In this episode, we’re going to shift into the early phase of many real-world attacks: the steps an attacker takes before they ever touch a password prompt or deliver malware. This stage is often called initial access, and it usually begins with recon and targeting. Recon is short for reconnaissance, which is simply the act of gathering information. Targeting is the act of selecting a victim, choosing a pathway, and preparing an approach that is likely to work. For beginners, it helps to think of this like planning a break-in, except the attacker is often trying to avoid obvious force and instead prefers a quiet entry. They look for weak points, predictable habits, and overlooked exposures that let them slip in with minimal resistance. Understanding these early steps matters because many defenses can stop an attack before it becomes a crisis, but only if you recognize the patterns and remove easy opportunities.
Before we continue, a quick note: this audio course is a companion to our course companion books. The first book is about the exam and provides detailed information on how to pass it best. The second book is a Kindle-only eBook that contains 1,000 flashcards that can be used on your mobile device or Kindle. Check them both out at Cyber Author dot me, in the Bare Metal Study Guides Series.
Recon can be passive or active, and that difference matters. Passive recon means gathering information without directly interacting with the target’s systems in a way that stands out. An attacker might study a company website, job postings, public documents, or social media profiles to learn names, technologies, vendors, and organizational structure. They might look for email address patterns, office locations, and the kinds of software the organization uses. A job posting that mentions a specific cloud platform or security tool can reveal a lot about internal architecture. None of this requires hacking in the classic sense; it is simply collecting clues from public sources. Passive recon is difficult to detect because the target may not even realize it is happening. The key beginner insight is that a surprising amount of useful targeting information is publicly visible.
Active recon involves interacting with systems in a way that can generate signals. This might include scanning for open ports, probing web applications for known paths, or testing whether certain services respond. Attackers may attempt to map a network perimeter by discovering which servers are exposed to the internet and what software versions they appear to be running. They may also enumerate subdomains, identify externally accessible login portals, and look for misconfigured services. Active recon is more detectable because it often leaves logs, such as repeated connection attempts or unusual request patterns. However, many organizations do not monitor these signals closely, or they may treat them as background noise. For beginners, it is enough to understand that active recon is the attacker looking at your digital “front of house” by trying doors and windows to see what is unlocked. The more exposed and noisy your environment is, the easier recon becomes.
A crucial part of recon is building a list of likely entry points. Attackers love anything that is internet-facing and accepts user input, such as web applications, remote access portals, and email systems. They also look for third-party connections, partner portals, and cloud services that may not be as tightly managed as core infrastructure. Another class of entry points is exposed administrative interfaces, which should ideally be restricted to management networks but are sometimes left reachable from the internet. Attackers also watch for newly announced vulnerabilities in popular products because those often create a window where many organizations are unpatched. Even if you do not know every product, you can understand the general pattern: attackers focus on places where they can interact with the organization from afar. The more pathways you expose, the larger your attack surface.
Targeting often becomes personal because humans are both powerful and vulnerable points in systems. Attackers may identify employees by name, role, and department to choose targets who are likely to have valuable access. They might focus on finance, human resources, IT support, or executives, because those roles often handle sensitive data or approvals. They may also target new employees who are unfamiliar with processes, or remote workers who rely heavily on email and chat. The attacker’s goal is to create a believable story that triggers an action, such as clicking a link, opening an attachment, or sharing information. This is not about intelligence in a flattering sense; it is about careful preparation. The more believable the story, the less technical skill is required to gain initial access. Beginners should realize that targeting is often a marketing problem for attackers: they are trying to sell you on a bad decision.
One common targeting method is identifying credential pathways. Attackers want to know what login systems a company uses and what accounts might exist. They may look for Single Sign-On portals, remote access gateways, cloud login pages, and password reset mechanisms. They may attempt to learn the email format and then guess or generate likely usernames. They might then try password spraying, which is a technique of trying a small number of common passwords across many accounts to avoid locking out a single account. Another approach is to use credentials leaked from other breaches, because people reuse passwords. This is why M F A and strong identity controls matter so much, but from the attacker’s perspective, the goal is simple: find an account that will let them in. The recon phase helps them choose which accounts and portals are most likely to succeed.
