1
00:00:05,625 --> 00:00:06,375
Welcome to the

2
00:00:06,375 --> 00:00:09,500
Proteomics in Proximity podcast, 
 where your co-host

3
00:00:09,625 --> 00:00:12,916
Cindy Lawley and Sarantis Chlamydas 
 from Olink Proteomics.

4
00:00:13,250 --> 00:00:16,875
Talk about the intersection of proteomics 
 with genomics for drug target

5
00:00:16,875 --> 00:00:20,875
discovery, the application of proteomics 
 to reveal disease biomarkers,

6
00:00:21,250 --> 00:00:25,875
and current trends in using proteomics 
 to unlock biological mechanisms.

7
00:00:26,250 --> 00:00:29,250
Here we have your host, 
 Cindy, and Sarantis

8
00:00:30,125 --> 00:00:33,500
What if your chronological age 
 only told part of your story?

9
00:00:34,125 --> 00:00:36,916
What if your brain, 
 your lungs, your ovaries?

10
00:00:36,916 --> 00:00:40,541
What if they were all aging 
 at different rates in your body,

11
00:00:41,250 --> 00:00:45,166
and that you could know that you could 
 find that out from a simple blood test?

12
00:00:46,541 --> 00:00:50,166
Today's guest, 
 Tony Wyss-Coray from Stanford University.

13
00:00:50,541 --> 00:00:53,125
We'll talk about just that.

14
00:00:53,125 --> 00:00:55,750
He's one of the pioneers who's building

15
00:00:55,750 --> 00:00:59,541
organ aging clocks out of simple Olink.

16
00:00:59,541 --> 00:01:01,125
Protein measurements.

17
00:01:01,125 --> 00:01:02,541
Tony and his team at Teal

18
00:01:02,541 --> 00:01:06,041
Rise are revealing remarkable insights 
 into biological age,

19
00:01:06,500 --> 00:01:11,666
organ health, and even future 
 disease risk years before symptoms

20
00:01:12,666 --> 00:01:13,166
at all.

21
00:01:13,166 --> 00:01:17,375
Of course, we're delighted to have 
 our customers get more out of the data,

22
00:01:17,375 --> 00:01:20,375
so we're partnering with a team 
 at Teal Rise to ensure

23
00:01:20,541 --> 00:01:23,166
customers do just that.

24
00:01:23,166 --> 00:01:26,875
In this episode, 
 we talk about young blood vampires,

25
00:01:27,375 --> 00:01:31,000
immune cells, organ aging clocks 
 and so much more.

26
00:01:31,541 --> 00:01:34,000
I hope you enjoy it.

27
00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:34,750
Hello everyone.

28
00:01:34,750 --> 00:01:37,750
Welcome back to Proteomics in Proximity.

29
00:01:38,125 --> 00:01:40,750
We're very excited to have, guest.

30
00:01:40,750 --> 00:01:43,666
We haven't had before here to talk about

31
00:01:43,666 --> 00:01:46,916
aging and some amazing innovations 
 happening in aging.

32
00:01:47,166 --> 00:01:47,875
Sarantis,

33
00:01:47,875 --> 00:01:50,625
do you want to introduce our our guest?

34
00:01:50,625 --> 00:01:51,041
Thank you.

35
00:01:51,041 --> 00:01:53,500
Thank you Cindy. Welcome everybody.

36
00:01:53,500 --> 00:01:57,041
We are excited and honored to have with us 
 a leader in the field of aging research

37
00:01:57,041 --> 00:01:59,125
professional, Tony Wyss-Coray.

38
00:01:59,125 --> 00:02:01,791
Tony is a professor of neurology 
 at the Stanford University School

39
00:02:01,791 --> 00:02:06,750
of Medicine, director of the and Benny 
 Knight Initiative for Brain Resilience,

40
00:02:06,916 --> 00:02:10,875
where he leads biomedical research 
 on aging and age related diseases.

41
00:02:11,500 --> 00:02:15,125
His work focuses on blood proteomics 
 and circulating factors

42
00:02:15,375 --> 00:02:19,125
and how they influence healthspan 
 and lifespan, with a goal, of course,

43
00:02:19,250 --> 00:02:22,875
of developing interventions 
 to help us live longer, healthier.

44
00:02:23,416 --> 00:02:25,250
Tony is a pleasure to have you with us.

45
00:02:25,250 --> 00:02:28,250
To start, we would love to hear 
 a little bit more about your journey.

46
00:02:28,500 --> 00:02:31,916
What led you to aging research 
 and what continues to inspire your work

47
00:02:31,916 --> 00:02:33,166
every day in the lab?

48
00:02:33,166 --> 00:02:33,500
Thank you.

49
00:02:33,500 --> 00:02:35,125
And it's hot, hot, hot right now.

50
00:02:35,125 --> 00:02:37,166
This aging stuff is on fire.

51
00:02:37,166 --> 00:02:38,416
It's so exciting.

52
00:02:38,416 --> 00:02:41,000
Yeah. Thank you. 
 Thank you so much for having me.

53
00:02:42,250 --> 00:02:43,541
Yeah, I was when I

54
00:02:43,541 --> 00:02:47,375
started out in research, 
 I started actually immunology.

55
00:02:47,375 --> 00:02:51,250
I really had no interest 
 in aging research, to be honest.

56
00:02:51,791 --> 00:02:56,500
But, I got into neurodegenerative research 
 and studied

57
00:02:56,500 --> 00:03:01,125
how the immune system affects the brain, 
 and particularly in Alzheimer's disease.

58
00:03:01,875 --> 00:03:04,875
And, I realized

59
00:03:04,875 --> 00:03:09,000
that age is really the key risk factor 
 for this disease.

60
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,625
And we, did more than 20 years ago,

61
00:03:12,625 --> 00:03:15,625
some very simple experiment,

62
00:03:16,416 --> 00:03:19,500
where we asked patients,

63
00:03:20,416 --> 00:03:23,416
for blood samples, and,

64
00:03:23,750 --> 00:03:28,250
could we see changes in immune, factors 
 in the blood

65
00:03:28,250 --> 00:03:31,666
of these patients with the disease 
 compared to those without?

66
00:03:32,250 --> 00:03:36,625
We saw some differences, 
 but we realized that in the healthy

67
00:03:36,625 --> 00:03:40,500
controls, 
 the changes are actually often bigger.

68
00:03:40,500 --> 00:03:46,000
And so there were a lot of changes in the 
 composition of proteins that we measured.

69
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:51,000
And at the time, it was actually a filter 
 area where we measured 120 proteins.

70
00:03:51,750 --> 00:03:54,000
And these changes in healthy 
 people are often

71
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:57,000
bigger than between disease and control.

72
00:03:57,125 --> 00:03:59,750
And that really got me 
 into aging research.

73
00:03:59,750 --> 00:04:04,375
Meaning that over time, 
 the longitudinal aspect

74
00:04:04,750 --> 00:04:09,375
showed changes despite them 
 not having any apparent disease,

75
00:04:09,750 --> 00:04:12,916
but that there were changes 
 that happened longitudinally that were

76
00:04:13,125 --> 00:04:18,375
because so much of the big population 
 health projects are one sample, right?

77
00:04:18,375 --> 00:04:22,500
The baseline sample, like in the UK 
 Biobank data, which went into the paper

78
00:04:22,500 --> 00:04:26,500
that we certainly want to talk 
 about the organ aging paper today,

79
00:04:26,750 --> 00:04:28,166
but those are baseline samples.

80
00:04:28,166 --> 00:04:32,625
And so this was really about longitudinal 
 sampling way ahead of its time

81
00:04:32,625 --> 00:04:34,875
I'll say 120 proteins. It's a lot.

82
00:04:34,875 --> 00:04:37,625
At the time 
 it actually wasn't longitudinal.

83
00:04:37,625 --> 00:04:39,000
It was still cross-sectional.

84
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:42,416
But what we saw 
 is that people who were younger

85
00:04:42,916 --> 00:04:46,375
had different concentrations of proteins 
 than those who were older.

86
00:04:46,625 --> 00:04:49,791
So this was cross-sectional, but

87
00:04:49,875 --> 00:04:53,041
it just showed that, you know, age

88
00:04:53,416 --> 00:04:57,166
seems to be associated with changes 
 in concentrations of proteins.

89
00:04:57,166 --> 00:05:00,625
And, you know, now this makes total sense.

90
00:05:01,791 --> 00:05:03,875
And we know, of course,

91
00:05:03,875 --> 00:05:08,750
you know, most molecules 
 change in concentrations with age

92
00:05:08,750 --> 00:05:13,500
and in organisms 
 and certainly function changes with age.

93
00:05:13,500 --> 00:05:16,000
We look different as we get older.

94
00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:20,750
So the fact that we can capture this 
 in the blood, provided us

95
00:05:20,750 --> 00:05:26,666
with an opportunity to start asking, 
 are these changes cause or effect?

96
00:05:27,375 --> 00:05:30,250
And we can talk a little bit about what 
 that led to?

97
00:05:30,250 --> 00:05:33,625
Yeah, definitely 
 want to talk about causality for sure.

98
00:05:33,750 --> 00:05:37,375
And I'm guessing that this is what drives 
 you later on to parabiosis experiments.

99
00:05:37,375 --> 00:05:37,625
Right.

100
00:05:37,625 --> 00:05:41,125
Because it was a big actually discussions.

101
00:05:41,125 --> 00:05:44,375
They make a lot of, impact 
 in the community

102
00:05:44,375 --> 00:05:48,125
also of these parabiosis experiments 
 parabiosis

103
00:05:48,125 --> 00:05:51,125
Yeah. Let's explain. So exactly.

104
00:05:51,416 --> 00:05:53,875
So Sarantis is actually absolutely 
 right.

105
00:05:53,875 --> 00:05:55,500
So this was really the

106
00:05:56,666 --> 00:05:57,875
motivation for

107
00:05:57,875 --> 00:06:01,000
us to get, into, into this model.

108
00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:05,625
And so basically what this is, 
 is it's a model where you can,

109
00:06:06,541 --> 00:06:09,375
pair animals,

110
00:06:09,375 --> 00:06:11,875
of, you know, different composition

111
00:06:11,875 --> 00:06:15,416
or different age or different geneticbackgrounds.

112
00:06:15,916 --> 00:06:18,500
And in this case, 
 and it's called parabiosis

113
00:06:18,500 --> 00:06:21,500
So it means living next to each other.

