share of their impact

991
01:05:34,992 --> 01:05:39,753
and also their ability to

992
01:05:39,833 --> 01:05:43,754
innovate in this market. That's scientifically even

993
01:05:43,834 --> 01:05:47,194
more important. I think no science actually gets

994
01:05:47,434 --> 01:05:51,275
developed very well if it's kept in secret. So

995
01:05:51,775 --> 01:05:55,636
for the sake of advancing the science of artificial

996
01:05:55,676 --> 01:05:59,496
intelligence, especially in the United States, definitely the

997
01:05:59,776 --> 01:06:04,011
U.S. is right now the current leader. I

998
01:06:04,051 --> 01:06:07,374
think by having the open

999
01:06:07,414 --> 01:06:11,418
source community very robustly

1000
01:06:11,438 --> 01:06:15,122
grounded in the United States, actually end up helping the

1001
01:06:15,142 --> 01:06:18,325
United States to be the leader for

1002
01:06:18,345 --> 01:06:21,808
the past many decades in IT technology. Look at, for

1003
01:06:21,828 --> 01:06:24,971
example, the development of

1004
01:06:25,051 --> 01:06:28,535
operating systems like Linux, the search engines.

1005
01:06:29,118 --> 01:06:32,741
and many of the novel IT innovations

1006
01:06:33,221 --> 01:06:37,965
is because there is this openness of

1007
01:06:38,606 --> 01:06:43,890
technology to be played and experimented and

1008
01:06:44,050 --> 01:06:47,173
advanced, not just by a designated player, but

1009
01:06:47,253 --> 01:06:50,876
by the entire academic and

1010
01:06:51,056 --> 01:06:55,400
industrial community at large. I think that capability and

1011
01:06:55,960 --> 01:06:59,462
freedom is nowhere to see, in fact, elsewhere

1012
01:06:59,502 --> 01:07:03,644
in the world, not even in Europe. In

1013
01:07:03,684 --> 01:07:07,326
fact, that's part of the reason I become excited to take

1014
01:07:07,406 --> 01:07:10,767
on this job in here, because I do like to

1015
01:07:10,927 --> 01:07:14,629
see such a mindset and such a value,

1016
01:07:14,829 --> 01:07:18,957
a principle in education, in technology, to

1017
01:07:19,357 --> 01:07:24,139
impact regions which are yet to be impacted. So

1018
01:07:24,179 --> 01:07:27,460
here is a young country that

1019
01:07:27,540 --> 01:07:31,941
wants to have a voice and have a stake in the global technological

1020
01:07:32,001 --> 01:07:35,202
advancements. And they have the

1021
01:07:35,242 --> 01:07:38,783
resource and also the ambition and also the enthusiasm of

1022
01:07:38,843 --> 01:07:41,984
being a leader. And absolutely, I think by

1023
01:07:47,895 --> 01:07:51,397
you know, moving the,

1024
01:07:52,018 --> 01:07:55,260
maybe I'm lacking the right word, by learning or

1025
01:07:55,300 --> 01:07:58,461
maybe by advocating and advancing, amplifying in that

1026
01:07:58,502 --> 01:08:02,444
kind of openness, that kind of transparency, you

1027
01:08:02,504 --> 01:08:06,146
know, from the very beginning of the foundation of this university and

1028
01:08:06,306 --> 01:08:09,548
of the talent we are training, I believe is

1029
01:08:09,688 --> 01:08:13,671
at the end of the day helping, you know, to grow this technology. And

1030
01:08:13,691 --> 01:08:17,113
that's also why in our university, yeah, we indeed take a very, very

1031
01:08:18,116 --> 01:08:22,238
open, but of course, compliant and

1032
01:08:22,478 --> 01:08:25,900
regulated approach to develop our AI.