Another targeting approach is finding technical weaknesses in exposed systems. If a web server reveals its software version, an attacker can search for known vulnerabilities associated with that version. If a remote access service is misconfigured or outdated, it might be vulnerable to exploitation. Attackers often prioritize vulnerabilities that allow them to gain access without needing valid credentials, because that bypasses many identity defenses. They also look for misconfigurations, such as default credentials, open management ports, or overly permissive cloud storage. For beginners, it helps to treat misconfigurations as doors that were never meant to be open. Attackers are not always discovering brand-new weaknesses; they are often finding things that were accidentally left exposed or left unpatched. Targeting becomes easier when organizations do not maintain good asset inventories and patch routines.
Recon and targeting also include understanding the organization’s defenses. Attackers may test whether email security blocks certain attachments, whether web filters block certain destinations, or whether login systems require M F A. They may send harmless probes to see what triggers alerts, which helps them adjust their tactics. They might use multiple small steps instead of one big obvious step to avoid detection. They may also use infrastructure that blends in, such as cloud-hosted servers, because those destinations can appear normal in network logs. This is why monitoring and baselining matter, and why unusual patterns should not be ignored just because they are small. Attackers often prefer a low-and-slow approach that looks like ordinary noise until it is too late. Recognizing that mindset helps defenders design systems that detect subtle signals.
A beginner-friendly way to connect recon to initial access is to see it as building a map and then choosing a route. The map includes technical routes, such as exposed portals and vulnerable applications, and human routes, such as employees likely to respond to messages. The route selection depends on the attacker’s goals and resources. A financially motivated attacker might focus on phishing and credential theft because it scales well. A more targeted attacker might invest time in researching specific systems and using specialized exploits. In both cases, recon and targeting shape what happens next. If defenders reduce exposed surfaces and strengthen identity controls, they force attackers into fewer, riskier routes. That is a strategic win even if it does not guarantee perfect prevention.
It is also important to recognize that attackers do not always start from scratch. They may buy access from other criminals who already compromised systems. They may use stolen credentials from prior breaches. They may leverage information from public repositories, shared documents, or misconfigured cloud storage. In other words, recon might include shopping for a shortcut. This is why exposure and hygiene matter so much. If an organization has many neglected accounts, open services, and poorly managed third-party access, the cost of initial access goes down. Attackers are opportunistic; they take the cheapest path that works. Security architecture is partly about raising the cost and reducing the number of cheap paths.
A common misconception is that recon is always loud and obvious. Some recon is noisy, like rapid scanning, but much of it is quiet and social. Another misconception is that only highly skilled attackers do recon. In reality, many recon techniques are automated or use publicly available tools and services. What makes recon effective is not always technical sophistication; it is persistence and careful selection of targets. Beginners should also avoid thinking of recon as purely external. Attackers who already have a foothold may perform internal recon to learn where valuable systems are and how to reach them. The recon mindset is simply, learn before acting. That mindset applies both before and after initial access.
As you build your recognition skills, focus on the defender’s side of the story. Reducing unnecessary internet exposure, enforcing M F A, monitoring for unusual authentication patterns, and limiting information leakage through public artifacts can all reduce recon success. Clear segmentation and least privilege reduce the value of stolen credentials because they limit what an attacker can reach. Logging and alerting on scanning behavior and repeated probes can turn active recon into an early warning signal. Training users to recognize targeted messages reduces the success rate of social engineering. None of these are perfect alone, but together they change the environment from easy to harder. The lesson is that stopping initial access often starts with hygiene and awareness long before a malware alert ever appears.
In conclusion, recon and targeting are the planning stages that set up initial access, and they rely on gathering information about systems, people, and defenses. Passive recon uses public sources to learn names, technologies, and habits, while active recon probes systems to discover exposed services and weaknesses. Targeting turns gathered information into a chosen route, often through credential pathways, social engineering, misconfigurations, or known vulnerabilities. Recognizing these techniques helps defenders reduce attack surface, improve monitoring, and strengthen identity controls before an attacker gets a foothold. The decision rule to carry forward is this: if an attacker can easily learn what you expose and who to trick, they can choose low-risk routes to initial access, so your architecture should minimize unnecessary exposure and make the remaining pathways tightly verified and closely observed.