114
00:06:21,541 --> 00:06:25,125
But essentially 
 when you use this model, the,

115
00:06:25,125 --> 00:06:29,791
the circulation of two mice in 
 this case is shared.

116
00:06:30,250 --> 00:06:32,791
And so we paired young with old mice.

117
00:06:32,791 --> 00:06:36,625
And we did this actually in collaboration 
 with Tom rando, who,

118
00:06:38,041 --> 00:06:41,375
you know, in a seminal paper 
 with the Con Boys,

119
00:06:41,875 --> 00:06:46,625
showed that he can change 
 the age of muscle stem cells.

120
00:06:46,750 --> 00:06:51,750
So use an old mouse, which has very low 
 stem cell activity in a muscle.

121
00:06:51,750 --> 00:06:54,791
He paired it with a young mouse 
 and could show that

122
00:06:54,791 --> 00:06:57,875
this regenerated 
 and rejuvenated the old muscle.

123
00:06:58,666 --> 00:07:03,500
And so he had this model 
 and he actually recruited me to Stanford.

124
00:07:03,500 --> 00:07:06,500
So we asked 
 what is the effect on the brain?

125
00:07:06,500 --> 00:07:10,666
Because we saw these changes 
 in blood composition with age.

126
00:07:10,666 --> 00:07:14,291
And again, this allowed us to ask, 
 is this cause or effect?

127
00:07:14,291 --> 00:07:20,750
Are the change a reflection of the aging 
 organism, or do they even influence it?

128
00:07:20,791 --> 00:07:22,625
Turns out they do both.

129
00:07:22,625 --> 00:07:27,250
And this is really the basis of now 
 the diagnostic potential of this,

130
00:07:28,666 --> 00:07:31,500
and the 
 implications for biology in general.

131
00:07:31,500 --> 00:07:36,000
But what we did is we basically used, 
 the same model

132
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:39,000
that Tom had used and asked,

133
00:07:39,916 --> 00:07:43,000
is it the brain of a of an old mouse?

134
00:07:44,375 --> 00:07:48,125
Affected by exposure 
 to a young circulation?

135
00:07:48,125 --> 00:07:50,125
So young blood factors.

136
00:07:50,125 --> 00:07:51,541
And that was indeed the case.

137
00:07:51,541 --> 00:07:54,541
So we could rejuvenate the old brain.

138
00:07:54,750 --> 00:07:59,125
These mice, had less inflammation, 
 more stem cell activity.

139
00:07:59,541 --> 00:08:03,125
But then what we also showed 
 for the first time, actually,

140
00:08:03,125 --> 00:08:08,875
if this was Saul Villeda, who has now 
 his own lab at UCSF, he showed that he can

141
00:08:08,875 --> 00:08:13,875
simply take blood from young animals 
 and repeatedly infuse it into old.

142
00:08:14,625 --> 00:08:17,375
So he did this 
 every three days for three weeks.

143
00:08:17,375 --> 00:08:21,666
He infused small amounts 
 of just the liquid part

144
00:08:21,666 --> 00:08:27,125
of the blood, actually, not the cells, 
 just the plasma, and could show

145
00:08:27,125 --> 00:08:31,166
that this reproduced pretty much 
 the effects of this para bias model.

146
00:08:31,875 --> 00:08:36,000
And, most importantly 
 it improved function of these mice.

147
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:40,000
So when mice get old, 
 they get cognitively impaired,

148
00:08:41,041 --> 00:08:44,125
they have difficulty navigating a maze.

149
00:08:44,625 --> 00:08:49,000
And when they're exposed to young plasma, 
 they can navigate it better.

150
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,375
And their function improves.

151
00:08:51,375 --> 00:08:55,375
And so that proved to us 
 that there are factors in the blood

152
00:08:55,875 --> 00:09:00,625
that can not just that, 
 not just reflect the aging

153
00:09:00,625 --> 00:09:04,250
of the organism, that they can actually 
 change the age of an organism.

154
00:09:04,750 --> 00:09:06,000
But this is amazing.

155
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:07,250
I mean,

156
00:09:07,250 --> 00:09:09,500
from the way that I understand this, 
 like these factors,

157
00:09:09,500 --> 00:09:12,541
they target specific 
 cells in brain, right?

158
00:09:12,541 --> 00:09:15,750
Because at the end, the brain seems that 
 this is the the final,

159
00:09:16,125 --> 00:09:18,791
actually hit on these on these factors.

160
00:09:18,791 --> 00:09:22,750
Do you know what type of cells 
 are you targeting with these factors?

161
00:09:22,875 --> 00:09:23,666
Are we aware

162
00:09:23,666 --> 00:09:26,750
I'm guessing more of them than 
 most of them are stem cells now, right.

163
00:09:27,250 --> 00:09:28,750
Yeah, that's a great question.

164
00:09:28,750 --> 00:09:34,000
So initially you can imagine 
 when when we first reported these results

165
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:35,875
and also when Tom reported these results,

166
00:09:35,875 --> 00:09:38,125
people thought that's too good to be true.

167
00:09:38,125 --> 00:09:40,666
How could young blood 
 just have these effects?

168
00:09:40,666 --> 00:09:42,500
That's folklore.

169
00:09:42,500 --> 00:09:42,791
Right?

170
00:09:42,791 --> 00:09:46,250
People thought, 
 you know, give me Young Blood and Dracula.

171
00:09:46,250 --> 00:09:48,916
Exactly. Little Dracula stuff.

172
00:09:48,916 --> 00:09:53,291
But then with the advance of single cell, 
 genomics,

173
00:09:53,291 --> 00:09:56,791
where we can take cells 
 basically of every,

174
00:09:57,666 --> 00:09:59,916
organ tissue in the body,

175
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:02,416
of a mouse,

176
00:10:02,416 --> 00:10:06,500
we can study how 
 every cell is affected by these, factors.

177
00:10:06,500 --> 00:10:09,750
And so because we saw these effects,

178
00:10:10,875 --> 00:10:14,916
I was really interested 
 in, in harnessing the,

179
00:10:15,500 --> 00:10:19,666
the transcriptomic approaches 
 and worked with Steve Craig,

180
00:10:19,666 --> 00:10:23,500
who was one of the pioneers 
 in developing these, technologies.

181
00:10:24,250 --> 00:10:29,125
First genetic diagnosis, first genetic 
 diagnosis made by Stephen Quake on himself.

182
00:10:29,125 --> 00:10:30,000
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

183
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:30,625
That's it.

184
00:10:30,625 --> 00:10:31,000
Yeah.

185
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:35,875
So we, we built this atlas, 
 we called Tabula Muris,

186
00:10:35,875 --> 00:10:39,791
where we profiled 
 the cells of all major organs.

187
00:10:40,250 --> 00:10:45,166
And then we used this approach 
 to ask in a very unbiased way,

188
00:10:45,375 --> 00:10:50,666
how is, how are the cells 
 in the parabiosis model affected,

189
00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,125
which cells, as you asked Sarantis, 
 which cells are most affected?

190
00:10:56,250 --> 00:10:58,875
Globally, throughout the organism,

191
00:10:58,875 --> 00:11:03,750
we find that, stem 
 cells are a major target,

192
00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:06,916
especially hematopoietic stem cells,

193
00:11:06,916 --> 00:11:09,750
but also, hepatocytes, for example.

194
00:11:09,750 --> 00:11:12,541
And as you know, hepatocytes produce,

195
00:11:12,541 --> 00:11:15,541
the majority of proteins, 
 at least in quantity,

196
00:11:16,375 --> 00:11:21,500
in the blood, like albumin and coagulation 
 factors, component factors and so forth.

197
00:11:22,666 --> 00:11:25,250
But what was really also exciting

198
00:11:25,250 --> 00:11:30,916
is that almost every cell responds 
 to, this hetero chronicity.

199
00:11:31,125 --> 00:11:36,041
So whether you give an old animal 
 young blood or a young animal old blood,

200
00:11:36,625 --> 00:11:41,500
which accelerates aging, most cells show 
 transcriptional changes.

201
00:11:41,875 --> 00:11:44,000
And you can then ask 
 what are key pathways.

202
00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:46,250
So one of the key 
 pathways are mitochondria.

203
00:11:46,250 --> 00:11:49,791
For example, there's a general, reduction

204
00:11:49,791 --> 00:11:52,791
in inflammation,

205
00:11:53,875 --> 00:11:57,416
from young plasma to to old animals.

206
00:11:57,875 --> 00:12:00,625
And I think with respect to the brain, 
 we don't know

207
00:12:00,625 --> 00:12:03,625
exactly how these factors 
 get into the brain,

208
00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:08,125
but there is sort of, reduction 
 in inflammation in the vasculature.

209
00:12:08,291 --> 00:12:11,500
So for that, factors 
 don't even have to go into the brain.

210
00:12:12,291 --> 00:12:16,125
And that may be one prominent way 
 to get benefits.

211
00:12:16,666 --> 00:12:21,250
But we also know now from other studies 
 that Andrew Yang, in my lab,

212
00:12:21,625 --> 00:12:24,375
you know, is at the class on institutes,

213
00:12:24,375 --> 00:12:29,625
these simply labeled, proteins, 
 in the plasma and injected them into mice

214
00:12:29,625 --> 00:12:34,291
and sees that they're actually broadly 
 taken up into brain tissue,

215
00:12:34,791 --> 00:12:39,291
you know, unexpectedly, you know, people 
 always think there's this barrier.

216
00:12:39,291 --> 00:12:41,625
Nothing goes and this is totally not true.

217
00:12:42,791 --> 00:12:45,791
So we're 
 now following up on different cell types.

218
00:12:46,125 --> 00:12:49,166
Neurons 
 take up proteins from the circulation,

219
00:12:49,166 --> 00:12:53,125
but we pursue 
 a very specific type of microglia

220
00:12:53,125 --> 00:12:56,625
that are specialized 
 in taking up proteins from circulation.

221
00:12:56,875 --> 00:13:00,625
So I think there's a whole biology 
 of how this might actually work.

222
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:03,625
But, yeah.

223
00:13:03,625 --> 00:13:07,750
But I think the key message 
 was really that factors in the blood

224
00:13:08,291 --> 00:13:11,000
can modulate aging.

225
00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:13,291
And so let's define hepatocytes. Right.