1033
01:08:26,521 --> 01:08:30,062
You may have heard about, of course, everybody heard about Lama from Meta,

1034
01:08:30,363 --> 01:08:34,325
right? And it's a huge benefit

1035
01:08:34,545 --> 01:08:37,866
and support to

1036
01:08:37,886 --> 01:08:41,588
the community. And they benefit a lot, a lot of researchers working

1037
01:08:41,648 --> 01:08:45,390
on that and maybe inspired

1038
01:08:45,410 --> 01:08:48,964
a lot of new advancements. In here, we

1039
01:08:49,024 --> 01:08:52,647
have a project called LLM360, which actually went

1040
01:08:53,148 --> 01:08:56,912
even multiple steps further. We not only open-sourced the

1041
01:08:57,312 --> 01:09:00,636
model weights, we open-sourced the

1042
01:09:00,696 --> 01:09:03,959
checkpoints and also the code that

1043
01:09:03,999 --> 01:09:07,222
you use to produce the model. And our goal is

1044
01:09:07,282 --> 01:09:10,684
to let researchers to be able to reproduce the result,

1045
01:09:10,764 --> 01:09:14,767
good and bad, because otherwise you can only use

1046
01:09:14,847 --> 01:09:18,089
it and augment it. But you

1047
01:09:18,109 --> 01:09:21,832
still have this dependency of waiting for the next version, you

1048
01:09:21,872 --> 01:09:25,374
know, for you to rebuild everything from scratch. And

1049
01:09:25,414 --> 01:09:28,976
in our case, We want to make the community even bigger

1050
01:09:29,837 --> 01:09:32,938
with this higher degree of transparency. And I

1051
01:09:32,978 --> 01:09:36,260
think, does that give us any risk? Well,

1052
01:09:36,720 --> 01:09:40,722
you can never rule out the possibility of a bad player somewhere

1053
01:09:40,783 --> 01:09:44,705
in the world to take that and turn it into somewhat

1054
01:09:44,885 --> 01:09:47,986
a malicious tool. I

1055
01:09:48,026 --> 01:09:52,067
don't think, you know, that's going

1056
01:09:52,087 --> 01:09:55,308
to be stopped if we just close source it. People will

1057
01:09:55,348 --> 01:09:58,990
figure out from else places. But on the other hand, by

1058
01:09:59,491 --> 01:10:02,793
opening the technology in such a way,

1059
01:10:03,473 --> 01:10:07,095
we end up having more people understanding how

1060
01:10:07,675 --> 01:10:11,537
to augment and how to manage

1061
01:10:11,657 --> 01:10:14,899
and contain the risk from this machine and how to make

1062
01:10:14,919 --> 01:10:18,701
the machine better. So again, it's a debatable topic, but

1063
01:10:18,941 --> 01:10:22,123
I just want to share with you my view from a developer and

1064
01:10:22,163 --> 01:10:25,365
a researcher who makes these kind of technologies, I think

1065
01:10:28,647 --> 01:10:32,088
And we talked about this a little bit, but the thing that I think is important

1066
01:10:32,189 --> 01:10:36,171
in the realm of AI literacy and helping ordinary

1067
01:10:36,211 --> 01:10:39,573
people who don't spend their time reading

1068
01:10:39,633 --> 01:10:45,455
research papers or writing research papers about AI, What

1069
01:10:45,475 --> 01:10:48,962
are the biggest misconceptions that you see people

1070
01:10:49,022 --> 01:10:52,329
make about artificial intelligence in general

1071
01:10:55,322 --> 01:10:59,945
Well, all the things that we just discussed, like taking

1072
01:11:00,925 --> 01:11:05,468
AI as some sort of a creature that

1073
01:11:05,788 --> 01:11:09,210
could spin out of control from human hands, is definitely

1074
01:11:09,330 --> 01:11:12,651
one misperception. And

1075
01:11:12,751 --> 01:11:16,914
also exaggerating the power

1076
01:11:17,054 --> 01:11:20,576
of AI in real human

1077
01:11:20,676 --> 01:11:26,084
life, and also in scientific exploration, In

1078
01:11:26,104 --> 01:11:30,486
my opinion, it's also a misperception because AI

