Learning should not be measured by how much information we deliver. It should be measured by whether people can perform better in the moments that matter.
We talk about why traditional training approaches often fail, why learning requires practice and feedback instead of just information, and how L&D teams can shift from order takers to performance architects. We explore the role of AI in learning, why technology should support human judgment rather than replace it, and why grounding learning programmes in science matters more than ever.
Clark leaves us with an important challenge: stop measuring whether people enjoyed learning and start measuring whether learning actually changed outcomes.
Some curious takeaways:
- Design learning around performance, not just content delivery
- Measure outcomes, not learner satisfaction scores
- Use AI thoughtfully while keeping humans in the loop
Episode highlights:
(
00:00) Welcome to Harald’s Curious Corner
(
01:41) What is learning, and why is it so misunderstood?
(
03:32) Debunking myths: learning styles and the "accidental instructional designer"
(
04:45) L&D's identity shift: from facilitator to performance architect
(
05:54) Event model vs. content model of learning
(
08:35) Why liking a course doesn't mean it actually works
(
11:06) Are we measuring the wrong things, skill gap or competence gap?
(
12:56) The pharmacist vs. the doctor: two tales of L&D
(
14:12) Do the analysis first, don't prescribe before diagnosing
(
17:23) Entertaining learners vs. motivating learners
(
22:13) Building "super fans": what L&D can learn from marketing
(
25:29) How people actually want to learn (and when long-form still matters)
(
28:07) Is L&D doomed by AI?
(
41:51) What separates genuine learning-tech value from hype
Connect with the guest:
Follow me on the following sites:
What is Harald’s Curious Corner?
Harald’s Curious Corner is where curiosity meets connection.
Harald chases that question with a guest, gathers perspectives from voices across the industry, and then steps back to reflect on what it all means. The show unfolds like a story arc, part exploration, part roundtable, part reflection, blending imagination with analysis.
The result: trusted insights, meaningful conversations, and forward-looking takeaways that shine a light on where learning is headed next.