226
00:13:13,291 --> 00:13:16,291
These are the functional cells 
 in the liver.

227
00:13:16,875 --> 00:13:20,541
And as you said they they are incredibly

228
00:13:20,541 --> 00:13:23,541
important in producing proteins 
 that show up in the blood.

229
00:13:23,916 --> 00:13:27,375
So I think that that leads us down 
 a path of

230
00:13:27,791 --> 00:13:30,916
proteomics that you've explored 
 since then.

231
00:13:31,250 --> 00:13:35,000
Can you tell us about how you got to 
 where we are today?

232
00:13:35,291 --> 00:13:39,125
And in particular, I'm, I'm pretty excited 
 to talk about the origin organ

233
00:13:39,125 --> 00:13:44,000
aging work that, that your team 
 published in Nature Medicine.

234
00:13:44,750 --> 00:13:49,375
So this is plasma proteomics 
 links brain and immune system.

235
00:13:49,375 --> 00:13:53,500
Your, your, 
 your foundation in immunology, which is,

236
00:13:55,375 --> 00:13:57,166
makes complete sense that

237
00:13:57,166 --> 00:14:01,000
that the immune system is key to this, 
 and healthspan and longevity.

238
00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:04,666
So maybe it's useful to define healthspan 
 as opposed to lifespan

239
00:14:05,250 --> 00:14:09,541
and then talk a little bit about the path 
 that led you to, work

240
00:14:09,541 --> 00:14:13,625
with the UK Biobank data and build 
 the organ aging clocks that we,

241
00:14:14,416 --> 00:14:17,541
we're excited to see leverage today.

242
00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:19,000
Right? Yeah.

243
00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:22,666
So maybe just the definition of health and 
 and lifespan.

244
00:14:22,666 --> 00:14:29,250
So, healthspan is, is described as the, 
 the time of your life

245
00:14:29,375 --> 00:14:32,291
where you're generally healthy

246
00:14:32,291 --> 00:14:35,291
and you don't have any major diseases.

247
00:14:35,500 --> 00:14:39,416
So now I think the field sort of describes

248
00:14:39,416 --> 00:14:43,000
that we live, roughly 80 years of age.

249
00:14:44,250 --> 00:14:47,250
You know, in, in sort of,

250
00:14:47,291 --> 00:14:49,541
economically developed countries

251
00:14:49,541 --> 00:14:52,541
with good health care systems.

252
00:14:53,166 --> 00:14:56,666
And of those 80 years, roughly 50,

253
00:14:56,666 --> 00:15:01,666
55 years where were totally healthy. 
 The average population.

254
00:15:01,666 --> 00:15:01,916
Right?

255
00:15:01,916 --> 00:15:06,375
So there's of course, always people 
 who get sick at different ages of,

256
00:15:07,750 --> 00:15:10,375
or different times of the, of their life.

257
00:15:10,375 --> 00:15:14,291
But, the 55 years 
 would be the health span.

258
00:15:14,625 --> 00:15:18,625
And then we're getting more 
 and more diseases as we get older.

259
00:15:19,166 --> 00:15:22,166
And some people call this sick span.

260
00:15:22,541 --> 00:15:25,375
But the goal, really, of,

261
00:15:25,375 --> 00:15:29,250
efforts in this field of, aging research

262
00:15:29,250 --> 00:15:34,166
is to extend the health span 
 so that you lis healthy until you die.

263
00:15:34,166 --> 00:15:37,166
Ideally. The sled ride to the bottom.

264
00:15:37,250 --> 00:15:39,291
Yeah. Like, just I just want it to.

265
00:15:39,291 --> 00:15:39,625
Yeah.

266
00:15:39,625 --> 00:15:42,541
You fall asleep and or you say, I'm tired.

267
00:15:42,541 --> 00:15:44,250
I think I've seen it.

268
00:15:44,250 --> 00:15:46,625
You know, you're you're. 80 
 and you're done 90.

269
00:15:46,625 --> 00:15:49,000
Years old and and that would be it.

270
00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:53,000
I mean, that would be a nice, way 
 to, to die

271
00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:56,000
I think, rather than suffering from

272
00:15:56,500 --> 00:16:01,125
multiple degenerative diseases and, 
 I think the worst for me,

273
00:16:01,375 --> 00:16:04,166
but for many other people, 
 would be to lose

274
00:16:04,166 --> 00:16:07,500
your cognitive abilities 
 and don't even know,

275
00:16:08,375 --> 00:16:11,375
you know, who your children are, who your

276
00:16:11,541 --> 00:16:14,625
your loved ones are, things like that. 
 Yeah.

277
00:16:15,041 --> 00:16:16,291
Yeah, those big ones.

278
00:16:16,291 --> 00:16:17,625
Cardiovascular disease,

279
00:16:17,625 --> 00:16:21,166
cancer, Alzheimer's disease 
 or neurodegenerative disease.

280
00:16:21,166 --> 00:16:21,750
Exactly.

281
00:16:21,750 --> 00:16:26,416
Those are the biggest risk for getting 
 those living long enough to to get those.

282
00:16:26,500 --> 00:16:28,416
Yeah. That's true. Yeah, yeah.

283
00:16:28,416 --> 00:16:31,416
But maybe getting back to 
 how did we get here.

284
00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:35,416
So having having shown that,

285
00:16:37,500 --> 00:16:40,125
the blood is really sort of

286
00:16:40,125 --> 00:16:43,375
able to affect the aging

287
00:16:43,375 --> 00:16:47,000
or even the physiological state 
 of cells in the body.

288
00:16:48,875 --> 00:16:51,750
Of course, we wanted to know 
 where do these factors come from?

289
00:16:51,750 --> 00:16:55,250
That was one of the motivations 
 to do the single cell transcriptomics

290
00:16:55,250 --> 00:16:59,625
and ask, well, which cells are potentially 
 producing factors,

291
00:17:00,250 --> 00:17:03,375
but also which cells 
 are targets of these factors.

292
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:08,000
And so the question was 
 then more generally,

293
00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:11,000
if we look at the changes in the blood,

294
00:17:11,916 --> 00:17:14,791
can we ask where these factors come from?

295
00:17:14,791 --> 00:17:15,875
And that's that.

296
00:17:15,875 --> 00:17:18,875
Tell us something about the state

297
00:17:19,416 --> 00:17:22,875
or the physiology 
 of a given cell or organ.

298
00:17:24,291 --> 00:17:27,666
And that's really a very trivial question 
 if you think about it.

299
00:17:28,500 --> 00:17:31,875
And we pursued this for decades.

300
00:17:32,500 --> 00:17:36,500
You know, in clinical chemistry, 
 if you go to the doctor,

301
00:17:36,916 --> 00:17:39,750
they take a blood sample and they measure

302
00:17:39,750 --> 00:17:42,750
a number of different analytes.

303
00:17:42,875 --> 00:17:44,291
They measure lipids.

304
00:17:44,291 --> 00:17:47,541
They measure also a few proteins, 
 very few, actually,

305
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:53,250
but one, you know, very prominent, 
 to come back to the liver protein

306
00:17:53,250 --> 00:17:57,666
that is measured in our transaminases, liver transaminases

307
00:17:58,125 --> 00:18:00,625
They tell you 
 if the liver is damaged or not.

308
00:18:00,625 --> 00:18:04,625
So if they go up, that means 
 your liver is not really functioning well.

309
00:18:05,125 --> 00:18:09,041
But we've used this mostly in medicine

310
00:18:09,541 --> 00:18:13,791
to record abnormality, 
 to record pathology.

311
00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,000
So people 
 go to the doctor when they feel sick.

312
00:18:17,291 --> 00:18:20,291
And then the doctor says, yeah, 
 I can see your liver.

313
00:18:20,750 --> 00:18:24,625
Your liver values are too high 
 or you know, there's something wrong

314
00:18:24,625 --> 00:18:25,625
with your heart

315
00:18:25,625 --> 00:18:29,500
based again, on on a couple of proteins 
 that are measured from the heart.

316
00:18:31,750 --> 00:18:33,500
We measure,

317
00:18:33,500 --> 00:18:38,125
of course, some lipids, cholesterol, 
 that's a prognostic factor.

318
00:18:38,125 --> 00:18:41,125
But we have very few factors 
 that really look in the future.

319
00:18:41,750 --> 00:18:46,416
So we asked, you know, 
 can we get information from,

320
00:18:46,875 --> 00:18:49,125
the brain in the circulation.

321
00:18:49,125 --> 00:18:54,250
So are there proteins in the blood 
 that might be derived from the brain?

322
00:18:54,916 --> 00:18:57,291
And what was really sort of a revelation

323
00:18:57,291 --> 00:19:00,291
for us if we once we started to use

324
00:19:00,750 --> 00:19:04,500
these multiplex platforms like the one,

325
00:19:05,166 --> 00:19:09,500
you are, developing 
 or have been developing a link,

326
00:19:10,666 --> 00:19:12,625
what we see is that there's

327
00:19:12,625 --> 00:19:15,166
lots of proteins in the blood

328
00:19:15,166 --> 00:19:19,125
that are not made as secreted proteins.

329
00:19:19,500 --> 00:19:24,250
Remember I said we started out 
 by looking at immune factors in the blood

330
00:19:24,250 --> 00:19:29,291
because I thought, well, the immune system 
 sort of communicates across the body.

331
00:19:29,666 --> 00:19:32,666
So we may find some cytokines 
 and chemokines

332
00:19:33,125 --> 00:19:36,375
that tell us 
 about the state of the organism,

333
00:19:36,625 --> 00:19:40,500
but it turns out you can literally measure 
 almost every protein

334
00:19:40,500 --> 00:19:42,750
that the body produces in the blood.

335
00:19:42,750 --> 00:19:47,666
If your assay is sensitive enough 
 and one of the proofs

336
00:19:47,666 --> 00:19:51,500
for that statement 
 is that we can now measure a-beta

337
00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:56,625
or tau with the key pathological hallmarks 
 of Alzheimer's disease in the blood.

338
00:19:57,250 --> 00:20:00,250
If you told anybody 20, 30 years ago,

339
00:20:00,625 --> 00:20:04,375
they would have said, that's not possible, 
 that won't be too noisy.

340
00:20:04,375 --> 00:20:09,000
We will not be able to pick this up 
 because there is no relationship.

341
00:20:10,750 --> 00:20:13,750
But it will also not be, measurable.