1079
01:11:30,686 --> 01:11:33,947
is very powerful, but

1080
01:11:34,067 --> 01:11:37,428
it is powerful in certain dimensions. For example, it is very powerful now

1081
01:11:37,488 --> 01:11:40,569
in playing the game of chess and Go. But it

1082
01:11:40,609 --> 01:11:44,111
doesn't mean that it plays other things well, like planning

1083
01:11:44,131 --> 01:11:48,512
your trips. So it takes time to get there. Another

1084
01:11:48,612 --> 01:11:51,954
misperception is that AI is

1085
01:11:52,154 --> 01:11:55,956
only about large language models and the GPTs. In

1086
01:11:55,996 --> 01:12:01,505
fact, AI is a very, very broad technology that

1087
01:12:01,625 --> 01:12:04,990
is more than actually we

1088
01:12:05,070 --> 01:12:08,275
expected to be coexisting with

1089
01:12:08,356 --> 01:12:11,835
us already. Our search engine is also an AI tool. And

1090
01:12:11,895 --> 01:12:15,216
I don't think people want to ban such engine. And

1091
01:12:15,916 --> 01:12:19,676
also, now everybody is driving

1092
01:12:20,136 --> 01:12:23,337
a car with a GPS or

1093
01:12:23,357 --> 01:12:26,778
with your iPhone next to you to

1094
01:12:26,978 --> 01:12:30,178
show you the road. I can tell you that I'm old enough that I live

1095
01:12:30,198 --> 01:12:33,419
in an age where I use a paper map to drive. It's painful. I don't want

1096
01:12:33,439 --> 01:12:36,819
to go back that age. People don't realize that that function is also

1097
01:12:37,039 --> 01:12:41,304
from AI. So AI is already everywhere. So

1098
01:12:42,125 --> 01:12:48,428
using the GPT as the

1099
01:12:48,648 --> 01:12:51,790
main or the only representation of AI is

1100
01:12:51,970 --> 01:12:56,192
itself a misperception. And therefore, the discussion around

1101
01:12:56,352 --> 01:13:00,455
AI sometimes is

1102
01:13:00,495 --> 01:13:03,696
very, very confused and ambiguous. Maybe we

1103
01:13:03,776 --> 01:13:07,538
should say that, how about we discuss large language models? That's actually

1104
01:13:07,578 --> 01:13:11,060
a lot more precise. and

1105
01:13:11,100 --> 01:13:15,023
better scoped. But when you say AI, literally

1106
01:13:15,043 --> 01:13:19,246
you are talking about how about we take a Google

1107
01:13:19,266 --> 01:13:22,888
map from your iPhone. That's a part of AI. And

1108
01:13:23,388 --> 01:13:27,751
who knows what will come along that line, the next product. I think

1109
01:13:27,911 --> 01:13:31,718
self-driving is one of the major things That

1110
01:13:31,798 --> 01:13:35,480
is coming very close to what

1111
01:13:35,500 --> 01:13:38,741
it's already realized. It's just like right now the policy is

1112
01:13:39,641 --> 01:13:43,202
lagging behind for its deployment. In

1113
01:13:43,222 --> 01:13:46,403
fact, I think a policy is more needed over

1114
01:13:46,483 --> 01:13:50,485
there in terms of deployment. Because if you look at the statistics, the

1115
01:13:50,625 --> 01:13:53,826
accidents committed by an autonomous driving car actually is

1116
01:13:53,946 --> 01:13:58,168
lower than people. And the

1117
01:13:58,228 --> 01:14:01,590
reason why it is not widely adopted is a policy and

1118
01:14:01,710 --> 01:14:05,091
infrastructure issue, not necessarily a technological issue.