342
00:20:14,291 --> 00:20:17,250
And now we, you know, 
 we can measure transcription factors,

343
00:20:17,250 --> 00:20:19,000
we can measure kinases.

344
00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:22,166
Any protein seems to make it

345
00:20:22,166 --> 00:20:25,166
somehow into the blood that,

346
00:20:26,625 --> 00:20:28,625
could then potentially tell us something

347
00:20:28,625 --> 00:20:31,625
about where does that protein come from?

348
00:20:31,750 --> 00:20:36,250
And, if we know that, 
 does it tell us something about the cell,

349
00:20:36,250 --> 00:20:40,125
where it comes from or the organ, 
 the organ that it comes from?

350
00:20:41,250 --> 00:20:43,250
Yeah. So so plasma.

351
00:20:43,250 --> 00:20:44,375
I've thought about this a lot,

352
00:20:44,375 --> 00:20:48,500
and I'm curious because I don't 
 I don't necessarily think of plasma as

353
00:20:48,791 --> 00:20:52,375
or even the organ aging clock which, 
 which we'll talk about in this paper

354
00:20:53,125 --> 00:20:56,000
as, reflection of the tissue state

355
00:20:56,000 --> 00:20:59,000
as much as a reflection of,

356
00:20:59,125 --> 00:21:02,125
you know, secretion, leakage,

357
00:21:02,166 --> 00:21:07,000
turnover of cells, signaling 
 between cells, maybe between organs.

358
00:21:08,375 --> 00:21:11,875
But but 
 maybe because of all of those activities

359
00:21:11,875 --> 00:21:15,166
and the way they change with age, 
 then maybe

360
00:21:15,500 --> 00:21:18,500
plasma does give you

361
00:21:18,625 --> 00:21:20,500
tissue state. Exactly.

362
00:21:20,500 --> 00:21:23,000
Yeah. I think,

363
00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:28,250
you know, intuitively, 
 we think about the proteins in the blood,

364
00:21:28,250 --> 00:21:32,875
maybe like you just stated, right, 
 that they're a reflection of some

365
00:21:33,666 --> 00:21:38,791
either secretion or damage, 
 but it seems not to be the case

366
00:21:39,000 --> 00:21:42,750
because in a young, healthy organism,

367
00:21:43,250 --> 00:21:46,250
you find any type of proteins,

368
00:21:47,125 --> 00:21:50,541
again, cytosolic proteins 
 that were never meant

369
00:21:50,541 --> 00:21:53,625
to be secreted, synaptic proteins.

370
00:21:55,166 --> 00:21:58,166
And I think they're a reflection 
 of cellular,

371
00:21:59,791 --> 00:22:01,250
activity.

372
00:22:01,250 --> 00:22:04,500
And many of these proteins 
 are maybe the majority, certainly

373
00:22:04,500 --> 00:22:07,750
of intracellular proteins are released

374
00:22:07,750 --> 00:22:11,000
through some vasicular mechanism.

375
00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:12,500
Exosomes.

376
00:22:12,500 --> 00:22:16,125
Maybe there's others that we haven't 
 really characterized that described well.

377
00:22:16,500 --> 00:22:19,875
But exosomes is, 
 you know, a key part of this.

378
00:22:19,875 --> 00:22:24,125
And that's part of, a communication system 
 that people start to discover

379
00:22:24,125 --> 00:22:25,750
and describe.

380
00:22:25,750 --> 00:22:29,916
So, you know, immune cells, 
 in particular, macrophage

381
00:22:29,916 --> 00:22:33,875
type cells, 
 they release tons of these exosomes.

382
00:22:33,875 --> 00:22:37,375
And maybe it's a part of communication 
 with, with the rest

383
00:22:37,375 --> 00:22:40,375
of the body cancer cells, of course also.

384
00:22:40,666 --> 00:22:44,000
But it turns out every cell can release 
 exosomes

385
00:22:44,666 --> 00:22:47,666
and people that now describe markers

386
00:22:48,041 --> 00:22:52,500
in these exosomes that tell them 
 the exosome comes from a neuron

387
00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:57,791
or the exosome comes from a macrophage, 
 or it comes from a liver or a tumor.

388
00:22:57,875 --> 00:23:00,250
So or a cancer.

389
00:23:00,250 --> 00:23:03,791
When we 
 when we then apply the plasma proteomics

390
00:23:04,541 --> 00:23:08,500
and measure the concentration 
 of proteins with your tool.

391
00:23:09,625 --> 00:23:10,000
You know,

392
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:14,000
we, we look at all the proteins 
 that are present in the blood,

393
00:23:14,500 --> 00:23:17,291
whether they're in a vescicle or not.

394
00:23:17,291 --> 00:23:21,916
And so we really have all this information 
 wherever it comes from.

395
00:23:22,375 --> 00:23:24,875
Some proteins are secreted.

396
00:23:24,875 --> 00:23:28,000
They're meant to be secreted as a, 
 you know,

397
00:23:28,500 --> 00:23:31,500
an endocrine, communication.

398
00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:35,750
But and others are shared 
 from the surface.

399
00:23:35,916 --> 00:23:40,041
And, if a protein is shed, 
 it may also have a physiological function.

400
00:23:40,750 --> 00:23:43,250
And yet others come through these, 
 you know,

401
00:23:43,250 --> 00:23:46,250
access 
 exosomal mechanisms and other parts.

402
00:23:46,375 --> 00:23:49,375
And of course, 
 some come from damaged cells.

403
00:23:49,750 --> 00:23:56,291
But I think it's it's really a combination 
 of, anything that happens in the body.

404
00:23:56,291 --> 00:23:58,250
And I really,

405
00:23:58,250 --> 00:24:01,250
state 
 now, in all my talks, the blood,

406
00:24:01,250 --> 00:24:04,375
is an endophenotype 
 of organ physiology.

407
00:24:04,750 --> 00:24:05,416
That's great.

408
00:24:05,416 --> 00:24:07,875
That's amazing. 
 Yeah, that's a good point, Tony.

409
00:24:07,875 --> 00:24:09,375
I mean, stay on this.

410
00:24:09,375 --> 00:24:11,250
And I want to follow up on that question.

411
00:24:11,250 --> 00:24:15,000
Now, having technology 
 that Olink democratized proteomics

412
00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:18,875
and we can identify more, much 
 more proteomics and low abundant proteins,

413
00:24:19,375 --> 00:24:23,500
now we are able to predict right 
 to have biomarkers with predictive power.

414
00:24:23,750 --> 00:24:25,875
You mentioned p tau right now.

415
00:24:25,875 --> 00:24:27,250
It's already for late stages.

416
00:24:27,250 --> 00:24:29,750
I mean, already for your sick.

417
00:24:29,750 --> 00:24:34,000
I think now what you bring in the field 
 and how you, you are the pioneer in

418
00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:38,000
the field is like having predictive 
 biomarkers at the level of organ.

419
00:24:38,416 --> 00:24:42,166
And that's really super powerful 
 for precision medicine.

420
00:24:42,875 --> 00:24:43,416
Yeah.

421
00:24:43,416 --> 00:24:45,166
How how would you see this moving forward?

422
00:24:45,166 --> 00:24:49,000
Yeah, I think I think it 
 has the potential really to,

423
00:24:50,166 --> 00:24:52,250
change the way we,

424
00:24:52,250 --> 00:24:56,041
we do medicine and apply 
 sort of this concept of,

425
00:24:56,791 --> 00:25:01,166
you know, blood pressure and cholesterol, 
 which are predictive markers

426
00:25:01,875 --> 00:25:04,541
to, to many more organs by simply

427
00:25:04,541 --> 00:25:07,875
looking at molecules 
 that are derived from these organs.

428
00:25:08,500 --> 00:25:12,125
And if they change with age 
 and physiology.

429
00:25:12,625 --> 00:25:16,000
And I really see the state of an organ

430
00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:19,166
reflected in the age related changes.

431
00:25:19,791 --> 00:25:22,000
So in other words,

432
00:25:22,000 --> 00:25:26,166
if the function of an organ changes it,

433
00:25:26,666 --> 00:25:30,750
it is because the molecular composition 
 of the organ changes

434
00:25:31,291 --> 00:25:34,250
and we can measure that in the blood.

435
00:25:34,250 --> 00:25:37,250
So in other words, we can measure how,

436
00:25:38,916 --> 00:25:41,041
your liver changes with age,

437
00:25:41,041 --> 00:25:45,500
how your heart changes the age, 
 how your brain changes with age.

438
00:25:45,500 --> 00:25:49,000
And if it shows an accelerated aging,

439
00:25:49,375 --> 00:25:52,750
it is more likely to develop what we call 
 disease.

440
00:25:52,750 --> 00:25:55,750
Now, disease is a human construct, right.

441
00:25:56,250 --> 00:26:00,291
And if Vadim Gladyshev, you know his analysis 
 of,

442
00:26:01,250 --> 00:26:03,125
the same data we analyze, his

443
00:26:03,125 --> 00:26:06,875
conclusion 
 is that all these diseases that we give

444
00:26:06,875 --> 00:26:11,166
specific names are a reflection 
 of accelerated organ age.

445
00:26:12,125 --> 00:26:16,625
A very bold statement, but I think 
 you might be right for many of them.

446
00:26:16,625 --> 00:26:18,500
Of course, if you have to pass,

447
00:26:18,500 --> 00:26:22,250
a pathogen that causes a disease, 
 then that would be exempt.

448
00:26:22,750 --> 00:26:26,625
But these chronic diseases 
 of dysfunction of an organ

449
00:26:27,375 --> 00:26:31,666
like Alzheimer, 
 they're a reflection maybe of,

450
00:26:32,041 --> 00:26:36,125
the aging of that organ 
 and the failure of that function.

451
00:26:36,666 --> 00:26:39,625
We give a name, we call it a disease.

452
00:26:39,625 --> 00:26:40,666
Now, we know, of course, there's

453
00:26:40,666 --> 00:26:44,625
many different diseases in the brain 
 and there or the brain age,

454
00:26:44,625 --> 00:26:47,750
for example, is not a good predictor 
 of Parkinson's disease.

455
00:26:48,416 --> 00:26:51,416
But I think that's just a question 
 of resolution.

456
00:26:51,750 --> 00:26:55,125
As we get more and more proteins

457
00:26:55,125 --> 00:26:58,416
that are specific to different brain 
 regions, for example,

458
00:26:58,791 --> 00:27:02,750
we may pick up a signal 
 from the substantia nigra

459
00:27:02,750 --> 00:27:06,791
or from specific neurons 
 that degenerate in Parkinson's disease.

460
00:27:07,500 --> 00:27:11,500
And that will give us information 
 about Parkinson's disease.

461
00:27:11,500 --> 00:27:15,875
And in fact, 
 we just showed this recently with measures

462
00:27:15,875 --> 00:27:20,000
that, estimate the age of 
 cell types, not just organs,

463
00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:24,000
based on changes with age

464
00:27:24,166 --> 00:27:27,625
and the age of muscle, of muscle cells

465
00:27:28,125 --> 00:27:31,250
is a strong 
 predictor of future risk for ALS,

466
00:27:32,750 --> 00:27:36,166
again, 
 based on 50,000 people in the UK Biobank.

467
00:27:36,166 --> 00:27:39,166
So we have a blood sample from people,

468
00:27:40,500 --> 00:27:43,500
when they enter the study healthy

469
00:27:43,750 --> 00:27:46,500
between age 40 to 60,

470
00:27:46,500 --> 00:27:49,500
we measure their blood proteins

471
00:27:49,625 --> 00:27:51,000
with the Olink platform

472
00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:55,250
and we derive signatures of different cell 
 types.

473
00:27:55,250 --> 00:27:58,750
We can derive about 40 different 
 cell type signatures

474
00:27:59,375 --> 00:28:02,791
based on proteins 
 that are cell type specific.

475
00:28:02,791 --> 00:28:04,791
And we can measure in the blood.

476
00:28:04,791 --> 00:28:09,375
And so we can estimate 
 how old your skeletal myocytes are.

477
00:28:09,375 --> 00:28:11,125
Your muscle cells.

478
00:28:11,125 --> 00:28:14,791
And if they show an accelerated 
 aging phenotype,

479
00:28:14,791 --> 00:28:19,125
you're three times more likely to develop 
 ALS in the next 15 years.

480
00:28:19,416 --> 00:28:23,000
So this brings us to the paper 
 where you leverage the UK

481
00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:26,250
Biobank population, 54,000 individuals,

482
00:28:27,041 --> 00:28:30,750
and developed organ aging estimates

483
00:28:31,125 --> 00:28:36,375
relative to known chronological age 
 and demonstrated

484
00:28:36,375 --> 00:28:41,041
what you've demonstrated before that aging 
 is heterogeneous, meaning it changes.

485
00:28:41,041 --> 00:28:45,625
It's different across different organs, 
 maybe more heterogeneous in some people,

486
00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:49,000
over others, depending on on age, 
 probably as well,

487
00:28:49,250 --> 00:28:52,000
but that some of these nodes are,

488
00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:56,291
are dominating outcomes of longevity.

489
00:28:56,291 --> 00:28:59,291
Healthspan likelihood of death.

490
00:28:59,375 --> 00:29:02,375
How would you how would you explain that?

491
00:29:02,625 --> 00:29:02,875
Yeah.

492
00:29:02,875 --> 00:29:06,750
So what what you're bringing up 
 is a very interesting point

493
00:29:06,750 --> 00:29:10,500
that when we. So again, 
 we built these models,

494
00:29:11,125 --> 00:29:16,375
we measured proteins 
 that are derived from specific organs.

495
00:29:16,375 --> 00:29:20,875
We have about 11 organs 
 where we have good enough signals.

496
00:29:22,250 --> 00:29:25,291
And we can measure proteins that are

497
00:29:26,541 --> 00:29:31,416
produced in the liver, but not in 
 other organs or mostly in the liver.

498
00:29:32,125 --> 00:29:35,541
And then if we add 5 
 or 10 proteins together

499
00:29:35,541 --> 00:29:41,625
that are all enriched in the liver, 
 and we can measure in the blood and

500
00:29:41,625 --> 00:29:47,291
they change with age, we can build a model 
 that estimates the age of the liver.

501
00:29:47,875 --> 00:29:50,875
We can 
 then apply this model to every person

502
00:29:51,291 --> 00:29:54,291
and ask how?

503
00:29:54,750 --> 00:29:58,750
How well does our model predict your age?

504
00:29:59,750 --> 00:30:03,125
And the deviation from that age, 
 which we call an age

505
00:30:03,125 --> 00:30:06,291
gap, is a reflection of faster

506
00:30:06,291 --> 00:30:09,291
or slower aging of your liver.

507
00:30:09,291 --> 00:30:12,916
So if somebody has an accelerated 
 aging of the liver,

508
00:30:12,916 --> 00:30:17,541
they're more likely 
 to have cirrhosis later on and so forth.

509
00:30:17,541 --> 00:30:20,250
So we get these organ specific diseases.

510
00:30:20,250 --> 00:30:23,666
But then when we look at these 
 50,000 people and we ask,

511
00:30:25,125 --> 00:30:29,000
how many 
 people have accelerated organ aging

512
00:30:30,125 --> 00:30:33,125
and then how many people have one

513
00:30:33,500 --> 00:30:36,250
accelerated organ age or so,

514
00:30:36,250 --> 00:30:40,750
one organ that is aging, two or 3 or 4?

515
00:30:41,250 --> 00:30:44,250
We find most of the people 
 have only one organ,

516
00:30:44,916 --> 00:30:49,125
showing accelerated 
 aging consistent with this concept

517
00:30:49,125 --> 00:30:52,500
that Mike Snyder came up, 
 which he called ageotypes.

518
00:30:53,375 --> 00:30:58,291
So it seems like you have one organ 
 that seems to get sort of out of control,

519
00:30:58,291 --> 00:31:01,500
and that may be the disease 
 you develop later on.

520
00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:05,250
But then we do 
 find people who have multiple organs age,

521
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:10,250
organs older, 
and we can predict mortality.

522
00:31:10,250 --> 00:31:13,875
So we can 
 then ask which organ is the strongest

523
00:31:13,875 --> 00:31:17,000
predictor of, of future death.

524
00:31:17,916 --> 00:31:21,625
And, it turns out that an old brain

525
00:31:21,625 --> 00:31:25,541
and an old immune system 
 are the strongest risk factors.

526
00:31:26,375 --> 00:31:29,541
And this is because we've 
 we collected those samples

527
00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:33,541
almost 20 years ago, and we know who died.

528
00:31:33,541 --> 00:31:35,916
We know who got what diseases we've got.

529
00:31:35,916 --> 00:31:38,916
Those data in those outcome data 
 from the UK Biobank.

530
00:31:39,166 --> 00:31:42,250
And so the strongest predictors of death

531
00:31:43,500 --> 00:31:46,500
are brain and the immune system.

532
00:31:46,500 --> 00:31:48,750
Yeah. In this UK Biobank population.

533
00:31:48,750 --> 00:31:54,375
And what was even more surprising 
 is if you have young brains

534
00:31:54,375 --> 00:31:57,875
and young immune systems, 
 you live actually longer.

535
00:31:57,875 --> 00:32:03,208
It's not a traumatic, increase 
 in longevity, but it's clearly significant

536
00:32:03,416 --> 00:32:06,416
And it's young 
 relative to your logical age.

537
00:32:07,166 --> 00:32:10,458
And then you're looking at this across, 
 you know, a normally distributed

538
00:32:10,458 --> 00:32:14,791
population, presumably, and looking at, 
 you know, the mean of that.

539
00:32:14,916 --> 00:32:15,166
Yeah.

540
00:32:15,166 --> 00:32:18,416
So the way you do 
 this is basically you can imagine like

541
00:32:18,541 --> 00:32:21,791
like anything 
 height is always a good example, right?

542
00:32:21,791 --> 00:32:26,541
If you look at the population, 
 you most people who are similar size.

543
00:32:27,916 --> 00:32:31,333
But then you have some people 
 are very short and some are very tall.

544
00:32:31,791 --> 00:32:37,291
So similarly, 
 if we predict the age of your of brains

545
00:32:37,291 --> 00:32:42,208
and 50,000 people, most people's 
 brains will match their actual age.

546
00:32:42,208 --> 00:32:46,041
So if you're 50, your brain 
 is predicted to be 50 years old.

547
00:32:46,458 --> 00:32:49,541
But then some people have a little bit 
 younger, a little bit older.

548
00:32:49,708 --> 00:32:53,541
It's not normally distributed 
 all the time.

549
00:32:53,541 --> 00:32:57,166
So you often get a skew towards older 
 because

550
00:32:57,333 --> 00:33:02,291
and that makes maybe sense 
 because our organs get older all the time.

551
00:33:03,666 --> 00:33:04,041
But we

552
00:33:04,041 --> 00:33:07,291
really look at the outliers 
 at the very tail.

553
00:33:07,291 --> 00:33:10,916
So, you know, those with the very youngest 
 and those with the very oldest.

554
00:33:11,291 --> 00:33:15,041
And that's usually only 1 
 to 2% of the population.

555
00:33:15,208 --> 00:33:18,541
You can make this cut arbitrarily 
 anywhere you want.

556
00:33:18,541 --> 00:33:22,333
But we have decided to really 
 look at this top 1 to 2% .

557
00:33:22,916 --> 00:33:25,916
And that's where you find the strongest,

558
00:33:27,166 --> 00:33:30,291
effects or risk predictions, right?

559
00:33:30,541 --> 00:33:33,291
Like we know if you smoke, your risk

560
00:33:33,291 --> 00:33:37,291
to get lung cancer increases
 by, you know, two fold.

561
00:33:37,666 --> 00:33:41,291
Here we find if you have an older brain

562
00:33:41,291 --> 00:33:44,791
you risk to develop Alzheimer's increases 
 three fold.

563
00:33:45,291 --> 00:33:49,666
And if you compare those with the youngest 
 brains and those with the oldest,

564
00:33:49,666 --> 00:33:53,416
there's a 12 fold difference 
 in risk to develop Alzheimer's. Wow.

565
00:33:53,916 --> 00:33:55,791
And and what about protective.

566
00:33:55,791 --> 00:33:58,083
What what about the other side 
 of the curve?

567
00:33:58,083 --> 00:34:01,041
The those folks that are outliers.

568
00:34:01,041 --> 00:34:02,041
On the younger side.

569
00:34:02,041 --> 00:34:02,916
Yeah. Yeah.