1119
01:14:06,212 --> 01:14:09,593
And so I think there are a lot of examples in

1120
01:14:09,633 --> 01:14:13,055
such a space where especially decision makers

1121
01:14:13,295 --> 01:14:16,937
and policy makers will be benefiting from

1122
01:14:17,237 --> 01:14:20,514
having scientists and developers next to

1123
01:14:20,574 --> 01:14:23,756
them to be part of the discussion. I have to say

1124
01:14:23,776 --> 01:14:29,081
that I've been to events in various organizations

1125
01:14:29,241 --> 01:14:33,284
in the government bodies where a scientist

1126
01:14:33,304 --> 01:14:37,647
like myself could amount to

1127
01:14:37,647 --> 01:14:41,230
5% of the participants, or even less. So

1128
01:14:41,350 --> 01:14:45,253
in that environment, it is amplifying, in

1129
01:14:48,387 --> 01:14:51,788
We talk about people kind of trying to educate themselves better. And

1130
01:14:52,248 --> 01:14:55,489
like you were saying, it's really difficult. A

1131
01:14:55,529 --> 01:14:58,770
lot of this is ambiguous. A lot of the language changes depending on who you

1132
01:14:58,790 --> 01:15:02,211
talk to. What should people

1133
01:15:02,271 --> 01:15:06,712
be doing about AI right now? How

1134
01:15:06,772 --> 01:15:10,193
should they be kind of going about thinking

1135
01:15:10,253 --> 01:15:13,333
about it? I think there's a

1136
01:15:13,373 --> 01:15:16,737
degree that some people are afraid that it's too complex, too

1137
01:15:16,857 --> 01:15:20,061
out of reach to have an opinion on it or to think

1138
01:15:20,101 --> 01:15:23,965
about it too much. What would you tell them they

1139
01:15:28,533 --> 01:15:31,694
Good question. I

1140
01:15:31,754 --> 01:15:34,935
have to say that I don't want

1141
01:15:34,975 --> 01:15:38,135
to push the blame to the public just because they don't do

1142
01:15:38,155 --> 01:15:42,256
enough. I think the general public, even

1143
01:15:42,356 --> 01:15:45,817
including decision makers, policy makers, I

1144
01:15:45,917 --> 01:15:49,158
genuinely believe that they wanted to know more, but they don't know where

1145
01:15:49,198 --> 01:15:52,870
to learn and how to learn. So our educational system

1146
01:15:52,890 --> 01:15:58,037
should be the starting point that our current curriculum regarding

1147
01:15:58,198 --> 01:16:01,616
AI or computer science probably it's time to revisit

1148
01:16:01,636 --> 01:16:05,597
them. In fact, for the past, I

1149
01:16:05,637 --> 01:16:09,238
would say, several decades, if you look at the curriculum,

1150
01:16:10,118 --> 01:16:13,679
there hasn't been a fundamental change. It's literally just about how

1151
01:16:13,759 --> 01:16:17,160
much I teach along the same line. Which program

1152
01:16:17,180 --> 01:16:20,561
language? Okay, I can start it from Fortran in the 50s,

1153
01:16:20,701 --> 01:16:23,921
and then C, and then Java, and now Python, and so forth. But

1154
01:16:23,941 --> 01:16:27,566
it's still about teaching a different language. mathematics, well

1155
01:16:27,586 --> 01:16:30,928
there are new material coming in, let's retire the older ones

1156
01:16:31,008 --> 01:16:34,449
and bring in new ones. But yeah, you need to know linear algebra,

1157
01:16:34,489 --> 01:16:37,831
you need to know calculus, and so forth. So it's still the

1158
01:16:38,331 --> 01:16:41,653
very, very conventional way of thinking, and the statistics, for example,

1159
01:16:41,713 --> 01:16:46,530
are still using a year to teach regressions and so forth. With

1160
01:16:46,610 --> 01:16:50,131
now AI and with functions like

1161
01:16:50,171 --> 01:16:54,172
GPT or search engine and so forth, in

1162
01:16:54,192 --> 01:16:57,593
fact, we already are in the crisis where some people are using