570
00:34:02,916 --> 00:34:06,958
So again 
 what we find is those with young brains,

571
00:34:07,083 --> 00:34:11,916
they live longer and have very reduced 
 risk to develop Alzheimer's disease.

572
00:34:12,791 --> 00:34:16,791
And and in a study that will be published,

573
00:34:17,791 --> 00:34:20,208
next month, I think

574
00:34:20,208 --> 00:34:25,166
in Nature Medicine, 
 we made similar, predictions

575
00:34:25,166 --> 00:34:28,416
at the cellular level 
 as I, as I indicated earlier.

576
00:34:28,916 --> 00:34:31,208
So we can

577
00:34:31,208 --> 00:34:34,041
build models that estimate the age

578
00:34:34,041 --> 00:34:38,916
of a cell in your brain 
 or a cell in your muscle.

579
00:34:39,333 --> 00:34:42,541
So you get more resolution, 
 basically not just a.

580
00:34:42,541 --> 00:34:43,541
Cell at the cell level.

581
00:34:43,541 --> 00:34:45,791
You get resolution of the cell level, 
 actually.

582
00:34:45,791 --> 00:34:48,041
Yeah. Yeah. That's amazing.

583
00:34:48,041 --> 00:34:48,541
That's something.

584
00:34:48,541 --> 00:34:53,333
And so there we find a cell type 
 called astrocytes.

585
00:34:53,333 --> 00:34:57,041
So this is a very important cell 
 type in the brain

586
00:34:57,416 --> 00:35:03,083
that is involved in glucose transport 
 from the blood to neurons.

587
00:35:03,083 --> 00:35:05,916
It's involved in,

588
00:35:05,916 --> 00:35:08,916
in modulating synapses,

589
00:35:09,833 --> 00:35:13,458
and, making them work 
 and actually building them.

590
00:35:14,791 --> 00:35:17,708
And we can estimate the cell of the cell

591
00:35:17,708 --> 00:35:22,541
type in every person based on protein 
 measurements in the blood.

592
00:35:23,416 --> 00:35:26,916
And what we saw 
 is even a more dramatic risk

593
00:35:26,916 --> 00:35:30,041
association with Alzheimer's disease.

594
00:35:30,791 --> 00:35:32,291
Particularly it's interesting.

595
00:35:32,291 --> 00:35:38,291
In individuals who also have 
 the genetic risk factors called APOE4.

596
00:35:38,708 --> 00:35:42,416
So that genetic factor is, a predictor

597
00:35:42,416 --> 00:35:47,791
of future Alzheimer's disease, 
 similar to having an old brain.

598
00:35:47,916 --> 00:35:50,708
So it's about a three fold increase.

599
00:35:50,708 --> 00:35:53,041
And if you have two

600
00:35:53,041 --> 00:35:56,041
genetic copies of the E4,

601
00:35:56,041 --> 00:35:59,916
it's a 10 to 12 fold increased 
 risk for Alzheimer's disease.

602
00:36:00,541 --> 00:36:05,041
But what we find if you're also unlucky 
 and you have very old astrocytes,

603
00:36:05,333 --> 00:36:08,333
that increases by a further three fold.

604
00:36:08,416 --> 00:36:09,166
Wow, wow.

605
00:36:09,166 --> 00:36:15,208
So we find actually in the UK Biobank 
 that almost 40% of the individuals

606
00:36:15,208 --> 00:36:20,333
who have the genetic risk factors 
 and old astrocytes,

607
00:36:20,333 --> 00:36:23,416
almost 40% will have Alzheimer's

608
00:36:23,416 --> 00:36:26,416
disease over the next 15 or 17 years.

609
00:36:26,708 --> 00:36:28,666
Which of them do 
 you think is more predictive?

610
00:36:28,666 --> 00:36:32,291
The genome genetics, proteomics, 
 combinationcombination

611
00:36:32,416 --> 00:36:34,166
It goes I would like combination.

612
00:36:34,166 --> 00:36:35,291
I would like to highlight here

613
00:36:35,291 --> 00:36:38,291
the value of having proteomics data, 
 because so far we're really focusing

614
00:36:38,291 --> 00:36:39,416
on genetics data. Right.

615
00:36:40,416 --> 00:36:42,541
How would you see this moving forward.

616
00:36:42,541 --> 00:36:45,833
And like a follow up question is 
 to the clinical relevance.

617
00:36:45,833 --> 00:36:48,833
Would you see the clocks to be like,

618
00:36:49,333 --> 00:36:52,166
a nice tool 
 to have in patient stratification

619
00:36:52,166 --> 00:36:55,541
for clinical trials, 
 for clinical diagnostic in the future?

620
00:36:55,541 --> 00:36:56,958
Yes, absolutely.

621
00:36:56,958 --> 00:36:58,291
Is moving forward the field.

622
00:36:58,291 --> 00:37:02,791
Before we change from the astrocyte story 
 and we can we can switch over to that.

623
00:37:02,791 --> 00:37:06,708
I just want to talk about 
 the oligodendrocytes that you the pathways

624
00:37:06,708 --> 00:37:10,708
that you saw 
 that were important in brain aging,

625
00:37:10,708 --> 00:37:13,708
which may be to some extent, 
 a function of which proteins

626
00:37:14,166 --> 00:37:17,166
you were able to measure 
 because it is a targeted assay.

627
00:37:17,291 --> 00:37:17,541
Yeah.

628
00:37:17,541 --> 00:37:21,333
But this these were proteins 
 that weren't neurodegenerative proteins

629
00:37:21,333 --> 00:37:25,041
that I typically think of, 
 you know, that show up and say,

630
00:37:25,208 --> 00:37:28,416
Parkinson's disease, for example, 
 when you've got these neurons dying.

631
00:37:28,791 --> 00:37:30,208
They were myelin structure.

632
00:37:30,208 --> 00:37:32,958
They were the sheath on these.

633
00:37:32,958 --> 00:37:34,833
Can you just comment a bit about that.

634
00:37:34,833 --> 00:37:38,833
And then I absolutely want to talk about 
 the genetics, the proteomics, you know,

635
00:37:38,833 --> 00:37:42,208
bringing these modalities together 
 and that importance.

636
00:37:42,208 --> 00:37:43,666
Yeah it's super interesting.

637
00:37:43,666 --> 00:37:45,833
So when we make these models,

638
00:37:46,958 --> 00:37:49,041
the algorithm,

639
00:37:49,041 --> 00:37:52,583
first we make the assignment 
 out of the thousands of proteins

640
00:37:52,583 --> 00:37:55,291
that are on your platform, 
 we make the assignment.

641
00:37:55,291 --> 00:38:00,166
Where do they potentially come from 
 based on gene expression data.

642
00:38:00,291 --> 00:38:04,416
So if a gene is only expressed 
 in an in the brain,

643
00:38:04,708 --> 00:38:08,916
then we say, okay, 
 this is a brain protein in the blood.

644
00:38:10,416 --> 00:38:14,791
And when we when we then ask it,

645
00:38:15,458 --> 00:38:19,291
when we don't develop a model 
 that estimates the age of the brain,

646
00:38:19,666 --> 00:38:24,166
we know, of course, 
 which proteins are making that signature,

647
00:38:24,166 --> 00:38:29,958
and we can ask, what is the biological, 
 role of these proteins?

648
00:38:29,958 --> 00:38:31,708
What what is known about them?

649
00:38:31,708 --> 00:38:34,708
And as, as you just mentioned,

650
00:38:35,041 --> 00:38:37,791
the proteins that make up the brain age

651
00:38:37,791 --> 00:38:41,541
model are largely involved in synaptic,

652
00:38:42,541 --> 00:38:47,458
a synaptic structure 
 that wraps around synapses and is,

653
00:38:47,916 --> 00:38:50,666
produced in part by oligodendrocytes,

654
00:38:50,666 --> 00:38:54,166
maybe also some other, cell types, but,

655
00:38:55,333 --> 00:38:56,291
it, it

656
00:38:56,291 --> 00:39:01,916
it reinforces this notion 
 that maybe synapses are the first part

657
00:39:01,916 --> 00:39:06,291
that that declines as we get older 
 and that get this function dysfunctional.

658
00:39:06,291 --> 00:39:06,833
So was point.

659
00:39:06,833 --> 00:39:09,041
And that's what we miss communication.

660
00:39:09,041 --> 00:39:12,208
And that's what we may be picking up 
 long before

661
00:39:12,208 --> 00:39:15,291
you get amyloid plaques 
 and tangles in the brain.

662
00:39:15,583 --> 00:39:16,291
Amazing.

663
00:39:16,291 --> 00:39:20,541
This is also consistent 
 with parallel studies that we did

664
00:39:20,541 --> 00:39:26,666
in cerebrospinal fluid, where we looked at 
 which proteins are strongest

665
00:39:26,666 --> 00:39:31,916
associated with cognitive function 
 independent of amyloid pathology and tau.

666
00:39:32,291 --> 00:39:35,291
And there two we found plasma.

667
00:39:35,541 --> 00:39:39,666
We found synaptic proteins 
 are the strongest predictors.

668
00:39:39,666 --> 00:39:42,666
And specifically this NP two.

669
00:39:42,958 --> 00:39:46,666
And why w h h three

670
00:39:46,916 --> 00:39:49,916
that we found are very strong predictors

671
00:39:50,208 --> 00:39:54,916
15 years into the future 
 with a hazard ratio of 15 or so.

672
00:39:54,916 --> 00:40:00,083
So a 15 fold increased risk if you add, 
 very high levels of that protein.

673
00:40:00,333 --> 00:40:01,916
Amazing. Yeah.

674
00:40:01,916 --> 00:40:05,916
So to come back for what 
 that all mean and,

675
00:40:05,916 --> 00:40:09,041
and how do we integrate this 
 with current knowledge?

676
00:40:09,583 --> 00:40:12,208
Genetics is incredibly powerful. Right.

677
00:40:12,208 --> 00:40:14,541
But what we've also learned is that,

678
00:40:15,666 --> 00:40:17,916
there's very relatively few genes

679
00:40:17,916 --> 00:40:21,666
that are really predicting your risk 
 to get a specific disease.

680
00:40:22,666 --> 00:40:25,416
April E4 is a strong exception.

681
00:40:25,416 --> 00:40:28,916
That link to Alzheimer's disease is almost

682
00:40:28,916 --> 00:40:31,916
unprecedented in any other disease.

683
00:40:32,958 --> 00:40:35,333
So we need something on top of genes.

684
00:40:35,333 --> 00:40:40,666
And that's where proteins are, 
 because proteins capture where we live.

685
00:40:40,791 --> 00:40:43,791
They integrate many different genes.

686
00:40:44,291 --> 00:40:47,583
And there are that's why I call this 
 the end of phenotype.

687
00:40:47,583 --> 00:40:51,791
They capture, our life experiences and,

688
00:40:52,416 --> 00:40:55,291
our daily, challenges.

689
00:40:55,291 --> 00:40:59,083
Now, some of these are very noisy, 
 but the beauty of it is,

690
00:40:59,083 --> 00:41:03,208
if you measure a lot of proteins, 
 you can pick the stable ones

691
00:41:03,208 --> 00:41:06,791
that provide information on disease risk.

692
00:41:06,791 --> 00:41:08,541
15 years later.

693
00:41:08,541 --> 00:41:12,291
And that's really what 
 we can call the proof in the pudding.

694
00:41:12,291 --> 00:41:12,583
Right.

695
00:41:12,583 --> 00:41:18,208
Because we can say what your risk is in 
 an unknown sample from a person.

696
00:41:18,208 --> 00:41:19,583
We've never seen before.

697
00:41:19,583 --> 00:41:23,416
We know nothing about this person 
 except the concentration.

698
00:41:23,416 --> 00:41:26,166
No lifestyle factors, no clinical.

699
00:41:26,166 --> 00:41:28,041
We don't need. Any other knowledge.

700
00:41:28,041 --> 00:41:31,791
And that answers 
 your question, Sarantis.

701
00:41:31,791 --> 00:41:32,083
Right.

702
00:41:32,083 --> 00:41:36,291
That means you can potentially translate 
 that to the clinic

703
00:41:36,291 --> 00:41:41,041
and provide information 
 to a patient about their future risk.

704
00:41:41,666 --> 00:41:45,791
And, you know, while that might not 
 be helpful for some diseases

705
00:41:45,791 --> 00:41:49,541
at this point, 
 I think you could change lifestyle.

706
00:41:49,541 --> 00:41:51,291
And for some there are drugs.

707
00:41:51,291 --> 00:41:57,416
And we you know, we started a company 
 to really, take advantage of this

708
00:41:57,416 --> 00:42:00,416
and hopefully bring it to the consumer 
 in the coming years.

709
00:42:00,916 --> 00:42:06,416
Vero Bio Sciences, that is trying to 
 to harness this information

710
00:42:06,833 --> 00:42:09,916
where, the consumer can then,

711
00:42:10,833 --> 00:42:13,208
you know, have their blood measured.

712
00:42:13,208 --> 00:42:17,416
We give an indication of which organs 
 show accelerated aging.

713
00:42:18,291 --> 00:42:21,291
And then with advice from a clinician,

714
00:42:21,541 --> 00:42:26,541
the clinician helps interpret the results 
 and what you can do about it.

715
00:42:26,666 --> 00:42:31,041
Because of course, you don't want to 
 just know that you have an old heart.

716
00:42:32,083 --> 00:42:34,291
You would 
 like to know, what should I do about it?

717
00:42:34,291 --> 00:42:36,583
You have to regenerate. Yeah.

718
00:42:36,583 --> 00:42:39,791
And then the beauty is 
 that you can follow up

719
00:42:39,791 --> 00:42:44,291
three months later and say, 
 okay, did my intervention do something?

720
00:42:44,291 --> 00:42:44,916
Exactly.

721
00:42:44,916 --> 00:42:48,041
And this is really 
 what we're working on now to prove that,

722
00:42:49,583 --> 00:42:53,291
these, 
 these measures are functionally tied

723
00:42:53,291 --> 00:42:57,958
to, to, to 
 to outcomes and, and specific organ.

724
00:42:58,583 --> 00:43:03,166
And so what would be needed 
 to leverage organ aging clocks

725
00:43:03,541 --> 00:43:06,541
as a surrogate endpoint 
 and a surrogate endpoint would be,

726
00:43:06,791 --> 00:43:12,291
you know, shifting your biological age 
 of an organ or overall biological age

727
00:43:12,583 --> 00:43:16,291
would be an endpoint in a clinical trial 
 to demonstrate effectiveness

728
00:43:16,291 --> 00:43:19,458
of an intervention, either a therapy or, 
 you know, certainly we do

729
00:43:19,458 --> 00:43:25,291
clinical trials on some, some companies, 
 support clinical trials on their vitamins.

730
00:43:25,291 --> 00:43:26,416
Exactly.

731
00:43:26,416 --> 00:43:27,541
Things like this.

732
00:43:27,541 --> 00:43:30,916
Yeah. So what what will be required is to,

733
00:43:32,208 --> 00:43:32,541
you know,

734
00:43:32,541 --> 00:43:36,291
keep validating these tools 
 across the community.

735
00:43:36,291 --> 00:43:40,916
And it seems a lot of studies, 
 you know, have very similar findings,

736
00:43:41,458 --> 00:43:45,416
and I've shown the value, but there's, 
 of course, more work to be done.

737
00:43:46,791 --> 00:43:49,958
I think the, 
 the platforms have to be stable,

738
00:43:49,958 --> 00:43:53,333
what with whatever, 
 you know, from a technical perspective.

739
00:43:53,333 --> 00:43:57,291
And I think they 
 they show that they can get

740
00:43:57,291 --> 00:44:00,291
the same results with repeated testing.

741
00:44:00,833 --> 00:44:03,416
And then what we also need to show is that

742
00:44:03,416 --> 00:44:06,416
if you measure these,

743
00:44:07,041 --> 00:44:10,041
if you make these estimates in a, 
 in a person,

744
00:44:10,291 --> 00:44:14,916
you know, once a month, over a year, 
 that they're relatively stable, right?

745
00:44:14,916 --> 00:44:18,416
That it doesn't change 
 based on the breakfast you had.

746
00:44:18,916 --> 00:44:21,916
So again, 
 we need to figure out what are the,

747
00:44:23,291 --> 00:44:27,833
what are the signatures that, that really 
 have this predictive value on are stable.

748
00:44:27,833 --> 00:44:29,041
And and we're getting there.

749
00:44:29,041 --> 00:44:32,958
We have such a data set 
 and it seems they're remarkably stable.

750
00:44:33,666 --> 00:44:36,291
But then they need to be tested in

751
00:44:36,291 --> 00:44:39,458
the, in, in the traditional,

752
00:44:40,708 --> 00:44:43,708
placebo controlled clinical studies,

753
00:44:44,666 --> 00:44:47,666
where you show that they track function

754
00:44:48,666 --> 00:44:51,541
and then you can start using them as a,

755
00:44:51,541 --> 00:44:55,541
as a secondary endpoint, maybe, 
 and then as a primary end point.

756
00:44:55,541 --> 00:44:58,583
So it's a, a stepwise validation

757
00:44:59,166 --> 00:45:03,416
in the scientific community, 
 then into, clinical trials.

758
00:45:04,458 --> 00:45:06,166
And they're also stepwise.

759
00:45:06,166 --> 00:45:08,041
But I think we can get there.

760
00:45:08,041 --> 00:45:09,208
In the biomarker world.

761
00:45:09,208 --> 00:45:13,291
Then not only will you envision 
 a model based on proteomic signatures,

762
00:45:13,666 --> 00:45:15,458
because now I have the impression 
 that we are moving

763
00:45:15,458 --> 00:45:18,958
from the epigenetic laws 
 that initially Steve Horvath has launched

764
00:45:18,958 --> 00:45:22,208
with, like the methylation profile 
 to something more functional

765
00:45:22,208 --> 00:45:26,083
to the to the biology, the proteomics, 
 then the future will be bringing

766
00:45:26,166 --> 00:45:30,041
these proteomic signatures 
 in the in a model that you can predict.

767
00:45:30,041 --> 00:45:32,291
This is how you see this moving forward.

768
00:45:32,291 --> 00:45:36,791
And we definitely want to talk about 
 Teal Rise, another company that,

769
00:45:37,458 --> 00:45:41,666
that is leading the way and 
 their expertise for building such models.

770
00:45:41,666 --> 00:45:41,916
Yeah.

771
00:45:41,916 --> 00:45:45,833
So the idea is that 
 that you would be able to make models

772
00:45:45,833 --> 00:45:49,916
that, that predict function 
 and that, track

773
00:45:49,916 --> 00:45:55,541
with efficacy of drugs and allow you 
 then to use these models as surrogates.

774
00:45:55,541 --> 00:45:59,333
And this is what, another company 
 that is really trying

775
00:45:59,333 --> 00:46:03,541
to provide these services that we started 
 Teal,

776
00:46:04,333 --> 00:46:07,166
Teal Rise, is

777
00:46:07,166 --> 00:46:10,666
is partnering with, 
 with Olink to provide that service.

778
00:46:12,166 --> 00:46:13,541
Not everyone has

779
00:46:13,541 --> 00:46:17,416
maybe the tools to, 
 to develop these models.

780
00:46:17,833 --> 00:46:22,041
And teal has assembled a large, database

781
00:46:22,041 --> 00:46:25,041
that it uses to train the models

782
00:46:25,083 --> 00:46:28,708
and can 
 then provide all these, services, to,

783
00:46:30,416 --> 00:46:31,708
to really across

784
00:46:31,708 --> 00:46:34,708
any type of disease and prediction,

785
00:46:34,708 --> 00:46:38,791
that, that you can imagine and see how, 
 how valid they are.

786
00:46:39,083 --> 00:46:42,416
And I see 
 this is you know, hastening us to that,

787
00:46:43,333 --> 00:46:48,541
that state Barrett, by which we do 
 see these as surrogate endpoints.

788
00:46:48,541 --> 00:46:53,333
We do see these as ways to confirm 
 and corroborate interventions

789
00:46:53,333 --> 00:46:56,333
or even discount interventions.

790
00:46:56,666 --> 00:46:59,916
You talked in the paper, Hamilton, 
 you know, first author,

791
00:47:00,416 --> 00:47:03,958
and your team talked a bit 
 about ibuprofen,

792
00:47:03,958 --> 00:47:06,958
about vitamins, 
 you know, looking at associations.