1163
01:16:57,653 --> 01:17:01,674
GPTs to write scientific reviews of the submitted

1164
01:17:01,754 --> 01:17:05,335
publications. And people are getting very frustrated,

1165
01:17:05,415 --> 01:17:08,836
but you cannot stop it. It's happening, right? So then your attitude towards

1166
01:17:08,996 --> 01:17:12,116
even published papers may need to be augmented. Are

1167
01:17:12,156 --> 01:17:15,700
they really the product of the the researchers or

1168
01:17:15,760 --> 01:17:19,449
it's a mix and so forth. So I think this awareness of

1169
01:17:19,529 --> 01:17:22,977
the changing technology should be first taught to the public,

1170
01:17:23,358 --> 01:17:26,803
you know, in some curriculum. And that material does not require you

1171
01:17:26,863 --> 01:17:30,326
to know calculus and know linear algebra and know all this fancy

1172
01:17:30,686 --> 01:17:34,048
mathematical stuff. And in fact, it could be taught even

1173
01:17:34,088 --> 01:17:38,171
in elementary school and high school. So I think bringing

1174
01:17:38,471 --> 01:17:42,534
the AI into the background of

1175
01:17:43,235 --> 01:17:47,037
all teaching materials makes them not a specialty,

1176
01:17:47,437 --> 01:17:51,712
but a very, very horizontal, fundamental

1177
01:17:51,772 --> 01:17:55,073
science is probably where we want to begin from. Start early

1178
01:17:55,834 --> 01:17:59,535
and start very, very simple but broad to

1179
01:17:59,695 --> 01:18:03,016
create awareness about what we

1180
01:18:03,096 --> 01:18:06,518
already are using AI to do, and how

1181
01:18:06,738 --> 01:18:10,821
well they can do, and what else we set

1182
01:18:10,901 --> 01:18:14,324
forth for them to do. That kind of high-level knowledge

1183
01:18:14,784 --> 01:18:18,347
can be already taught to the general public

1184
01:18:18,567 --> 01:18:22,530
without any emphasis on technical specialty.

1185
01:18:23,551 --> 01:18:27,093
Then you can talk about the connections of

1186
01:18:27,313 --> 01:18:31,396
AI with all disciplines, not just AI

1187
01:18:31,436 --> 01:18:36,611
for science or AI making a product. For

1188
01:18:36,631 --> 01:18:40,276
example, artists are already using generative

1189
01:18:40,376 --> 01:18:43,860
AI to create visual arts,

1190
01:18:45,022 --> 01:18:49,347
music, and many other things. How

1191
01:18:49,367 --> 01:18:52,771
do we appreciate and interpret these

1192
01:18:52,871 --> 01:18:56,956
kinds of outcomes? and how can we redefine copyrights

1193
01:18:57,957 --> 01:19:02,724
and maybe authorship

1194
01:19:02,824 --> 01:19:06,407
and all that kind of things. I think this kind

1195
01:19:06,427 --> 01:19:09,731
of issues are already happening, but

1196
01:19:09,891 --> 01:19:14,256
very few people really put time

1197
01:19:14,316 --> 01:19:17,879
to think about it, or not even maybe knowing it. So

1198
01:19:17,899 --> 01:19:22,144
I think the AI literacy is really about awareness

1199
01:19:22,805 --> 01:19:26,028
of such an entity, such a

1200
01:19:26,509 --> 01:19:30,312
capability. We all know, for example, the capability of linear

1201
01:19:30,412 --> 01:19:33,615
algebra, or not linear algebra, just algebra. That's why

1202
01:19:33,635 --> 01:19:37,658
we are not afraid of a calculator, because we actually know algebra, even

1203
01:19:37,698 --> 01:19:41,021
though we don't know how to do algebra, but we know what is algebra. Right

1204
01:19:41,061 --> 01:19:44,844
now, we don't have such a literacy in AI. And

1205
01:19:45,024 --> 01:19:48,407
that's where, from the educational standpoint, I