793
00:47:06,958 --> 00:47:10,833
I just want to clarify, 
 we talked about causality earlier.

794
00:47:11,208 --> 00:47:14,458
Those associations are are helpful.

795
00:47:14,458 --> 00:47:17,458
They're one step toward understanding,

796
00:47:18,666 --> 00:47:19,291
causality.

797
00:47:19,291 --> 00:47:21,833
But causality is about finding

798
00:47:21,833 --> 00:47:24,166
what are the levers, 
 what are the pathways?

799
00:47:24,166 --> 00:47:25,708
What are the cells.

800
00:47:25,708 --> 00:47:30,791
What are the, triggers that are actually 
 moving us toward disease?

801
00:47:30,791 --> 00:47:37,291
And those are the magic that, 
 that pharma can leverage if they're,

802
00:47:37,833 --> 00:47:41,333
if they meet the right criteria 
 to build therapies

803
00:47:41,333 --> 00:47:45,583
to nudge someone out of a disease state, 
 back to a healthy state.

804
00:47:45,583 --> 00:47:47,666
Right. 
 So the vision here is precision medicine.

805
00:47:47,666 --> 00:47:50,791
Being able to treat the individual 
 based upon

806
00:47:50,791 --> 00:47:54,833
what their needs are, 
 to bring them safely back

807
00:47:54,833 --> 00:47:58,666
into a healthy state 
 and extend their health span.

808
00:47:58,666 --> 00:48:00,083
Absolutely. Yeah.

809
00:48:00,083 --> 00:48:04,041
So as you said, 
 we have been able in the UK

810
00:48:04,041 --> 00:48:07,041
Biobank to look at,

811
00:48:07,416 --> 00:48:10,416
people's lifestyles, people's,

812
00:48:10,666 --> 00:48:13,416
use of medications.

813
00:48:13,416 --> 00:48:17,791
But this is all retrospective 
 and some of it is self-reported.

814
00:48:17,791 --> 00:48:19,416
So it's noisy.

815
00:48:19,416 --> 00:48:20,791
It looks very promising.

816
00:48:20,791 --> 00:48:21,958
It looks interesting.

817
00:48:23,333 --> 00:48:24,291
Like I often

818
00:48:24,291 --> 00:48:27,666
mentioned glucosamine 
 this in our first study

819
00:48:27,666 --> 00:48:30,458
with a different platform 
 on 5000 individuals.

820
00:48:30,458 --> 00:48:35,791
We had a signal on glucosamine 
 use associated with younger organs.

821
00:48:36,291 --> 00:48:41,208
We felt 
 this was not good enough to report yet

822
00:48:41,666 --> 00:48:45,666
because this was a relatively small 
 number of individuals, 5000.

823
00:48:46,041 --> 00:48:50,166
So the exact same signal in 50,000 people 
 with the Olink platform.

824
00:48:51,541 --> 00:48:53,708
And we reported it then,

825
00:48:53,708 --> 00:48:56,041
but it's still it's retrospective.

826
00:48:56,041 --> 00:49:00,666
People report I use glucosamine that is 
 associated with some younger organs.

827
00:49:02,041 --> 00:49:03,916
So now the next step, as you

828
00:49:03,916 --> 00:49:09,041
said, is to do a clinical trial 
 where you have people

829
00:49:09,041 --> 00:49:13,166
placebo controlled, 
 they get the supplement or not.

830
00:49:13,541 --> 00:49:16,041
And you do 
 these measurements of the clocks

831
00:49:16,041 --> 00:49:17,166
and you say, okay, does it.

832
00:49:17,166 --> 00:49:22,916
Actually track with the functional 
 benefits, does it track with drug use,

833
00:49:24,041 --> 00:49:24,791
and so forth.

834
00:49:24,791 --> 00:49:26,291
And we're starting to do that.

835
00:49:26,291 --> 00:49:29,291
We have a collaboration with Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari

836
00:49:29,291 --> 00:49:32,291
who ran the DO-HEALTH trial.

837
00:49:32,666 --> 00:49:35,291
This was a 3000 individual trial

838
00:49:35,291 --> 00:49:38,291
with vitamin D,

839
00:49:39,166 --> 00:49:42,166
exercise and omega-3 fatty acids.

840
00:49:42,208 --> 00:49:46,041
Was a four arm trial 
 to see what control they had, some,

841
00:49:46,791 --> 00:49:49,791
functional outcomes. And,

842
00:49:50,416 --> 00:49:52,333
Steve Horvath showed that

843
00:49:52,333 --> 00:49:55,333
epigenetically some people got younger.

844
00:49:55,416 --> 00:49:57,958
And so we're now, running,

845
00:49:57,958 --> 00:50:01,791
with, Vero and Teal, 
 we are running the proteomics

846
00:50:01,791 --> 00:50:06,166
to, to say, okay, 
 is there a signal in the protein clocks?

847
00:50:06,166 --> 00:50:10,541
And indeed we, 
 we see signals suggesting that, you know,

848
00:50:10,541 --> 00:50:13,916
you can pick up, functional outcomes

849
00:50:14,541 --> 00:50:17,541
and, you get also this,

850
00:50:18,166 --> 00:50:22,291
agreement between epigenetic and proteomic 
 signatures.

851
00:50:23,041 --> 00:50:23,916
Amazing.

852
00:50:23,916 --> 00:50:29,666
So, so can you tell our audience 
 where might they track or

853
00:50:29,666 --> 00:50:33,958
keep an eye on some of the interventions 
 that you might be involved in

854
00:50:33,958 --> 00:50:37,541
if there are clinical 
 trial calls for participants?

855
00:50:37,916 --> 00:50:41,291
I know Mike Snyder has has this, often,

856
00:50:41,791 --> 00:50:46,833
these QR codes to invite participants 
 that are of a particular demographic.

857
00:50:47,166 --> 00:50:48,916
Are there opportunities

858
00:50:48,916 --> 00:50:52,666
for people to get involved and support 
 the work that your team is doing?

859
00:50:52,833 --> 00:50:53,541
Yeah, certainly.

860
00:50:53,541 --> 00:50:56,041
They can, sign up on Vero

861
00:50:57,041 --> 00:50:59,791
for, for updates.

862
00:50:59,791 --> 00:51:03,333
And, we're still going to launch an IRB

863
00:51:03,333 --> 00:51:06,333
approved, beta trial,

864
00:51:06,833 --> 00:51:09,833
so people can sign up for that.

865
00:51:10,291 --> 00:51:12,041
To analyze data sets.

866
00:51:12,041 --> 00:51:15,708
They can, of course, reach out to you 
 and, work,

867
00:51:16,166 --> 00:51:19,208
with Olink and, and, Teal Rise

868
00:51:20,791 --> 00:51:23,666
and otherwise.

869
00:51:23,666 --> 00:51:24,208
Yeah.

870
00:51:24,208 --> 00:51:27,791
Stay tuned with the publications 
 that we're working on.

871
00:51:28,541 --> 00:51:29,791
Exciting, exciting.

872
00:51:29,791 --> 00:51:32,166
Well, so happy to have you.

873
00:51:32,166 --> 00:51:32,958
Thank you so much.

874
00:51:32,958 --> 00:51:38,291
We had a little bit of a hiatus 
 in our, in our, our, podcast publishing.

875
00:51:38,458 --> 00:51:40,666
We had some months off.

876
00:51:40,666 --> 00:51:43,458
This is an exciting episode 
 to be our first one back.

877
00:51:43,458 --> 00:51:45,708
So thank you so much for agreeing.

878
00:51:45,708 --> 00:51:46,791
Much on it.

879
00:51:46,791 --> 00:51:47,791
Yeah. Thank you.

880
00:51:47,791 --> 00:51:50,791
If we can stay all day asking you.

881
00:51:50,916 --> 00:51:51,583
Exactly.

882
00:51:51,583 --> 00:51:52,541
Exactly how, you know.

883
00:51:52,541 --> 00:51:55,541
I, I, we have to stop at the point 
 because they have so many questions

884
00:51:55,541 --> 00:51:56,291
popping up all the time.

885
00:51:56,291 --> 00:51:59,041
You know, it's definitely 
 we will catch up again soon.

886
00:51:59,041 --> 00:52:00,041
Definitely.

887
00:52:00,041 --> 00:52:02,458
Because there’s so many things
 we need to know from you.

888
00:52:02,458 --> 00:52:04,291
Thanks so much. Thank you so much.

889
00:52:06,166 --> 00:52:07,541
Well, that wraps up

890
00:52:07,541 --> 00:52:10,541
this episode of Proteomics in Proximity.

891
00:52:10,541 --> 00:52:14,666
Huge thanks to our guests and authors 
 of such impactful publications.

892
00:52:15,041 --> 00:52:17,666
I also want to thank you for tuning in.

893
00:52:17,666 --> 00:52:19,916
Really appreciate you being here.

894
00:52:19,916 --> 00:52:22,416
If you enjoy the content of this episode,

895
00:52:22,416 --> 00:52:25,541
please think about sharing it 
 with friends or colleagues

896
00:52:25,541 --> 00:52:27,833
you think might be interested 
 in the content.

897
00:52:27,833 --> 00:52:31,833
In addition, if you'd be willing 
 to head over to Apple or Spotify

898
00:52:31,833 --> 00:52:35,333
or wherever you digest your podcasts 
 and give us a rating and review,

899
00:52:35,333 --> 00:52:37,416
this will help others find the podcast

900
00:52:37,416 --> 00:52:40,708
when they're searching for proteomics 
 or precision medicine podcasts.

901
00:52:40,916 --> 00:52:44,541
And mostly I want to say 
 we would love to hear from you.

902
00:52:44,708 --> 00:52:46,708
So we have a dedicated email address.

903
00:52:46,708 --> 00:52:49,708
Pip@olink.com. Please reach out.

904
00:52:49,708 --> 00:52:53,666
Let us know what you're interested 
 in hearing, about what you care about,

905
00:52:53,666 --> 00:52:57,666
and any feedback on the episodes 
 that we have already done so far.

906
00:52:57,958 --> 00:53:01,416
This is all about you, 
 and so we're really keen

907
00:53:01,416 --> 00:53:04,416
to make sure that we're meeting 
 what you'd like to hear about.

908
00:53:04,666 --> 00:53:06,791
Thank you so much, and we'll see you soon.

909
00:53:07,708 --> 00:53:13,666
In.