1206
01:19:48,447 --> 01:19:51,629
would like to see universities and even

1207
01:19:52,811 --> 01:19:56,173
going further earlier, high schools, elementary schools, start

1208
01:19:56,193 --> 01:19:59,635
thinking about that. My son is in high school right now and

1209
01:20:00,516 --> 01:20:04,018
I sometimes look into

1210
01:20:04,098 --> 01:20:07,741
his curriculum and try to understand how

1211
01:20:07,781 --> 01:20:12,264
much their teachers and principals actually know

1212
01:20:12,344 --> 01:20:16,246
about all this. I think it's fun to keep an eye on it. Then

1213
01:20:16,286 --> 01:20:19,462
given that's happening, I have more to say to

1214
01:20:19,482 --> 01:20:22,825
the general public. Hey, go read

1215
01:20:23,626 --> 01:20:27,630
such material. Go watch a few informative

1216
01:20:27,990 --> 01:20:31,113
videos on YouTube and other places. But on

1217
01:20:31,133 --> 01:20:34,716
the other hand, go ignore certain kind of information that

1218
01:20:34,776 --> 01:20:39,741
you get from all different sources. There is definitely a

1219
01:20:39,821 --> 01:20:43,184
difference of good and bad information. And there

1220
01:20:43,224 --> 01:20:46,767
is also a judgment that you have to grow to be

1221
01:20:46,827 --> 01:20:51,172
able to tell what is really

1222
01:20:52,933 --> 01:20:58,539
valuable and authentic versus

1223
01:20:58,559 --> 01:21:02,483
what may be something suspicious. I think, again,

1224
01:21:02,503 --> 01:21:06,360
I'm not a fan of just

1225
01:21:07,240 --> 01:21:10,822
cleaning up the things to make it like a

1226
01:21:10,882 --> 01:21:14,964
hospital and a clean room. In fact, if

1227
01:21:14,984 --> 01:21:18,086
you look at evolution, both in

1228
01:21:18,126 --> 01:21:21,968
terms of a biological entity or even evolution

1229
01:21:22,008 --> 01:21:25,450
of our brain, You evolve and

1230
01:21:25,490 --> 01:21:29,252
you become healthier because you have adversaries. You

1231
01:21:29,292 --> 01:21:33,534
have all these viruses, you have all these pathogens, you

1232
01:21:33,574 --> 01:21:37,576
have actually all these misinformations from

1233
01:21:37,956 --> 01:21:41,438
your world. And you co-evolve with it. You

1234
01:21:41,498 --> 01:21:45,139
end up developing your own immune to be stronger. And

1235
01:21:45,260 --> 01:21:48,621
keeping you away from all this isn't going to make you healthier. In

1236
01:21:48,641 --> 01:21:53,458
fact, it makes you weaker. I don't think the politicians

1237
01:21:53,678 --> 01:21:56,979
and the general public appreciate that. They want to be as

1238
01:21:57,039 --> 01:22:00,361
safe as possible, away from all risk and all

1239
01:22:00,801 --> 01:22:03,882
kind of pathogens, psychological pathogens, you

1240
01:22:03,902 --> 01:22:07,223
know, or biological pathogens. I think it's going to weaken

1241
01:22:07,343 --> 01:22:10,665
our civilization. And then when you have an adversary, we

1242
01:22:10,685 --> 01:22:14,506
talk about China, we talk about some other countries, what if they don't do that? You

1243
01:22:14,566 --> 01:22:17,927
will eventually run into an adversary that is healthier than

1244
01:22:17,967 --> 01:22:21,330
you, and that will be even worse. So I would really

1245
01:22:21,430 --> 01:22:24,615
advocate a culture of openness and

1246
01:22:24,655 --> 01:22:29,061
also of brevity to embrace this

1247
01:22:29,141 --> 01:22:32,385
reality and then try to take on it. Thanks so much,